tf* (<0)-7 3
REGISTERED No. D(D>-?3
3TRTT®
(Hi e (Bazette of <3ndia
mfnn inufym
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
Ho 47] Hf hPwtc, HHTHT 22, 1975/HH<rm 1, 1897
No. 47] NEW DELHI, SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897
fH HHT if <^»5 *)w<4l HTlft (“ fa *Tf 3THH *faHH 4 W TOT W
Separate paging Is given to this Part in order that it may be filed as a separate compilation
HTH II — IPI (il)
PART II— Section 3— Sub-section (ii)
(TWT HHTHa Vt Vtiwn;) HTTH HW H? HHTHHt sffa (HH TTSH HHIHHf Vt tffJVT)
aifsntofrHf ittt httI faq nq Htfafaw? ht#h nftnjHHitj
Statutory orders and notifications issued by the Ministries of the Government of India
(other than the Ministry of Defence) by Central Authorities
(other than the Administrations of Union Territories)
NOTICE
The undermentioned Gazettes of India Extraordinary were Published upto the 31st July, 1975 : —
STo^o TO * fdfa
Issue No. and Date
No.
225, *FToHTTo 292 (*) , 1
1975
S O. 292 (E), dated the 1st July, Ministry of Home Affairs
1975
226. into iffto 293 (^°)» fadN* 1 ^FTTd TftT IsTR
yPTTf, 19 7 5
S.O 293(E), dated the 1st July, Ministry of Steel and Mines
1975
TTTotrro 524, flTfrsr 13 1975 h' l
Amendment in Notn. No. S.O. 524, dated the 13th February,
1967.
( ) mtvj, 1970 % sFprcw *f srfawrf *ft sr^mr i
Authorises all the gazetted officers of Central Excise to use
powers under clause 9 of the Aluminium (Control) Order,
1970.
jttt
Issued by Subject
22 7- HToSTTo 29 4 (n), 1 ^ft^T 'rftT TfuT^T
1975
S.O. 294(E), dated the 1st July, Ministry of Shipping and
1 975 Transport
228- TT°^° 295 (*T), fFTtT 1 5RIHT ^Ti
mfi, 1975
S O. 295(E), dated the 1st July, Central Board of Direct Taxes
1975
Vftopm 4o HToqTo 255 2 ut, 1975 T I
Further amendment in the Notn, No. S.O. 255(E), dated the
2nd May, 1975.
c^FJ fh^TH) 19 62 tfK mfflTH ^RTT I
Rules further to amend the Income Tax Rules, 1962.
102 GI/75 — 1
( 4017 )
4018
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA ; NOVEMBER 22, 1 975/ AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 [Part II-
12 3 4
2 29. 0 *TT o 29 0 (*r), fadW 1 OTEt *flT TPlfotf g;l% TW tfo ^TofTTo 147 (f) fertV 20 *TTtf, 1975 4TT (ftT I
^TTf, 1975
S. 0 . 296 (E), dated the 1st July,
1975
Ministry of Industry and
Civil Supplies
^ToSTTo 297 (*r), fVrfrr 3
,J 1*F"FP, 19 7 5
S, O, 297 (E) dated the 3rd July,
1975
Ministry of Home Affairs
T7°*rro 298 (*t), pTTtT 3
3 1975
S.O, 298(E), dated the 3rd July,
1975
Do.
*‘r°*rro 299 (*r), farfa 3
^rrf , 1975
S.O. 299(E), dated the 3rd July,
1975
Do.
300 (u), fcrfa 3
3[CTT$, 1975
S.O. 300(E), dated the 3rd July,
1975
Do.
TRtrro 301 (*r), Prrto 1
1975
S.O. 301(E), dated the 3rd July,
1975
Do
302 (*r), Prrfar 3
SjTITf, 1975
S.O. 302(E), dated the 3rd July,
1975
Do.
*TTomo 303 (sr), fadtr 3
sp 1975
S.O, 303(E), dated the 3rd July,
1975
Do.
S.O, 304(E), dated the 3rd July,
1975
Do.
S.O. 305(E), dated the 3rd July,
1975
Do.
S.O. 306(E), dated the 3rd July,
1975
Do.
S.O. 307(E), dated the 3rd July,
Do.
1975 .
232. TR^TTo 308 (w), fVil^ 4 ddOlM
ijmf, 1975
S.O, 308(E), dated the 4th July, Ministry of Labour
1975
Corrections to be mide In Notn. No* S. O, 147 (E),
dated the 20th March, 1975.
^XtPfT ^TftrlWT 1968 BRT 2 3WTT (i) ST** (Jf7)
^ if rrfar i
The duty of every person serving in Haryana referred in
clause (a) of sub-section (i) of section 2 of Border Security
Force Act, 1968, is active duty.
3T3TT Td SrfaRm, 19 68 ^ OKI 2 ^THTTT (i)
(w) if ^ TRTFTFT Tl^T if dfer
'
Duty of persons referred in clause (a) sub-section (i) of Section
2 of Border Security Force Act, 1968, serving in Rajasthan
is active duty.
*?t qferftw, 1968 ^ mxr 2 ^t u itt (i) % ***
(^r) if H IB1FT if qfw I
Duty of persons, referred in clause (a) sub-section (i) of section
2 of Border Security Force Act, 1968, serving in West Bengal
is active duty.
qpsrr 1968 in mxi 2 ^rt (i) %
(*>) if dP^fPan **rPrct ^ fajnr 1
Duty of persons, referred in clause (a) sub-section (i) of section
2 of Border Security Force Act, 1968, serving in Bihar
is active duty,
^tstt m rfafw, 1968 H sttt 2 "ft wurtr (i) % <irr
(T) sqfaRT ^ ^ HftuT igjft I
The duty of persons, referred in clause (a) sub-section (i) of
section 2 of B.S-F. Act, 1968 serving in Delhi is active
duty.
fwr 1968 H «rm 2 otetrt (i) i^m
(^) if ®rf^r i^r if rrfw i
The duty of persons referred to in clause (a) sub-section (i)
of section 2 of B.S.F, Act, 1968 , serving in Kerala is active
duty,
qrm trPrPm, i968 ^V urn 2 Or t tj itt (i)
(^) if H ipTETr it Ffrr 1
The duty of per ons referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (i)
of section 2 of B.S.F, Act, 1968, serving in Meghalaya is
active duty.
Application of the Defence and Internal Security of India Rules,
1971 to organisations as specified in the Schedule,
Do,
Application of the Defence and Internal Security of India Rules,
1971 to the Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh,
Application of the Defence and Internal Security of India
Rules, 1971 to the Jamait-e-IsIami-e-Hind.
'JPfTCT f 3TU PEPT if £*<TTT ’Ft I
Prohibition of strikes in the Food Corporation of India.
Sec. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975 / AGR AH AY ANA 1, 1897 4019
1 2
3
4
233. VToWTo 309 (tr) forte 4
jpif, 1975
S.O. 309(E), dated the 4th July,
1975.
Ministry of information and
Broadcasting.
Approval of films as specified in the schedule.
234. S.O. 310(E), dated the 4th July,
1975.
Ministry of Home Affairs
Application of the Defence and Internal Security of India
Rules, 1971 to Jama at-e-lslami-e- Jammu and Kashmir.
235- 311
’RTCT f^rVNfd
mrtft t srrfwtr vt ^ ftru fs^rr
1975
fo^for rrfEPPTtt % ^r Jr <T4Tfrrfor frt7TT i
S.O. 311(E), dated the 4th July,
1975,
236- 312 (tf), 4
Election Commission of India
Designation of officers as specified in the table to be District
Election Officer in the State of Assam.
ITPJRT tfo 2/61 2 8 1961 *FT BUlltH 1
^Trf, 197 5
S.O. 312(E), dated the 4th July,
1975,
Ministry of Commerce
Amendment to Order No. 2/61 dated the 28th February, 1961
237 , ^rottro 3i3 (<r) t fiprtT s^rrf,
*7 fdfii r* Vt *RT fuftffiOTT Tit TXff % PtfR
1975
«vr Uh i y i -'IcT ^HTT ^>TTT 1
S.O. 313(E), dated the 5th July,
1975.
Ministry of Industry and
Civil Supply
Production of Certificate of Registration of undertakings as
specified in the Schedule for entering particulars etc.
238. S.O. 314(E), dated the 5th July,
1975.
Ministry of Home Affairs
Appoints the Chief Censor to the Govt, of India to be a Censor
239. S.O, 315(E), dated the 5th July,
1975.
Do,
No power will be exercised by the State Govt, under sub-rule
(1) of rule 48 of the Defence and Security of India Rules
1971 without the approval of Central Govt.
240. S.O. 316(E), dated the 6th July,
1975.
Do,
Amendments to the Order No. S.O- 275(E), dated the 26th
June 1975.
241, *Ro¥Tr° 317 (*r), flRfr 7 Tjyfrf,
MWft % TT'fu 2 *r it ^ wJ Fftf Pci i
1975
S.O. 317(E), dated the 7th July,
1975,
Ministry of Information and
Broadcasting
Approval of films as specified in column 2 of the Schedule
annexed hereto.
iFToSTTo 318 (tf), ftPTO 7
1975
fofta 2 Jr fa?*fr vt fofofa
S.O, 318(E), dated the 7th July,
1975,
Do.
Approval of Films as specified in column 2 of the second
schedule annexed hereto.
319 (%r), 7 aprfc
2 if faf qfw toft fir i
1975
S.O. 319(E), dated the 7th July,
1975.
Ministry of Information and
Broadcasting
Approval of films as specified in column 2 of the Second Sche-
dule annexed hereto.
320 (*), 7 ^TT?,
OTT
% T.mJT 2 Jr fafafosr tewt Frtefo i
1975
S.O. 320(E), dated the 7th July,
1975.
Do.
Approval of films as specified in column 2 of the Schedule
annexed hereto.
^To*TTo 321 (sr), 7^ni t
tFRpft 'FEET 2 Jr fofofog fetfi Tt riftete |
1975
S.O. 321(E), dated the 7th July,
1975.
Do.
Approval of films as specified in column 2 of the Schedule
annexed hereto.
*To*tto 322 (tr), 7 ^rrf ,
% TTHrr 2 Jr faftrfor toff Vt 1
1973
S.O. 322(E), dated the 7th July,
1975.
Do,
Approval of films as specified in column 2 of the Schedule
annexed hereto.
4020
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 [Pari II—
1 2
3
4
323 7^[f f
^TTF wi mr^
frefar -ft *rm 2 *r fafafe: fwff ftr 1
1075
S.O. 323(E), dated the 7th July,
1975*
Ministry of Information and
Broad casting
Approval of films as specified In column 2 of the Second
Schedule annexed hereto.
TT°3no 324 (*r), taro 7T?ni
ft 2 3r ftrffrtar ftt 1
1975
S.O. 324(E), dated the 7th July,
1975.
Do.
Approval of films as specified in column 2 of the Schedule
annexed hereto.
«frTo*n-o 325 (tr), taro 7 ^nf,
m?
ft 2 if ftV 1
1975
S.O. 325(E), dated the 7th July,
1975.
Do.
Approval of films as specified in column 2 of the Schedule
annexed hereto.
ifiToSTTo 326 (w)i taW 7
ft *T*rrr 2 faftrfe: f^ff ftt 1
1975
S.O. 326(E), dated the 7th July,
1975.
Do.
Approval of films as specified in column 2 of the Second Sched-
ule annexed hereto.
ifTToGTo 327 (ST) , tal* 7 ,
ft ifiMrr 2 ^
1975
S.O. 327(E), dated the 7th July,
1975.
Do.
Approval of Films as specified in column 2 of the Schedule
annexed hereto.
•FToSTTo 228 7
TtS*
ftefrr ft «rPTFr 2 fafatar ftr^hrfa'i
1975
S.O. 228(E), dated the 7th July,
1975.
Do,
Approval of films as specified in column 2 of the Second Sche-
dule annexed hereto.
*TT° 229 (IT), faTfr 7
ft qrm 2 # fftfrfor ftt 1
1975
S.O. 229(E), dated the 7th July,
1975,
Do.
Approval of films as specified in column 2 of the Schedule
annexed hereto.
(TToflfrTo 330 (*T) , taffa 7 ^TT^,
ft 2 *r faftrfw ftt i
1975
S.O. 330(E), dated the 7th July,
1975.
Do.
Approval of films as specified in column 2 of the Schedule
annexed hereto.
242, tfloffTo 331 (it), tai^ 7
fe^fr, srk p ^ ^ hrwr trr^vr, 1975
1975
S.O. 331(E), dated the 7th July,
1975.
Ministry of Agriculture and
Irrigation
The Delhi, Meerut and Bulandshahr Milk and Milk Products
(Export) Control Order, 1975.
243. *FT°*no 332 {$) , tat* 8
gnrr v\x spht^t
ft 2 ftt 1
1975
S.O, 332(E), dated the 8th July,
1975.
Ministry of Information and
Broadcasting
Approval of films as specified in column 2 of the Schedule
annexed hereto.
VTo^To 333 (tf), tatT 8
ftefrr ft 2 ^ faftrfw ftt i
1975
S.O. 333(E), dated the 8th July,
1975.
Do.
Approval of films as specified in column 2 of the Second Schedule
annexed hereto.
*PTotrT° 334 (*r),tatv e wrf ,
ft 2 $ fafafW ftetf ftt pftyffr 1
1975
S.O. ’334(E), dated the 8th July,
3975, - ■
Do.
Approval of films as specified in column 2 of the Second Sche-
dule annexed hereto.
Sec. 3 ( ii ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 4021
1 2 3 4
335 (*r), IVfi* s ^ srtrrFr
1975
S.O. 335(E), dated the 8th July, Ministry of Information
1975* and Broadcasting
* * 7 T*R 2 ^ ft Pilaw fwff *T7t I
Approval of films as specified in column 2 of the schedule
annexed hereto.
336 (*r), firffiF 8 spnf,
1975
S.O, 336(E), dated the 8th July,
1975.
Do.
Approval of films
annexed hereto.
2 $ fTRlr Tt pftvfir i
as specified in column 2 of the Schedule
cr^otfro 337 (*r),pRt*F s^ri afa
1975
S.O. 337(E), dated the 8th July, Do.
1975.
fofhr ^ «frm 2 faPrftrs PmT vt i
Approval of film# as specified in column 2 of the Second Schedule
annexed hereto.
338 (*r),.forft7 8 ^TvlTf, dfa
1975
S.O. 338(E), dated the 8th July, Do*
1975.
244. 'FTotfTo 339 («T), f^TtT 8 *?TR pRft^T RifR
1975
S.O. 339(E), dated the 8th July Election Commission of India
1975*
fcfnr % ^i^ih 2 ^ faPifra Pmf ^ fir i
Approval of films as specified in column 2 of the second schedule
annexed hereto.
fetft * PrPr ^rfWc
^ f q^rfVrf^r *rrw i
Designation of Electoral Registration Officers of Parliamentary
Constituency of Delhi.
JJTToUTo 340 (*T),fortT 8 tffo
1975
S.O. 340(E), dated the 8th July Do*
1975.
S.O. 341(E), dated the 9th July, Ministry of Home Affairs
1975.
xm PrWv T ft rc flym ^ PrPft i
Appointment of Assistant Electoral Officer for Union Territory
of Delhi.
Specifies rule 33 of the Defence and Internal Security cf India
Rules, 1971.
2 46. SfToSTTo 342 (*f), 9 ^iTf, faftT, RR ^Rt <FTtf WT- qfW fatiR *TRT ^ PttfpR *RFl1r 3TTT TTR HW %
1975 *R
S.O. 342(E), dated the 9th July, Ministry of Law, Justice and
1975. Company Affairs
247. ^ToJRTo 343 (<T),ftTOT 10 ftfa, RR tfk
1975 *R
S.O* 343(E), dated the 10th July Ministry of Law, Justice and
1975. Company Affairs
248. *FTo*no 344 (^), PRPF 10
^nf, 1975
S.O*344(E), dated the 10th July, Ministry of Communications
1975.
249. 'FTcEn'o 345 (n), f^TtlT 10 *R HCTRR
19 75
S.O. 345(E), dated the 10th July, Ministry of Labour
1975.
250- TToflTo 346 (*r), 10 PfTT
sr^mf, 19 75
S.O. 346(E) dated the 10th July, Ministry of Finance
1975.
251. *Tc*rro 347 (n), 10 ^rrr *flr srirt *rpr
1975
S.O. 347(E), dated the 10th July, Ministry of Information and
1975. Broadcasting.
r<iO[ ftRifw i
Biennial Election to the Council of States by the elected mem-
bers of the Legislative Assembly of Weft BtniP],
W M faflR *RT % Pl^lfpR *PTHff ffRT pRff?R
*rc**fi tr i
Names of Members elected by the elected members of the
Legislative Assembly of West Bengal.
?rrc mPptfr ( i R^r) Pm 1905 vr fafwr
TFR iFf ftRlfR I
Indian Wireless Telegraphy (Possession) Rules, 1965 extended
to Sikkim.
rt)' TFR affal uffeffim, 1948 % *TRR 4, 5 , 6, %
IRCT % w?fi $TR I
Provision of Chapters, IV, V and Vi of the Employees
State Insurance Act, 1948 come into force in the areas of
Andhra Pradesh as specified.
*ft T’lrsfi vmj jPr vrr,
mw $rPrc \
Directs Shri Champalal Punjaji Shah to appear before the
Commissioner of Police, Greater Bombay.
r Viffr” ^TRT fTR ^ FtPlTT |
Exhibition of the films entitled 1 ANDHT' be suspended for
two months.
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1 975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 [Part II—
252 , ^ro^rro 348 (st), tato 10 dta - *rtar n<> *ETosrr° 230 26 n{ 1975 irttvifim
1£, 19 7 5
S.O. 348(E), dated the 10th July, Ministry of Industry and Amendment to Order No. SO. 230(E), dated the 26th May,
1975. Civil Supplies 1975.
253. ^0*110 349 (*t), ii tn^rft ftet (tnsrta^ srtafttaf 3 wpfT) nfsrta 1971,
spnf, 1975 wfRr vifiwtft wri ir4bi ^ fp^TTr srfmrrrft
S-O- 349(E), dated the 1 1th July, Ministry of Energy
1975.
254- ^To^TTo 356 (*t)> fad I* 11 *R TTCTTOT
1975
S O. 350(E), dated the 11th July, Ministry of Labour
1975.
*T*T o*TT o 3 51 ( ) , Pl r fta 1 1 *H+T ^T^T^TtT
1975
S.O. 351(E), dated the 11th July, Do.
1975.
{HTfTft FTET Sttafttaf ^ S^^fr) 5tfata 1971,
nta vi tarot wr ^ ta *rfanft
tafVr I
Appointment of officers as Estate Officer to exercise the powers
under Public Promises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants)
Act, 1971.
tot star mw taf ir firor *T s r frfV s in^n i
Prohibition of strikes in textile mills in Madhya Pradesh.
Rtaft fawn Rtaft ^ Tt sffiftat I
Prohibition of strike in Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd.,
Neyvcii.
255. fToigjo 352 (*t), tafa 15 faffcr, tfk *>*8^ (ermivff TT ITWPft fWnFT) IffaW fWT, 1675 l"
^TTl, 197 5
5.0. 352(E), dated the 15th July, Ministry of Law, Justice and Companies (Temporary Restrictions on Dividends) Warrant
1975, Company Affairs Rules, 1975.
256. TTomo 353 (*f), OmI* 13 WTT?l sfa OTd (tatar) fata tfVfta trtar 1975
^ ii, 1975
5.0. 353(E), dated the 15th July, Ministry of Steel and Mines Aluminium (Control) Second Amendment order, 1975.
1975.
*7Totrr° 354 (w), fata? is wm rfk ott vjff tanr mfr Tnrrta Rtanfrifr
i 97 5 tarn (ta^i). wtar, 1975 % tnJRr xriwrcf tt sr^fEr
ta mfaf «■ i
S.O. 354(E), dated the 15th July, Ministry of Steel and Mines Appoints all the gazetted officers of Central Excise to exercise
1975. all tho powers under the Aluminium (Control) Order, 1975,
1975. all tho powers under the Aluminium (Control) Order, 1975,
TT 0 TTT 0 355 (IT), te 15 ta (tata) ^ta utal ^pJVT 1975 I
1975
5.0. 355(E), dated the 15th July, Do, Aluminium (Control) Third Amendment Order, 1975.
1975.
fTotTTo 356 («), fata 11 *1 ^ tpp $ota *¥, WT
ipnf, 1975 ^b\ \ uWT ^fhotfw rfl Vtftl tar WT $1
5.0. 356(E), dated the 15th July, Do, Each producer shall produce required quantity of Electrical
1975. conductor grade Aluminium in terms of Industrial licence
granted.
vt«ht° 357 (*r), tare is *ftet ta tffET 4fti hit sj^v^wiw *ta mta ^rm 65 tavpr ^(pt
197 5 vt ^rrf tvh f^rwr (Rrtt^rtr) ^rr^vr,
1971 urt 4 Tfr # tan wr $ i
5.0. 357(E) dated the 15 th July Ministry of Steel and Mines Each producer shall supply 55 % of monthly production to the
1975. consumer referred to in clause 4C of the AluminJ urn (Control)
Order, 1970.
iFToflTc 358 (w),tatT 15 ^Tr£,
S diwtai vr tad mn i
l S.O. 358(E), dated the 15th July, Do.
1975.
Fixation of sale price of levy Aluminium at specified in the
Schedule.
Sec. 3 (ii)]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1 975 /AGR AHA YANA 1, 1897
4023
l
2
3
4
257. mo qT* 359 (*r), fiPTtT 10
f, 19 7 5
5.0, 359
dated the 16th July, 1975,
253 . ^ro *rro 33 o(*t)/ib
ft qir tr /7 5 , fWr 10
1975
5.0. 3 60(E)/ 18 A/IDRA/75,
dated tho 16th July, 1975.
259. ^To STfo 3 6 1 ( Tf ) , frlW 18
1975
S.O. 361(E)
dated the 18th July, 1975.
m o mo 362(q) farhrr is
1975
S.O. 362(E)
dated the 1 8th July, 1975,
mo mo 363(^r) l fciw is
1975
S.O. 363(E)
dated the 18th July, 1975,
mo 364(fr), finrhr is
1975
S.O. 364(E)
dated the 18th July, 1975,
mo mo 365(w), hnfa 18
1975
S.O. 365(E)
dated the 18th July, 1975.
280. mo mo 300 (*t), 18
1975
S.O. 366(E)
dated the 18th July, 1975.
261- mo mo 36 7 (?f ) frrhF 19
1975
S.O. 367(E)
dated the 19th July, 1975.
262. mo mo 308(<r)/mt ft
mT^/29 w/75/4, frrhF 21
197 5
S.O. 368(E)/IDR A/29B/75/4
dated the 21st July, 1975.
2 G 3. mo mo 369 (*r), farrv 22
arsrrf, 1975
S.O. 369(E)
dated the 22nd July, 1975.
Ministry of Commerce
Ministry of Industry and Civil
Supplies,
Election Commission of India
mcr m^HT
Election Commission of India
Election Commission of India
Election Commission of India
Election Commission of India
Ministry of Commerce
r *rmr Pnrfmr smfFT
Election Commission of India
*ftx Tnrfw <jf%
Ministry of Industry and Civil
Supplies.
Election Commission of India
Pnrttf (Pntonr) mtm «rr^m 4 19751
Export (Control) Fourteenth) Amendment Order, 1975.
mfrr do eoe(q)/i8 njmi ft mr 7 2 , lsfimr^n:,
1972 d hvhun 1
Amendment in Order No. S.O. 608(E)/ 1 8 A/IDR A/72, dated
the 18th September, 1972.
TTlFftT TT^T ^ fVO'Pr TT^TT % PT^rift h
wm $ ftp? ^ *frTrn i
Calls Jpon the elected members of tho Legislative Assembly
of Jammu and Kashmir to fill a vacancy in Council of
States.
crfh^TT do 10 0 /tT ° do IT T/ l/75(l) ^TTo 18 1975
d TTW dfa: ^TPT untr % fcrd
m purmiace or Notn No .100/CS-J & K/I/75(l), dated, the
18th July, 1975 appoints the dates for nomination, Scrutiny
of nomination and election etc,
to ioo/tto ?fo-irnt/i/7s( 1 ), ^rrfta ie aptf, 1975
<.'j| if ffrrf^T f^pf f>rq^T TT'Tr 1
Fixation of hours for election in pursuance of Notn No
100/CS-J & K/I/75Q), dated the 18th July, 1975
trfas?FTTtf° 100/TTo t°-*nv/l/75( l), flTTflff 1975
* W^^PTir if pTtTPT 3PRT *1 fTsfTT (ttftm
fPtTTT |
In pursuance of Notn. No. 100/CS-J &K/I/75 m dateH th.
ieton"ngXr PPOinlSSeCretary * Le * Wt « v * Assembly as
wrfwr sff «imrr % fepf «ff tTsft ?rrw, trrcrf^, ^
XtY7 7 fifffPT 31*0, sff f^TTT'FB I
Appointment of ShriRoshan Din, Dy. Secy. Laid lativr Ascmki.,
of Jammu and Kashmir to assist tho Returning Officer. V
1 e 7 5 'T? 19 76 rffrFT % ftra trsif ^ |
“K! S'tTi %'r of R,w ,uu *“>»»
tfTRffi 5ffT PffNtt: ifw WJ5 *wfttr «sfer ?r fM f
^ ^ if
wnyn i -
Appointment of Treasury
Officer for the Andaman
Constituency.
n 5 ) H ffl M f “ s Electoral Registration
and Nicobar Islands Parliamentary
to 98(sr)/^ cttt q/29 w / 73/l> ^
is 'Fwtf, 1973 if sfh; frtfrenr i
dated the 16th February, 1973 .
idrt* Tx^ fkm * fhrfRm ITTT ^ ^ % ft
3 pTqf'in $3 tTTfllJ Pnr?r SHTIT I
Pisstion of dates for the eleetinn Af ,l_. ,
Si^lftlvf Assembly^ the C,eaed m^bersTf" the'cSan
THE GAZETTE. OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 19 75 /AG RAH A YANA 1, 1897 [Part !I
■JfTo mo 370(w) ffa+ir, 22
1975
S.O. 370(E)
dated the 22nd July, 1975
<FT° ATo 371 (a), 22
1976
ATTTT fA^T ARlA
Elect {on Commission
of India
*r i fWrmr ataFt
tot ft tot *nrr % faft ftft *rft firrrfW %
fftft TTAA fmET TT7TT I
Fixation of time for the biennial Elections to the Council of
States in the State of Gujarat,
TOT TTW % fftft fftft Alft fanWn ^ fftft
famA Efwrrrtr w\ atIwy ^ v<r ft qnfftfpR
S.O. 371(E)
dated the 22nd July, 1975.
* 7 T° trfo 372 (A), finrto 22
jj;at4 1975
5.0. 372(E)
dated the 22nd July, 1975.
264 , ITT* ATo 373 (A), fadll> 22
ipnt, 197 5
5.0, 373(E)
dated the 22nd July, 1975.
Election Commission of India
ait* PErf^r AtfttT
Election Commission
of India
mf^OT ftTETA
Ministry of Commerce
205. iTo ATo 374(ff), fafi* 22 fa fa, RR ftfa IOTA) Itfa ft?Tl\TA
Ministry of Law, Justice and
Company Affairs.
^T 7 t, 1975
S.O. 374(E)
dated the 22nd July, 1975.
2 6 0 . IT ° <TT° 375 (A), ftTt* 22
1975
S.O. 375(E)
dated the 22nd July, 1975.
267 . 1 Ao ATo 370 (A), 23
vtmi, 1975
S.O. 376(E)
dated the 23rd July 1975,
Designates Secretary Gujarat Legislative Secretariat as a
Returning Officer for the biennial elections to the Council
of States,
*rPw, mATTsT faAR AfcfTRA, ift frrfftA Hlfft.AT
% Let fhAAi ^TAT I
Appoints Dy. Secy,, Gnj irat Legislative Secretariat to assist the
Returning Officer.
Afa^AAT fto rr^o Afo 1 3 1 7, 9 1 9 50 ft tftT Apt
I
Further amendment to Notn. No. S.O. 1317, dated the 9th
June 1956.
’riTTTA TOT faAR AAT * ATTAt ift TOT A AT M
3 TAFT? ift faVffft7j TOT fafft ATf?T T^TAT I
To call upon the elected members of the Legislative Assembly
of Gujarat to elect three members for Council of States.
WET A)T ATAfTf 'jfa ftffTOT TTTf TT 5FTO HOTT |
Ministry of Industry and Civil Taking over the management of Messrs. Gluconate Limited,
Supplies, Calcutta.
snrAsmnr
Ministry of Labour
268. S.O, 377 (E)
dated the 23rd July, 1975.
Ministry of Home Affairs
Calcutta.
tot Atm Afufmnr, 1940 ^ aott 4, 5 a)t 6 %
JTOT TA ft AtTTdT faft % ATA IT ATA ^PTT I
The date on which the provisions of Chapter IV, V and VI
of Employees* Estate Insurance Act, 1948, come intc force
in village Bechhwal in Bikaner Distt.
Powers under sub-rule (2) of rule 48 of the Defence and
Internal Security of India Rules 1971, shall be exorcised
by all State Governments and the Chief Censor to the Go vern-
meat of India.
209- Ar° 378(A)/ 18 Afi/ Arf ^iftA A^T TFlfk^ 4 tTAA
fr AK 7 5 , 24
1975
, S.O. 378(E)/! 8 A/IDRA/75 Ministry of Industry and Civil
dated the 24th July, 1975. Supplies.
2 70 - TAo ATo 3 79 (a), fam^ 2 5
e^nf, 1975
5.0, 379(E) Ministry of Shipping and
dated the 25th July, 1975. Transport.
ffTTo ATO 380 (a), fftrtir 25 aVt fttffOT
197 5
S O, 380(E) Ministry of Shipping and
dated the 25th July, 1975, Transport.
27L AT? 381(a), fifAfar 23 *flT STTl <ny hsiOT
^RTf, 1975
5.0. 381(E) Ministry of Information and
dated the 26th July, 1975. Broadcasting.
AT*A fto ITo AT 0 725(a)/ 18 T / ATlf ft ATT ^72, TTftA
25 TOTT.I925 ^ AaVaA I
Amendment in Order No, S.O, 725(E)/! 8 A/TDRA/72, dated
the 25th November, 1972.
tt^Ia tea trfefw, 1956 ft PrfApr^ te?a Anf
2 ift AA^ft ft fJTTAT |
Omission of National Highway No. 2 as specified in Schedule
to National Highways Act, 1956.
rnrft % etta (3) ft fifftffe Tnrmft ift tt^ Tnrmft
atat 1
Declaration of the highway as specified in Column (3) of the
table to be a National Highway.
A^f^ft imrA 2 ft fftfftfmA: fft pftffir \
Approval of films specified in the column 2 of the Schedule
annexed-
4025
Sec. 3(iin THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA L 1 897
i 2 3
2 7i. qrro uro ;m(*r) feTrr 26
\*nt i 975
S.O. 182(F)
dated ihc 2*!h July, 19', 5.
Ministry of Information and
Broaden sling.
TTo stto 383(*r) farfir
^ff 197 5
26
S.O. 383(E)
dated ihe 26th July 1975.
Do.
^rro qro 38-1 (<r) foffHT :
26
*FTTf 19 7 3
S.O. 384(E)
dated the 26th July 1975.
Do.
qrro STTo 335(w) kTTT
^TWTf 19 7 5
26
S.O. 385(E)
dated the 26th July 1975.
Do
VTo 3 8C(*0 fork
197 5
26
S.O. 386(E)
dated the 26th July 1975.
Do.
272. *FTo qto . 387(tf)
2 6
^rf«rwr*rcir*pr
^rrf 1975
S.O. 387(E)
dated the 26th July 1975.
Ministry of Commerce
273. STTo 388(tf) faffa
^rtrrf 1975
2 6
WTO *k TOTTO
S.O. 388(B)
dated the 26th July 1975.
Ministry of Steel and Mines
2 74. ^fo mo 389(tf) ft-TfT
28
T«fk tffc mtrfpr jftr
^TTlf 1975
S.O. 389(E)
dated the 28th July 1975.
Ministry of Industry and Civil
Supplies
2 7 5. ^0 *1T° 3 90(*0 feffFT
28
f^T^srrfispFT^r
^Tf 19 7 5
S.O. 390(E)
dated the 28th July 1975.
Delhi Development Authority
276- Tfo qTo 391 (tf) faffk
2 8
^ ^TTTTq-
*r*rvf 1975
S.O. 391(E)
dated the 28th July 1975.
Mins try of Home Affairs
277 . qr* mo 392(?r) Prrh?
26
1975
S.O. 392(E)
dated the 28th July 1975.
Ministry of Agriculture and
Irrigation
278. ^ro qTo 393(w)
29
ffffiT ? TFT 'rfK *FrqTf
^TTf 19 75
S.O. 393(E)
dated the 29uh July 1975.
Ministry of Law, Justice and
Company Affairs
102 Gl/75 — 2
4
TrpjTt ^ 2 if wft i
Approval of lilms specific. I in Column 2 of ihc Sche.lule annexed.
% wr*r 2 if tfr rqkfrf i
Approval of films specific.! in column 2 of the Schedule an-
nexed.
2 pftf I
Approval of film specified in Column 2 of the Schedule annexed,
* *T*PT 2 it ft*m *TT l
Anproval of films specified in Column 2 of the Schedule an-
nexed.
2 if fafafW fi^*r qk 1
Approval of film specified in, Column 2 of the Schedule annexed,
fffnk (Ppt^) mkr 1975 1
The Exports (Control) fifteenth Amendment Order 1975.
*ft *fto q^rmfiFT TT^rfirf^^ % ft ^ 1
** «N J
Appoints Shri V. Panch&pagosan to be Controller of AJlumi-
nium.
mru (Wrsr <**3) *rk*r, 1975
The Defence of India (packaged Commodities) Order, 1975.
fwft ift-TTr 4 *rr* ^ faipfr *r Trittpr 1
Proposal to the modifications to be made to the zoning regu-
lation in the Master Plan,
*fo GT° *ITo 88(f) TTftST 10 <TiT*fV 1975 % IRT ftPfrF *rt*T
VPfPT sfk I
Further extended the period of Ihc Commiss : on of Inquiry
appointed by Notn. No. S.O. 88(E), dated Hie 10th Febru-
ary, 1975.
) tJtftiT JjftER 1 9 7 5 I
The Fertiliser (Movement Control) (Third Amendment) Order,
1975.
nTJj-qptfk frsrrff ttcftt am ttmt
'JhPitFm i
Declaration ro. H lection to the Council of Slates by the elected
members of the Legislative Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir.
4026
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975 / AG R AHA Y ANA 1, 1897 [Part 11—
1 2
3
4
279- Ro Wo 39i(*T) f?FTPF 30
^fhr TFif^r f A
mzz (ftTrw sftr fjf^ar) (fr^fr^r #m) *n$wr, 19751
n-)7 5
SX>. 394(E)
dated the 30th July 1975.
Minisiry of Industry and Civil
Supplies
The Scooters (Distribution and Sale) Control (Second Amend-
ment) Order, 1975.
280- Ro Wo 395(?r) Pmt^ 30
mrm
srfafmn o Ro mo 102 , fcmr 13 mr^fr 1 9 (5 1 r ttPt-
1975
T-rpir ^ tott £ fti^r 40 ^ aft fern
stft w r: mum 1
j ^
S.O. 395(E)
dated the 30th July 1975.
Ministry of Commerce
In Supersession of Notn. No. S.O, 162 dated Ihc 13th January
1961 appoints the date on which the cess of 40 paise per Kg.
of Rubber will lake effect.
28i. R° mo 396(*i) Prpf :u)
^tfirnr Tmmr warm
wi^nr *f° 1 s 7 n, flrfinr is *r$ 1970 if trh ototept i
^nnf 1 975
S.O. 396(E)
duted the 30th July 1975,
Ministry of Petroleum and
Chemicals
Further amendments 0 Order No- S.O. 1873 dated the 18th
May >970.
282. Ro Wo 3 9 7 ( ?T ) fcm 30
^ftpT*r tfpt JT*rmr
m^?r ^0 fTo m 0 1573 mffar 1 8 *r$ 1970 tfifrw 1
j 975
S.O. 397(E)
dated the 30th July 1975.
Ministry of Petroleum and
Chemicals
Further amendment to Order No. S.O, 1873 dated the 18th
May 1970.
283. R* mo 398(*r) fcTRT 31
1
15 TO 1 975 *rt OT mfpj % ii pFR $ fTOf
1 075
m m tor (mtmR) srfsrPrw 1975 sr^r tfmi 1
S.O. 398(E)
dated the 31st July 1975.
Ministry of Home Affairs
Appoints the 15th August 1975 as the date on which the Govern-
ment of Union Territories (Amendment) Aci, 1975 will
come into force.
284 . Ro mo 401 (w) 1
firen wm ircrrcpr
fRRT % rffTT sfr tjo tr 0 femiT
1975
S.O, 401(E)
dated th; 1st August, 1975.
Ministry of Education and
Social Welfare
Appointment of Shri A, A. Ginwala, Secretary to Govt, of
Maharashtra as a member of Copy right Hoard.
285 . Ro pT° 402(5T) pTTTCT 1
SRfrfT •tfy <sft Pfr ^ 196 8 5TTTT 2
mrpt i .■) 7 5
ifr ( 1 ) % *?¥ («f) % *r ft ftmTtf
1 £Ynt l
S.O. 402(E)
dated the 1st August, 1975.
Ministry of Home Affairs
Duty of every person referred to in clause (a), sub-section (i)
of section 2 of the B irder Security Force Aot,l (968. Serving
in Manipur is an ac ivc duty.
hi * f ; T • 4 o 3 ( ’ff ) PftPf i
sRTq? qft aft Pr ^ srfafamr iot'3 r|- etto 2
mm, 1975 j
3Tt*TTl ( 1 ) % ^ (^ 7 ) % WFSV 1 T ?t ^ITT^- ¥t ^TTT^T
^ 1
S.O. 402(E)
dated 1st Augusl, 1975.
Do.
Duly of every person referred lo in Clause (a), sub-scclion (i
of sec ion 2 of the 3order Secuiity Force Act, 1968, Serving
in Mt.harashtia is un active duly.
mo Pto 404{w) ArK l
®ft Pit grm ^ ^ftrfTmr 19 15 8 m^i 2
wm 1 97 5
qft v^mTi ( 1 ) % (^) % ^ mt; ^
^ ^ 1
S.O. 40- (E)
dated the 1st August, 1975c
Do.
Duty of every person, referred to in clause (a) sub-section (i)
of Section 2 of the Border Security Force Aci, 1968 Serving
in Madhya Pradesh, is an active duty.
mo Pro 40 e(^) fcTTT 1
<¥> fv ^ srftiftmr 1968 «rt uitt 2
mPR 1 975
^rsrm ( 1 ) ^ *5T¥ (t) % if ^ ^RrT g
^T*fr 1
S.O. 40 i(E)
dated the Isl Ai gust, 1975. .
Do.
Jduty every porson referred to in clause (a), sub-section (i)
of section 2 of the Border Securi / Force Act, 1968, Serving
in Mysore is an active duty.
TJTo pT o 406(ff) T^TOTTO
fefr 1 STTOT, 197a
5.0, 406(.Z) Ministry of Home Affairs
dated the 1st August, 1975.
tfTo Pto -10 7(«r) cRT
fcfe 1 3TTOT, 1975
5.0. 407(B) Do.
dated the 1st August, 1975.
2 Htt- FTo TTU 40 H(tt) .. feTOTOT
pTTOF i ERTO, 19 7 5
S.O. 408(E) Ministry of Energy
dated the 1st August, 1975.
2S7- *TT° 4 0 9 ( 5T ) PirTTOTTO
faTOT 2 19 7 5
S.O. 409(E) Ministry of Finance
dated the 2nd August, 1975.
^\o mo 4 1 o ( it) frfr, 'TTT T Tr T f ft' otJ toitot
fetr: 2 ErTOr, 1975
qrr° srro 4 li(et) ^
2 EFTTtf 19 7 5
2B9- m* 4 1 2 ( et ) tfftrsnTsr ^ferFrc
pRPF 2 EFTftT, 19 7 5
S.O. 412( E) Cabinet Secrelar’at
dated the 2nd August., 1975.
29 o* eh* 4 1 3 («r) shttorpt
ferfa 2 tttot, 1975
S.O. 413/1E) Mi nisfry of Labour
dated the 2nd August, 1975.
S.O. 414(E) Central Board of Direct Taxe.-..
dated the 4th August, 1 975.
2 9 L ^f° ETT^ 41 S(eT) Pf RTTTO
ftTTtr 4 «T*TCT, 0)7 5
29 2 ^f° 416 (^)f TO Mit
ftTOtf 4 197 5
S.O- 416 (E), M nibtry of Communications
dated the 4th Au t ,um 1975.
293 srno^TTo 4 17 (st), T* ‘ i'T E pT TT^fe jf?T .
^o^olTo j 2 / 6 2 ,
RCTFP 4 ETTOT, 19 75
S.O. 417 (IE)/ EC A/2/62, Ministry of Industry and Civil
dated the 4th August, 1975. Supplies.
^94 5fTTo?TT o 4 18 (ar), fetfe ETTTOT
fTXRtqr a sttot, 1975
S.O. 418 (F.), Election Commission of India
dated the 4th August, 1975.
^qf*R 5ft fo TO srftjftipT 1968 TOT 2
stoitt ( 1 ) w* « (t) % efttot if jfiw
$, *rfro TJjfr $Ffr 1
Duty o' e^ery person referred to in clau;c (a) sub-section (i)
ot section 2 of the Border Security Foicc Act 1968, Serving
in AndL.ra Pradesh, is an active duty.
? uqp.TT sfr fr qrm to Erftjpnm 1 968 ^ tot 2
mrtf (l) ^ («F) % 9TO & %WTTO
i TTpnT TTOt Cpff I
Duty of every person referred to in clause (a) subsection (i)
of section 2 of (ue Border Security Act 1968, serving in Uttar
Pradesh is an active duty.
W to prPnft 5 rt *>roi ettot vrv fW; % fair in
^FfT Pilfer TOLT l
Fixcatk n of pit head prices at which coal or Coke may be sold
by Colliery owners.
qfcr <rwyr (4;ftr^ toRr PtPtto 1975 1
Levy of Fees (Customs Documents) Amendment Regulations
1975.
m* 343(*r) frrir lo^rnf, 1975 ^-Y^rRa^r^ r % 1
ETfa^TO *?• TT* *TT° 2 42($r) pRPT 9^5^, If) 7 5 *T TTtfTSPT 1
awe (vrf <rr*ro) (■ stifer) jwr 1975 1
Government of Iidia (Allocation of Business) (One Hundred
and ule v onth Amendment) Rules, 1975.
yfV if Puffer -nfefefT -Rr totT m rjTftftrff
i
Proposals o rovL; the mini num wages rf the employees em-
ploye:! .n agricLilture,
Coirigeulr to Notiu No. S.59. 615(E) dalcd the ! 7th October.
1974.
srfa^PTr ^io ^TTo STTo 615 (^r) pRTT 17 W,iR, 1974 %
l
JTUT % firf&VarSff % pRTTW ^ ftr^ pRP,
'T’TT ?n\ TO (5R (to fs.TO) I 5 «R9TT
195 1 ETT PrpHP ft^TTT I
The Rules for the prevention of Unlawful Possession of Tele-
graph w res, anc the Teleg’aph wires (Permission for sale and
Purchase) Rules. 1954 com ; into force in the Statv of Sikkim.
(<RT,5Tfr Pp-^rt) wrvr m^m 19751
The Cement (Quality Control) Amendment Order 1974.
T 1 1 Tc-te °hT TOT TO1TOT1 lTT r rr TT'SffflpR %wi
tit & Pttttot I
Deletion of the name of the Proulist Block of India from the list
of registered uni ©cognised political party.
4028 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 I.Part 11—
TSg5 tMte 7=:.---x: ic
1
2
3
295.
^oSTTo 419 (tf),
Mto 5 OT7T, 1975
S.O. 419(E),
dated the 5th August, 1975.
Ministry of Home A flairs
2 9 6.
4 20
'TTTT7 MM Mr 7
Mt^ 5 OTT7, 1975
S.O. 420 (E),
dated the 5th August, 1975.
Election Commission of India
2 9 7.
Ro^TTo 42 1 ('tf),
5 OTKT, 19 75
71TT7 7SOT7
S.O. 421 (E).
dated the 5th August, 1975.
Ministry of Industry and Civil
Supplies.
295.
*tTR*rro 422 (*r)
to 5 197 5
S.O. 422 (E),
dated the 5th August, 1975.
Ministry of Industry and Civil
Supplies.
29 9.
5f7To<T[o 423 (ar) 7
MtT 6 OTECT, 1 97 5*
S.O. 423 (E),
dated the 6th August, 1975.
Ministry of Commerce
300,
*70 4 24 (3T),
ftM H OTT7, 197 5
ttMtt
S.O. 424 (E),
dated the 6th August, 1975.
Ministry of Commerce
301.
*Tc-qr^ 425 (tf),
Mt* a <TTO T, 1975
S,0. 425 (b),
dated the 8th August, 1975.
Ministry of Home Affairs
3 0 2,
fTolTto 426 (3f)
Mt* 8 TOT, 197 5
S.O. 426 (E),
dated the 8th August, 1975.
Ministry of Labour
303.
^ToUTO 427 (9T)i
Mw a otw, 197 5
7TM7
S.O. 427 (E),
dared the Sth August, 1975.
Ministry of Commerce
30 4,
*To^n o 428 (9T),
Msrl Mt7 rnfaspOT
Mt* 1 2 srmr, (975
S.O. 428 (E),
dated the 12th August, 1975.
Delhi Development Authority
305.
*To^TTo 429 (3T),
fflRT* 1 2 ’5RT7, 19 7 5
3;arf
S.O. 429 (E),
dated the 12th August, 1975.
Ministry of Energy
3 0«.
*ToW!o 43 0 (3 T)i
%T5f7 JFW *T A\£
MPP 12 197 5
397-
*ToiflTo 431 (3T),
Mt* 12 TT T R^, 197 5
S.O. 431 (F),
dated the 12th August, 1975.
Ministry of Home Affairs
"Mt qfe sftr am wtM *rt Mnff” *r fafa
Mj ^ftfVrf *T7i i
Declares the " Mizo National Front and Other bodies set up
by if’ to be an unlawful association.
tt^t ter % M Prefab 7 m wrMi
1
List of Contesting candidates lor the election to the Council of
States from Gujarat State.
MOT (%M otM) *TTOT, 197 5 l
The Cement Control (Second Amendment) Order, 1975.
j?*m trM *Mr ts z^{ *r srr
tot M 1 ^ M Mr tortt i
Appointing a body of persons to take Over (he management of
M/s Engel India Machines and Tools Limited, Calcutta.
Mfa (Mot) StrOTt OTIOT Wlfar, 197 5 I
The Export (Control) Sixteenth Amendment Order, 1975,
Mfa (Mot) othr shot 1975 1
Export (Control) Seventeenth Amendment Order, 1975.
vrnrr xm zftx MM gr^r M*r, 1971 * snrM M
#ht *f 1
Appointment of a Censor for the purposes of the Defence and
internal Security of India Rules, 1971.
smmfr ttr Mt *rfaM*r 1949 *nRR 4 , 5, *ftr $ *t
ttr % nfw 77 ^17 art 1
The provisions of Chapters IV, V and VI of the Employees State
Insurance Act, 1948 cpmc into force in areas in the State of
Orissa, as specified.
strut (Mot) ^tWt stofitR M*n\ 1 •-. : e 1
The Imports (Control) Fourth Amendment Order, 19-55.
fq^sfl- tot Mtt ff tfprrM ^tsfiff rt M M 4 m
M*ff ^ OTttR *r snFcfR 1
Modifications to be made to the zoning regulations applicable
to residential plots in the Master Plan for Delhi.
?rw srOT % ^twi M % *3 a ^frfV Tmfr if f,
*r *r *jott i
Notice of intention to prospect for coal in area of Surguja Distl.
of Madhya Pradesh, as Specified in the Schedule.
P?rl ^TToWTo 599 (&r) Mfr 8 19 74 4
HUftOT I
TToMsTTo 275 (|) otM 26 ^ 7 , 1975 if *rtx OTF
U7 1
Further amendment in the Order No. S.O. 275 (F) dated the
26lh June, 1975.
Sec. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, I975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 4029
1
2
3
308
qiToSTTo 432 (3l) r
fcETRf 13 SETFr, 1975
ftfqr q\x fqxrf qq
309
qqo^ro 433 (sr),
feqtqi 13 Wm 1 9 75,
S.O. 433 (E),
dated the 13th August, 1975.
Ministry of \griculture and
Irrigation.
310
qrt 0 STT 0 434 (3r),
fqqrq 14 qqtq, 19 75
qmq q)x qjqfxr> qqj^q
S.O. 434 (L),
dated the 14th August, 19T5.
Ministry of Industry and Civil
Supplies.
311
qrro^rre 435 (sr),
feqftr 14 qHAT, 19 75
Tf rfXTTfq
S.O. 435 (E),
dated the 14th August, 1975.
Ministry of Home A (fairs
312
5f7To?TTo 436 (sf),
fqqfqr 14 Wff, 19 75
fqfsr, ^rr q ?frx qrrqqr qrr q q
S.O. 436 (E),
dated the 14th August, 1975.
Ministry cf Law, Justice and
Company Affairs.
313
qrfoqro 437 (sr),
fffff, -Tfq q\r qrtTfff TPT
fqqiT 14 qqxq, 1975
qqrqq
S.O. 07 (£),
dated the 1 4th August, 1975.
Ministry of Law, Justif;e and
Company Affairs.
314
qrjosrro 433 (ar),
fqqtT 19 ?ETPT| 19 75
S.O. 438 (E).
dated the 19th August, 1975.
Cabinet Secretariat
315
qn *>'$TTo 439 (t),
fertT 20 xrnxq, 1975
fi?j q
S.O. 439 (E),
dated the 20th August, 1975.
Ministry of finance
316
qrioSTTo 440 (ai),
fqqfqr 21 mxq, 1975
%fq v\x firqif qqjqq
S.O. 440 (E),
dated the 21st August, 19/5.
Ministry of Agriculture and
Irnga.ion.
317
qrro^To 441 (sr),
ftqff 21 Sf'TET, 19 75
^fq- %\r fqxii qqjxq
S.O. 441 (E),
dated the 21 st August, 1975.
M i n i s t ry of Agric 1 1 1 1 ure a n d
Irrigation
31$
qrro?TTo 442 ( 3T ) ,
qqiqq
fqqtT 22 mxq, 1975
S.O. 442 (E),
dated the 22nd August, 1975.
Ministry of Energy
319
qrro^To 443 (^r),
tstn xftx qiqfrqr gfq
fqqVZ 22 qW, 1975
S.O. 443 (E),
dated the 22nd August 19/5.
Ministry of lndustiy and Civil
Supplies.
4
^rPcT^f^TT HoJ^HoSTTo 2 6 9 ( 3T ) , 2 J 19; 5 TT $*[-
fig*fr wn i
mm qnosryo 273 (sr) 23 tr, 1975 *r
srsrfigsrt sto i
I 11 Notn. No. S.O. 273 (Ei, dated the 23rd June, 1975 printing
mistakes may be rectified.
?rfsnj^TT mq\ ^to^rro 436 (sr), 10 srff*cr, 1973 srtx
490 (sr) rrrfbq 9 1074 % qmqfsa rfo 555
(3T) cTTXhq 14 1 9 72 ^ftcTf^nfsT V?\X qzrqj I
Duration cf the Notn. No. 555 (E), dated the 14th August, 1972
read with S.O. Nos 436 (E), dated the 10th August, 1973 and
'490 (E), dated the 9th August, 1974 should be further exten-
ded.
JEisrmfi sm qq;w-q % qqx\^qqm
sttt qq\q fe*rr q\\q\ i
Powers of the Chief Commissioner will be exercised by the Lt.
Governor of Arunachal.
qqxm fasrnr qqxq\ ?ttt xx*q mi % faq
fqqfaff i
Election to the Council of States by the elected members of the
Legislative Assembly of Gujarat.
qjqrjq xvm qft fasrrff mr % qqxqi qixx xi*q mi %
f^tfxr^r % qm i
Names of the members elected by the elected members of the
l egislative Assembly of Gujarat.
SffTff qxxP\X (qqq (rr^p- spirit m,v&) fan^r,
197 5 !
The Government of India (Allocation of Business) (One hundred
and twelfth Amci cment) Rules, 1975.
sfr *rrco «fro raj* sfm ffrqrr fqqq % ^ qx
I
Appointment of Shri R.B. Pradhan as Chairman of the Life
Insurants, Corpora: ion of India.
; TTTofr ff fcfafets fqqqi % qm\ qff %.f pjfra q\Tiq mrqi \
Declaration of kinds of seeds to be the notified kinds of seed as
specified in the ta ole.
Ttx^fr 4 fefxfes fqxffi % 4Wt qfr fwm ^xffT i
Declaration of kinds of seeds to be the notified kinds of seed as
specified in the table.
sffbp^rr *fo xxo ?rro 4os ( 3 -), feqiT 1 vj\*q } 1^75 ir
rat sr t
Amendment in Notn. No. S.O. 408 (E), dated the 1st August, 1975.
q TJ^t Tft (faf****) 1975 I
The Packaged Comniodues (Regulation) Order, 1975 .
4030 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRA HA YANA I, 1897 (Part II—
1 2 3 4,
.320
^rro^To 444 (ar),
faTRT 2 3 19 75
S.O. 444 (E),
dated the 23nl August, 1975.
Ministry of Commerce
321
’FToSTTo 445 (at),
fREFT 23 1973
S.O, 445 (E),
dated the 23rd August, 1975.
Ministry of Finance
322
qTT o?t,o 44 6 (^T),
few 2 5 1975
5FTR SjH WR tt^T^TT
S.O. 446 (E),
dated the 25th August, 1975.
Ministry of Steel and Mines.
323
^ToTtro 447 (^r),
2 6 STWT, 1975
Tfts
S.O. 447 (H),
dated the 26th August, 1975.
Ministry of Industry and Civil
Supplies.
324
mom* 4 48 ( 3T ) ,
ftqfar 2 6 OTFf, 19 75
'<ifjE?zr jrawr
S.O. 448 (E),
dated the 26th Angus!, 1975.,
Ministry of Commerce
3 25
T>T*»IT° 449 [**),
fa^TPfr 26 197 5
S.O. 449 (E),
dated the 26th August, 1975.
Ministry of Commerce
3 26
^TTo^To 45 0 (ar),
faffi-T 27 1975
nfe Ti’iTR farrTTR
S.O. 450 (Fi \
dated the 27th August, 1975.
M inistry of Tourism and Civil
Aviation.
327
5f>Tu?lTo 45 1 (<%)j
faT AT 2 7 SPTSv, 197 5
utfapjir torpt
S.O. 451 (E),
dated the 27th August, 1975.
Ministry of Commerce
328
*PTo?n 0 45 2 (af),
faTiV 28 1975
S.O. 452 (H),
dated the 28th August, 1975.
Ministry of Home Affairs
3 29
TToiCTfo 453 (3f) 7
TrfVjR ifmw
faRiafT 23 197 5
'
S.O, 453 (E),
dated the 28th August, 1975.
Ministry of Commerce
330
Tfo^Io 454 (3f),
2 3 5T4TR, 1975
Rrfam wrr
S.O. 454 (E),
dated the 28th August, 1975.
Ministry of Commerce
331
^ro'q-fo 455 (3t),
fa^TT 2 3 19 75
RTRfTT
S.O, 455 (E),
da led the 28th August, 1975.
Ministry of Industry and Civil
Supplies.
S fa faff'd airfowt
f^nrf^ i
Appointment of persons as specified in the Notn. to be members
of the Tea Board,
faRT^I' *TTRc3 ^'t tftTTT ftm W %
fa^rfaw i
Appointment of Prof. Nitish R. De, as a membei of Life Insurance
Corporation of India.
(faif^piT) ’qHi tfKrm (rr^vr, 1975 1
The Aluminium (Control) Fourth Amendment Order, 1975,
sft sprtfnrr ^ frr^r «F^Ptfr if *rr ftrurc tfr %
Appoint ;d a body of persons to investigate into circumstances
of falling of Production of Shrec Ambica Jute Mills,
Calcutta.
*rnMY *1 fafcfted RfaRf <r wii % srr % 5f
1
Appoints the persons specified in the tabic to be members of
Cardamom Board.
Wfa (fa4^r) 1 m 197 s 1
The Export (Control) Eighteenth Amendment Order, 1975.
fa^TR TrT^f HTfEK7T*r (mftsnT) fam, 19 7 5 1
The International Airport Authority (Amendment) Rules, 1975.
fafVtrT (faiflTT) 19^1 tfwfUR, 1975 I
The Exrort (Control) Ninteenth Amendment Order, 1975.
TT fafrfaR 5TI 7TR 9T fiRflR l
Oxtcnticn to the State of Sikkim the enactments specified in the
Schec ule.
fa^TT (ftl ^nft€R STRUT, 19 7 5 I
The Exports (Control) Twenty-first Amend men l Order, 1975,
faster (faq^r) tfRret tfufMSR srfavT, 1975 1
The Exports (Control) Twentieth Amendment Order, 1975.
faJftRT ^rrpft, TOTTTT Sq^TT % JR :
Tnflr ^rr^r tff Tt^TRRT v snffiJRR fa^nr
f^Rlfafi 1
Appoints n body to investigate the possibility of restarting the
undertaking known as NTs. Britannia Engineering Company,
Calcutta.
Sec. 3 (ii) ]
l 2
Ministry of Home Affairs
tfrr TnrftT <jfa irarm
Ministry of Industry and Civil
Supplies.
"faffer fen «rwrr (fw^) ^fw^r" *Tt"s?r =r^r i
Constitute the ‘‘Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Tribunal".
TTTO TTFT Tt fapftFR) WtET »TFm, If) 7 5 I
I he Paper (Conservation and Reguhiio i of Use) Amendment
Order, 1975.
T^rrd tjzv ftm (#^) *rfctfTa*r, id 7 5 tfr *titt 3 & 7
cRT 9 T T^F'J 1 fadR?. 19 7 5 HR I^TT I
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER, 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA I, 1397 4031
3
tJfT TORR
333 TTo%TTo 45 7 ( 3?) ,
fcTFF 2 9 SPTFtf 1975
S.O. 457 (E),
dated the 29th August 1975
334 ^To mo 458 (3T),
fvm 29 tPTTFT 197 5
S.O. 458 (F),
dated the 29th August 1975
33 5 sfrrom<> 459 (ar),
29 ?TTOT 1975
S.O. 459 t.B), Ministry of L.abour
dated the 29th August 1975
The provisions of Sections 3 to 7 and section 9 of the Employees
State Insurance (Amendment) Act. 1975 come into force
,rom 1st September. 1975.
Tnf*T4T %f\T srorrcrFrr ^;r
f^TF^ft 3 0 19 7 5
VTo QTTo 4 87 4.— ftrf^T HTT (SFTTlft ^Tl) faw,
it )65 % frmr 5 % (2) 3 ? (t.) % wswH %
if rRT *TTTR %
59/l3/65-wmr(v) tTTffaT 22 SJHTf, 1 965 Vt <TF
OTT JJW fTTSTF, dm Trmft h srfk^hr
vr# 5T %?£pT ( i ) $ ^Vr
jrrfimfttff w\ FT srrfimfafi % if £ fhm
ITCT ^r^lSTTr TOT 7rf4T Tf 5R>T TTPTTt % ( 2)
if t$T ^ *fRT mp, TdtT fw *T%*TT I
srrfwifV tt dR srfwff tft ^ITrt
*prn fd^TRTT
¥r f^r^r,
f, t fw
frpr 5(1 ) T wsUr qrfxH
^rni sfr vtrr T 1
fW^p *rrmfr T sr7nr?ppT %,
*fn5=TTfT*if ft fftfl
Trfarrf) Thrift £,
*f> ftrrfuft T fft^r frrr
5(1) T w tffar TrfTd
% ft^i if 1
fftWF, TT7TUT7T % TTdEpT T,
T^rrfrm t f^rd%
fHTjfe snfispprtt ■’Cr^.Tfd f' 7
Iwt 5
( 1 ) % «m>i difcr
?t if !
[*ro 12011/2/75^1^ (t)]
myo
1. fdTvrr,
2. fdT^db dr^T dTTtff
3. fd t PdT, Milled
CABINET SECRETARIAT
(Department of Personnel & Admn, Reforms)
New Delhi, 30 October, 1975.
S.O- 4874.- -In pursuance of the provisions of clause (a)
of sub-rule (2) ol' rule 5 of the Central Civil Services (Temporary
Service) Rules 1965, and in supersession of notification of the
Government of India, M nistry of Home Affairs No. 59/13/65-
Ests (A), dated the 22nd July, 1965, in so far as it relates to
Chief Controller of Printirg and Stationery, the Central Govern-
ment hereby specifies the authorities mentioned in column (1) of
the Table below as the authorities by which the power
conferred by the said clause may be exercised to the extent
indicated against each such authority in column (2) of the said
Table.
TABLE
Name of the Authority Extent of powers
I , Director of Printing
2. Cent roller of Stationery
3. Controller of Publication
In respect of orders passed
under rule 5(1) against the -
eiTipl wees of the Directorate
of Tinting, o:her than
those- whose appointing
auth >rily is the President.
In respect of orders passed
unde’ rule 5(1) r gainst the
empj >yces of the Office of
Cent oiler of Stationery,
oilier than those whose
a ppo riling authority is
the President.
In rcspxt of orders passed
undci rule 5(1) against the
emplc yecs of the Office of
the Controller of Publi-
cation other than those
whose appointing authori-
ty Is he President.
[No. i 201 1/2/75- Ests (C)]
J, S. AHLUWALlA, Under Secy.
4032
THE GAZETTE O;- INDIA • NOVEMBER 22, 1 9 75 /AGRA HAY AN A i, 1897 [Pari II—
TffaTT! 6 TWR, 19 75
srfe tot
TOfo TOo 4 375. — TORT TO TfaTOT TOTTO II, 3, 'STOSS (ii)
<TO 3181 TO H fTOWR, 1975 fa TOTOlfaT, VRT *RTOR
to'Pttow faTOwr (TOifroro faF wTOffa wr ffaronr) fa fafa-
gTOTT TOOT TOToSjlo *>8M TR'psT 19 19 75 TO 77TTO 1
TOpfT 12 TO “(TOOT 2 28/l3/7 4*TTftfr-II) ” % ^FT W fafaRT
228/K{/75) 1 ' 9% 1
[fasTT .* 2 V 1 3 / 7 5 Tnfrff II]
faofao tottI, -tow toPtot
New Delhi, the 6th November, 1975
ERRATUM
S.O. 4875. — In the notification of the Government of
India in the Cabinet Secretariat (Department of Personnel
and Administrative Reforms) No. S.O. 2864 dated the
19th August, 1975, published at page 3181 of the Gazette
of India, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) dated the
6th September, 1975, in column 2, line 11, for [No. 228/
13/74-AVD.II] read [No, 228/13 /75-AVD. ITT .
[No. 228/13/75-AVD. 11]
B. C. VANJANI, Under Secy.
*TRcT
totW
Tf fwfat, 8 3TTOTTT, 1975
TOR SHo 4 876. — TOT:, faifaTT STtfaTO TOT TTOTTTT fa
ft 1974 fa fT TORT ffaTTT TTOT fa PlTO TTURTO
fTTfror % Ptto iq2-?P3tto; qffarro P^rff^t fa ttoft wttft
TOlfaTTR fa TTOT WFT PR, tnr-1, FTT fTOTO TOFTtfa, ffalTT far,
vFtots, tort srfa?r, *rrro TprPrPr farffaFT, 1951 ttot nfaro
otto tto Pttotot sr. faf^T sm fTfarr otto tot faf tot fan
ttPtot toft fa tow fa f 1
far, to: TOTOT TOfatTTR T, TO TOW fTTT P?TO TOTTqT fa,
TO TOT, • TO TOTOWTf % ffa( fat TORTO TOTOTOT TOW Tfa ffarr
far Prarfro totto ito tt to toi Troran ft tot I far totto
qm to totowr fa Ptto faf toP^t torr tot wtPrto far 1 1
TO:, TO, TOTOT fafafw TO TORT 10TO TO SFTTWfa Pietro:
TOTTOPT TOTWRT TOT fa TOR TOT fro TO TOR % fa TO TO TOR
% TO farfr WTO TO fasr i TTOr STTOTOT fTOTOTT qffaT fa TTR
TOT TOTT TOR if fa % fa 7 RT TOTTOT far TTOa TO TpTTOTO TO
TORI TITO % faTO pRffa ^ rffan TOOT | I
[TO® RoTOo-fTOoTOo/ 10 2/74(241)]
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA
ORDER
New Delhi, I he 8th October, 1975
S.O. 4876.- — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Chandra Bhtn Singh. M-l, Paper Mill Colon},
Nishatganj Lucknow, Ut ; r Pradesh, a contesting candidate
for election to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 102-
Lucknow West, assembly constituency, has failed to lodge
an account of his election expenses as required by the
Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made
thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not gi\ui any reason ui explanation xor die fand.c and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
3. Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, Pie Electicn Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Chandra Bhan 5 mgh to be disqualified for being chosen
k as and foj being a member of either Hou*e of Parliament
cr of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA/ 102/74 (241)]
TOTTOTO
Too TOTo 4 37 7. — TOT:, fTTOfTOT TOTTOPT TO TTOfTOTT TOT TOTOT I
fa 1974 if ffT WT WT fTOTOTT TOTOT % pRTO TOTTORTO PfaTTOT
% pTTO 1 1 3-TOTOTT (TOroRTo ) pTTfTOT-RTO ^ WIT TT% RFTOfaTOR
TOf TFT c TOfa , TOTTO TO TOFT TOTOTl, fafTOT TTTO TO^rfa, ^TOT TO TOT,
TOR TOfTpTpRTO TOftrfTTOTO, 1951 TTOT T^TT TOTOTTO TOTO fTTOTOf gRT
TO^faTT TOTOT fTTOfTOT TOTOT TO Ttf TOf TOTOr TOlfw qTTTO if TOTW
TOfa. TOT" TOTO TOTTOfaTOTT TOT *FTOT ^TOTT fTTO TOFT TOT TOt,
TOTOTOf TOTwrr % faP mi trto tototot ftrrw Tfr Ptott
TO fr, frqTTT tots' ft to 7TO 4t tototw fa totot | fa
TOFT RT TOTOTOWT % Pt^ TO# TOTOfar TOW TOT Tfa | ;
TOT: TOT, TOTOT TOfafTTOTO TO 9RT 1 CR ^ TOTTOW if fTTOfTOT
TO TOFT TTtTScTRT TTOT ^ff '*FT 'TO'fa TO TTTO % fafa fa TTOT %
TOT fafa TfTO fa fTOTOTT TTOT TOTOTOT fTOTOTT qpTTOTO % TRf TOT
TOT far faT % fa4 RT TOTOTO fa TR1R T TlT TTO fa TOTTTOfa
qr pTTO pRfpFT fafar TOW I I
[To ToTo-fToTo / 11 3 / 74 ( 242 )]'
ORDER
S.O. 4877. — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Ram Piyare, Village & Post Office Mamuni,
District — Rae Bareli, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate
for election to the U.P. Legislafive Assembly from 113'Salon
(SC) Assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account
of his election expenses as required by the Representation
of the People Act, 1951, and the Poiles made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
h?s not giv;*n any reason or explanation for the failure and
ths Electicn Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now the efore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
sa d Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Ram Piyare to bo disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member o'* either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assemb y or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA/113/74 (242)]
TOW
Too Too 4878. — TOT:, fTTOfar TOTOpJ TO TTTJTT fa TTOT |
P5 19 74 TO gtr TOR tfaT ffalTT TOTT % fa TO TFTRR faTOTOT
% fat 20 7-TOT JT fTTORl-^T $ ^TfTO Fft TOFf TOfaTOTR
fa TFRTT, TOFT TOTT fa A” TOR, faR TOW^ froTT TOTTOTFT W 7-
8 fa, fafa sfaffaTOTO % IriTTOT, 1 >51 TTOT TOsfT TOTR ffafa
gRT TOtfTOi fTTOr-FT TOTOt fa faf fa TOTO TOTpTOT TORT TO
3TTOW t% f; ;
Sec. 3 (ii) J
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897
4033
TOr, irt: -3tTOtop; ?r, fW <tt TO,
wq^fr to trflWTT ^ faq TOS 'totut smr qff fan
§, TOf, ftVRT ^nr>T TO TOTTOT
tot to ^^tortt * fir? TOt qqfcT to *tt ^TOfTOr^?- ;
to., ^ *rfafaTO TO «rpcr io*p %
STObT rr^gixf T*FT TO WT TO TOT % fTOft TO
% tt faTO TRq TO faror tot smr twft <rfT^ %
tttot ^T *\TO TOr % fart to TO i TTffar & TOf
TO qrmTrftr % fro farT^r TOfTOr tot $ i
[4o ^o^o-Pto^q/207/74( 243)]
ORDER
S.O. 4878. — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Kamta, Village Basti Bason Nidhiyawan, Post
Office Rampur, District Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh, a con-
testing candidate for election to the U.P. Legislative As-
sembly from 207-Nathupur assembly constituency, has failed
to lodge an account of his election expenses as required
by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the
Rules made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Kamta to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order,
[No. UP-LA/207 /74 (243)]
BTT^T
qJTo tffo 4879 . — TO:, 'ffrtfa ■PT TOTETFT Iff TOT $
fa 1974 *T tot spftr faint TOT % ftp? etehtw frotro
% fart 3 1 2-W^rRTT PptfTO ft ^TTT
^■pTOTOIT TO TOfaPJT TOT, t TOTOST, f^THT
TOT S*9T, TO*F TTPrPffTOT ^fupTTO, 19 51 TOT
TO? PrqTO 9 TTT tfTO faiqfan *qTO TOf TO % 73 T TTfTO
SrTO *T 1TCTOT T$ I ;
TOr, to: tto TO firt srrt tt TO,
TOTt TO TOTTvTOT ^ fart TO§ TTRTT TOTTT ^ PTOT
ft, TOr, PtoIto «rr 3 fTO ^ TO tottot TO tot | ftp to%
TOT TO % fart TO£ *Fl <«i ^TfTOfadT -T^T
TOii TO, TOT TOTOTOfT TO RTTT 1 OTO % if fafaRT
WTTOT TOT >sft TOfTO *TPT TO TOT % faTO TOT
% qT faTO TTW TO PtTOT TOT TTTOT fqHFT TOt^ ^T
stfT TOr ft Pr^ to vi^vr ^ ^nffra- Ir rfnr to ^ *fttotPt
^ Prq 1 ftrf^T mfTO TO 7 TT | 1
[rfo ^oSloTqTOo/312/74(244)]
ORDER
S.O* 4879. — Whereas the Election Commission Is satis-
fied that Shri English Bhan, Mohalla Sadhwara, Farrukha-
bad, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for election to
the U.P, Legislative Assembly from 3 12-Earrukhabad as-
sembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his
election expenses as required by the Representation of the
People Act, 1951. and the Rules made thereunder;
102 G 1/75—3
And whereas* the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri English Bhan to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA/312/74 (244;]
STTilT
° o 4880. - j TO:, ffi^PTO TOTTOT [ft TOT ^ PF
1974 §rr OTT 5 T^ 7 T PfHm TOT % PTO TOJTTO f^TTO
$ Prq“ 3 1 2-^NroiT fTOpTO-^ & ^TPT TOT TT% TOftTOTT
*sfT ^pftt Pet, ttht q toht Ptot it,
TOT ^fpp TpTpTpOT 1 95 1 W
PttoT 'R'^rPfFT wfi TtoPto' ^T ?t«t stPto
t $ ;
tflr, to:, tot totTtott ^ TO toto fTO TOT tt
TO vrq-^T to fTOwu ^ qflf ^ttot
fTO $, TOt, PtTOft ?! r TO t ^ TO ^ w % Of
tot TRT To % Pt^ Ttt Tqfe 'TTOT ^TT ^TTTOTOt
^ I ;
w, w, TOTOm TO mrr iov % if fTOTOr
TrrqPT ^ q a i < r ^pt TO fTO TO ^ ^ fTOfr TO ttto %
qT PTOt TITO TO pHTFT TOT WTT fWFT % TRFT ^
^rTO TOt Pt^ to TO tt^^t TOt ^ TO
iTOTqftr % M Pr%t TOfTOr qn^T ^ i
O ^0^0-^0^0/312/74(245)]
ORDER
S.O, 4880. — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Muncshwar Singh, Village and Post Office
Sabalpur-Kanchanpur, District — Farrukhabhad, Uttar Pradesh,
a contesting candidate for election to the U.P. Legislative
Assembly from 312-Farrukhabad, assembly constituency, has
failed to lodge an account of his election expenses as re-
quired by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and
the Rules made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Muneshwar Singh to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA /3 12/74 (245)]
*n* 7 T
^Jo Hlfo 4881 . — £TrT:, EtTOto "Ml TOT *FT TOTUUT TO TO 1 t
fa 1974 if ju; Wf faTOT tot % fad m*\vn ftTOro
% M 319-TOtt ftTOwifcr *r ^ ^TOsqiT
TO qrqim fbij tot TOt c frr qTftrn, fWr tott^ ^nr TOvr
trfa TObfafuFt ^fufaTO, 19 51 TOT qniq qq ftqTO 33TT
4034
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1 975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 [Part II —
irrfWfl faqf'rr *rr nfff »ft Swr ^ *r
ww f;
tffT, JW: -jw n*(TT >3% *i * m t- ^tiT ft*?
wft w nwrar ^ ftp? wfrf ifn?r ft*n
tfft, srnfft w *nj <fr rrrrren^ t f%
<mr vx rrwrar $ ftm *rt£ <PTfar jtt PTPfiPMw *i# § ;
w: *ur, 3^ wfaft*pr rfi ttra iov v^T^r *rft*ftR
*n*?ft qa^srcr ™ «fr q-OTRRT tfr tfwr * ftrfr *ft rnrt
% itt fa*fr Trnr fatm rrm fatm 'rfr^ % rrm
srft tfft ijft fa*? w «tt%vt if? wifftr # ?fft
if? m^TTfa % «frf*rcr tott t i
[#o 3eSTo-ProHo/3l9/74(24e)]
ORDER
S.O. 4881. — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Parmatma Din, Village &. Post Office, Gokhia,
District — Banda, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for
election to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 319-Banda
assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his
election expenses as required by the Representation of the
People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission Is satisfied that he has no good
reason or Justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Parmatma Din to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA/319/74 (246)]
VToWro 4882* — TOT, TOfal *TT TOTfTOT TOT $ fa
1974 ft 5 ^ tot fatrm h*tt fa? mum
fa? 319-Vkr ft TO? qfa ^jfafaTTT
ui*r, ^Winftift, j^rhrr, tot jfar, sffq? a PnPiffa^ ^rfLrfai ^n=r,
1951 TOTT TOTTO *T? froftf ffTTT TOft
to ftt TOfro to? ft toto t$ $ ;
*ftr, tot: tot ft, sft fa? sqft qr
?t, ^ R tlWRTT %fa? *ftf TOFT fan
*ftr, farter 'tn^ffT to ^ prm tot | fa
ftt w % fa? 4ft? TOftd totw tt RrtfffaFT $ ;
TO: TO, TOT WfafaTO qft EHTT 1 0*F % 5FJTTFT ftfarfro
%rwM tr^aiTT ^ ^ njq- qrr mu % fatff fHR
^ UT fan) fatSTO rr^TT 5TTOT fatJR ^ TOFT ^
^ fa? tt rffa q? 'ft qmrofa
% fan fa^f^r fafro *fftt ^ i
[tie ^ono-faon*o/3i9/74( 247)]
ORDER
S.O. 4882, — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Surendra Nath, Pilikothi, Bandra, Uttar
Pradesh, a contesting candidate for election to the U.P.
Legislative Assembly from 319-Banda assembly constituency,
has failed to lodge an account of his election expense*
as required by the Representation of the People Act, 1951,
and the Rules made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Surendra Nath, to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA/319/74 (247)]
mivi
tffTo flTo 488 3. — TO:, , *Tl l fpT *FT THTTUR TOT ^
fa 1974 if ^ tot sfavr fam % fa? mtnrw Pufan
?T fa 7 ? 3 2 4-TFir/t (sToWTo) ft TOft ^ift
STftfasnT VSpTT, SR *T >F^1T, fiTOT
^TTT TT^r, ^TfafaTO 1951 mj TO1?
ftTOf bttt wf fhqfro «rrr ftt fttr Ttfaw
^rft ft to t| | ;
ftVr, to: ^ftfroiT ft, \jft fa? 'snft tt
ftf, TOftt w ?r fa? ifftf TOTO ^
fan rflr, faVfro ’mftPr ^ ftt totur $ tot ^ fa
qnr ifa fa? 4ftt TOfar ^tw to
qtff | ;
to: TO, TOT ^fftfftTO ^ TOTT 10T ft
ftqlfai imqtq qd^iRi tot ^ vgro vf ftro^ faftt ft] hto
% TO faftt TITO *ft fWT ^TO ^TTOT fa TOT % TOTO
inft vfti iftft ^ fa? TOftvr 4ft mfter ft rffa q? qft
TOTO^fa ^ fa? faT% ?tfaro *ftto ^ i
fao SoSro-faoHo/324/74( 248)]
ORDER
S.O. 4883. — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Kalua, Village Post Kelpahar, District — Hamir-
pur, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for election to the
U.P, Legislative Assembly from 324-Charkhari (SC) assem-
bly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his elec-
tion expenses as required by the Representation of the
People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notict
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10 A of th<
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Kalua to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council ol
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order,
[No. UP-LA /324/74 (248);
Sec. 3fii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22 , 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897
4035
rt*r
4884 *— to, «rr*ftrr «ft toitot (t w t
fr 1074 # gv r* fcuR to % ftr# totcr
% frrir 3 2 4wwrft (^oitto) ?r *r^r ^ 1 %
*»itTOr< «ft ttr HTVT to r qte ^rcfrjr, frwr 5 ^ 5 ^ ^r*
Rtr Tfaftfro Rfuftw, 1951 to tot *jr ftRTf
ffTTT flfir ftrVfro ®TJff tt TO *rfaw *r*it S
$ ;
tffy to: tot TOftTOrc %, gfr tott grot fro srfa t*
^1 RTFft if^nr^RTr % f?i 4 *t*)$ *tn< u f Rq<^t *h < y i
tw t %fft, ftartro ^rrTO ttt *ft tour $t tot fc fa
TRT TO RTORT % ftr^ TRf*R sfTTTTJT qT W<q)faW
^ t ;
TO TO TOT Rfafim ETRJ 1 0*17 % R^JtTTO %
f^rf^l TOR TO^TTTT W *ft TO TO qft *> TOT % tft
^ ^ RT fTOt TT^T faRR TTHT W^T faURT TftT^ ^ W(
R^T srR *fr* ^ % ftr^ w rt%r ^ mriv ?r dfa r^
■ft *fTO^rfe ^ ftnj fa^f^T UTO $ 1
[*f° ^0-^0^0/324/74(240)]
ORDER
S.O. 4884.— Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Ram Nath, Village Post Kashipur, District —
Hamirpur, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for election
to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 324-Charkhari (SC)
assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of
his election expenses in the manner as required by the
Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made
thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Ram Nath, to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order,
[No. UP-LA/324/74 (249)]
rt^r
fTToWTo 4 8 85 . — TO, RRfRqFT RTOTO TOT fcfa
1974 TO* fatTR RRT % frq 1 TOTTR %
32 5-TOfaTT ft <^TO TRY
Wftfinftft, jpTORRT Tli Ffo 5, TO* 5 faVT, RfafnftPT
RfafaRT, i95i, tot *reffa tor farof tttt xrtfTO
WTJff ¥7 vpr ^7fw W&r R
tftr, TO: wftTOTT RTW fro anR qr
*Fl, ^T T T 5 fr fHTR 'HTOI ^
fon rflr, tTTRtR Vf IT? vh TO 5 TO TOT ft fr
TO Ffl fHTETOT % fTO Tti fHTR qT TOtfTOT
^ t ;
TO: AT, tf'Kl RtWiMH til <1 1 0<t> % vn if fh^TWR
TO>T qaq^Ki TO ift
HTO * in ftTrh TT^T ^ faTO *mT ITTOTf^TO % RTOT
^ to wi%wr orfta it rfl^ ^ q?V
^RTRftr % ^rr?rr ^ i
[do ^o 3 To-firo*To/ 325 / 74 ( 250 )]
ORDER
S.O. 4885. — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shriinati Jyotirmayi, Hussainganj, Ward No. 5,
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for election
to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 325-Mahoba assembly
constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his election
expenses as required by the Representation of the People
Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shrimati Jyotirmayi to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for 'Being a member of either "House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA/325/74 (250)]
tn^tr
WT°«n° 4880. — TO:, ft^fTOTOflRqTT TOUR jj[t TOT $ Pf
1974 if 517 TO* fa UR TO % frtf RITOR ftprfTO ^
frpt 32 5-RftRT faqrfRR-tfo ^pT«T TT% *sft
TOW, TORRJTT RtfjWT TOtRT, faWT ^41 <^< 7 TOT
^fafafh*W qftrfhTO, 1951 TO TO ftunft 3T*T
faqfan ®TOf W Tfti 5lfaw *Tr^ if
? ;
«fk, TO: TOT TOftTOT* W ^RT fTO T
7* *ft, 5TTOt TOTOTT % foR ^ ^IRR RTOT F T ^<h*ui
*itfr f^nn t «fk, fa^rfro rtrPt to ^ tot t far
'3R% TRT TT*TTWm f^TT TRfw TT*R TT iRRtfRR
flfr $ ;
to; to, tot tifafaro ^ ur*T 1 ov % ^^r*r if fa^fro
TOffa to^3t*t tot «ft wwj tow <rt *fro ^ vfr *tto
% RT ftlRft TTTO Tff faUTO TOTT fasTFT Tf*T^ ^ *RTO ^ ^
rV* ^ ^ Wn to RrfW ?r R*f wttrTu
% ftTR farf^T RtftTT q**RT | I
[tfo To-fro^To/ 325 / 74 ( 251 )]
ORDER
S.O. 4886* — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Shambhu Dayal, Chhajmanpura, Mahoba, Dis-
trict — Hamirpur, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for
election to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 325-Mahoba,
assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his
election expenses as required by the Representation of the
People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
4036
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22. 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 [Part Jl—
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Shambhu Day at to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA/325/74 (251)]
STTOTT
Wo 3 n° 4 88 7 . — x*r, forTOxx nrrxtx tt ’Hhium' TO txt ¥
for 1974 x grr otx tto fount thu % fofo murr^T faxWx
% fofo 328 -fiWt t XXTT TflTO xTO ttTOTOtTT
TO foxrTO 35/36 ftFTxf to irhtfr, srix
TOf ufhfhfer TObfoxr, 1 9 5 1 ott xTOx xxfo ^ foxTO am
sfofoFT ttT foVhnt sxxf xtt TO? TO TOsrr aiP^ txT t wi^T
^ ¥ ;
TOx, to: XXT ^TOXTTT TO ?JTOT foX tstTO TT
TO, SFrTO TO TO9^RTT ^ farR TO? XFOT *TTOT
frxT TOx, faxfxx mxfo *tt x^ TO tFTTtrrx fr tot ¥
TFT TO ' WTOTT % font TO? TXfot xr *XTXtfoT?T
^ ¥ ; i
srer: to fto TOTOTOro TO utxt io*f % *
fox-forr tttxFt q^ranTT tjto w TO TOre % fTOft TO tot
% XT fTOft XRX TO fomT TTr TOTT foUFT TOxTO % TOBT
sj^r totTOx fob % fofo to *rr*?r TO m xto ?r TOx x* TO
xnwxfo r ^ fofo forf^r TOfox x>t<ct ¥ i
[ 4 o ^osro-ftro^ro/ 323/74(252)]
ORDER
S.O. 4887. — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Noor Bux, Resident of 35/36, Silvartganj
jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for election
to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 328-Jhansi, assembly
constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his election
expenses as required by the Representation of the People
Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for 8uch failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Noor Bux to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of tbis
order.
[No. UP-LA/328 /74 (252)1
*To*n° 4888 . — TO:, foTOXT JTTXTT *FT dHIUH TO TOT |
ftp 1974 if fx ttix xTO fount tot ^ fofo rtutxx faxfanr
% font 1 9 s-tft TOtt fTOffxrTO^f *xTO xTO toTOtotx
TO TtTOtT TFTTX, TOT X TFT TOTTT, fw ifofTXT, TTTT TON",
TOt> xfoforfuTx TOufopnr, 1951 xxr fnfht tott TOi formt
gjrr TOrfttx tot foxforo ®xxf TO? TO TOst ttPto tttx t
totot x¥ I ;
TOx, to: tot totVtotx ^t, to *fw fro ^rfo xt
TO, ^rTTO TO HTTOTTr * fvT^ TO? 'HXq’ STTOT tTO
foTT ti TOt, frofaf TOTtX TO TO XXTHTX TO XXT ¥
xttt to ^ TO? xTOxr ^txut xt xTTxtfror
*RT:W, XTO TOTOwr To ETTTT 10^7 % ^T^TTO t fTOrfTO
^rrTOx y ci i x i TO ^vflx ^ n i x TO urrx ^7 fTOrt TO u to ^7
xt fTOfr xt^x TO ferrx w wxt fxurx xFtxx, ^ ^
TOt TO* to ^t*tt TO ^TOx TO THTfixfiT
^7 f^rS fin%T TOPrx xtxut ¥ 1
[Wo5MW°/l95/74( 253)]
ORDER
S.O. 4888. — Whereas (he Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Sushil Kumar, Village & Post Office Ramkola*
District Deorla, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for
election to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 195-Ramkola
assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his
election expenses as required by the Representation of the
People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Sushil Kumar to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA/195/74 (253)]
TOTO
fXo 3 H° 4889 : — TRT:, TOTOXX STFfPT ^ mvm TO W f
for 1974 JF XTTT XTO fTOJFT XXT ftTO BTOTOX
forrforx foTO 1 9 5-xft xtot h' rr-TO xTO
■xTOTOnx TO TOx TOt, TOc* xtxtxtxtt fotxi ^xfoxT, xxx
TOt TOhfxxRj 1951 xxr xTOx xxTO forxTO
5ttt TOtfopr ^tTOt TOTOxx ^xxt TO TO? TO TOxr XTfir^r xtTO
¥ ;
TOx, xx: xTOtxxrr 73 % g;xxr M ^tTO xt
TO, thTO to ’Xxwxt % ftTO TOf xtttx Krxxr ttTO^tx xTO
foxr ¥» fTOWx 5 TiTOx xrr x?f TO thttuft TO W ¥ Pp
TFT TO ^ foTO TO? tTOft ^TXX XT TOXtfXTX
# | ;
iert: trx, xxd TOTOTOtt TO htxt iott % *rjx <«i xfxVNr
icnTOx t^tsxtxt ^ TO TO^ w TO hxT ^7 fTOft TO xro %xt
forTO TTXX TO fxtJFT TTXT WXT foUTX TfXT^, % RXTX TFt
TOx TO* ^ foTO to n 1 3^ TO xttPt ^ TOx x 1 ? TO Tnxrrxfh
% foTO fTOdro TOf% tottt ¥ 1
[to XoTTo-fToX s / 1 9 5/ 7 4 ( 254)]
4037
Sec. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22 , 1975 /AGRAHAYANA 1 , 1897
- _ i , ■ ■ — ^ ! ; — — » ■ L- ' 'll ' -i— t- I-TI-
ORDER
S.O. 4889.— Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Haribans, Post Raja Bazar Khadda, District
Deoria, UttHr Pradesh, a contesting candidate for election
to the UP. Legislative Assembly from 195-Ramkola, assem-
bly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his
election expenses as required by the Representation of the
People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Haribans to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the dale of this
order.
[No. UP-LA/195/74 (254)]
UlToSHo 4890. — rifa ufafufa?! ttfafaUU, 1950 (i960
*rr 43 ) mrr 13 * u?v ( 1 ) am m
uuV t jjr, vtrer fWM jtrRt, <1^ ucvrc % urmtf
ft r° * wft T’c *sft RUo l^mr,
^ unto £ xm M r«u faufvr wMitV
% vr 5t ktk fa?faK <rn;?rr | i
[y O 154/MfR^5/7 5]
S.O. 4890. — In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
section (1) of section 10A of the Representation of the
People Act, 1950 (48 of 1950), the Election Commission of
India, in consultation with the Government of Maharashtra,
hereby nominates Shri H. Nanjundiah, Additional Chief
Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra, as the Chief
Electoral Officer for the Slate of Maharashtra with effect
from the date he takes over charge vice Shri K. A. Gafoor
retired.
[No. 154/MT/75]
Mft, 10 abrupt, 1975
®fT° 4 891* — UK - ;, UTUW afiT dOTU M UUT
% fa 1974 *T £R VxTZ TO7T faKlR HKT $ fair mmX*\
% far 43 -fc^r (mo mo) fxxUx m ^ ufa
KrullUR aft TRUTU UTU TOffT, Mr TOR KTTT *Tfa ufafafeu
’qfyfhu'u, i95i to it utfrr tor m frofi srrr tkM mfa
faufKU mu 1 *T*T Ut KWT nfa?T R ^414^1
tffa UK: ^RT R, TOUT W ^ ip.
'ft, wft IU % fair "Ptt 4nxq *TTO FTsStIR
fon $, tftr, fhukK urulu m u$ 'ft toktk $ wr $ fa
mfa trt tPLtHdr K M qukr xxz*] ur mruVfro
^ $;
to iru, kir ufufem *V urn 1 ot % RRurtu R Muk
UTUtU RTOTTCr RTK *a WTTU T?T KUI ^ MV *FV mTT % qr
fatfV rm frxTx xm n«rrr fusm qf kpr % ^
^ ik ^ fer w ufa?r irRpg' ft ^V wxm-
uftr M farf^r urfaT xmr k i
[^0 ^o 3 To-faorro/ 43 / 74 ( 257 )]
ORDER
New Delhi, the 10th October, 1975
S.O. 4891. — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Raghunath, Village Paruya, District — Budnun,
Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for election to the
U.P. Legislative Assembly from 43-Bilsi (SC) assembly con-
stituency, has failed to lodge an account of his election ex-
penses as required by the Representation of the People Act,
1951, and the Rules made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10 A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Raghunath to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA /43/74 (257)]
StfaifT
VT<> 4892 . — Uir:, TT ITUWT Bt rpiF
| fa 1974 if ipr mrr sfarr Met thtt % M utetttw M-
spt % fmr 176 -h^inM faufau ^ ft ^ urn
TUTT 'sft U^fV, TTo , 2 TMT fam
ufakfcu 1951 itut uudVu qmq
ur Mff mi wfair wt fT#T wnff Ufk vft ^nar
xfk, uk; KT 5 kwIkur K, kK R^rr far mK tt
vfV, mxt vi writ % faR qftf xxvx m
ftUT fc tfk , Mfau mukT U^ tft UUTUTU UUT | fa
ITU IK UUWKT ^ M qufof UT
TO TO KUK ^ uttt 1 0 ^T % falkpr
mutu RKRjm KIK *ft ^V UKK % MV »fV UKK
^ UT fatfV UNU faUTU UUT WUT flllM UfaUI KIEU
^ tfti ifa % faR ik mfm § kVk ^
‘VMiqftT % faR Utfq r\ H77KT ^ I
[U 0 ^oSTo-fao^o/j 7 fi/ 7 4( 260)]
ORDER
S.O. 4892. — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Mazhar All, Post office Mendhawal, Tola Bar-
gadhi, District Basti, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for
election to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 176-Mendha-
wal, assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account
of his election expenses as required by the Representation
of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
4038 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 [Part It
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declare? the said
Shrl Mazhar All to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order,
[No, UP-LA /176/74 (260)]
TO* wto 4803:— TO, Prckrq stptPt to ertutt tott
ft Prr 1974 $ ^7 TOTC f™ TOR T % fair TOUTTOT firnkpr
TO fap 183 -rTOt totor (w° too) IrosrkpHfor £r tosTO
tirhRi, trm tttojtt, TOte ifrjr, fron
3m jtTOto sfirfiffter trfufroTTO i os i redtR TOmr
rtf ftrrorf jrt tfftfarr frorkFr ®nff to TOk *fr TOro
W 7ft ft;
sfk, tot; topt ^ffiwr *r, ^tott W to^ to vfr,
TOrofr tot qr^TOTRrr TO fror to?^ sttott ¥^fwvi\ faro
ft, tfk, fa*k 3 qrofFT TO tfr TORTTOR ftl WT I far totTO
TITO w TORWTO TO TOf qrofcr ^HTT RT TOR'fiTOTO
toto 3qr wfalwT TOt mrr ioto TO # frorkpr
vi [lf| Tf trq^TTRT 'datl TEPTfd TOt TOTOf TO fTOff TOf ffTO TO
to fq^ft <itr q^r Itotopt tort tototo Ptktft h f/q 4 % totft
TOTO % fTOT TOT VTT^ *7T qh" RTTlV ^ dk TO}" TO TOTO^ fir
TO fro? frofftd TOfror VETO ft l
[tio ^0 To-fac Tto / 1 8 3 / 7 4 ( 2 6 1 ) ]
ORDER
S.O. 4893. — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Rampatl, Village Rampur, Post Office Brihm-
pur, District Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate
for election to the LT.P, Legislative Assembly from 183-
Mundcra Bazar (SC) assembly constituency, has failed to
lodge an account of his election expenses as required by the
Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made
thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Rnmpati to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of their
order.
[No. UP-LA/183/74 (261)1
STT^VT
Vfo WTo 4 8 94 : — RTO, ftVRR WPTpT TO TOTOTOq ftt
tott ft fir 1974 it m 3 m fTOsnro ttot TO frotr tottortti
fpprfcR TO fkq lSS-’jtTT fPfTT (Wo TOo ) ft
3*TO *to 7 TO ftm vtet wm, wPmrtffn:, Tto
4\tt, fawT ifnwjr, 3m ^rPr tffafrfaET 1 9 3 1
n^rr fur^fPr ftppff aro srr^ ^
wH jet: vj^frrirrc ?r, <^rrr ftft tft,
wfr ^ q?rf to m fwr
ftRtqp wnfPr qp to Tft phtuk tot |
q^r w f?rn; qT^RT pt R^ftfwr ^
t;
*ET: XPT ; ^PT qfuftpr^ TOf 10V ^7 TPJTOTT t
•tmrtq- ftr* tpet wk vt tor v fq^ft
eto % qr frofr tito q?r froriq - tort tottt froror rItor v totto
^ ^TFt wk V ftpr w WT^TT q^t mfp3T qtt
qrorreftr % fTOtfcr qtfror qrror | 1
[^O Zo STo-f^o ^ 0 / 183 / 74 ( 262 )]
ORDER
S.O. 4894.^-Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Sheo Sharan Prasad, Village Bhopa Bazar,
Post Office Chauri Chaura District Gorakhpur, Uttar
Pradesh, a contesting candidate for election to the U.P* Legis-
lative Assembly from 183-Mundcra Bazar (SC) assembly
constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his election
expenses as required by the Representation of the People
Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10 A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Sheo Sharan Prasad to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA/183/74 (262)]
*T° WTo 4895 . — TOT:, fTOlfTO WTTOPr TO TOTOTOTO ?T
TOT ^ Pf 1974 S’ JT?, 3TTOT fatfFT TOTO % f*TO TOTUTTOT
frofrov fact isg-to^tet 3 toto totT
jrft TO?rf, TOR TO RkT WRTT^T, fWT TORTIJT, 3TOT
wrv Rfirffifirro wfirffiroR, 1 9 5 1 tot totr to from
tottt frotror *toTO vt qfif ^ mi TOfiror vtr
tfk, TOT: 3TOT 3«fkTOK 3% ^TTT W TOT RT vft,
^Troft TpR WRTO’TOT TO fil R TO^ TOT^T ^TTOTOT 7R &<fl T ufl
froror ft, frotror toTOft to tot TOTruiroft tot ft fTO toTO
TPT 5EPFTOTT TO f3R VT? rTOrT TOTO TO TO^T ft;
WTT: 3Vq wftrffiTOT TO) ITRT 1 0 ^
WEfTTO TTfTTOTRT 3TOT RTrf TOt TOTT TO froff r 4t rpTf TO TO
fircfr ttto TOV fTOTOT fTRT wron frurT qfro^ TO ttw
wk ^ TO f^rR vi TOt TOkfor ?r ?ffT toJ" TOr
TO f^pr fiurftd wtfror totto ft 1
[TTc*^oRo-f3rom-o/l 86/74( 2 6 3)]
ORDER
S.O. 4895. — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
lifted that Shri Satai, Village and Post Office Basharatpur, Dis-
trict — Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for
4039
Sec. 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1 975/ AGRAHA Y ANA 1 # 1897
election to the UP. Legislative Assembly from 1^6-Maniram
assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his
election expenses as required by the Representation of the
People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
hag not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Satai to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA/186/74 (263)]
W° *no 4896.— TO, STFfTTT W FiTTSTO ^ TOT
t ft? 1974 t TOrr fatro tot ^ f#r tttuttvt frof-
TO 333-^rf fTOfad ft wTO TOr *d**iRjK
# TO#T 7TW, TTFT TlFT *5Tf, faw OTTlTT, TOT 5P^T, Ffa
srfbfcfuw ##wr. 1951 tot to#^t totu w, fro# sttt
TOftro spr# frofro ^rTf Ttf # tfw *Tfar*r wr# fi'
S;
#T, TO: 3TO TOftTOTT TOTO ^[TOT fTO TOt TT
#, SUUft TO *TWTdT faR WTO JTTOT FT^TTTO *T$T
fan | J fTOfTO 3fPTtn W IT? # TOTHR ft TOT $ % wfa
tth to srerwflT ^ fwj ^ toIw wttjj in t;
TO TO, TOT CrftrpTTO # UTTT I0«fr ^ <njFTO *f frofaf
TOTpT qci^il <1 'iff T*J#T vi w ^ fa# # TTTO
^ qr fa# TTW # fWR *T*TT ^TOTfWPT 'tfCTO ^ TOW
^iT'f far TO *b<tvi # flTffa #*T # nuMiqfa
% faf^T ^TTcTT ^ I
fao fa°tfa/333/74( 264)]
ORDER
S.O. 4896. — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Raghuvir Saran, Village Post Kharra, District
Jalaun, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for election to
the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 333-Orai assembly con-
stituency, has failed to lodge an account ol his election ex-
penses as required by the Representation of the People
Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission Is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Raghuvir Saran to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of ti e Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA /333/74 (264)]
JTTTftr
Wo BCT° 4897. TO, farfaT TOfftT W TORR # TOT
t fa 1974 *r gr( tot faro tot * far rnwro frof-
TO * fa* 334-Wft fWfWT ft YTO ^ ^
*TT # 4# TOR, WT f St° VmT
Wt ^fkr !TfhftTftTO 1951 TO
Trq- fwff am TOfcr frotro tft ^nrr
^ TOW ? 1
TO: 'HTO ftfi 1 ^TFt RT
vft Wff TO TOWdT ^ fHt^ Wt WT^T TOTT ^
fro % ?rk, frotro TOft^r w totot ft tot | fr
TRT TO TOWW % kPT WTO TT
^ t;
TO: TO, wftrf^RTR- ^ STRT 10T ^ TOHT^ ^
®nfT TOUT TITO ^ fwft 'ft - TTTT
% ITT felt TTTO fTOR TOTT ’RTOT fTOFT S> TOFT
^ ^ «tfk ^ % f^tr to fiLchi ffkr <t
WTTFTfir % fii^n 'frfro W7TT $ I
[*fo ^o5To-f^QTTo/334/74(26S)]
ORDER
S.O. 4897. — Whreas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Badri Prasad, Village Haripura, Post Jagamman-
pur, District Jalaun, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate
for election to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 334-Kalpi
assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his
election expenses as required by the Representation of the
People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
haa not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
3. Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Badri Prasad, to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA /334/74(265>]
’HI 5 VI
Wo STTo 4898, — TO:, frofWT TOT>T W TPTT5TR ft TOT
$ fa 1974 % JTt TOT jfaffT fWT TT9T $ fa^ TTTflT TO fiftf-
WT % fa q 3 3 6-*frTOT -1 Tt ^TOVTOTT
TOT TOR. TOW 1TWTT 'ft^Tfa, faw
tot 3T§T7T, Tlfa HfafafTOT srfaftTOj 1951 TOT TOUT
TO froW BTTT Ttf vft Trfw
totT wntR Tq ;
^ftr, TO": 3TO TOtftTOTT ^ TOTpF fa^ wft" TT
fiY, qrot to wfiwur ^ fro Ttf wtot r rofaTT r
TOt four fTOtro TOft^r w to ^ ^ttuto w |
^ fa wfa qrrr w wot ^ farr wf TOf^r wr^ m
^ t ;
TO: TO, ^TTO 'TfuftUTU' CTTTT 1 0^ ^ TOTRW %
wftU rrTO3TTT «ft 3TTO fTO TOT4 - Tt WTR % fa# #
TTTO ^ UT fa# TTW # fauUT TOT TOTT f^UM ql# ^ ^
tow ^ rfk i fau; to w%ht # rrirfa ^ #^t TO
i WW^rfa % far- fur% #f*R WRT I
[Tio tfotfo faoWo/336/74( 266)]
4040
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975 / AGR AH A Y ANA J, 1897 [Part H~ ■
ORDER
S.O. 4898* — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Jaber Singh Yadav, Nagla Sukhoo, Post Office
Bhongaon, District — Mainpuri, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting
candidate for election to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from
336-Bhongaon, assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an
account of his election expenses as required by the Repre-
sentation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made there-
under ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act. the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Jaber Singh Yadav to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Lcipslative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA /336/74 (226)]
WTtff
«KT° WTo4899:~-*RT, Wriffr TT *RTtTR *PJT
19 74 *f <, f^TPT qqf ^ fatT qitu <^1 ffiqfTO
% f^rr 336*'4frfa frofTO & ^TPT STTt RF
Trif toft, trm qbiiA, fVqr
?flT qfqfafroT ^ftrPrqq, 1951 sto tor m, faqqf
5TTT ttffTO TOFt frofTO *Rf TT Ttt *ff qTfw TOt %
TOW $ ;
5 riV?: J to: 3TO qTO> feq ^TFf TT
WFfr TO TOWdT fatj ^TT°T *TTOT FLffaTq far
fqqtro TOfiEr q^ tft qwxrq qqr $fq: to
TO TO^FTOT V Prq 1 Tff Tqfar TOR qi RT*f!FW?tI ffijf $
to: to, wftjfqqq urn iov * TOjqw if fqqfaq
qiqpT trq^TTr qqq *ft Trtf *qrq vt to^ ^ feft *ff qro
tn fotff xm frorq qqr tort fwR qfr^ to ^
tfTc to tfr qnffa *r TOtrofa
^ fqtr fqrf^rq qtfro wqr $ i
[*fo q 0 qo-fqo qo/336/74/( 267)]
ORDER
S.O. 4899. — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Radhey Shyam, Village Partappur, Post Bhon-
gaon, District — Mainpuri, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting can-
didate for election to the U.P, Legislative Assembly from
336-Bhongaon assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an
account of his election expenses as required by the Repre-
sentation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made
thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Radhey Shyam, to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA/336/74 (267)]
*ni?r
TO &To49Q0:--TO:, faqfqq qrqpr TT TOTffR ffT *TCt
$ fa 1974 if grr qrn: frorq qqi * faq qrtrRR frot to
% frrq 33G-qfqtq frofaq^T fr
tr q^'r?r fq?, qrq TOj^r, fqqr
q>: q(q(qfij?q qfuftqq, 1951 qqtf[q qqpT qxj
faqqf im ftqHq Rqf Tt vtt 4f TllW
ittX, TO: ^FFffTOR RT
to towtt ^ f^ror wtot q^rftqr
t, ^ frofqq ^Tfifry qj 4V qqrarq qqT qro
TO TO^TOT firo JFtf qqfcq TIW qt | ;
TO: TO, ^TO ^fqfqqq ^ KTRT 10«F % if fqqfro
ffrqtq qqrffRT *fr tr fq^ qrf % ft^ff tff qro
% qr fiFqf TT^q^f fqsrR qqT ^TTOT fqqrq ^ qTOq ^
rfk ^ % finj TO wi%rt qff qrfhar ?ftq q4 qror-
qftr % fqq fqqf^q qffro qRqr $ 1
[qo q 0 -fifo ^ 0 / 330 / 74 /( 268 )]
ORDER
S.O. 4900. — Whereas Jhe Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Ram Bharosey Singh, Village Shyampur Bhat-
pura, Post Office Mainpuri, District, Mainpuri, U:tar Pra-
desh, a contesting candidate tor election to the U.P. Legis-
lative Assembly from 336-Bhongaon, assembly constituency,
has failed to lodge an account of his election expenses as
required by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and
the Rules made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Ram Bharosey Singh to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA/336/74 (268)3
«trifT
Wo WT 4901>-TO:, fqqfaq TOffr TOTOR ^ TOT
$ fa 1974 jq 3TTT fwrq qqr fqrTqrqiTq fqqfro
337-foTOf (TO 3TO) fqqfqq^hrfr TOrf qqf
^RfTOrr qrq ^r, ^T'jffq q^r, Drqi
qTR tftqr qfHqfeq qfqfqqq, 1951 tot qqtfR tor
qr^ ffiqqf grrr mfm q 1 # frofro tft ^rter
qrq ’MU't/i \
tftT, to: qqq q^ffTOK qro^r qror fqq 1 ^ qr «ff , iqrpff
TO TOWTr fqtr ^ JpTTO TORT R^r>rqq fer %frx,
flrafro qrqfq tt to 4f wrmn ?f qqT | ftr to to
% firo vff qqfR to qr mdlfaw q^f | ;
Sec. 3 (ii > J
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975 / AGR AH A Y ANA 1, 1897
4041
TO": TO", UITT 10^ % EPJTRW ¥ ftui HH
trrro TOf ¥ ftmt r 4r tot % wi
farfr Tjm faro tot. otto faro qfm % nro ^ wrt
*rtr frfa % fw w mtw tfr totow & tffa wr *f¥roftr
% f m fTrf^r 4rfro t i
[¥<> ¥° TTo-fao ¥0/3.17/74/( 269)]
ORDER
S.O* 4901, — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Nnksoo, Village Hira, Post Office Ajeetganj,
District, Manipur, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for
election to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 337-Kishni
(SC) assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account
of his election expenses as required by the Representation
of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shn Naksoo to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the dale of this
order.
[No. UP-LA/337/74 (269)]
BTTTOT
f>To w r° 4902 : — to:, Pnrfww totot w>\ roro
TO % far 1 9 74 ¥ ¥7TT sfaw faro TO ^ ft (TJ W1TO1TW
* ftrq; 3 3 7-froft (ot wto) fatrfTOtror ^ totot
tp* wfmn ^ tow iiwt gwfa, fwwr
tott ztw, Tot srfaftfro srfhftTOT, 1051 TO TOtflw
totu w faro sro ftfa ¥ wtf frorfror tt vm
mfm f‘ <4 ¥ ^ ;
tflr, TO: ¥, toT to *jrRr fai} WT% ’TT'rft,
¥TOft w OTTTTOT ^ftrq TOW OTTO to€VtoTI ft?7T
I, tffa fasfro otTO to to ?¥ to 1% to
W ttro % ftm qqiro tow to
wn; w, wthfror qh ror 1 0 ^ % ottow ¥ ftprfror
wrwlw u^PtOTTr ^ ffer qh % ftrrfl r 41 to
ftfat TITO ^ faro TOT OTTO faTO ufrq^ % TOW ^ WT¥
* ftp W OTTOr mfm % ¥TOtJ WPTRftT % ftp?
ftrfp rftf^T TOTT J I
[4° 3-° ¥o-fto ¥o/337/74(270)]
ORDER
S.O, 4902. — Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Vireodra, Village Bagbirua, Post Office Sugaon,
District. Manipuri, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for
election to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 337-Kishnl
(SC) assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account
of his election expenses in the manner as required by the
Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made
thereunder ;
An whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
102 G 1/75—4
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Virendra to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of cither House of Parliament
or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of
a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA/337/74 (270)]
WTiw
vro 5TT° 4 9 0 3; — ltd:, ftqfapf TOPf TOTCTFT ^ TO
1974 3r gtT ¥tTT StW frETET TOT % ftpr TOTOW ItoWw
^ ftp? 337'ftTOt (¥0 WTo) ¥ ^PT TO
TOfrT^rrv, «fr to r fiwjfr,
rr^w, M ft'ftfTO ^fuftro, I95I TO TOfftr TOU TO
ftTO 5 TTT ¥^¥¥ 7 % ftVfwW ^ 1 ^ 4 ^ *NrT ^T 4
straw ^ f;
rfrr, mr: ^frr^n: ¥, “?¥ tih qr 4 t
sruT r ?¥ utmt % ftrq ?rft f quro fp^Pttw ^ Tto
t froftpr to vft; TPTrtrnr ^ to ft ft- to
% fro ^ TJrfRT q-iROf ¥T ^PflfeT ¥lff | ;
to: to, w wftrftm trnr 104T %
«tt¥W -3to <ift ^fr qro wr % f^4r *fr tot %
wr TTrq ari ftro wwr faro qf^ro ^ ^
wfa* ffa* % ftnr w?r mfi^r ¥ ¥¥t vroftr
% ftprfW^T ¥>fTO TOTT t I
[Wo ^To-fao ¥ 0 / 337 / 74 ( 271 )]
ORDER
SjO. 4903.— Whereas the Election Commission is satis-
fied that Shri Hari Bux, Village and Post Office Kaithauli,
District, Mainpuri, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for
election to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 337-Kishni
(SC) assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account
of his election expenses as required by the Representation
of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Hari Bux to be disqualified for being chosen aa and
for being a member of cither House of Parliament or of
the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State
for a period of three years from the date of this order.
[No. UP-LA /3 37/74 (271)]
STT^fT
Tto WTo4 9Q4 : — TO:, fa^lTO'ro'ET *T¥ TOTO ft TO
& Pp TOsrt , 1974 *rg¥ TfTOr faro to % frofro % ftr¥
tot frofro ?r wro p 4V
TOTT ¥Tg, TOT ftulTl, TOTTO WW I TO, (^¥I~) , ¥tTT
¥ftftPT¥, 195 1 T¥T TOTU TU faTOt ffTTT
toTto to¥ frotro wfTT4 4t TOfew ¥ totot
tS# ;
4042 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1 975 /AGRAHA YANA 1, 1897 [Part II
tfk jrt, ^kfatxpc ^ tfxf faM uk xt xY ,
xrMr.^x xxfxxt M fair Mfa tout to ^ ffan
ft, xk, faMfafi ’qr^fm' ft x? MY xxtxr ifr xxr ft ft? xrx
w xfixRxr % fax Mfa xxfar to^t qTTOqYfaFT xftf ft ;
XX, W,OTT XfafalX Mt XRT 10F % X^X^ if fafahR
Xfafa XXTXTTT ^ MY Tkl JTTTT Tt XX3 M flrcft MY
*m % xr farfr TTTq Mr ta fmr xxxt famx qfkk M txtx
• apr ftM xk ftfa % fax cx xfavr MY trnCnir x ?fk xM Ml
FRrrxfa M fax faxfftx MrfaTT fto ft i
[M° ^XTfao Fo/ 43 / 74 ]
ORDER
8,0. 4904. — Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Sbri Narcndm Kumar Sahoo, Village Singhalo, P.O.
Khalarda, Cuttack (Orissa), a contesting candidate for elec-
tion to the Orissa Legislative Assembly from Cuttack Sadar
constituency, held in February, 1974 has failed to lodge an
account of his election expenses as required by the Repre-
sentation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made there-
under;
And whereas* the said candidate even after the due
notice has not given any reason or explanation for the failure
and the Election Commission is further satisfied that he has
no good reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Narcndra Kumar Sahoo to be disqualified for being
chosen as nnd for being a member of either House of Par-
liament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Coun-
cil of a State for a period of three years from the date of
this order.
[No. OR-LA/43/74J
xfavT
fafaY, 15 XFJXT, 197 5
FTo STTo 49 05. — FT:, frVFR XTXfa FT XXTTTR ftt XXT
ft fa 1 97 4 M XTR sfavf fa-XR THE M ftpr FTUTFT
% fax 1 6-Tmrpi faxfaR 51 X M q fa Mf
WMH XXTO XXX, TTXTT, TOT Mfa faTfafXcX Slfa-
ftUR 1951 TXT TXtfR 5RR XX ftr^TTOt fflTT Wrfm XTT ffRkR
FT Mfa MY XTfaw ®t> vl M XTTHTT XQ ft ;
tfk, xt: ret T^fam T, TO m fax tot qr vfT,
XhMV TO ^FTHrlT M fax Mfa xnxr XXXT X$T faqT
ft, xYc, farfad XTTR XT q^ MI XTHTR W ft fa TO%
XIX TO qWTRT % fat* Mfa tMrt FTTX XT xftf ft ;
X?f: w, rrftTfRXR um iox? % *FJF'F n T ^f fxxWx
VrxPT FX^TTT MY «1WT Xh XTR ^ ftxff MY RR %
xt ft.Mr ■'TRxMr fair ft fvtt wxt faurr qfw^ % wx
<qk ftfa % ftrer ^r qitx Mf xrfPff M rfk xx Mt xMRfy
^ farx farfftx xtfaR xrtt ft 1
[to Xo-fto M/ 16 / 74 ( 272 )]
ORDER
New Delhi, the 15th October, 1975
S.O, 4905.— Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shri Aslam Khan, Aslam Bhawan, Rampur, Uttar Pra-
desh, a contesting candidate for election to the U.P, legis-
lative Assembly from 16-Kashipur, Assembly constituency,
lias failed to lodge an account, of his election expenses as
required by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and
the Rules made thereunder;
And whereas, the said candidate even after dfie notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said
Act., the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Aslam Khan to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament or
of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State
for a period of three years from the date of this ordQr.
[No. UP-LA/16/74 (272)]
ifTTo 3 TTo 4 9 06 * — XX:, frxfax FTXfa XT XXTXTX ftt XXT
ft ftr 1 9 7 4 M jx 3Trc srkr fxGH frt . mmvn faxfax
Tr ftpr 29-x^xff faVrxx-^x ?t ^xix xfar xtMYtxit MV
xk?r ftr?r, xtx x Mte wfar, wm, faror ^ttxtxtx,
MYt xfafaftpx Fftrfaxx, 1951 x«rr xxMtx xxtx xp faxMf
tttt xxx fxxtxx 5 xxr xr Mlf Mf xrlw tttR M
XXXJfT xft ft ;
xk, xx: x^fkxiT Y to fax Text,
XXXY UT XXXiXXi M fax, XXXI FTOftvOX xftf fan
ft, xk, faxYxX mx>r TT X^ Mr XXTtJTX XXT ft fa
xrt fx xt hr 5 r T 4 Ti txYr ^tct xt rttYx?x xftt ft ;
XX: XX, xfdfaxx *TTTT 1 0 *F ^ X^JXTX M faxWx
xrxfa MY- fa^ Mr Mrfa; M faMT r xT xxx M
xt fadY tt^x MV fauTT xxr xxxt faxR xftx^ M
xk ftfa M fax w xfax MV XTTfar M Mk xM MT ^irtxTx
M fax farfax Mrfax ftr ft i
[Mo x°'fao Fo/29/74/( 273)]
ORDER
S,0* 4906. — Whereas the Election Commission Is satisfice
that Shri Saiendra Singh, Village & Post Office Panbasa, Sam
bhai, District, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candi-
date for election to the U. P. Legislative Assembly from
29-Bahjoi, assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an ac-
count of his election expenses as required by the Representa-
tion of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made there-
under ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure ant
and the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no gooc
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the sale
Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the saic
Shri Satcndra Singh to be disqualified for being, choaer
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament oj
of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a Siat<
for a period of three years from the date of this order.
[No. UP-LA /29/74 (273)
Sec. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 4043
wrfcr
49 0 7- — m: t fatfdd Wfar 1U TOTO *RTT
ft IV 1974 ^ jjtt ^n: srftvr fatim to % fad toit^t fftrfad
fad 49 -faftfaT fTOfa*Rfa ft tot mft «ft
fSRTH *TftV Tfo TO dftfaY, fWT 1JTOTO, ^R, ST^T, ftW
RfafafuR TTfafror, 1 9 s 1 to rr^ffa wtj to froftf skt
*falw *T'rt fftqfa;r *wf ftt fasTT iTfa^r qnft ft
WWTft ft ;
ftfa, TO 1 ; 'JWfalR ft, ^jft TOT *TT fad '’lift TO ftt»
WftV W WTTO % faq Tt$ dTOT dftf fm\
ft, fa^iror tor to ftt toto $ tot ft fa to
w sttotot % fad to£ mrfar iro^ m wnflfaw ^r|f ft ;
TO: TO, 3 *PT dfafftro ift ITRT 10 T % ’fl^WT ft falfTO
irriftn' d<rc5Rr p 4f gtTTO TOT vt TO* % fTOT ftr tiro ^
in faftr \tto ift faur* wu mu ffttim T rfo^ ftr tow ^
TOr TO ftrft % fad W TOfa ift mTO ft TO TO *fft Tisn-
TO fad TOfar ftrfTO ^rcarr ft i
[ft° ^Jo TO-ffto ^ 0 / 40 / 74 ( 274 )]
m faftt W iff fatfFT *Rfl WIT fftTO Tf^ TOR ^
^ TO TO ft? fmr TOm ftfi TOfa ft TO TO iftin^nTOr
^ fad TOl^r fttfTO itw ft 1
[ft° ^o tfo-ffto Ho/42/74( 275 )]
ORDER
,w ,C c\ * 90 **r-Whtrta$ the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shn Asharfi Lai, Village & Post Olficc Dahgawan, Dist.
Budaun, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for election
V Lce , 13lat i vc I Assembly from 42^Sahaswan, assemfa
lv constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his election
expenses as required by the Representation of the People Act,
1501, and the Rules made thereunder ;
w n l, W ^ ereaS - the said candida,c cv -n after due notice
n °f 8 , . ven an >' re ?son or explanation for the failure and
(he Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Ac?7h*T,^;J n P l,rsuance of section 10A of the Said
Shri Ash-iffi r T f Co 5" nils 5, ,on *?orcby declares the said
A3 harfi f.al to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament or
foVa'nS 3 f V ih ASSSmb,y ? r legislative Council of a State
for a period of three years from the date of this order.
[No. UP-LA /42(275)]
ORDER
S.O. 4907. — Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shri Sultan All, Village & Post Office, Aincholi, District
Moradabad, ULtar Pradesh, a cons isting candidate for elec-
tion to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 40-Risauli, assem-
bly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his elec-
tion expenses as required by the Representation of the People
Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said
Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Sultan Ali, to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament or
of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State
for a period of three years from the date of "this order.
[No. UP-LA /40/74(274)]
%Wtvr
*tfT° ®TT° 49 0 8- — Uf:, LMw qW>T Id WTOR ftt UU
ft fa 197 4 f 5 ^ dTR fa0Td tHtt % fair flTtjm faffat
% 4 2-^r^WTd
wpt, trm d mwn fiwr
xrf^finriT, 1 9 5 1 mn uz famfi
JRT ■CTPt' fddtW ^TT W.VZ if
wrm dft ft ;
«fR, jrt: did d^fffirrR ft, m pw fftft ^uft qr '4Y,
wftt x$ ^ fair ^ fftm
ft, *rtr, fdifdd wifpr w d? r 4f wrmd ftt w ft fa dffa ti*t
iftf qd?dr ^ 777 ^ irr ^ni flfa^ qftr ft ;
W: w, Wr ^rfafftw ift ehtt 1 oir ’CTdroir ft
^rfttn dd^TTT ftt TT»rq5f ift m* % faftt ftr tot %
^rr^r
1do«no 4909-— 1974
ft yr dvR rtn famd wu * fad mcrR<jr farfad % ffm
38-fadnrjr ft ^ Wjfft 17ft ^TftfaiR «ft
fa^, jm ?pRf, fa^r rm^r, ftfa
^rfafafarq <#m, 1951 to tott ffmf jrt
*fafad wft sqftf itt ft<ar fVfft ft ^rfarr irrft ft %mu
^ t :
ftfa, trcr ^ftfadR % tt fftrR ftr
imfiTf «n ^ifr wTmd ftr to ft fa ^fa w w-
% fa^ iftf mrfar wtvj\ u ^dflfaTtr dftr ft ;
w: w, sffyfTOT ift trnr io*p ^
Td^rrr tot dm fft^ ift ftro % faftV ftt tot $ m
faftt tto ift fum H^rr wtt firro qfr^ ^ tow ^ft inft
ftfa ftTft % fad W TTlifa ifft mffa-' ft fttd iff ift ftr
fad fftr%?r fttfftd iTO ft 1
[fto ^0 qo-ffto do/38/74( 276)]
— Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
hat Shri Nazar Singh, Village Gokul Nagri, Tahsil Bilaspur,
District Rampur, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for
election t 0 the U. P. Legislative Assembly from 38-BiIaspur,
assembly constituency, has failed to lodge his account of elec-
tion expenses in the manner as required by the Representa-
tion of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made there-
under ;
And whereas after considering the representation of
the said candidate the Election Commission is satisfied that
he has no good reason or justification for such failure ■
Now therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said
c u / ^ Elt ^ io n Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Nazar Singh, to be disqualified for being chosen
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 [Part li-
as and for being a member of either liousc of Parliament or
of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a S' ate
for a period of three years from the date of this order.
[No. UP-LA/38/74(276)]
stoItor ft, to fro on ft 77 ftt,
to % fro ipri q«rrr TTCfaT'rf trtjf firm
ti wmr *t to fttTOiiro *mi £ fa to
% fro TO$ toTO ^.R^r m *uTOfTOr ^ | ;
*TTTO
vt° an 49i o. — to, fTOTOr snftm «pt TprmK ft w
tfa 19 7 4 ft ^7 d T1 V TOvf fTOK TO{T % feitr HTUIR^T fftVr^T
% fir? 338-^tfTT Mrm-m ft m ft $rrft sTOYtott TO
7T*T TOft mw, tTPR TOfTOr, ftk STTo 57 ft fwtj 3^7
TOur, ftR yrftffftfTOr TOTOftro, 1951 rf«TT a^TOt tout mr
trot hrt TOrfTO fftfthrr *TOf *n TOf TO TOt TOTO
qTO ft toto' t ;
sfR, ?r: ott wfbmT ft, TO m ^ptt fW <5nft 77 TO,
fTFft TO *mm T * ftp? TO WTOT FPTOffTW TOf fan
I, TO7, fWm TOpT VT ^ 'fr TPTPJPT {ft TOT fcfa ^TOft TO
% fftq m ^nfrlTOr t ;
TO, vj«w TOiifium aft ETiRl 10TT % if fftqfTO
Pd^aKT 3TO TO 7TIT HT^r TO ftTO % ftTO vfr TnRT %
^ fNt xm TO faro tmr from Tfnr^ % tow ^ft arm
tfhr fttft % fim TO *lft*T aft dTTO ^r TpRT ^t «PT*TT«rfft %
fap fftrf^T TOfftcT I |
[*0*O ^0-f^o ^0/338/74( 278)]
ORDER
the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shn Rad hey Lai, Village Pashupur, P.O. Mohnbbatpui,
Distnct Mainpuvi, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for
election to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 338-Karhal
assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his
election expenses as required by the Representation of the
People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder ;
<rcr xnr, flfsfopr 1ft hrt ion % wiuTnT ft fftqfa>r
itttfpT uflyitj ijw ^itr tt^r hrt nt % fnrft nt ttft
4 r tn fnrfr trit ^ fntuR thti tmi Pthpt ^ trrt ^
tftr %fntf w m^ir TTrOsr tt tfk >£r TRntrTiT
% fetT Pr^tt HTfiPT nrm t i
[ijo ^0 qo-Pfo ^0/338/74( 277)]
nna wnereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
ihe hlection Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said
Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shn Radhey Lai to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of cither House of Parliament or
of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a Sfatc
for a period of three years from the date of this order.
ORDER
S.O. 4910, — Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shri Ram Sanchi Lai, Village Tarolia, P.O. Ktirra, Dis-
trict — Mainpuri, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for
election to the U. P. Legislative Assembly from 338-Karhal,
assembly constituency, has failed to lodge tin account of his
election expenses as required by the Representation of the
People Act. 1951, and the Rules made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said
Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Ram Sanehi Lai to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament or
of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State
for a period of three years from the date of this order.
[No. UP-LA /338/74 (277)]
STT^T
vto 4911 . — to fmrfaPT ttptPt *ftt mmrpr tot
|f¥ 1 974 JTJ ^Tpr rftTT fadR *HTT % ftTR ^mnrq" fipTfcffi
ifr far* 338 -mr^t *n£r ^
7m m^r, urn 'fte ^iPtrt Ptott
fl^TSlT, StfirfhfiOT TOfiT, 195 1 TO7T T\W$R W
fhroPr jm ^ in^t^r tot tt *ftf vft mj
[No. UP-LA/338 /74(278>]
*rftT7r
VTo ^To' 49 12. — TO:, ffiVfTO WlTO TOTUFT f\ TOP
tfi* 1974 % ^TR TOIT ^7 f^Tq
^ HiO 3 3 8-^TppT PrqfTO-ftl 1 ^ ^TPT ^ttP)toTT
rn^T, TOT ^ 7t73 TOTlTOf, fwT frfjft, TO7
qfhfdFurq nftrfhro, 1951 tot to fronff
tot.t sftfftn ftfir qTO frotro *rof Tot ft
TO: TOftTOR 3% Tl^PF g;TOI firft orr% 77 ftf,
RT ’tTTOTOT % ffttT ^TTTO TOTT FT gft^TO fTOT
fth, fivffro *to>t to ftr ftr 1 1ft qro
TO troqTTOT % fTO TftRT ^TVn qi np?frfft?iT ^ ;
TO: TO, UT71 10^ ^ iff^TTO ft finrfTO
RTftPT TOTOTTT OTT *sft TO 11 ^ ^ fifTftt ftt TT^r ^7
m feftt TRq ^ f^rtTTR TRIT ^TTOT fftiTH qftTO % TORT ^ft
onft tftr ^tft % fro TO «ft dTThg- ft ftffT v<f ift nrrmTfiT
qr fro fhTtftd ftrfro ^rttt % i
[fto I'O 5To-ffto TT 0 / 338/74 ( 279 )]
ORDER
S.O, 4912. — Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shri Munna Lai, Village and Post Office Bcrnahal, Dis-
trict — Mainpuri, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for
election to the U. P. Legislative Assembly from 338-Karhal,
assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his
Sec. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 4045
election expenses in the manner as required by the Repre-
sentation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made
thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason ot justification foi such failuic ;
Now therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of \he said
Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Munna Lai to be disqualified for bein$ chosen
as and for being a member of cither House of parliament or
of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State
for a period of three years from the date of this order,
[No. UP-LA /33 8/74(279)]
1 5 197 5
*To 3 TTo 4913.— TO:, m ffffTGTff ut TOT t fir
1 974 if ju TOC TOff fitJTff ffff r $ fm. ffTffTCff *
ftrer jewr tost froNff ft toVtott
to tot for?, to vto togt vtr:
firffr Trrrjr, toc sfiff, ttof yfirfifro GfafiTO, 1 95 1 w
vrfft TOTff m fifffff 3TTT GTO fTOfipT TOT *TT ^TT
srftrr if GtfTiff $ ;
tfk, to: to totwc ir, tptof fin; tR to -41,
wft ifftfw % tro ^iXff gw nff fw
ft, gV:, Prrfro giTO ffr fft wtutg $r tot ft fir to
W WT5[ % f^iT qfyf TOfa totot gt «rr*rVfaw | ;
Gff: Gff, TO GfafiffG TOP 1 0^7 GffffTff if fmrfTO
gtto t^aror to *sft to to hro * frofr 4t wt
m firft tot faro to gw fnriff ^ w
^ ^ ^ ^ W Griff ^ ffrftsr ^ fffff ^
ffr^rrarfr $ Iro frefitf ^ftPra' *ror ft i
[ffo ffo Go-fio ffo/36/74 ( 28 o)]
ORDER
New Delhi, the 16th October, 1975
S,0* 4913* — Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
Shri Ram Pal Singh, Village Chandupuri, P,0. Lamba Khera,
Tahsil Suar, District-Rampur, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting
candidate for election to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from
36-Suar Tanda, assembly constituency, has failed to lodge
an account of his election expenses in the manner as required
by the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the
Rules made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said
Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Ram Pal Singh to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament or
of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a Slate
for a period of three years from the date of this order.
[No. UP-LA /3 6 /7 4(2 8 0 >J
VT o WTo 4.914. — W, GTGtff TG TOTUTT TOT
| pF 1974 if JR TOT TOff fiffTT TO t far? mtTKff
% faff 3 6-m ttw firofTO ste tr TOfaro
*fr gzjg GifTff erf, fft^ror gto ttgjt., grn:
G^7T, GpTfffftRG GFtffiRff, 195 1 W TOR W7 *TR
if GG9R T? | ;
gR, qff: '3ffi ^T } '3’^" ffrtpF ffR TT
r 4V, Wff W G7F5W % fWT t ^TRff
fkm gK gRr w ^ r +P ffqTtnff ?fr w t ft 7 .
Tiff Iff GffffW % PffCT *Ftf TTftd TTfffT TT ^
A* . ‘
? i
G5T: Gff, ffplftHff fcTRT 1 0’F % if Rfffffff
ffrtfPr RTWTT eft Gfffff tfff fftR % RR fft
% Gr TRT’ Tft RrjPT ffffT % WG
%% ffR gVt ^ % fair Iff ff Rff R'rfr^- & ritT* ^
fflfflTfiiT % fffC{ PrRg Ftftff TRTT | 1
[ffo ffo Go-pTo ffo/36/74( 281)]
ORDER
S*0* 4914* — Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shri Abdul Aziz Khan, Mohalla Sami Sadat Yar Khan
Ram pur, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for election
to the U,l\ Legislative Assembly from 36-Suar Tanda,
assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his
election expenses as required by the Representation of the
People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said
Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Abdul Aziz Khan, to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either Elouse of Parliament or
of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State
for a period of three years from the date of this order.
[No. UP-LA /36/74(281>]
GT4ff
HTTo GTo 4 9 15.— TO , G'Rtff T7T ffTTlTR ft W
| Iff 1074 ^ gn jpfrr fVmff ffffr % iw ffrmTff f^RNff
% fi?r^ 3 6WT ztff t RdRw Gtff ff^fnr^rn:
p 4f IffffTffff FGR, fffffT TTffR. ; ffrPC
sritff, T fd fn fijfG ffhjlffqff, 195] TOT qffTU W
Rtot GhftTff ffrh m
Fffff ff GffW I ;
G’h:, TO: TO ^T, fffffff qffffT fez ffR T7
r 4Y, wfr ^ff GTOTOT ^ fffn Tdf TO^JT TOTT ffTr'rhTffff
fop t, gR, frorro GPfni rr ^ R tothtp ffr tot ft ft?
Tiff w GffWffT % Rv Tht qffRr TTRff Gr^rr^fiTOr
Hfr | ;
. TO: Gff, TO fffhRffP Mf tTRT 10^ ^ # mWff
GifffG iff «ft ftnp erf to % ftfffl* r 4r pro
^ ffT ftffft TITO fTOTff Flfff G^^IT Rtllff TfTffiT TT ff<TO
4046
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1 975 /AGRAHA YANA L, 1897 [Part II—
^ %)< $ fa*? ??T # tfrxb* % hr *4 ^
f f$TFTO ^ fa'? tftfarT ''PTdf $ I
[flo ^ TOfao H-o/36/74 ( 282)]
ORDER
S.O. 4915. — Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shri Risalat Khan, Mohalla Kashipur, Tahsil Suar, Dis-
trict. — Rampur, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for elec-
tion to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 36-Suar Tanda,
assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his
election expenses as required by the Representation of the
People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;
And whereas, the said candidate even after dute notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now therefore, in punuance of soction 10A of the said
Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Risalat Khan to be disqualified for beinjj chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament or
of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State
for a period of three years from the date of this order.
[No, UP-LA/36/74 (282)]
3TT*?T
fa?#, 17**^, 1975
*rro 3TTo 4 916. — TO, ftqFw VT#I tft TOT
$ f¥ 1971 if tot faro $ firu totto frofro
% Ettt 3 4 o-to*:rt (toF<h to 1 ^ftTOTT
j»jfr toto to sttPeh, totr, fror tot
3T4qT, FffiffifTO 19 5 1 TO TOR TOR TO M
*nxr sftftrer FrVt^r tt vft srfiTO
if x% $ ;
wftx, TOT. TO? TOftTOT 3?T TO4? ^TT f^T ^TPf TT
?fr, stTO to 'tHWf ^ fro; ^toft smrr ^
fro $, sftc frofro vpt>t *ft 3T? '4t tooth tot | fa
to wwxft' % ftnr qqfar tot*t ^
t;
ot: to, to? xrfafwr tim i o* % TO/H ,j r if frofaR
to *fr ijtof *pt fto % FtnffV tfr fto
^ m .Mt xrro faro to wxr Ptoh ’ifaR ^ toto
^ serb* sftx jjfa i - firo to ^rr^xr mTfa & dfa ^4 ^
fan; fax%r ^ i
[HO 3o STa-fa* TT./340/74 ( 283)]
ORDER
New Delhi, the 17th October, 1975
9 0. 4916. Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shri M abend ra Mudgal,, Village and Post Office Padham,
District Mainpuri, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for
election to the TCP. Legislative Assembly from 340-Jasrana,
assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his
election expenses as required by the Representation of the
People Act, 1951 and the Rules made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
ha 3 not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
3. Now therefore, in pursuance oi section LOA of the said
Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Mahendra Mudgal, to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of Parliament or
of the Legislative Assembly or Legislatives Council of a State
for a period of three years from the date of this order.
[No. UP-LA/340/74 (283)
Vto «To 4917. — TO *mr>T *FT TOtH l PTT
t ft» 1 9 7 4 4 tox 5r%?r fatjR % ftrq wnmyi
t fwr 3 4u-7Jr?n:Rr m § ^ *r?r
«fr»rdt fiTR^r?r xrnw, trnr h tocrt, fmj
tot srtbrr, hPf yfitfirfuFx 1951 mrr
3rxrtr rrrr firqxff 5TRT f^arf^rq- WTJff ^ %VT
4rfirr if xir t ;
wVt, to to Tjaftrort b", 1 $ fw
’4t, w TT^rwrr fiTO ^)r
forr rftx, hrEt qrr hit 4^ HtntjR tft w fv
TO RTOTOr % f^rcr ^TF ^
t ;
TO W, ^ ilfTT 10^ % if frqfar t
TTTTPT rrfTOTXT 4tmfV fVq^ifr ^ ^ UTO % fV4t 4t
fto % ^rr xito iff firETH w ufVqq %
«rr^ «fk ^ ^ firq mfrtsr ?r rfPr ^ *r?r
TOTOfa % fi=R firxf^T mf^^T qtXtTT I I
[4o JTo-fqo Fo/340/74 ( 284)]
ORDER
S.O. 4917, — Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shrimati Vimlesh Yadav, village and Post Office Pendhat,
District Mainpuri, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for
election to the U. P. Legislative Assembly from 340-Jasrana,
assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his
election expenses as required by the Representation of the
People Act, 195L and the Kules made thereunder;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied (hat he has no good
reason or justification for such failure;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said
Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
mati Vimlesh Yadav to be disqualified for being chosen as
and for being a member of either House of Parliament or
of the Legislative Assembly or Legislaive Council of a State
for a period of three years from the date of this order.
[No. UP-LA /340/74(284)]
vto hto 4918 .* — to frofro *mfpr «rr frtto tot
| Pf 1 9 7 4 *f JR tot tojt fxtrpr *nrr ^ fro Frmrro
% firu 3 4 1-fHTtx frofro tff^r ^ ^ ^ ^ftro rr
xnr Rr^, to ttotot nVarr vzrfi, i) 0 %no nmtx, toft,
iftTOj Rrsrr "xnr vfhfiTTO, 1951
Sec. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 4047
tot f4tt totT to fftFm jru srftfro iM farfro *rof tt
*fti ftt ftran FTftrr wft ft wr xft ft ;
TO: TO TOftFFR ft, ^?ft TOW ftTT TTrft qr ftt
trcftt to ^ fror qft$ ttto sttot Frt
ft, tflr, f^t^r tofW ft to ftr tottor ftV tot ft F* wtt%
qro to q uwn i * firo Vrf toFr Frro qr wtrIFmcf F#r ft ;
Htf: OT, TO FfftfftFF *ft tTTTT lOF* % ^PJTOR ftfimbn
q T F > T rrfl^KT TO Mt TO fft^ TOTF % ftt TTTO HT
fftrftr ttto qft Ftto ^r tort fftTO qfrro % fto
^ fttft * farr to irtsr qft *rrffar ft FtF F<t *ft vi^rwftr
% fir^ ffttf^r tftflrr ft i
[*• ^° ^°-^ 0 »T®/34l/74 ( 285)]
S.O. 4918 . — Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shri Ram Singh, Village Shyam Nagar, Mnnja Patsui,
P.O. Amor, Nagla Jeewan DistricLMainpuri, Uttar Pradesh,
a contesting candidate for election to the U.P. Legislative
Assembly from 341-Ghiror, Assembly constituency, has failed
to lodge an account of his election expenses as required by
the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and <he Rules
made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Ram Singh, to be disqualified for being chosen as and
for being a member of cither House of Parliament or of the
Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State for a
period of three years from the date of this order.
[No, UP-LA/341 /74 (28 5)]
*To 49 19— TO:, fftF^R TOFpT FT TOWR fft TOT
ft 1974 ft wr stTtt Ffutf fto % frrq towto FtoEr
ft 3424 ^ 5 ^ ft f;ftf srftteFK
jftt q$q fft$, to qfto to farin'
^tTC qftur, *frqr fFtoFto srFyFTFF, 1951 to ffr
ttf Ftoft aT^r «rHirer tuft frofaR ft fttf r 4V ft^T
FTfarft if ft ;
xfre, to: * ft, wtf fin* Trft qr
ftt, to TO4>Hm % fir* tttut toft wtitaror qftf
fcrr ft, qftr, fft^rr TOffir bft ^ ftt tour w ft fft
wft qpr «TTTW FT
^ ft;
tpr: w, ^rftrfwT qft uro tov % fft^Tra
TmfP r ^ fftff Tt TRTF ^ f 1 ^ TpTT %
FT foftt TRF ffttTFT Witt WFT fcrR ^
irrft ^ftr fttft ftr fw w vrftw ^ ir 4ft ^r^nFftr
ftr Ptf firrfftF fttfftn* ft 1
[rfo ^-o Fo-fFo Fo/342/74 ( 286)]
ORDER
S.O. 4919 . — Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shri Puhup Singh, Village Pirpur, P.O. Sikandrapur,
District Mainpurl, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for
election to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 342-Mainmiri,
assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his
election expenses as required by the Representation of the
People Act, 1951. and the Rules made thereunder;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Puhup Singh to be disqualified for being chosen as and
for being a member of either House of Parliament or of the
Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of . a State for
a period of three years from the date of this order.
[No. UP/LA/342/74 (286))
*uftur
VTo VJO 4920. — tttt:, fftqW^T qq- TFTPTR ft TOT
ft % 1 974 ft JTftiT fftfjR w*tt f^r 37tfP?*r
f w 4 4-^1^47^ ft ^14= ^r?ft Fift
\Ttt TO ^ «ft ftftt TJtt, ftt^TT Ffftqr,
fwr ite T, tot. ftHr 1951
f«tt OTR TOiTT qn fftaftf sto ?rqft fWNpf wrftf tt
*fft£ ftt ^rfw ft tow 7;ft ft ;
fttr, TO: TO) ^rftVTOIT: ft, Stt TOFf ^TOT fer Ifjft qr ftt,
5TRt TO % fftrr ^ 5T r 4FT Fftf fftFT
ft, fttr, fiRfTO ?rrftPr 'ftt tot*jr ir FFr ft ffti fto
To fl^RiTOT ^ fftt Ttf qqfR q-j- ft ]
TO: TO, TO wfirfftFF ftft STRT ! 047 ftr IFJTR’F ft
TOTtF TOWTT TO sfV XTF PTTO 5ft ftTO % fftrftt ftt RR
^ FT fTftt TRF 5ft fFETR F'SRT TOFT FfTOT qfTTO % TOTF
■qft mft ?ftft % fftR to “Fiftw qft ft fr f 4 5ft
FTORfft ^ fro. FftIto rfrfftq TRrfT ft I
[ftc Tjo qc-FFo fto/ 344/74 ( 287)]
ORDER
S.O. 4920. — Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied that
Shri Ram Swaroop, S/o Shri Beni Ram, MohaJIa Jatavan
Town Area Sahawar, Distt. Etah, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting
candidate for election to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from
344-Patiali, Assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an ac-
count of his election expenses as required by the Representa-
tion of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the said
Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said Shri
Ram Swaroop S/o Shri Beni Ram to be disqualified for being
chosen as and for being a member of either House of Parlia-
ment or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council
of a State for a period of three years from the date of this
order.
[No. UP-LA /344/74 (287)]
4048
THL GAZHTTII OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1 975/AGRAJTAYANA 1, 1897 | Par r IT -
M\^H\
mobile 4ft 2 1, — TO:, FftTto ^PT>T TT TORTO TOT
§ft 1974 *r jtt to r h>ttt fwR tot % fro murro firtfro
fatr 344-Tfcrmt to* to^it
«fr TW TT*T Rtf «fV "JTTr^fV, 3TTOT, £I3rT Trfw, T^ETT
PTOT TOT, TOT 3T^W, TfH tffdPtPTOT StPtFtTO, 1951 TOT rr#PT
cttot to frmi gm fiT'Tfro *to* <ft Ttf iff ttar
srftlTO ^ totto t^ | ;
(fir to; 'dxti tt, u Eii t^tott fro, tt tft,
toto w <r^TOf ^ Ftr ^tt<t wr tor
$, <lTT, JTi*fbT ^51 ^ 'fft TlTOTR ^ TOT £ ft TO% ^TT
TF % f^rcr to^tt <r[Tq m FTHflfror £ ;
w: *rftrfim *ft ritt 10 * tFjrrrq ^ frofro
*rrqrVr Rtf^jm to; Pitot Tt ttto ftrfr tot % ot
frrft rm faror tprt xitot ftmT % toft ^ tt*
*rft 5 ft *S fro to ^r?m ^?r TrfPr *r fR tftf tft TTrorftr
^ Ptt ftrftr ^ftfatf *7Ttfi | i
[f° tjo 71 o/345/74 ( 269)]
ORDER
S.O. 4922. — Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shri Girand, Village Muzaffarpur, Hirodi, Post Kangrol,
District Etah, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for
election to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 345-Sakit,
assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his
election expenses as required by the Representation of the
People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;
srcr to, tot mfaPm qfr uttt kff % st^nTO ?f Pprfro
TOTtTT TTtfRaTTT TO sfr TO ETTO Rtf *fT TOl*t tft FTO ^
fqrdt dr Tiro ^ *nftrfr tito 5ft fwR tot sttot Ftor qfx^r
% TOTO T?r ITT^ tfrr, K)^r ^ ftfR ^TT ^f*7T TfiTtl % ?flT
^ ^ ^ f^iT^ pn:^ qtfad ^ I
[TTo Vo-fao 770 / 344 / 74 ( 288 )]
ORDER
S.O. 4921. — Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shri Ram Swnroop Son of Shri Bhawani, Mohalla
Jatwan, Tow Area Sabawar, District Etah, Uttar Pradesh,
a contesting candidate for election to the U, P. Legislative
Assembly from 344-Patiali assembly constituency, has failed
to lodge an account of his election expenses as required by
the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules
made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after duo notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
[as not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Girand to be disqualified for being chosen
as and for being a member of either House of
Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative
Council of a State for a period of three years from the date
of this ordei^
[No. UP-LA/345/74 (289)]
trrfar
VTo ^TT 0 4923. — TO - :, fh^rW^T TO*fPT TTRTtrPT TOT ^
fa 1974 t TOT faSTTO 7TR[ $ TTIUTOT FtoHh
$ ftpT 347-ifTTpfir frotro-TO § tfpt
vft fro, GET TOTTFJT, Tfo TO7^ f f^PTT TOT ST^T,
rftr sirnPife y trfuPm, 1951 tot fr #r totr tr frorf am
7 ft ^rsr afPa-^ ^
^ I;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Ram Swaroop S/o Shri Bhawani to be disqualified for
being chosen as and for being a member of either House of
Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative
Council of a State for a period of three years from the date
of this order.
[No. UP-LA /344/74 (288)]
TTo Wto 1922.— TO:, PtoITO Wf FT *FT TOTUTT $t TOT $
1974 TOT H^T fTOTO TT^T % FTT TTIETraT fTOf^TO
^ PTO 345TT#a: TOftrorr «ft
Priro, qrq TOnT tot itot fror ret tot
TOF ’uf'TlWT, 195 1 TOT TOTR qR fTORl
am frotro^rot Tdf vft ^ifro tt^t
t^ ^ ,
?fk, TO: TO ^fTTOTT ^r, RTOl faTT TT
>fft wvt ^ % Pto ^ XPTOT FU^Tq 1 fT§
Fptt ^T f fTOtro wmPi H ft FmuET $ w t ft
qiF to »ro % fro to'ri *HTq qr
#;
7T^ ^ ^ft^T ^ 7TOT RTOT ftR HT^t 7T
vft, iffTTt TO ^ fqR TITO TOTT FT^ftTO
fTOii tfT, frotTO , m#T tt ^ *fr Trmuro ^twt ft
RTF T7T TOT^TdT T 1 ftR Tt$ TTTO Rf ^mflfTOT % i
to ^brFnnr «rn l <lt ^ wsjttto ^ Frotro
OTfPT R^rTT TO «ft ftnj Tt TfTO ^ ftTft »ft TTTO
^ 3TT ftTftTlVU f^STR 7H1T T1TOT fTOl^T Tfr^ ^ TTW ^
1TI% tflT faRTO tr qpr ^ Ti^riTftr
^ ftR frTffT TTdT ^ I
[q° ^To sto-fto Ho/ 347/74 ( 290 )}
ORDER
SO 4923.— Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
hat Shri Tej Singh, Village Nasaratpur, Post Office Nad rai.
district Etah, Uttar Pradesh, a contesUng candidate for
lection to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 347-Kasganj,
ssembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his
lection expenses as required by the Representation of the
>eonle Act 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure :
Sec. 3 ( ii) J THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 4049
Now, therefore, in purauance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Tej Singh to be disqualified for being
chosen as and for being a member of either House of
Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative
Council of a State for a period of three years from the date
of this order.
[NO. UP-LA/347 /74 (290)]
492<.— w:, farWfi* srriri tt TOT
ft fa 1974 ir jit ^ fauK rrm * fm, rntrirr
* 347-Tr^3T ft ^'TTf ^
»sft WfTTtT, WT^T TCWfL WW, frmT t^Tt,
^ur, Trfafaftrc* trfafwr, 19 5 1 tf«rr T^rrq: farof am
«rri writ tt *ft ^twt *tPit ?r *r*rr*r
t ;
*jk, irt: to: ^ ^ttt fVr irri <rc riV,
smt w *m - wu ^ ^rr*r *mr pMitt ^ fan
ft, wk, ftrckPT *rrik tt it j Kft ^rmsrpr <£r toi ft fa ^*fa tht
w <rcrfi?T<rr % %(t iptf 'mfcr ft ;
sfd': flf, ^ flfirPrw <fV ^ixr iov ^ 5f Pr^rr
^riri rr^jTTT *T1TONT vt % faflt *ff HtfT *TT
fatft TF*T fWR tf*TT tiw pRTT'T srfa
fa? ^r? % Prq to sufa? it ?r?far *r fa? ?$ fa WFifas
ffaC f??f?? fafa? wfafri
[to TO TO-fao TO/347/74 (291)]
ORDER
S.O. 4924. — Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shri Man Pal, Village Kyampur Bahedia, Post Office
Khas, District-Etah, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate
for election to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 347-Kasganj,
assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an account of his
election expenses as required by the Representation of the
People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;
2. And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
3, Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Man Pal to be disqualified for being chosen as and for
being a member of either House of Parliament or of the
Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State for a
period of three years from the date of (his order.
[No. UP-LA /347/74 (291)1
otto
icffowft, 18 OTF^[??, 1975
Wo JTTo 49 25. — TO, frofTO OT?>TOT TOTUT? fa TOT $
fa 1974 4 J? -j?n; tfa? fast? TOT % fair ^TUTTO fa?W?
% fat 17-^rrr fa?fa?-3fhr 4 'j?r? srfar qfar ^fa ??k
fa ottoto fa?, urn- fao fa?<j? fair, fro? ffarfa?
■jrre jfaur, fa? srfafafaw wfafaTO, i9Si ?*rr ?fa? totu
ffafaf ikt wVfar^r to? ffariro *?fa w faf fa farr nrfanr
OTTWT 7^ $ ;
102 GT/75— 5
far to : to? 3«ffa?T? 4 ^ otto $wrr fat ^fa to fa
wtfa tw ^ fat fa< ttTOT rTfafaro faaT |
fa? fafaro wnfr? cr q? fa rrftTUT? ?r tot % fa mrr
frr TOT?r % fat fa? ?afar w?»r qr ?qfafa?T | ;
totw, fafafar? fa urn 10 * % nrfro 1 ? 4 farofa
wfan t^STOf ^ fa tot tot fa? fa far? % fafa fa TO?
% ?r fafa T\m fa fasrr? ^tot faui? farfa % toft
fa? fat w urtjr fa mfaisr h fa? fafa
wsrnrfa % fat fa?f?? fafro w??rr ? i
[to 5To-fao to/ 17/74 ( 298)]
ORDER
New Delhi, the 18th October, 1975
S.O. 4925. — Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shri Chandra Pal Singh, Village Ajupura Jat, Post Office
Heempur Deepa, District-Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh, a con-
testing candidate for election to the U.P. Legislative
Assembly from 17-Seohara, assembly constituency, has failed
to lodge an account of his election expenses as required by
the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules
made thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Chandra Pal Singh to be disqualified for
being chosen as and for being a member of cither House ctf
Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative
Council of a State for a period of three years from the date
of this order.
[No. UP-LA/17/74 (298)]
wr*7r
wo WTO 4926. — TO:, fafaTO STifa? W BTiTTEfT? fa ?qr f fa
1974 4 ?7 3 ’?? tott fawn? ?*rr % fan rrrGfT?'? fafa??
$ fat! 355 i^totj? (to orr 0 ) frofa? 4 tot? to? ?fa
3 Tfa??r? fa TOtF??, ?t? trfan?, fao srr<> ???r frorar,
TTTTOT, 3TO TOST, faT srfaF?F(TO srfafaqq, 19 51 tot ?fa?
fa?fa arr?r toFto sr?? fafa?? w fa? fa fasrr
?rffar »??? 4 toto ?t ^ ;
fa?, TO: 3TO 3Tfa??r? ?, 3# TOTO7 ^??t srfa TO fa
srrfa to TtTOiTOT ?■ fro faf w? 1 ? to?t ? | TOfa?or ?fa fa?r
t, wfa. fa?fa? wfa? W ?? fa TOTEfT? ?> ??T t fa
TOT TOT!??! ^ fa? faf TOfat W? 1 ? ?! TOfafaW
?fa t ;
to: to, to? fa? far? fa £rr?r 1 w ?> «pj??? 4 fa?fa?
wifa? ??!^r?TTr to? fa ???fa? fa far? farfr fa to? ?t
fafa ttt? fa fatrr? tr??r faro? ?f??s[ ^ ???? ■?? m?
fa? ^ ^ fat( to *n?sr fa ?rfa? ? fa? ?4 fa wterraffer
(TO fa?fro fafa? F??r | 1
[fa TO ?o-fao fa/ 355/74 (300)]
4050 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1 975/AGR AH A Y ANA l t 1897
ORDER
SO. 4926. — Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shri Pancham Singh, Village Samogar, Post Office Nagla
Siwala, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candidate for elec-
ttion to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 355-Etmad-
pur(SC) assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an
account of his election expenses as required by the Repre-
sentation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made
thereunder ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Pancham Singh to be disqualified for
bcin^ chosen as and for being a member of either House of
Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative
Council of a State for a period of three years from the date
of this order.
[No. UP-LA/355/74 (300)]
totostto 4927. — tot:, TOTO arPTfr tot *pmrr?r iftmn $ fro
1 974 #' JTT TTRsTOtTOrtETT $ TO TOTO $ %tT 353-
q^RTTT TOTO-9riTO # TO ^TfTOtoT «fV
'rfV TORft srcrw, strttt > tot
srffifirfTO arfferTOir, 1951 ro totht tot froff ^tttt
sttTO TOTO «nff tot totTO to# #
3ETTO" T# I* ;
■rf\T, TO TOT # OT *TRT fTOTT TO TO TT
ar^Hdt $ TO TO tott^t tost ;TOfiFT*T *t$- TOt t,
Pnrfvr sruft^r to ^ toi f fir to* «rm w
■ClWTflT V TO Trf RT^T TOW 3PTO | ;
TO W, TO StfalWT TO# (JKT 10TO? % WH # LroTO
TOR ^?ra to to# TOaf ^ froft tfft 3?t TO#
TITO TO# f#uM TTOT XFFTOT f#UET # TTTOFT *^# TO#
*ft# %■ TO r tfTO to# # TO to# totthtTO % TO
TOTO TOft toftf $ 1
[#<? ^0 ro-TO *0/353/74 (303)]
ORDER
S.O. 4927. — Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shri Kishan Chandra, S/o Shri Kali Prasad, Town and
Post Office Fatehabad, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting
candidate for election to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from
353-Fatehabad assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an
account of his election expenses as required by the Repre-
sentation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made
thereunder ;
And Whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is satisfied that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Kishan Chandra S/o Shri Kali Prasad to be disqualified for
being chosen as and for being a member of either House of
Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative
[Part H —
Council of a State for a period of three years from the date
of this order,
[No. UP-LA /3 53/74 (303)]
TO#fT
VTo TOo 4928. — TO, f#TO* T TO TOPXR F# RTT
$ ft 1 974 # jftr TOr TOn* TOjET TO #7 TO TOK^T f#TOr
% fro T 3 S3 HTO-tTO # ^TPT *T*# TO
sjft tft Tjr *4# TOrr tut, ttto ? m
tj?tt rrtro, to TOfirfTO TOfror, 1951 to tTO tor
TO froft ffTTT wTOTO TO# TOTO TOf TT TO#f tff TO tnTO
TO # t# t ;
TO, tot: TOtTOTC #, TOfTOT fTOT f#7 TO RL
TO#r WTOTT % TO TO ? UR I T fpTOtjt TO
TOt TO, TOTO TOEr ?bt ^ tortuet toit # f# TOfr
TRT TO^TOTT %TO TO tTO ^TRT TO RpflfTO TO t I
TOT: w, TOFrror TOTT 10^ % # TOTO
itpiPt tft ^ TOptot vt % fTO
TOR % TO TOft TT^r ^ f#tTFT WT TO*TTO TOWT
% ^TTOTO ^TT# #Vt ?## fvpr TO#TO ^ dTf!PT # rfbt
to} ti TTftT^fir # Frq TOf^rr #tfq?r tort i
STo^f#o ^ 0 / 353 / 7-1 ( 304)]
ORDER
S.O. 4928. — Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shri Devi Ram, S/o Shri Vidya Ram, Town find Post
Office Fatehabad, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, a contesting candi-
date for election to the U.P. Legislative Assembly from 353-
Fatehabad, assembly constituency, has failed to lodge an
account of his election expenses as required by the Represen-
tation of the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made there-
under ;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Election Commission is salisfled that he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
said Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Devi Ram to be disqualified for being
chosen as and for being a member of either House of
Parliament or of the Legislative Assembly or Legislative
Council of a State for a period of three years from the date
of this order.
[No. UP-LA/353 /74 (304)]
WTO> TOo 49 29. — TOT:,’ f#4?TOT TOIRPT TOT TOTOTOFT TOTr
# fro 197 1 # ffq frorR toto %f*r# tottort PtotFm'
$ Fro; 35 3-TO#$far; TOTO-fler ' # ^tet to?# to# TOTOtt
*5# TO«fr TOFT, 7T Txrpft TFT, TTOT TOTTTOT, 'RTOFITT,
roftro TOtt apttt, ^tTOttot,
19s 1 ro totto w.[ f # tot# iirr TO#ftT=r tot# TO TO
TOT T#f TOt RTT ^TfeTO TOT# # OTTR T^’S’;
Sec. 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975 /AGrAHAYANA 1, 1897 4051
Sffa, qq: ^ 3rql K^rr 3% JTnp* fatr sim TC
qt, OTfr pft iqqwfT % finr fqcfffarm qftt
feqr ft, sffa f^qqqrqtq +r q? nwTTq ftt qqt ft fa
’pfa TR - SR WTqqT ^ faff ffqfcd T-PT^T qT ^qpftfaq
| ;
iffPi; *fq r ^ ^fafaqff URT 10^ % if faqfar
^rqfa ffqssrtr ; 3’ j Ti *r q?»ff *rrcr *D q?ra * fa*ft vfr qqq
^ qr faifiY ^Dq fatriq qqr *mr fanr fffas % uq*q
’qff *rfa tffa t fan tr qrfar q"r qfate ft tffa
^prrTfti % faq farfaq qTfaq q-Ttfi ft i
[qo qo-fao tfo/353/74 ( 305)]
TTo tTqo tfq, qfqq
ORDER
S.O. 4929.— Whereas the Election Commission is satisfied
that Shri Nathi Lai, S/o Shri Gyani Ram, Village Murawal,
P, O. Bhalokhra, Tahsil Fatehabad, Distt. Agra, UUar
Pradesh, a contesting candidate for election to the U.P.
Legislative Assembly from 3 53 -Fatehabad assembly
constituency, has failed to lodge an account of
his election expenses as required by the Representation of
the People Act, 1951, and the Rules made thereunder;
And whereas, the said candidate even after due notice
has not given any reason or explanation for the failure and
the Flection Commission is satisfied thut he has no good
reason or justification for such failure ;
Now, therefore, in pursuance of section 10A of the
suid Act, the Election Commission hereby declares the said
Shri Nathi Lai to be disqualified for being chosen as and
for being a member of either House of Parliament or of the
Legislative Assembly or Legislative Council of a State for
a period of three years from the date of this order.
[No. UP-LA /3 53/74 (305)]
A. N. SEN, Secy.
q£ fafat, 17 197 5
VTP 493 0 . — qfafafar* qftrfaqrr, 1951 ( 19 51
4:t) rim 22 qft ^qtnrr (l) gro vrfafaf *rr qqffr
vnrq faqfar smnq q? fatw ft fa qqq:V
q‘o 4 3 4/^T’T / 7 4 ( 4 ) , rTlftar IS I974 ^f faqfafar
q>'tvjq srfa fan *rtbif, trqfaf ; —
srfajqqr q qn.qT t 2 it tfo 5 % qiqff,
4 TT-f^wpr qfafaq: l# 4?m (vifa
3jqn. 1), stfafar qfawfar ^rrr^TY i
[Ho 4 34/3F^/75 (4)]
qYo qpTqqqrqq, qfaj
New Delhi, the 17lh October, 1975
S.O. 4930,— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
section (1) of section 22 of the Representation of the
People Act, 1951 (43 of 1951), the Election Commission
hereby directs that the following further amendment shall
be made in its notification No. 434/KL/74(4), dated 18
November, 1974 namely: —
In column 2 of the Tabic appended to the said notifica-
tion, for the existing entry at Serial No. 4 against
item No. 5, the entry "4 Additional Deputy Collector
(land Reforms-!), Malappnram", shall he substitu-
ted.
[No. 434/KL/75(4)J
New Delhi, the 20th October, 1975
S.O. 4931. — In pursuance of clause (b) of sub-section (2)
of section 116C of the Representation of the People Act,
1951 (43 of 1951), the Election Commission of India hereby
publishes the order of the Supreme Court of India dated
19th September, 1975, on an appeal from the Judgment and
order dated 10 April, 1973 of the High Court of Punjab
ond Haryana in Election Petition No. 1 of 1971.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Civil appeal No. 1172 of 1973
S. Iqbal Singh — Appellant
Versus
S. Gurdns Singh & Ors. — Respondents
JUDGMENT
ALAGIRISWAMI, J.
This appeal relates to the election to the Parlia-
ment from the Fazilka constituency in Punjab held
on 5lh March, 1971. The Parliamentary constituency
consisted of eight assembly constituencies of Malout,
Muktsar, Gidderbha, Fazilka, Jalalabad, Abohar, Lambi
and Faridkot. The voters were counted on 10th and
llth of March at five different places. The counting of
the votes of the Malout Assembly Constituency wUs hcla
on 10th March by Mr. Aggarwal, Assistant Returning Olli-
cer, of Muktsar and Gidderbha on 10th and llth by Mr.
Sayal ,of Fazilka and Jalalabad on the 10th and llth by
Mr. Mahajan, of Lambi and Abohar on the 10th and llth
by Mr. Ram Lai and of Faridkot on the llth by Mr. Garg.
6,409 votes were declared invalid and the 1st respondent
was declared elected having secured 1,52,677 votes. The
appellant obtained 1,47,354 votes. There were six other
candidates about whom it is not necessary to refer.
A number of allegations were made in t lie election peti-
tion about many irregularities that took place on the date
of the polling. It is not necessary to refer to them as the
issues concerned with them were not pressed even before
the High Court. Only two issues, issue 1 and 4 were con-
sidered by the High Court and those arc the issues urged
before us also. They are;
“1. Whether the respondent No. 1 is guilty of corrupt
practices specified in paras 19, 20, 22 and 23 and
26 to 29 of the election petition as amended? If
so, what is the effect?
2. Whether 15000 ballot papers were invalid and were
wrongly polled and counted ? If so, with what
effect?’’
Tt is also necessary to refer to issues 3 and 6 for they
have some relevance in discussing issues l and 4 :
“3. Whether - the petitioner is entitled to the scrutiny
of the ballot papers alleged to have been illegally
rejected and those of the respondent, alleged to have
been illegally accepted and on that account is en-
titled to a recount 7
6. Whether the allegations made in para 7 of th#
petition are correct, and if so, what is the effect ?”
As issue 6 was not pressed the various allegations of ir-
regularities at the lime of polling including collusion by
Polling Officers and consequent false voting and stuffing of
ballot, boxes could not be considered. As issue 3 was not
pressed recount cannot be asked for on the allegation of
wrong counting of votes that is that the appellant’s votes
were wrongly rejected and the 1st respondent’s votes were
wrongly accepted.
With regard to issue 1 the allegation as that corrupt
practice of bribery was committed in the interest of the
1st respondent hy hi* brother Shri Parkash Singh BadaE
who was at that time the Chief MinisLer of Punjab. One
of the items of bribery alleged was that large sums of
4052 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA !, 1S97 [Fart II—
money were distributed to Harijans in the form of contri-
butions towards construction of Dharamshalas for the pur-
pose of inducing them to vote in favour of the 1st res-
pondent. The second allegation was that Shii Farkash Singh
Badal directed Mr. Sayal, one of the Assistant Returning
Officer, to issue 3,304 gun licences for furthering the pros-
pects of the 1st respondent's election and that this was a
gratification for inducing the electors to vote for the 1st
respondent, Similarly Mr. O. P. Garg, another Assistant
Returning Officer was alleged to have issued 485 gun licences
in the months of February and March, 1971. Shfi Parkash
Singh Badal was alleged to have arranged and addressed
a number of meetings in various villages promising to help
the voters in many ways if they would vote for his brother.
There were certain other allegations of corrupt practices but
the only ones canvassed before us were those relating to
gun licences and grants in respect of construction of dharam-
fchalas to Harijans.
The allegations which relate to issue 4, as found in the
etUion, were that at least 15,000 invalid and void votes
ad been included and counted in favour of the returned
candidate, which should have been rejected and not counted
at all and that in addition at least 3,000 invalid ballot
papers which should have been rejected under rule 56 had
been wrongly counted as valid votes in favour of the return-
ed candidate. The distinction between 15,000 and 3,000
votes was this ; The 15,000 ballot papers were said to
consist of (i) spurious ballot papers, (ii) ballot papers
not bearing serial number or design authorised for use at
the particular polling stations, and (in) ballot papers not
bearing both marks and the full signatures of the Presiding
Officer. The 3,000 ballot papers were said to have been
so marked as to render it doubtful to which candidate the
vote is given, or the ballot papers bore marks with instru-
ment other than the one supplied for the purpose, or
ballot papers marked in favour of more than one candidate
had been wrongly counted in favour of the returned candi-
date. No evidence in fact was let in in respect of the
3,000 votes. The attack was concentrated on the 15,000
invalid and void votes. In view of issues 3 and 6 having
been given up, the effect of which we have earlier referred
to, the only question that arises is whether these 15.000
votes should not have been counted at all, whether for the
appellant or for the 1st respondent on the basis that they
bore neither the stamp nor the signature of the Polling
Officer.
with the Assistant Returning Officer at the time of the count-
ing. Neither the counting agents nor the chief counting agent
bad complained in writing to the Assistant Returning Officer.
It is impossible to believe that if there were as many as
15,000 invalid ballot papers, which amount to about two
thousand from every assembly constituency they would have
kept quiet without raising hell On both the days of count-
ing an observer deputed by the Election Commissioner had
gone round all the places where the votes were counted.
No serious infirmities were pointed out to him. One or
two ballot papers which did not bear either the signature
of the Polling Officer or the stamp were shown to him only
in the Lambi constituency and he scrutinised them and
found that the serial numbers tallied and he was satisfied
about their genuiness. He as well as the various Assistant
Reluming Officers had offered that if there were any com-
plaints the candidate could ask for a recheck. No
such recheck was asked for. It was argued on behalf of
the appellant that the recheck offer meant only a check
on whether the number of votes had been correctly added.
We find it impossible to accept this suggestion. The refer-
ence to the checking in the observer’s report shows that
the checking meant also scrutiny as to whether the ballot
paper was signed by the Presiding Officer. The Returning
Officer has also mentioned in his order on the application
made by the appellant for a recount that he was asked
to specify as to whether in any assembly segment he or
any of his agents had asked for the recheck or pointed out
any discrepancy in the figures and that the appellant had
failed to cite any such specific instance, and that he was
also asked as to whether he wanted the recounting of any
specific assembly segment but he reiterated that he wanted
a total recount.
Four of the Assistant Returning Officers, Mr. Sayal* Mr.
Ram Lai, Mr, Garg and Mr. Aggarwal have been examined
and they did not support the appellant’s case that there
were such a large number of invalid ballot papers or that
it was brought to their notice even orally. Mr, Ram Lai
said that at the most there might be 200 such votes which
were objected to ; that is in respect of the two consti-
tuencies in which he was the Assistant Returning Officer.
This would mean that there might have been about one
thousand invalid ballot papers at the most and we have
already mentioned that 6,409 had been declared invalid.
We do not know how many of them were ballot papers
which did not contain either the signature or the stamp.
The whole of the evidence Jet in was of a uniform type
that a number of ballot papers did not bear the signature
of the Polling Officer or the stamp of the booth. Indeed
the allegation in the petition on this point is “ballot papers
not bearing booth marks and full signatures of the Presid-
ing Officer were wrongly counted as valid votes". It is not
said that the ballot papers bore neither the mark nor the
signature of the Presiding Officer. The rule in question,
rule No. 56, was amended in 1971 providing that only a
ballot paper w-hich did not contain both the mark and sig-
nature would be deemed invalid but even then it is not
as though it automatically became invalid, The Returning
Officer bad to scrutinise it in order to sec whether the
ballot paper was a genuine ballot paper. This provision was
apparently put in because under pressure of work the Polling
Officer might have failed either to affix the stamp or .his
signature. If the Returning Officer was satisfied that the
failure to affix the stamp or the signature was due to the
fault of the Polling Officer but the ballot paper was itself
genuine he could include it among the valid ballot papers.
Therefore, merely by giving evidence that the ballot papers
did not contain both the signature and the stamp it would
not be established that the ballot paper concerned was not
a valid ballot paper. But that is the only type of evidence
which has been let in.
Apart from this the number 15,000 seems to be a case
of wild guess, The appellant’s voting agents were alleged
to have kept a note of the number of invalid ballot papers
that they had noticed but none was produced. Some of the
counting agents gave evidence that they brought it to the
notice of the chief counting agent who sat on the dais along
The way the appellant’s case has been developed is
also very interesting. We have pointed out that votes of
four constituencies were counted on the 10th and of four
other constituencies on the 11th. The first move of the
appellant was to send a telegram on the 11th. By that
time half the number of votes had been counted and
probably more than half because we do not know at what
time on the 11th telegram. Ex. B-2 was sent. Even assuming
that nearly half the number of votes had been counted the
appellant probably had an inking of the possibility of his
being defeated. In this telegram tie referred to about fifteen
thousand ballot papers which did not contain either the sig-
nature of the Presiding Officer or the Polling Officer of the
polling station and booth numbers. He also mentioned that
about six thousand three hundred votes had been wrongly
rejected, Apparently he wanted to imply that they would
otherwise have gone in his favour. But his case of six
thousand votes which ought to have gone to him, but had
been wrongly rejected, had been completely given up later,
another telegram sent on the 13th March, 1971 was similar
to the telegram sent on the 11th. A similar telegram was
sent by the appellant to the General Secretary of the Cong-
ress Party as also the Prime Minister. But In the petition
given to the Returning Officer asking for a recount on the
same day the complaint was that some of the ballot papers
did not bear the official stamp on their back as provided
by rules and they seem to have been smuggled illegally and
the number given is "thousand". Another complaint, was
some of the ballot papers did not bear the signatures of the
Presiding Officers on the back, which were also "in thou-
sands" and even more titan five thousand. So here we
do not find the allegation that the ballot papers contained
neither the signature nor the stamp. In this petition before
the Election Commission asking lor recount he mentioned
Sec 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF iKDtA : KOVEMBER 1 %, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 4053
fifteen thousand ballot papers as having been found which
bore no distinction mark or signature of the Presiding
Officer. He also mentioned the rejection of more than
6.000 votes. As we have already pointed out, there is
absolutely nothing on record to show how the figure 15,000
was arrived at. We are, therefore, satisfied that the men-
tion about 15,000 votes, 3,000 votes and 6,000 votes are
only steps in the attempt to secure a recount at any cost
and to fish for evidence. As wc have already pointed out,
the allegation in the petition was that 15,000 invalid votes
were counted in favour of the returned candidate but in
the evidence as well as the arguments it was only claimed
that there were 15,000 invalid ballot papers which were
counted. There is nothing to show how many of these
15.000 went to the appellant and how many to the 1st
respondent. Indeed as wc have earlier explained that was
asked for was elimination of the 1 5,000 votes altogether
From the counting. The whole thing is there kite flying.
We are, therefore, in agreement with the learned Judge of
the High Court that the appellant has not succeeded in
establishing the allegations covered by issue No. 4.
There arc a large number of decision of this Court on
the question regarding the circumstances under which re-
count can be ordered, It has been recognised in all those
decisions that there can never be any hard and fast rule
as to the circumstances when an order of recount would
be permissible and should always be dependent upon the
circumstances of the case. We do not therefore consider it
-necessary to refer to any of those decisions. Suffice it to
say that the facts of this case do not leave even the slightest
justification for ordering a recount.
Now we come to the question of corrupt practice. We
shall first of all deal with the grant for construction of
dharamshalas for Harijans. The Punjab Government appears
to have set apart a sum of Rs. 50,00,000 for this very
purpose. All that is established is that a sum of Rs. 3,00,000
was spent towards the end of the official financial year
1970-71 in the district in which this Fazilka Parliamentary
Constituency is situate. Punjab has 11 districts and it cannot
therefore be said that this sum is disproportionately large.
The anxiety to spend the money towards the end of the
financial year is also natural. If the end of the financial
year also happens to be the period when an election is
going on parties in power naturally bestir this to show
that they are active in helping the people to get what they
want. The election time is the time when people in power
as well as ordinary politicians are active in trying to show
that they are out to help the people. They address meetings
and hold out all sorts of promises. Where a large section
of the people are concerned, who only get an amenity
which they ought in any case to get and which they get
probably a little more easily, because it happens to be elec-
tion time, it cannot be said that the person in authority
making that promise and holding out that he would carry
out many remedial measures to benefit the people was
resorting to bribery or bargaining for votes. It may not
amount to setting iip a very high standard and it may be
very desirable that whatever is done for the people should
be done by persons in authority throughout the period of
their office, But they naturally are more active at election
time than other times. That cannot be said to amount to
corruption.
We then come to the question of gun licences. It has
been pointed out that during the months of January, Feb-
ruary and March, 1971, Mr. Sayal had issued 3,304 gun
licences and Mr, Gar^ 485 gun licences, the usual number
in an ordinary year being about 300. When every explanation
offered on behalf of the official is taken into consideration
the fact remains that an unusually large number of gun
licences had been issued during that period. Wc are satisfied
that to some extent at least this amounts to improper use
of power. Wc do not say that this is an abuse or misuse.
In fact there is evidence that the proper procedure has
been followed in these cases. In one case, for instance,
a man who hud applied for a gun licence long time back
approached the Chief Minister when he had come to the
village and he at once told the District Magistrate and the
mun got his licence. We can see nothing improper in that
instance. But the gun licences themselves are issued by the
officials and not by the Chief Minister. It also appears that
a large number of relatives of the Chief Minister as well as
his Mukhtiur-e-Aam, his maternal uncle, and even the re-
turned candidate bad taken interest in the issue of gun
licences. It was sought to be proved that the Chief Minis-
ter had addressed a number of meetings promising to issue
gun licences if they would vote for his brother, ^ But there
was no allegation in the election petition relating to the
meetings he addressed or his having held out the promise
in those meetings that he would issue gun licences if the
people voted for his brother. The 1st respondent himself
not having had notice of the specific allegation of meetings
at which such promises were held out we have left out of
consideration the evidence regarding the meetings and the
promises held out by the Chief Minister in those meetings
as inadmissible.
Assuming that it was the returned candidate or his agent
that had held out an inducement to get gun licences issued
for people who vote for the returned candidate, does it
amount to bribery under s. 123(1) of the Representation of
the People Act 7'Bribery is defined thus :
“123(1) 'Bribery’, that, is to say, —
(A) any gift, offer or promise by a candidate or his
agent or by any other person with the consent of
a candidate or his election agent of any gratification
to any person whomsoever, with the object directly
or indirectly of inducing—
(a)
(b) an elector to vote or refrain from voting at an
election, or as a reward to —
(i)
(ii) an elector for having voted or refrained from
voting ;
(B) the receipt of, or agreement to receive, any grati-
fication, whether as a motive or a reward—
(u)
fb) by any person whomsoever for himself or any
other person for voting or refraining from voting
or inducing or attempting to induce any elector
to vote or refrain from voting, or any candidate
to withdraw or not to withdraw his candidate.
Explanation. — For the purposes of this clause the
term ‘gratification’ is not restricted to pecuniary
gratifications or gratifications estimable in money
and it includes all forms of entertainment and
all forms of employment for reward but it does
not Include the payment of any expenses bona-
fide incurred at, or for the purpose of any elec-
tion and duly entered in the account of election
expenses referred to in section 78.”
In order to understand the exact implication of the word
‘gratification’ it may be useful to refer to another statute
which has been in force for over a century, that is. the
Indian penal Code as most legislations tend to follow estab-
lished precedents, fn section 161 of the Code, which deals
with bribery, one of the explanation is as follows ;
“ ‘Gratification.’ The word “gratification” is not restric-
ted to pecuniary gratification, or to gratification esti-
mate in money.”
Illustration (a) to the section is as follows:
“(a) A, a nuinsif, obtains from Z, a banker, a situa-
tion in Z’s bank, for A’s brother, ns a reward to A
for deciding a cause in favour of Z. A has com-
mitted the offence defined in this section”.
4054 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 l P art II—
e.: .r-
We may also quote s. 171-B of the Code and a. 171-E
which find a place in the Chapter of Offences Relating to
Elections, which was inserted in the Code in the year 1920.
“171-B(1) whoever —
(i) gives a gratification to any person with the object
of inducing him or any other person to exercise
any electoral right or ot rewarding any person for
having exercised any such right; or
(ii) accepts either for himself or for any other person
any gratification as a reward to exercising any such
right or for inducing or attempting to induce any
Other person to exercise any such right,
commits the offence of bribery:
Provided that a declaration of public policy or a promise
of public action shall not be an offence under this
section.
(2) A person who offers, or agrees to give or offers, or
attempts to procure, a gratification shall be deemed to give
a gratification,
(3) A person who obtains or agrees to accept or attempts
to obtain a gratification shat be deemed to accept a gratifica-
tion, and a person who accepts a gratification as a motive
for doing what he does not intend to do, or as a regard for
doing what he has not done, shall be deemed to have
accepted the gratification as a reward.”
“171-E. Whoever commits the offence of bribery shall
be punished with imprisonment of either description for a
term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with
both :
Provided that bribery by treating shall be punished with
fine only.
Explanation. — “ 'Treating’ means that form of bribery where
the gratification consists in food, drink, entertainment, or
provision”.
It would be noticed that the Explanation to Section 123
(1) of the Representation of the People Act and Explanation
to section 161 of the Indian Penal Code relating to grati-
fication are similar. In addition, the Representation of the
People Act refers to all forms of entertainment and all forms
of employment for reward. The employment for reward is
covered by illustration (a) to s. 161 of the Indian Penal
Code. The words “all forms of entertainment” in the Ex-
planation to section (23(1) of the Representa-
tion of the People Act apparently refer to
offence of treating found in s. 171-E of the Indian
Penal Code. When Parliament enacted the provision regar-
ding bribery in the Representation of the People Act it
should have had before' it the comparable provisions in the
Penal Code. It is to be noticed that the giving of any grati-
fication with the object of inducing the receiver of any other
person to vote is an offence while acceptance of gratification
by a person either for himself or for any other person or
for inducing any other person to vote is an offence. In other
words giving is an offence if paid to the voter or such
giving induces another persons to vote. It is not giving a
gratification in order that he may induce another person
to vote that is an offence whereas receipt of a gratification
in order to induce another person to vote is an offence. The
reason for the distinction between the provision in s. 123(1)
(A) and 123(1) (B) seems to be this: In the former case
a person standing for election has necessarily to have a
number of people to work for him and he may have to
bear their expenses. That by itself should not be deemed
to be bribery. In the latter case when a person takes
money offering to induce other people, of course, induce
by wrong means, to vole for the person who pays him
the money he is realy poking his nose into something whfih
is no business of his and that practice should be discouraged.
See Kalya Singh’s case(') and our judgment in Harisingh
Pratapsingh Chnwda v. Popatlal Mulshanker Joshi & Ors.(-)
So far as we arc aware it has never been held that the
issue of a gun licence amounts to bribery under s, 171-B.
Wc are of opinion that the word ‘gratification’ should be
deemed to refer only to cases where a gift is made of
something which gives a material advantage to the recipient,
There is hardly any need to say that giving whose value
is estimable in money is bribery. A gun licence gives no
material advantage to its recipient. It might gratify his sense
of importance if he has a gun licence in a village where
nobody else has a gun licence. So might the conferment of
an honour like Padma Bhushan. A praise from a high
quarter might gratify the sense of vanity of a person. But
the world ‘gratification’ as used in s. 123(1) does not refer
to such gratifications any more than in s. 171-B of the
Indian Penal Code. Taking the case of licences : Possibly
the grant of a licence which enables a man to do some
business and thus make money may confer a material
advantage to him. Wc are not here speaking of licences which
arc insisted upon merely for regulatory purposes like muni-
cipal licences. But a licence given to a person to deal in
fertilizers might confer a financial advantage to that person;
so might an import licence or an export licence. Such licen-
ces differ from licences for regulatory purposes. Arms licence
is licence l'or regulatory purposes. Its possession gives no
material advantage, to its possessor. A licence in a prohibi-
tion area to deal in liquor might confer a material advan-
tage to the licensee. But a licence enabling a person to imbibe
liquor in such area gives the licensee no material advantage.
Such a licence is only regulatory. We must therefore distin-
guish between various kinds of licences and hold that
where a licence gives a material advantage to the licensee
the grant of such licences amounts to a gratification. In that
sense the grant of gun licences to voters is the Fazilka Consti-
tuency would not amount to bribery. We have discussed this
question on the basis that the authority to grant a licence
is the returned candidate or his brother the Chief Minister.
We have already pointed out that there is no evidence
regarding bargaining for votes by promise of gun licences.
A bargain for the purpose of this section does not mean
that the candidate or his agent makes an offer and the voter
accepts it in the sense that he promises to vole. It is
enough if the candidate or his agent makes the gift or
promise on that condition. If a candidate or his agent pays
money to a voter saying that he wants him to vote it is a
bargain for the purposes of this section. It is not necessary
that the voter should sijy that he would vote and thereafter
the candidate or his agent should pay the money. Even
in such a case the voter after receiving the money might or
might not vote.
The law regarding bribery in elections in our country has
been discussed in various decisions of this Court. In Hagan-
hil Bagdi v. Ilarl Vishnu Kamath (15 ELR 205) the can-
didate offered to construct a well in a village if the voters
voted for him and not for the rival candidate and money was
actually deposited for this purpose and was to await the
result of the election. It was held that there was a clear
bargain for votes. In Khader Sheriff, v. Munnuswami Go-
uncler Sc Ors. (AIR 1955 SC 775) it was observed by this
Court that it may be meritorious to make a donation for
a charitable purpose but on the eve of an election such a
gift may be open to construction that it was made with the
intention of buying votes. In Ghasi Ram v. Dal Singh (1963
(3) SCR 102) it was held that the gift must be proved to
have a direct or indirect connection with votes and this
must admit of no other reasonable excluse. In Radha
Krishna Shukla v. Tara Chand Maheshwar (12ELR 376)
general promises by Ministers to redress certain public gri-
evances or to erect certain public amenities like hospitals; it
elected, were held not to amount to corrupt practice. They
were treated as promises of general public action. In Amir-
chand v. Surendra Lai Jha (10 ELR 57) it was laid down
that if a Minister redresses the grievances ot a class of the
public or people of a locality or renders them any help,
0) C.A. No. 16 of 1973 decided on 28-2-1975.
(2) C.A. No. 90 of 1973 decided on 19-9-1975.
4055
Sec. 3 ( ii) J THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1 897
on the eve of an election, it was not corrupt practice un-
less he had obtained promises from the voters in return,
as a condition for their help. The promise to grant gun
licences would really amount to a redrcssal of the grievances
of a class of the public or rendering them any help. There
is no evidence here of obtaining a promise from the voters
in return. ' The observations made in Ghasi Ram’s case
(supra) regarding the action taken by a Minister which
helps a calss of the public may be noticed in this connec-
tion *,
“The postilion of a Minister Is difficult It is obvious
that he cannot cease to function when his election
fs due. He must of necessity Httcnd to the griev-
ances, otherwise he must fail. He must improve the
image of his administration before the public. It
everyone of his official acts done bona-fide is to
be construed against him and an ulterior motive
is spelled out of them, the administration must
necessarily come to a stand-still. The State of Har-
yana came into existence on November 1, 1966,
When an election in the near future, the political
party had to do acts of a public nature. The
grant of discretionary grants were part of the gene-
ral scheme to better community development pro-
jects and to remove the immediate grievances of
the public. The money was required to be spent in
about 3 months’ time. The action of the Minister
had often the concurrence and recommendation of
his subordinate staff. It is for this reason that the
orders about the improvement of the supply of
waters were not pressed. They were incapable of
being construed against the first respondent. There-
fore, emphasis was placed upon the distribution of
money. The money was not distributed among
the voters directly but was given to Panchayats and
the public at large. It was to be used for the good
of those for and those against the candidate. No
doubt they had the effect of pushing forward his
claims but that was inevitable even if no money
was spent, but good administration changed the
people’s condition. We cannot therefore, hold that
there was any corrupt practice. If there was good
evidence that the Minister bargained directly or in-
directly for voles the result might have been differ-
ent but there Was no such evidence.”
The issue for decision in Om Piabha Jain v. Abnash Chand
& Anr. (1968) (3) SCR III) was similar to the case here
in respect of the grants for dharamshalas for Harijans. It
was held that the action of the Minister could not be con-
strued against her and that it was done in the ordinary
course of her duties as Minister and there was no evidence
that it was, directly or indirectly, part of a bargain with the
voters. In Bhanu Kumar v, Mohan Lai '(197 1(3) SCR 522)
it was alleged that the Chief Minister bjCordcring the cover-
ing of a nallahp the construction of a road, the installation
of water taps and the prant of' pattas to the inhabitants Qf
a colony for construction of houses had made a bargain
with the people for votes and thus committed corrupt prac-
tice as defined in s. 123(1) of the Representation of the
People Act. This Court pointed out that ordinarily ame-
lioration of grievances of the public in innocuous and cannot
be construed against a candidate who is a Minister but that
if there is evidence to indicate that any candidate at the
election abused his power and position as a Minister in
the Government by utilising public revenues for conferring
advantage or benefit on a particular group of people for
the purpose of obtaining their votes, different considerations
will arise and it may be held to bo a corrupt practice within
the meaning^of s. 123(1). In that case it was held that in
all the instances relied upon by the appellant the evidence
showed that there were long standing public grievances and
the Government had from time to time made suggestions
and recommendations for redress of the grievances and ame-
lioration of the condition of the people and that it could
not be said that on the eve of' election there was any sudden
spontaneous outburst of public activity in the shape of divert-
ing money to win electors to the side of the Chief Minister
by throwing baits or giving them any particular and specially
favoured treatment. These observations apply to the case
of grants for Harijan dharamshalas.
We are therefore satisfied that In the case of both the
allegations of corrupt practice there was no gratification
offered, that there was no bargaining for ^ votes in the
sense we have explained earlier and these issues must also
be found against the appellant.
The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with costa.
Sd/- (A. Alagiriswami) J.
Sd/- (P. K. GOSWAMI) J.
Sd/- (N, L. Untwalia) J.
New Delhi,
September 19, 1975.
[No. &2/PB/1/71]
V. NAGASUBRAMANIAN, Secy.
fafa firm afk vPTfft vnr irarwr
(fafir fr*TPT)
ant*T
2 7 1975
mo 4 9 32.— sfof
1971 ( 1971 ipt si) ^trrrr 335 KT TOrrsrfwff qnJTJfk
STFtJT ff, sprfq; :~
i. (i) w nr^sr vr ’tpt t fyrr^
*n*ur, 197 s | 1
( 2 ) jt? 21 sr^r |«rr Tinprr 1
2 . w *r, ariwt", ir
Jirprm (ww, JTrcm*, «wm, nfag* ftrjtT) f 1
3. *rmm f % inrcf *rwr sft
froff ht fVfr *rrir ir Tt wi, n Pn > j,< ,
ifawr, sftr PS^<t *nr % *r«r, fHHfMRsi stthtt
■r srrjfor f^FT-rr snrmT,
(1?) *r*fr ^TsmfWf % tflr Krmr % ifrir
"<sw” fftri ^irr ^ tfr ’snrf vm $ 3%,
*rr urr$ if, sr?** tt«t irr vf *r m r srt*r
fi'TflTJT $ rnw ir rrfora wnr^t $
WiJWR WnjTTfafl OTETTT •K -SftST ^m^TT I
(v) *rc?rf Tfwff
"Frrf” ir ttt;, $?nr tfl t *r?rfi tt tt 3fr
wtflT | uir, farcr frrcr if ^rwfr 5 trrfi«rcr
| wfrfrw m ir farftnr fo<rr ^rr^rr ;
■(’T) , qw?r'=i! f ri+i'>2+#r3 +
*r<f «rr»r ir, HrrqRrc # ^pntfruff
% <r 3f^rr ;
it 1, ^ 2, 3 133ft shmt i # Prr ^ iff pqrnTrftrff
mxr >pt >PTir ^ nft tfrr it,
. jtwt ir fami ^ t i
40 56 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/ AGRAUAY ANA I, 1897 LPart 11—
€r i €12 €13.
(q) qr m tftr qtfl . ,
€1 el €1
qqnr % VIt Era TT^q 4 nnq4te mfFw |
qrq qra m ifrqftra $tqr i #1 i, €r 2 , €1 3 tftr
€r w q^l w«f t qft OTqw (q) n $ 1
[4qqr 4 / 2 / 72 ^ 174 ]
qto'flo q^n;, qqra qBr=r
MINISTRY OF LAW, JUSTICE & COMPANY AFFAIRS
(Department of Justice)
ORDER
New Delhi, the 27th October, 1975
5.0. 4932 .— In exercise of the powers conferred by sect-
ion 33 of the North-Eastern Areas (Rc-organisation) Act
1971 (81 of 1971), the President hereby makes the follow-
ing Order, namely: —
1. (1) This Order may be called the Judges of the Gau-
hati High Court (Allocation of Salaries and Allowances)
Order, 1975,
(2) It shall be deemed to have come into force on the
2 1st day of January, 1972,
2. Tn this Order, “Gauhati High Court” means the Gau-
hati High Court (the High Court of Assam, Nagaland,
Meghalaya, Manipur and Tripura).
3. The expenditure in respect of the salaries and allow-
ances of the Judges of the Gauhati High Court in any year
or part thereof shall be allocated amongst the States of
Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Nagaland and Tripura and the
Union on the following basis, namely: —
(a) The expenditure as arrived at by multiplying the
total of salaries and allowances of all the judges
with the multiple ‘X’ will be shared on pro rata
basis according to the cases instituted from each
of the States and the Union Territories of Aruna-
chal Pradesh and Mizoram in the particular, year or
part thereof.
(b) The balance of the expenditure on salaries and
allowances of the Judges shall be additionally de-
bated to the respective Slates in which the Ben-
ches are located, as arrived at by multiplying the
total of salaries and allowance by variable multi-
ple V;
(c) Multiple
T = total number of Judge’s working days in the
Gauhati High Court in a year or part thereof;
tl, 12, t3, and so on are days spent in journey to and
from the seat of the different Benches by the
Judges to attend to the work of the Benches.
(d) Multiple ‘Y’= - 1 or t2 or — and sc ? JIT.
T T T
and will vary with the State in which the Bench
is located, tl, t2, t3 and T have the same mean-
ing as in (c) above,
[No. 4/2/72-Jus]
P. P, NAYYAR. Jt. Sccy.
fiemn)
28 WJtT, 1 9 7 -*5
VToBTU 4933. — rrmfror 7* ^
1969 (i 960 TT 54 ) ft tfTTT 26 ft WflTTT (3) SpT?m
ftfti T fTrifiTT, T^ffUT 0 BTTT?fr
ftrfars ft ftmt nfafm ft <T*ffejr (q^fmr^r mvn-
mm 237/70 ferir 24 - 10 - 70 ) % ftf
§ 1
[9tTo Wl 2/9/7 5-^ 2]
(Department of Company Affairs)
New Delhi, the 28th October, 1975
S.O. 4933, — In pursuance of sub-section (3) of section
26 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act,
1969 (54 of 1969) the Central Government hereby notifies
the cancellation of registration of M/s. Sahyadri Dyestuffs
and Chemicals Limited under the said Act (Certificate of
Registration No. 237/70 dated the 24th October, 1970).
[F.No. 2/9/75-M.ll]
S. BALARAMAN, Under Sccy.
fim
rfrr afrirr ferni)
zt, 25 1975
s nmt
w\o sru 4934 . — wimmvz ft ^rrr^rfr ft
fen sirar | ft ^ *rfer ifan ftr snfenrl
vnrrftrv fw tttt niwr <rforPm, i 96 i
ft mXT 35 ft T^TTTT (l) i W ( iii ) ft ft fej
jppfrfcr ffttrr $ i mm 1 $ % srdrir mm jttjt vr,
Ttfft ft nfe, tr^r fern^r t
mm
fF<wr ftmzft urn? rnrr^Tfn^mrrn' i
1 - 4 - 75 ft ST<TPft sfPft i
[fto 1094 (tt° fto 203/66/75 II)]
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue Sl Insurance)
New Delhi, the 25th September, 197$
INCOME TAX
S.O. 4934, — It is hereby notified for general information
that the institution mentioned below has been approved by
Indian Council of Social Science Research, the prescribed
authority for the purposes of clause (iii) of sub-section 0)
of Section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The society
would send an annual statement of income received under
this exemption together with the details of its disbursal.
INSTITUTION
Indian Society of Industrial & Fiscal Economics, Madras.
This notification will be effective from 1-4-75,
[No. 1094 (F, No. 203 /66/75-TTA. II)]
^TTo Sp 0 4 9 35,’ — c j i 'ft ft f^iu
fen smi % fft 'ft ftfp trrof Y*r
nFTTf^T fsrorR Tfer mj 5TTWX 'trfbfen, 1961
ift nn:f 35 'ft ?r-mr ( 1 ) * (iii) $ fer,
ferftfer toT % sFHftfe fen mj
(1) Tf^qr Tm ^ wftn jtrt fenff ^rr w ^rr
nWt, ft*
Sec. 3(iij]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1 975 /AGR AHA YANA 1, 1897 4057
( 2 ) STRT fafatfi ufa ~*fa ^ITt'T "ft Efa % <TT>
7 VfTcfR frjTPT WTTTtJT^ iWif €j
f^HTt STF^fT I
ffpqr
MVtJ fTOFT TOTR, 3^57 TO
*To (rfsrg^TT 1-4-75 fr 31-3-1978 TO I
1095 (^fo^o 203/42/75 cftffll)]
^ ftrqr ^ «ra j jFto far^r arnrr t p* Wt^T TifTOrfT, <rRfffa
towr qfrir^ airr qfar *wn irnm wftiftm,
i 96 i ^rrrr 35 ^r-y-na (1) ^ sro (ii) % mfrnm
% ftp*, 1^, 1976 % 31 *TPT 1 977 TO Rtf TO *ftr
TOfa ^ ferr ir^Tfrf^T fanrr tot $ 1
tffTT
jtoi, fror
[ff* io97fa)ivf° 2 0 3 / «/ 7 5-3rrS«Yq , -H)J
S.O. 4935, — It is hereby notified for general infoi-mation
that the institution mentioned below has been approved by
Indian Council of Social Science Research, the prescribed
authority for the purposes of clause (iii) of sub-section (1)
of Section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, subject to the
following conditions:—
(1) The institute maintains separate accounts for the
funds received under this exemption, and
(2) The institute submits an annual report to the Indian
Council of Social Science Research regarding the
funds received & manner in which they were uti-
lised.
S.O. 4937. — Jn continuation of notification No. 853 (F.
No. 203/6/75-11 A. II) dated 7th March, 75 it is hereby
notified for general information that the institution men-
tioned below has been approved by Indian Council of Agri-
cultural Research, the prescribed authority for the purposes
of clause Iii) of sub-section (1) of Section 35 of the Income-
tax Act, 1961 for a further period of one year with effect
from 1st April, 1976 to 3 1st March, 1977.
INSTITUTION
The Karnataka Agriculture Foundation, Mubli, Distt.
Dharwar.
[No. 1097 (F. No. 203 /6/75-ITA. U)1
INSTITUTION
fTO^V., 29 fiiTOTO, 10 75
The Institute of Management Development, U P., Fuck-
now.
The notification will be effective from 1-4-75 to 31-3-78.
[No. 1095 (F. No. 203/42/75-ITA. JI)|
wffo ;m° 4030.— ^KiKim qff snroTft % fan htTst^to
fVqr ^ptt $ fa aT*ft qft fafipr mfTORlr, flfro,
fqiNN jfaTlfWt' fTOFT, iTRT *7TTOT irfyFdJJg,
1961 tfr mrr 35 TOtmr (1) ^ w (ii) * u*frrof
% ffrrr TOfffkm fmi TOr t 1
TO*rr
5TTTOT
JflTo 3H o 49 3 8 . — ^^PItTO *T>V ^TfTOT^t % fintr PTOS7TT *rfa-
ffror tott | fa fTOrfafaff ^«rr tT /: fVf?R THfrorfr”
vrRrfrjT to tor : rttot teei
srrer 35 TO^ra ( 1 ) % w (ii) t Tfftrof ^
firor tot 1 1
src«rr
TOTTR fqWPflT?, 3 1 «TTT I
TO 1 - 4-75 ir 31 - 3-77 to w) T^fV 1
[tfo 110 -l(TTsitfo 203/57/75-inf ^ ffll)]
(fl’o fffo SRrajTOTTTT,
^ 1-4-1 975 3 1-3-1 978 TO ^T^ft |
[^t io96 20 3 / 73 / 7 5-^trf 9 ; II)]
S.O. 4936 . — It is hereby notified for general information
that the institution mentioned below has been approved by
the Secretary, Department of Science & Technology, New
Delhi, the prescribed authority for the purposes of clause
(ii) of sub-section (1) of Section 35 of the Income-tax Act,
1961.
INSTITUTION
The Institution of Surveyors, New Delhi.
The notification will be effective from 1-4-75 to 31-3-1973.
T1096 (F. No, 203 /73/75-TTA. II)]
Wo 4937. — ^Tf^TOT^° 853 ^ 20 3/6/7S-*uf
efro it ii) mfhr, 7 wr^ } 7 5 i arj^FT $ gfr totoi^t
102 Gf/75 — 6
New Delhi, the 29th September, 1975
S*0. 4938. — It is hereby notified for general information
that the institution mentioned below has been approved by
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, the prescribed autho-
rity for the purposes of clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of Sec-
tion 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
INSTITUTION
Guiamt Yidvapith, Ahmednbad.
This notification will be effective from
1-4-75 to 31-3-1977.
[No. 1104 (F. No. 203/57 /75-ITA. II)]
T. P. IHUNJHUNWALA, Dy Secy.
3TTTOT 3TTTO, ^TT^TTIT
TOIST, 13 OTJTO, 197 5
1^0 4939 -— ^ TW t ^ ^ $
wrwr^ tftT ^rermt % *rm <ftt ^
Tnnfw fait mir fatrw ^ ctpt wifinaflr 'f^nwt'
% Jr faiTT tot fa^w farfra 1 974 - 7 s 3i
tr.H 137 5 9 ttTff Jr «rfer?T OT 2 5,-)00 To nr ^
5TTTOT TOT ffrff f ' WT t '
THE GAZETTE 01 INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRA HAVANA 1, 1397 [Pari IE-
4058
«ftr <rr 7 T , r f ; pf-jfti'rn , i g <? t ( i ne i 4 3 )
*fft mrr 287 p wr irfarnt wr pPt pftr (Pt ft, 5ft
p pr^rr (ft ppft *rsft ^Ap trwr ft tm Pitt**
9-6-1909 t PP^T fro l/i/oixnf rt (5ft) % srt *n4t
nmk pppft (ft «ttp (rr PTfft»nr (ftr fftw fftpr $ far i
Pft aqfrw cr Tnwt % ptp (ftr q% Prrrto ^ i
(ft: ft, pnm (ft™ fftrft ppp PtTsprsr, pipit t^-
ITTT P* toft TRtSaim PpTT % 3 1 PTP, 197 5 TO %
*ptoftf ^ ptp apt ftr TOrtor (rr r^J j i
(i) ipTWT 9 PTP ft ft(rr 1 Pft
3 PTP TO 5ft (Fife & WT Hlft
wf ^ t i
(ii) ptp V £ fftp ?E(k r*FT ftr i :j ptp ft TOr 2 *ft
:jptp to (ft (toft ft 1RT iflff (Ttfft
n< % 1
(i) (TPrV *frto;£: qrrwr ftr 2 to 3 ptp % pfro
w ft ppt Piff *rrrf p£ 8 : 1
(i.i) tor top srpr p (*rrft i to; 1
1 . sjft tto pp° ftftra, ppf ( ii i ) 1612418 (ftr (iv)
1612418
2 . ftt (nror pftt prftp ppp %o it^o cnr appftt p*r
*F*r, pTppr (i) 52000 , (iii) 59000 (ft r (iv)
1 1 1000-
3 . ppft ptoft vttt, pto^t (iii) 1 49191 (ftp (iv) 149191
4. (ft t^o CTo ^Frto (TPryTOt (wr) (iii) 30 273 (ftr
(iv) 30 27 3
5 . ftt torra TOtor *NWt, otoit j (i) 37940 (ftr
(iv) 3 7940
6 . ftpft <FPTTP to[TPT (fpo (ToTo) p^pT (i) 1735
(iii) 1787606 (ftp (iv) 1789341,
7 . *sft apat ft pm ftt$n (fir® (ToTo) «frn=r^Y, (ii)
27454, (iii) 1024307 (ftr (W) 1051761
s. 4pft pttp ptoftp iro $fftp (v°) ftr* (t«) tom
wtppp (iii) 29620 (ftr (iv) 29020
9. ppp pTPPP 5F?riTfR (fto P»° ), pTOn (iii) 41 2848
(ftp (lV) 412848
10 . «ft pftto snrrc TJRjrnr, ppppft(iii) 75150 (ftr (iv)
751 50
1 1 . ftt Tfrr, fVtor Tfrnfwrft., «ft *TTtorm
fftr'ytfrc (i) 6000 , (ii) 17000 , (iii) 313000 ,
(ftr(iv) 3153000
12. *sft RTf, (f^o(ro<T 0 ) (i) 1230000,
(ii) 1 524,000 (ftr (iv) 16-I7000
13 . torr^ fto tE (t^ 9io), ^Tfir^r tfft
(iii) 86931 (At (iv) 86931
14. fl-fT# fsto 4^ PTo ffTo (j) 5 7 264,
(iii) 20 5 3 5 71 (ftr (iv) 21 10855
1 5 . Mr TpErarr 6Tr% ym, firto TrotorA,
(toft fnkPHt PTP6 (i) 2 18285 (iii)
80 1659 (ftr (iv) 1022944
16- *prrp ? t ^rT^ft i?niirT3fir rmr ( t grr^T
^^pf itrro afro (firr-H "fto itto%o ; torFfli'Td^H
(iii) 56761 (ftr (iv) 56761
17 . «ft trrn? 5?mT («r) (iii) 5716 IH (ftr
(W) 574618
1 8. *ft JfTfJTPK fKT95 fkfW ^yTtTftmft, FTo (fptTP
thttfi, gjRR(iii) 575520 (ftr (iv) 575520 .
19 . (ftrnr (fpro^oTjo), ^pr^rr (iii) 10 20 789
(ftr (iv) 1020789.
20 . «ft ffro, (r^fr ppt^t (iii) 318680 (ftr
(iv) 318689
21 . *ft tutor ft ^nmrr ^Rpfrpr, (fpo^opo) grnrr,
(iii) 108227 (ftr (iv) 108227
22 . 4pft ^ftprtoR (^o Ptor
(iii) 470822 (ftr (iv) 470892
23. (ft ’pTTiPrFT Tprtorp6?rp (^) PPTPT (iii) 790 655
(ftr (iv) 790655
24. 4flft PPpP (<fo <TJo) pPTRj (iii) 1614392
(ftr ( 1\ ) 1614 3 92
25 . (ft sppiTrnm P^rtor'tr (^r) ffkr J (rrrf
aft<> pry iq7o f^o f^RrrTrPP (iii)
45133 (ftr (iv) 45133-
26- artrjfrqr grpt (po p,o) pwr (iii) 1624379
(ftr (iv) 1 624379
27 . fttpf ^rppfft ^ptpt pprjr (iii)
35967 (ftr (iv) 35967
28 . ftftff ptto ?rrro p?to FfRift p^ fnrr, ^Tppr ( i) 1000
(ii) 5ooo, (iii) 46000 (ftr (iv) 71000 .
29 - tto ifpjtpr , ftrnfr totoft, trtjt
(ii) 47316 (ft T (iv) 47316
30- fr^irMt ftrfpT, prnr^r (iii) 144696 (ftr
(iv) 144696
31- kt *ffto ^fto PPTTT (iii) 31 673 (ftr
(iv) 31673
32 . ftpf ^Nt rrTfp w, ^pprmTT (iii) 1171 68 (ftr
(iv) 117168
33 . ptpt^t ?, (®Po) pmpr (iii) 29432
(ftT (iv) 29432
34. (ft pprtorpft (wt) prfe pp?t WTr
p 1 ^ T7t> ; ’pPrnr (i ; .i) 37513 (ftr (iv) 37513
35 - 4prf Ptorrp (p° pv°), Ptfon (iii) 80622
(ftr (iv) 80622
36 , (ft «t° p^p, PPm (iii) 63172 (ftr (iv)
63172
37- (ft ppo (f^0 po po) TTTjr (i) 49181,
(iii) 5 1867 (ftr (iv) 1079-18
36- (ftp ft rfrrT<r (®q), pwk (iii) 97790
(ftr 97796
39 . 4+i<i fpBTiPT*rip fafi ^mrr (i) 79000 ,
(ii) 4 7 8 70, (iii) 308481 (ftr (iv) 435351
Sec. 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 4059
40. Toth tpht; (iii) iuogis
tAt (iv) 130 0 15
Ji. w *tth tw (iii) 77824 «ft?
(iv) 77824
42. tfr TPTT'm?? farrA, («ro) (iii)
1590 1 1 ’tftT (iv) 1599 1 I
43. TTTTTH (ffro H<> To), MHdl (i)
loooo, (ii) 85960, (iii) 1 54689-1 <Ar
(iv) 1042854
4 4- tfl TOrTTT TRft, RPPTR (i) 2 04 83 hV
(iv) 20 183
45. 'TV miTOTT TTOTPT (®To ) (i) 2880 7,
(iii) 029210 nV ( iv) 0580 17
40- ATT HI y . L> 41 |<o HT'TFT TT° f^Ta TPET viVF fait
TTTTT (i) 34758, (ii) 202207, (iii)
70S355 tfk (iv) 1005380
47 - ^ mrRpRr mr (fi?o no to) ^htt (i) 170000 ,
(ii) 3000, (iii) 2685000 nfa (iv) 2858000
4 8. HHT HF> HI <o <TT^TT tf’ r U (HTfl Tu' ) (i)
273002, (iii) 944338 Hfa (iv) 12 18000
19. 4 h4 ttttth fair srr<> fao, htct vrr
fart THI'K (i) 35-1836, (ii) 1 534 21,
(iii) 489390 tftz (iv) 997097
50. ^t 4 THTfrcnn *Rr, tffjt (i) 3 . 4050 ,
(ii) 40 249, (iii) 011118 (iv) 685417
51 . *4f tthtArtt tt£tt (f^o ho t<>), w>mz\ (ii)
1 5590 (iii) 1663412 ( iv) 1 679002
52 . tfr fafa tttts, (ii) 18807 (iii)
9 1726 $ftr (iv) 110 533
53 . «ft TTTPTTRT TttfaT (f^o Ho To) TTT^T (ii) 5240 9,
(iii) 900207 sAr (iv) 1012010
5 4. AtT TTH^^TT TTTTTH (to T7o), TPR^t (ii) 132170,
(iii) 2371 63 4 rfn; (iv) 2503804
55 . Ml n^r, thhst (ii)
12715, (iii) 88020 nfa (iv) 101335
56. Mt HTTo TTo HTHT (airo) H*RR?ff (ii) 44363
tffa (iv) 443 6 3
5 7. AtT fr+H'ri TTTTTT (nTo T»o) HHTTWt (ii)
5 28 00 (iv) 52860
5 8. *fr Tnflar ^urmrn hr (*to) ^rr (iii) 562 55
*At (iv) 5 0255
59. HR> TTfl-o sffo '4TTfw (wo) TO (iii) 8 5307
tfR (iv) 85367
60. ^TT TTTfmn TTOtR Ijw RPTH Tt^pfin (To )
flTRR (iii) 1 54472 sftT (iv) 1 54472
61. «ft ti wT i r. TOnrTRT hrtt (nfrorcrt) jkt
Ato hro iffa sffarr ^o fee frrwRTT
(iii) 2420 57 tftr (iv) 242057
0 2. TTHHR ^ HIM Id ^o SITo HTTTRff (iii)
3 7 20 1 5 *fR ( iv) 3 7 2015
63. T^Pt hfo ^to jstrr TTmrr 1T,r ? <Rrt
(i .i^k itt p: ) Tfa (to tto) hh?r (iii) 4 u7ihu
( iv) 40 7 189
64. for# HTTo nno jfHtfwr OTTTH (ftirtf) 5Ro f*R
T^tt (iii) 1343079 hV (iv) 1343079
6 5. Trnrrcm nK, fnrw fto *fr TnnT
Trfimm nir, gnrT; (iii) 1070000 (jv)
197800 0
66. Tjriwn T^rr^rn (feo to to) trttx (iii)
35-1581-1 sAt (iv) 35458 14
6 7 - +l+f^ tit o ls tt o fn o ttht (iii)
23857 481 ?At (iv) 2385748 1
68. Mrnr (ft* To) ijwr (i) 878636
*At (iv) 870636
69. *sft j vr«0 ?; prr, nnrrl^Trrf), ^o ?fr
mf tt^t %o mro rnro ^mfr
wrrA tftjt (i.) 32000, (iii) 55000 nk
(iv) 8 7000
70- nt THo %0 W3ff (®To) THTTT: (iii) 80857
«ftt (iv) 808 5 7
71 - *-ft wftjtr nqnrn (*q*o) (iii) 105770
5At (iv) 105770
7 2. 4m ^ftTTT TrfTTTT (1%o Ho To) (iii)
616773 xAt (iv) 6 16773
73 . sftnfa min (»To) (iii) 104324
(iv) 10 4324
74 . nntf tt 0 srto fno (ii) 00099
hYt (i) 96999
75. TOF ^rfWTT (f?o Ho To) (iii) 777636
^At (iv) 777636
76. HTO TTlfTT, TTT3t (i) 10 685 5 (li) 237 5 4
(iii) 140821 hV (iv) 271430
[TF To ( (5 4 )/ 7 5— 7 6]
5®/-
fno Tfo httttt
HTTq[r
mfYl 13-10-1975
CiFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF IN CO MET AX
V1DHARBHA AND MARATHWADA
Nagpur, the 13th October, 1975
S.O. 4939.“-Wherea L s the Central Government is of the
opinion that it is necessary and expedient in public interest to
publish the names and addresses hereinafter specified relating to
lax defaulters who were in default of payment of tax of
Rs. 25000 and above for the periods exceeding 9 months as
on 31st March, 1975 relating to Financial year 1974-75.
And whereas in exercise of the powers conferred by the
Section 287 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) and
all others powers enabling it in this behalf, the Central Gov-
ernment by its order V. No. l/l/69-IT(B) dated 9-6-1969
hereby authorised and directed all Commissioners of Income-
tax to publish the names and addresses of such tax defaul-
ters.
Now, therefore, I, Commissioner of Income-tax, Vidharbha
and Marathwadu, Nagpur, hereby publish the names and
addresses of the lax defaulters in Vidharbhn and Marath-
wada charge as on 31-3-1975.
(i) is for Part ‘A’ — Amount in default for periods ex-
ceeding 9 months bin not exceeding 1 year and
3 months.
(ii) for Part L W — Amount in default fui period of 1 year
& 3 months and above but not exceeding 2 years &
3 months.
4060
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22 1 1975 / A GRA H A Y AN A E 1S97 [Part II—
(iii) For Part 'C 1 — Amount in default for 2 years and 3
months above.
(iv) For total amount in default.
1. Shri A. S. Dixit, Ward ha (iii) 1612418 and civ) 161241b
2. Shri Adamdi, C/o M/s. K.S.M, Hasxonjee & Sonts.
Nagpur (i) 52000, (in) 59000 and (iv) 111 COO.
3. M/s. Abidi Shop, Nagpur (iii) 149191 and (iv)
149191.
4. Shri A. A. Amravnti (lndl) ( iii) 30273 and (iv)
30273.
5. Shri Bhivraj Te mnl Sanebeti, Malkapur (i) 37940 and
(iv) 37940.
6. M/s. Balaram Toluram (HUF), Tumsar (i) 1735, (iii)
1787606 and (iv) 1789341.
7. Shri Banwarilul Loiva (HUF) Kamatee, (ii> 27454
(iii) 1024307 and (iv) 1051761.
8. M/s. Bharat Minig ft Trading (Pvt.) Ltd. (Coy)
Vishakapatnam (iii) 29620 and (iv) 29620.
9. M/s. Bagmal Prahladrai (RF), Akola (Iii) 412848 and
(iv) 412848.
10. Shri Bhagirath Prasad Kaluram, Parbhani (iii) 75150
and (iv) 75150.
11. Shri Chandraknnt Mor Legal heir of Dale Shn
Narsinghdas Mor, Tumsar (i) 6000, (ii) 17000, (ill)
3130000 and (iv) 3153000.
12. Shri Chandrakant Mor, (HUF) Tumstw (i) 123000,
(ii) 1524000 and (iv) 1647000,
13. M/s. Citadel Trading Co. (RF), Burdwan, West Ben-
gal (iii) 86931 and (iv) 86931.
14. M/s. Dealers and Co. Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur (i) 57284,
(iii) 2053571 and (iv) 2110855.
15. Shri Durgaprasad Saraf, Tumsar L/H of Late Smt.
Sugnidevi Saraf, Tumsar, (i) 218285, (iii) 804659 (iv)
1022944.
16, Capt. Dadli Shamsherjang Bahadur Rana (lndl) through
Agent M/s. R. B. Shreerain & Co. Pvt. Ltd.,
Vishakapatnam (iii) 56761 and (iv) 56751.
17. Shri Durgaprasad Saraf. Tumsar (lndl.) (iii) 574618
and (iv) 574618.
18. Shri Durgaprasad Saraf L/H of Late Shrecrnm Daunt-
ram, Tumsar (iii) 575520 and (iv) 575520.
19. M/s. Durgaprasad Shreeram (HUF’), Tumsar (iii)
1020789 and (iv) 1020789.
20. Shri Fakruddin Mohd. Ali, Nagpur (iii) 318689 and
(iv) 3 1 8689.
21. Shri Gutihil Suwalol Jhiipuriti, (HUF) Tumsar. (iii;
108227 and (iv) 108227.
22. M/s. Goverdhandas Gopikisan, (RF) Gendin (iii)
470822 and (iv) 470822.
23. Shri Gulabdas Rambilada:;, (lndl.) Nagpur (iii) 790655
and (iv) 790655.
24. M/s. Gudrughat Mines (R.F.) Tumsar (iii) 1614392
and (iv) 1614392.
25. Shri Jainaravnn Nandkishorc (TndL), Through Agent
M/s R, D Shreeram & Co, Pvt. Ltd., Visliakhapnt-
n am (hi) and 45133 and (iv) 45133.
26. M/s. Jaipuria Bros. (RF), Tumsar (iii) 1624379 and
(iv) 1624379.
27. M/s. Janki General Stores, Hansapnri Nagpur (iii)
35967 and (iv) 35967.
28. M /s. K. S. M. Hasaniee & Sons, Nagpur (i) 1 0000,
(ii) 5fX)0, (iii) 56000 and (iv) 71000.
29. Dr. Kachumal Jethannnd, Netaji Dispensary, Mahal.,
Nagpur (ii) 47316 and (iv) 47316.
30. Sml. Krishnadevi Loiya, Kamptee (iii) 144696 and
(iv) 144696.
31. Shri V. G. Kolhatkar, Nagpur (iii) 31673 and (iv)
31673.
32. M/s. Laxmi Lime Works, Yeotmal (iii) 117168 and
(iv) 117168.
33. Smt. Laxmi bai Gaik wad, (lndl) Nagpur (iii) 29432
and (iv) 29432.
34. Shri Mohsinali Faiznlhussain (lndl) C/o M/s Jawahar
Traders & Co., Bhopal (iii) 37513 and (iv) 37513,
35. M/s. K. M ussa Mohd. (R.F.), Gondia (iii) 80622 and
(iv) 80622.
36. Shri D.W. Mandpe, Nagpur (iii) 63J72 and (iv) 63172.
37. Shri N. P. I.ahoti, (HUF) Lalur (i) 49181, (iii) 51867
and (iv) 107948.
38. Smt. Nirmalabai Solao (lndl), Nagpur, (iii) 97796 and
(iv) 97796.
39. M/s. Nizam a bad Bidi Manufactures Co., Kamptee (i)
79000, (ii) 47870, (iii) 308481 and (iv) 43535 L
40. Nagpur Orange Growers Association, Nagpur (iii)
130615. and (iv) 130615.
41. M/s. Nagpur Glass Works, Nagpur (iii) 77824 and fiv)
77824.
42. Shri Prahladrni Ramgopal Tiwari, (lndl) Akola (iii)
159911 nd (iv) 159911.
43 M/s, Ramkrishna Ramnath (HUF), Kamptee (i) 10000,
(ii) 85960, (iii) 1546894 and (iv) 1642854.
44. Shri Ramidau Bhivraj Sanchcli, Malkapur (i) 26483
and (iv) 26483.
45. Shri Ramcshwardas Ramdas (lndl.) Jaipur (i) 28807.
(iii) 629210 and (iv) 658017.
46. M/s. R. R, Agarwal Pvt. Ltd., C/o Shankar Bidi
Factory, Nagpur (i) 34758, (ii) 262267. (iii) 768355
and (iv) 1065380,
47. Shri Ramnarayan Mor, (HUF) Tumsar (i) 170000.
(ii) 3000, (iii) 2685000 and (iv) 2858000.
48. M/s. R. R. J.oiya & Sons (URF), Kamptee (i) 273662,
(iii) 944338 and (iv) 1218000.
49. M/s. Ramkrishna Ramnath Bidi Pvt. Ltd., C/o
Shankar Bidi Factory, Nagpur (i) 354836, (ii) 153421,
(iii) 489390 and (iv) 997697.
50. M/s, Ramkrishna Ramnath Sons, Nagpur (i) 34050
(ii) 40249, (iii) 611118 and (iv) 685417.
51. Shri Radhakishan loiya (HUF), Kamptee (h) 15590
(iii) 1663412 and (iv) 1679002.
52. Shri O. V. Ranade, Nagpur (ii) 18807. (iii) 9172(
and (iv) 110533.
Sec. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 4061
53. Shri Ramakant Loiya, (HUE) Kamptee, (ii) 52409,
(iii) 960207 and (iv) 1012616.
54. M/s. Ram Krishna Ramnalh (R.F.), 'Kamptee (ii)
132170, (iii) 2371634 and (iv) 2503804.
55. Shri Ramcshchandra Loiya C/o Raj Bhawan, Kamptee
(ii) 12715, (iii) 88620 and (iv) 101335.
56. Shri R. N. Ladha (Indl.) Amravati. (ii) 44363 and
(iv) 44363.
57, M/s. Ramchandra Ramratan (URF), Amravati (ii)
52860 and (iv) 52860.
58. Shri Rajiv Ishwarlal Mar (Indl.) Tumsar (iii) 56255
and (iv) 56255.
59. R.S.G-L. Jaipuria (Indl.) 1 umsar, (iii) 85367 and (iv)
85367.
60. M/s. Rambilas Murlidhar and Balaram Tolurum tRE)
Tumsar, (iii) 154472 and (iv), 154472.
61. Shri Rumkumar Ramgopal Bohara (Non-resident)
r fhrough Agent M/s. R. B. Shreernm and Co. Ltd.,
Vishakapatnam (iii) 242057 and (iv) 242057.
62. M/s. Ramchandra Transport Co. Pvt. Ltd., Amravati.
(iii) 372015 and (iv) 372015.
63. M/s. R. B. Shreeram Durgaprasad and Fatehand Nar-
slnghdas (Export) Firm (K.F.) Tumsar, (iii) 407189
and (iv) 407189.
64. M/s. R. S. Gopikisan Agarwal (Shippers) Pvt. Lid.
Tumsar. (iii) 1343079 and (iv) 1343079.
65. Shri Ramnarain Mor, Legal Fleir of Late Sin i Fnteh-
chand Narsinghdns Mor, Tumsar (iii) 1978000 and
(iv) 1978000.
66. M/s. Rambilas Gulabtfas (HUF) Nagpur (iii) 3545814
and (iv) 3545814'.
67. M/s. R. B. Shrccrarrr Durgaprasad Pvt. Ltd. Tmnsar
(ii) 23857481 and (iv) 23857481.
68. M/s. Shreeram Durgaprasad (HUF’) Tumsar. (i)
878636 and (iv) 878636.
69. Shri Shabir Hussain, Legal heir of Late Shri Hntirn-
bhai, C/o M/s. K.S.M. Hassonjee and sons, ltwavi,
Nagpur (i) 32000; (iii) 55000 and (iv) 87000. y
70. Shri S. K. Mukherjee (Indl.) Nagpur (iii) 80857 and
(iv) 80857.
71, Shri Sanloshkumar Agarwal (Indl.), Tumfinr (iii)
105770 and (iv) 105770.
72. M/s. Shreeram Durgaprasad (HUF) Tumsar (iii)
6)6773 and (iv) 616773.
73, Smt. Sudhadcvi Loiya (Indl.) Kamptee (iii) 104324
and (iv) 104324.
74. M/s. Suwarna Transport Co. Pvt. Ltd., -BuMhana.
(ii) 96999 and (iv) 96999.
75. Umashankar Durgaprasad (HUF) Tumsar. (iii) 777636
and (iv) 777636.
76, Umashankar Loiya, Kamptee, (i) 106855, (ii) 23754,
(iii) 140821 and (iv) 27)430.
[F. No Rcey. <64>/7:L76.|
Sd/-
V. R. BA PAT, Commossioner
5 19 7 5
VI O Wto 494 0. — 7RTR RP* tffafTTT,
1968 ( 19 68 TT 45) Wt <mT 80 ^ TTTRT (l) % WZ
(j£T) % 'dWJ i (ii) 3R T SfWf frfipm «FT 3TRRT TRtT
To ^fr % far El
% tfpR TCT TRf TUT Rot TfaTnft
E ^Rr rrf'dEm % otFt fonr farfr fMrwrr nr stttft
T Erf EtEittt tt wtr E ’crfl'^T,
strt % hsrfrfe: ttt E r 4hn
Er 5fR i
10/75 tjo m 132 / 11 / 74/^0 f?To 11]
trtTo STfafUT
ORDER
New Delhi, the 5th November, 1975
S.O. 4940. — In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
clause (ii) of clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 80 of
the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 (45 of 1968), the Central Gov-
ernment hereby directs that a person aggrieved by any dec-
sion or order made under the said Act by a Gold Control
Officer functioning within the jurisdiction of the Collector of
Customs (Preventive) Bombay, may prefer an appeal against
such decision or order, within the time specified in the said
section 80, to the Appellate Collector of Customs, Bombay.
(No. 15/75 F. No. 132/1 1/74-GC. Ill
M. G, ABROL, Add!. Secy.
fpRT favTHT
Tf 21 19 75
49 41, — i'TO) fafTTTT crfhfTTlT, 1 94 9 ( 1 9 4 9
10 ) URr 5 3 TRT TRT TT TTtT *Rrt JTjr,
tr <+■!<, TRrfrr fa ^ r Eh^ i Rv i tt n^jRr
MRft $ far Tts, rf r trr sro tjr
6 $3 Tf TT RT<Tf^T % fTTtJ if, Err qr fo T*R-
Hlfcm TQTT 8/:)20 T 3 20/n^-Fpf % 9 ^
W TT, qfrjfhrq- TV tJRT 9 % 4 If) 7 6.
WFT sfit 1
[To 1 5(20)-tfo rffo'ilI-7S]
(Department of Banking)
New Delhi, the 2 1st October, 1975
S.O, 4941. — In exercise of the powers conferred by sec-
tion 5.3 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949),
the Central Government, on the recommendation of the
Reserve Bank of India, hereby declares that the provisions of
section 9 of the said Act shall not apply, till the 4th Octo-
ber, 1976, to the Chartered Bank, in respect of the immov-
able property of 6 cents of land with nine shop rooms there-
on bearing Municipal Nos. VJ1I/320A to 320H held by
it at Pulluparfun, Fort Cochin.
(No. 15(20)-B.O. III/75J
M. B. USGAONKAR, Under Secy,
4062 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 [Part II--
nf fkmt, 29 1975
TfTfo 3ITo 4942:— tfr (w*j tfk srtW
Hffar, 19 7 0 % W 8 % 3W¥ ( I ) % Tf^T 3
(^) < ( J| it, ^?ftn TOT, ^tr^Ft fV*rf to
# TTO «ft 4to W Tt 30 TOJ^T;
197 5 tt HT7TVT ^PT TPTt tft? 29 SR^TT, 1970 ^ tfnFn
ghf % farr, to tfwf * ftow *7
*n it fnnnn ^r?fy ft i
[rfo TT^<s 9 / 1 0/ 7 5~^t o *fr*> I- ( l)]
New Delhi, the 29th October, 1975
S.O. 4942, — In pursuance of sub’Clause (a) of clause 3,
read with sub-clause (1) of clause 8, of the Nationalised
Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme,
1970, the Central Government, after consultation with the
Reserve Bank of India, hereby appoints Shri C. P. Shah as
the Managing Director of Bank of India for the period
commencing on 30th October, 1975 and ending with 29th
October, 1976.
[No. F. 9/10/75-BO, 1-11
WJo 3TT° 494 3: — to (Wtf toftf
tom, 1970 % WX 7 * nm qfOT Pf 5 t (l)
^ snnrn Sr, -h^k, ftoto to n TOtor
^ wrr^, “it tftc 4Yo to ftoft 30 1975 %
JTPfi 1 5i^ r U‘ if fn^n fanT *PTT fj[,
Ttfr prrfr* n to m ifrnr * fhtw-mi % tow % ¥n it
ntor ft 1
[^orr^o 9 / 10 / 75-^0 too I— ( 2 )]
^mr to *prr, totoi t
S.O, 4943,— In pursuance of sub-clause (1) of clause 5.
read with clause 7 of the Nationalised Banks (Management
and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970 the Central Gov-
ernment, after consultation with the Reserve Bank of India,
hereby appoints Shri C. P. Shah, who has been appointed as
Managing Director of Bank of India with effect from 30th
October, 1975, to be the Chairman of the Board of Directors
of Bank of India with effect from the same date.
INo. F. 9/1 0/75- BO, F2|
N. C. SEN GUPTA, Sccy.
to ftort, 3 1 1975
WT Trfta
^rfo wto 4944: — wp n l j i frto to totomrn, 1934 ^ mh/u’m it 1975 % ftotv 24 to 5P trmrf % far* ^5rr
(^ftorn)
^TTTTtf
trrftot
flftor fwn it
to gn; *fte-
2 2 , 49 , 48,000
to fhwr to : —
(t) r nTT?r it rm ferr
( «r) vtrtt % TJsrr pn
1 8 3,8 2 , 5 6,00 0
toum it to
6209 , 52 , 74,000
hwt srFnjnnt
121 , 73 , 97,000
tot M
to
62 » 2 , 02 , 22,000
iftf
wt cr fnw
*nrn ?twit wtt sr%-
Wt inFnm ’tfrr. $*rt
304 , 26 , 53,000
1 7 , 33 , 97,000
5970 , 39 , 72,000
iTTHT
6292 , 02 , 22,000
'tnffdnf
6292 , 02 , 22,000
ftofa : 29 TOfrr, 1 975 I
*tro %o imito T3 wh
SEC. 3 (ii) J THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975 / AGRAHA YANA 1, 1897 4063
24 WfWT 19 7 5 T'T flTTTK fr-fa fa; % fffaT fN"*TT'T % TtYtOTT TT ffarw
fOTmr
+ ,r !4
. WTfmt
rm
•jaft
5,00, 00,000
22,4 9,48,000
snrffar Frfw
150,00,00,000
sfaTT ffaWI
2,80,000
wta far Tfir
wtct fto*r
5, 19,000
( i fa ^rhr ) faftr
33 4,00,00,00 0
srfft *fhc fto
TT^hr ffa
(fa m-
89,86,67,000
(fwftorw) ftfr
1 4 0, 00,0 0,0 00
(fa forfait
. .
( *T ) fa < + 1 \) ^5fOTT fto
781,19, 43,00u
(fafarifar wfa) faftr
3 90, 00,0 0,0 00
forfaff t TTT JSTT «POTT*
7 8 2,2 1,95,00(1
jiih ^ iftnrt ; —
5 16,39,24,000
(<p) FOTft
^ KflT XTfim : —
( i ) fatffa 7OTTT
5 5,92,36,000
(i) Whr ipwrr
. .
(ii) TOT TOT?
7, 87,0 4,000
(ii) TTO^TT^VT®
I 1 3,32,00,000
(w) far
^rf<nr :—
(i) TrfaOT far
538,84,1 1,000
( i ) w<j4jfar ^if u i^ W tt|
15 5,1 9,20,000
(ii) Tm *r?VT<t tor
1 7,00,37,000
(ii) tot ■HsjT.i-O qft ft
343, 1 6,95,000
(iii) fa TOT TjTfafa far
1,02,68,000
(iii)
13,18,56,000
(l‘v) 5PT far
64,26,000
TT«fT Ff*r ^°T ((fWw4)T srqnr) frftr ir act,
srftpr sfVr
(qr) het «ftr srfirrr : —
(i) TOT TOTTf Tft
69,60,45,000
(ii) tot rrrmff tqff qfr
13,1 3,26,0 00
(iii) *ffr
(iv) yfr '^ftn fVrr *fr
87,00,00,000
(fa ^
1 221,27, 05,000
(w) ^TfjfOT wrfOTr?trr % ftrrf^ff £f frr«h!T
TT^tr rfa Trq (r«flTr».ui) frftr if ttt «ffr srfim
10,60,13,000
fa ffar
1 78,32,30,000
tot ♦fff Tf ^rw sTfinr
TT^T w^t) Prfv §
9-4,55,00,000
sot fafffa
728,17,54, 0 0 0
^TT, wfw ^ Mw
( ^ ) from t'F t>\ ip* v\r.
(t) frrrtr far sttt tt(V f%t Tf»f/frfam
333,25,56,000
it Mr
#
sft (TTffart
34 4, 4 1, 58, 000
*ifa
3768,67,71,000
3768,67.71,000
"•sfF^r, sTTqfaq; trt sftr >uw*irO'f qffnjffnrt TTf»r?r fc i
frfT TCT (llfaP’OH STCifa) faffeT sftr iflfllPm H'ji ( I'lfa.lcfl'l &TqnT ) frftT if if feij ipf fTTW vnfir^T sf^ffr I
(SjTFRfta FpT *t”T STTfa) frfa ft ITT^ W sfH srffar STTffaT !flff £, TT^ TOT fTWTTlf fa fffa faf SOTlfa farr-
fOT UTTfar | I
-bTTOfrr ffant far' stWott fa htti 17 ( 4 ) (»r) % wrffa OT^ffar mfaOT faff fa fanfa ffafi tt wftm f?fa fat <35,02,00.000
mfwvr f 1
ttn^onfftr v.<x (fafarofa swfa) fafa far far (ffafamr) fafa fr iott ^ far farm- wiffaT Tfa $ 1
ffarK ■ 29 WTJTT, 1 97 5
WF> %o fsrrff, gr, jp^
[tfo Tiro io(i)/ 75 -faofa<, I]
To To jfOTPTEff, SOTfafar
4064
THfc' GAZETTE OF INDIA ; NOVEMBER 22, 1975 / AGRAHAY AN A E 1807 [Part H—
(Department of Banking)
RESERVE BANK OF INDI A
New Delhi, the 3 1st October, 1975
S.O. l >4 4 . — \n Account pursuant to the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, for the week ended, the 24th day of October, 1975
ISSUE DEPARTMENT
LIABILITIES Rs.
Notes Hold in the Banking
Department . . 22,49,48,000
Notes in circulation . * 6269,52/74,000
Total no I os issued .
Rs.
6292,02,22,000
ASSETS
Gold Coin and Bullion : —
(a) Held in India
(b) Held outside India
Foreign Securities
Total ....
Rupee Coin
Government of India Rupee
Securities
Internal Bills of Exchange and
other commercial paper
Rs.
182.52.56.000
121.73.97.000
Rs.
304,26,53,000
17,35,97,000
5970,39,72,000
Total Liabilities . 6292,02,22,000 Tptal Assets . . 6292^02,2^000
R, K. HAZARI, Dy. Governor
Dated the 29th day of October, 1975
Statement of the Affairs of the Reserve Bank of India, Banking Department as on the 24th October, 1975
LIABILITIES
Capital Paid Up
Reserve Fund
National Agricultural Credit (Long Term Ope-
rations) Fund ......
National Agricultural Credit (Stabilisation) Fund .
National Industrial Credit (Long Term Ope-
rations) Fund
Deposits : —
(a) Government
(\) Central Govcmmct ....
(ii) State Governments ....
(b) Banks :
(1) Scheduled Commercial Banks
fii) Scheduled State Cooperative Banks
(iii) Non -Scheduled State Co-operative Banks
(iv) Other Banks
(c) Others •
Bills Payable ■
Other Liabilities ......
Rs.
ASSETS
Rs.
5,00,00,000
Notes
22,49,48,000
Rupee Coin . .
2,80,000
150,00,00,000
Small Coin .......
Bills Purchased and Discounted : —
5,19,000
(a) Internal
88,86,87,000
334,00,00,000
(b) External
(c) Government Treasury Bills
781,19,43,000
140,00,00,000
Balances Held Abroad * ....
782,21,95,000
Investments*'*
Loans and Advances to
516,39,24,000
(i) Central Government ....
390,00,00,000
(ii) State Governments^ ....
Loans and Advances to
113.32, CO CC0
(i) Scheduled Commercial Bankst
155,19,20,000
(ii) State Co-operative Bankstf •
343,16,95,000
55.92,36,000
(iii) Others
13,18,56,000
7,87,04,000
Loans Advances and Investments from National
Agricultural Credit (Long Term Operations)
Fund :
538.84.11.000 (a) Loans and Advances to : —
17,00.37,000 (i) State Government . 69,60,45,000
1,62,68,000 (i!) State Co-oporativs Banks . 13,13,26,000
64,26,000 (iii) Central Land Mortgage Banks
1221.27.05.000 (iv) Agricultural Refinance Coiporation . 87,00,00,000
178.32.30.000 (b) Investment in Central Land Mortgage
728.17.54.000 Bank Debentures .... 10,60,13,000
Loans and Advances from National Agricul-
tural Credit (Stabilisation) Fund .
Loans and Advances to State Co-operative Banks 94,55,06,000
Loans, Advances and Investments from Na-
tional Industrial Credit (Long Term Oper-
ations) Fund :
(a) Loans and Advances to the Development
Bank . - . 333,25,56,000
(b) Investment in bond s/deben lures isfitcd by
the Development Bank ....
Other Assets 344,41,58,000
RUPEES . * ...* __ 3768, 67,71, 000_ RUPEES . ■ _ . _ _ - 3768,6 7,71,00 0
^Includes Cash, Fixed Deposits and Short-term Securities.
^Excluding Investments from the National Agricultural Credit (Long Term Operations) Fund and Ihe National Industrial Credit
(Long Term Operations) Fund.
(djExcludmg Loans and Advances from the National Agricultural Credit (Long Term Operations) Fund, but including temporary
overdrafts to State Governments.
t Includes Rs. 65,02,00,000/- advanced to scheduled commercial banks against usance bills under Section 17(4)(c) of the Reserve
Bank of India Act.
It Excluding Loans and Advances from the National Agricultural Credit (Long Term Operations) Fund and the National
Agricultuva Credit (Stabilisation) Fund.
R. K. HAZARI, Dy. Governor.
[No. F. 10(l)/75 - BO. I]
Dated the 29th day of October, 1975
C.W. MIRCHANDANI, Under Secy.
Sec. 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897
4065
RffaPtft, 5 TORT, 1975
ftfo Wfo 4945. — ftTOTt fRftRRR RfirfilRR, 1949 ( 1949
tt 10 ) ftr tnrr S3 ffrtr rrvt wiroft rr ttYr to! ftj,
ftRflR otr, RmftR tor ft) fircnfTur me, irt^sttt
rIrrt TOY | fft faro tor far®, rTOt rnr rrTO (rtrr
TRTCr)RlfT RTO RmfiT ('tjfRJRITC # ot[Ro 832} % rrr Jr,
Tiff to <R, to Rfafror qfr um 9 % iws 5 R*JRT,
1976 TP tpj stiff i
[to 15 ( 43 ) “iff® «fto III/ 7 5]
Jr® mo toTOpt, rrt rTO
New Delhi, the 5th November, 1975
8.0. 4945. — In exercise of the powers conferred by Sec-
tion 53 of the Blinking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949),
the Central Government, on the recommendation of ihc
Reserve Bank of India, hereby declares that the provisions
of Section 9 of the said Act shall not apply till 5th October
1976, to the Vijaya Bank Ltd., Mangalore in respect of the
immovable property (plot of land bearing T. S. No. S32)
held by it at Mangalore (South Kanara).
[No. 15(43)-B.O. HI/75]
M. B. USGAONKAR, Under Secy.
worn rrjrr TFrfmr
'Tfarmr, 9 kwjst, 1975
rtrrt
<rr® wt® 4946 . — rtopt wfarfftRR, 1 9 s 1 ftr frrrr 297
% PR-fifT ^Wfdltff ft) sjpff, 3 1-3-1975 Tf 25,000
v® rto mfir wfto <pt tow tot «rr — (i) nft tfifr
TW ft farr I 5fr rft RfR ft RfilRr RRFeT % firtr | RT^ trip
to tftr TO rtr ft toto ftt rrFst ft far t (H)
iff t^to trtr ft fto t aft trqr to TO TO RTR ftf rTO
ft Rpr rrt wft Rfto wsrfer ft finj rt? 3 ?> tfft
TO RfR ft RfspP iff RRfa % fftcr R$r $ 1 ( iii ) ft) tfifr
■opr ft fTO^^^toTOTORraftr wtor ft ftrrr
to TOY toto ftf wafft ft firtj | (iv) to ftf $®r tor
ft Riy ?f i
1. TOf fftto fftfbr ato, ttmr rrk, sjfyam (i) 3 , 14,653
(ii) 3,591 (iii) 77,016 (iv) 3 , 9 s, 2 eo
2. «ff TOt TTR RlTO TOTO (i) 3,74,515 (ii) 13,434
(iii) 25,129 (iv) 4,13,078
3. «f( Tftw JRK rtTO TOTO (i) l, 05, 490 (ii) 2,365
(iii) 1,959 (iv) 1,09,814
4. *fr RTR TTR RRRTR, TOR RfiTT TO, TjfkRTRT
(i) 4,91,081 (iv) 4,91,061
5. *ft fto ?jrtt rtTO totofic (i) 1 , 21,490 (iii) 7,011
(iv) 1,29,101
102 GT/75 — -7
6 . tort fit? ftwY, tot «ff rrto fit?, 67 1 , tort
8-jff, mnffRT (i) 73,0di (iv) 73,041
7 . jTO sftftor rr Rfto, qfeTO (iii) 68,ize (iv)
68,126
e. ftto wto rr rRtr (rt® ) fft®, RfertRi 1 (iii) 29,204
(iv) 29,204
9, $RR RfoTO RR Rl%R (srTe) f'T®, '6'4%-R (iii)
84,845 (iv) 84,8-15
10 . iff ftff rir RiftR piftr wf, Rftrfttro (iii)
3,1 1,667 (iv) 3,11,667
11. Efrmff TOf ftfl 1 RI^R RRlRfr (iii) 68,425 (iv) 68,425
12. flPW vtfftT *0# ('nftjRRflf) RTOP1WT (iii) 50,847
(iv) 50,847
13. Eft mfr TTR RffR RRtRfT (iii) 45,084 (iv) 45,084
14- for# fwiR vilrr wf, Rftrfttro i (iii) 32,841 (iv)
32,841
15. ^RTfRTRRRTfRtn’Rfto.ft'Tf (i) 31,649 (iv) 31,649
16 . «ft'J«Rt : mR^R,TtRM,F!irRRT (iii) 7 0, 234 (iv) 7 0,234
17. RTOTO ft RRR, fwn (iii) 60,986 (iv)
60,98Q
18 . rtto qoi'vstar fmJtfts, rIrtt (iii) 54,120
(iv) 54,129
to. lift gta^R fir? RRfar ’jt-tsst p^ttr t^ ttrt rTtor,
WTIT (iii) 26,651 (iv) 26,651
20 . «ft tffimrt JRTR RT tRT, RflT fit? RiT TRJRt RTfTR, TfitR
tor, w«rr (iii) 43,355 (iv) 43,355
21 . trrtf rfrtt ftfRTO (mo) firo, TfR^rr (iii) 90,922
(iv) 90,922
22 . 'ft 'ff 'JR fir?, RfR TfRRTRRr, ftT? ( i ) 96,000
(iv) 96,000
[<pt® r» tr/snpiw/iii]
fr» ft® [prr, RRjw
(Office of the Commissioner of Income-tax)
Patiala, the 9th October, 1975
INCOME-TAX
S.O. 4946. — List of defaulters for payment of tax of
Rs. 25000 or more as on 31-3-1975 u/s 287 of the l.T. Act,
1961-0) is for amount in default for periods exceeding nine
months but not exceeding one year and three months, (ii)
for amount in default for period of one year and three months
and above but not exceeding two years and three months,
(iii) for amount in default for period of two years and
three months and above (iv) for total amount in default.
I. M/s. Girson Quitting Works, Sabnrt Bczar, Ludhiana,
(i) 3,14,653 (ii) 3,591 (iii) 77,016 (iv) 3,9J,26Q,
4066
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1 975 /AGRAHA YANA J, 1897 [Part II—
2. Shri Mangal Rai, C/o above, (i) 3,74,515 (ii) 13,434
(iii) 25, 129 (iv) 4,13,078.
3. Shri Ramesh Kumar C/o above, (i) 1,05,490 (ii) 2,3 ft 5
(iii) 25,129 (lv) 4,13,078.
4. Shri Babu Ram Aggarwal, Talab Mantlir Road,
Ludhiana, (i) 4,91,061, (iv) 4,91,061.
5. Shri Shiv Kumar C/o above, (i) 1,21,490 (iii) 7,611,
(iv) 1,29,101.
6. M/s Dhanwant Singh Sekhon, through Shri Balwant
Singh, 671, Sec. 8-B, Chandigarh (1) 73,041, (iv)
73,041.
7. M/3. Premier Bus Service, Patiala (iii) 68,126 (iv)
68,126.
8. M/s. Calcutta Bus Service (P) Ltd., Patiala (iii)
29,204, (iv) 29,204.
9. M/s. Patiala Bus Service, (P) Ltd., Sirhind. (iii)
84.845 (iv) 84,845.
10. Shri Siri Ram C/o Jindal Steel Works, Malerkotla
(iii) 3,11,667 (iv) 3,11,667.
11. Smt. Bachni Devi C/o above (iii) 68,425 (iv) 68,425.
12. M/s, Jindal Steel Works (RF) Malerkotla, (iii)
50,847 (iv) 50,847.
13. Shri Wali Ram C/o above, (iii) 45,084 (iv) 45,084.
14. M/s, Jindal Steel Works, Malerkotla, (iii) 32,841
(iv) 32,841.
15. M/s. Sham Lai Sood <5t Co., Ropar, (i) 31,649, (iv)
31,649.
16. Shri Prithi Chand Sood, The Mall Simla (iii) 70,234
(lv) 70,234.
17. M/s. Metropole Hotel, The Mall, Simla- (iii)
60.986 (iv) 60,986.
18. M/s. Kangra Iron & Steel Syndicate Kangra. (iii)
54,129 (iv) 54,129.
19. Shri Sukhdev Singh C/o Sh. Gurbax Steel & Wire
Products, Kangra (iii) 26,651 (iv) 26,651,
20. Shri Devinder Kumar Barotra, L/Heir of Shri Chattar
Singh, ExAlP, Chamba. (iii) 43,355 (iv) 43,355.
21. M/s. Azad Hind Chemicals (P) Ltd., Kangra. (iii)
90,922 (iv) 99,922.
22. Sh. Puran Chand alias Puran Singh, Vill. Raiemajra
Ropar (i) 96,000 (iv) 96,000.
(F. No. REC /PUBLICATION /ni]
V, P. GUPTA, Commissioner,
enron Tfermr-II
Tfbrrwr, 22 1975
4947 — m: trwt wr $ far
S to tot rrtfKTr $ fV % tot tot
TWtjrr tot ftfirrfert smftrcr to?, fro to
1974-75 tfr 5VTOT 5000/. tfo TOJ/T *FT r im
tot «tt 1
tfh: itt: trnm ( 1 9 6 1 43 ) qft «nrr 287
ffirr vrfarof Wro tox? toft *r*ft
tnfr ^ ^rfwTf 7Thr to:* jn tot * xrft
2 5 19 69 % WOT 9A1 tnywri •ft.
TOSTdTRt ^ TOT, JJfTOTT,
TO fWrror TO *rr TnC'Tmr^rf
TfCtTT Tiftr mrr (nm) wifror
T«TT far TO f^Tcfrtr Ip? 197 4-7 5 T ifFTO 5 0 00 /- %
irrr * tot 'qr tf+’iffrr to^ % f’TO sttIw^
fifTO | l
5RT- tr* 3TU fTOW 25 ^T, 1969 %
xnror ffRt urPRhfr to toVt tot 515 , t toF
ttot TT^j^ff TOTdmt T tot tot tot WvrftTOt
mtfm tott p i
tTPTTO f^TOT, TfTOFTT
$$ TOSTTI" fTO TO fafftT TT 1974-7 5 T
f&rot ^ sooo/- *ftot ^ «tt ;
(iv) % fTT t— ' '*&' f(TO (ii) TOfttjfar
^ ^ ftp? ttT (iii) TOP? TO Tjrrf* % fro £ i
i. (stto) (i) W (ii)
1965- 66 (iii) 75,000
[951o To ^m/sm^/ 73 “76/ ]
Patiala, the 22nd October, 1975
S.O. 4947. — Whereas the Central Government is of the opi-
nion that it is necessary and expedient in public interest to
publish the names and other particulars relating to asscssees
on whom penalty of not less than Rs. 5,000 was imposed
during the financial year 1974-75;
And whereas in exercise of the powers conferred by sec-
tion 287 of the Income-tax Act (43 of 1961) and all other
owers enabling them in this behalf the Central Government
as by its order dated 25th March, 1969 authorised all
Commissioners of Income-tax to publish the names, addresses,
Ftatus, assessment year and details of penalties levied which
would include the amounts and nature of penalties relating
to assessees, within their jurisdiction and on whom a penalty
of not less than Rs. 5,000 was imposed during, the financial
year 1974-75;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred on me
by the Central Government by its aforesaid order dated
25th March, 1969 J hereby publish in the schedule, hereto
annexed, the names and other particulars of the assessees
aforesaid.
lire ome- tax Department Patiala
Assessees on whom a penalty of not. less than Rs. 500C
was imposed for concealment of income during the financial
year 1974-75: (i) is for status ‘C 1 for Company : (u) foi
assessment, year and (iii) for penalty imposed,
1. M/s. The Haryana .Industries (P) Ltd.; Rohtnk H
‘ C (ii) 1965 66 (iii) Rs. 7,500.
[F. No. H Q. H /Pub/75-76;
qftTOTT, 25 TOJTT, 1975
VTo 3TT° 4 948. — TO: 'Viflq ^T TRT $T
^ to tot TOWtn | fr favfr-r ^ 1974-75 ^
TOTmmf % : —
(i) sft f% tott froj ^rfrwr jjrrr S tot
tot tot tost ttoT % frotfro ^ iftr
thi? r;A7X7TTP r>F iathia ■ wnvFkfHFtt 00 . 1 975 /AGRAHA YANA 1. 1897
4067
(ii) ft w, g-ifprr tot wrflfiT ftrrr fftift
TOT Ttf HTO tt wFfenr fftftfRf ft Tff $,
tpt fr'Tr ^rwrNrr wr fefefw - to jftftteft
smfftr ft
% rtT TO HVltFT ftfrfr TO (l9GI *T 43) ft ^TTT 237
gro wlftrft htt cr«rr to PrPm 3% to4 top* ^rft to
TniART^ff sft *R?r ijt ftft*r *r?fr ^ *pft feri^ 5
gprfe 1 97 j % jrt *rft to*r srr^jftf ft f^rrTiv to
1974-75 % ftor srft fttaR ^ ^7 tftorc faro *RrraTft
^r ir^rf^PT to ft, tfftd ^tt «ft ft rfK ft ft
itmr fanRft, *r fftrffar 5TT^r f fen ^rfe «r tot ferr
TOT *R ST^TpTTfT *Fft % fft mfe^rr fW % I
to, to ftjfirr *r?fr arm faro 5 1974
% <jftro srfejr 3KT to*t ftftft toft g^T, t
jftr ftrro ^f 'jpffro *Rgmmf % to tot to feftr-
foft swrfvRr w g 1
ottor fern, qftror
f$r *rft ^feTrt to F^ *rfawr fraff % to, fa^ft
HR feflq- ft 1974-75 % fttFT ^ RFff TTO *T *Tfipfr fftrffcr
ft ft $ : (i) fcfror * fci*_<*rnr write: % fft, ftr' fyg
^faror frwr % fft, (ii) fftiro ft 3* fft, ( iii ) ft ft
to fftrft % fro, ( iv) fftrffft «rr*r * fft, (v) fft sft *r
k fft, (vi) fft ft ^nr * ferr £ 1
1 . ftft fto fto ttu^ ^ j^rrn (i) 'to' (ii) 1974-75
(iii) 1,67,62 1 ^0 (iv) 1,68,060 *° ( V) 1 , 3 2, 1 9 7 *°
TO (Vi) 1,112,197 ** l
2. "ft ftw ^Tir TTT^fT WT$ qT?fm
(i) *rrf (ii) 1973-74 (iii) 1 , 01,010 (iv)
1,02,870 (V) 62,440 (vi) 62 ,M 0 ¥of
3. ft fto fto JTrtf?r Hxprft
q^r^m (i) ^ (ii) 1974-75 (iii) 1 , 8 . 1,006 *?o
(iv) 1,91,040 ^o (v) 1,00,544 Tie fWT (vi)
1,00,544 ^o I
4 . ft stro 5rfer 47Rf wthtr vj jfir
^o,q^rr (i) icrrf (ii) 1974-75 (iii) 1 , 27 , 230*0
(iv) 1,27,280 *0 (v) 83,153 *o Wftf (vi)
-83,153 5o 1
5 . ritro TOrft ftft feftpRrRT, rht (i) <nf (ii)
1 974-75 (ill) 1,94,660 5o ( iv) 1,95,880 ^e
(V) 1,32,118 ^o miT (vi) 1, 32, 1 1 8 1
[tr ftRT ^roll TnrrRr^/mo * 77 / 75 - 70 / 2 ]
0 R 0 0 ^ht*r tmr*f?r 1
Patiala, the 2Jtb October, 1975
S.O. 4948. — Whereas the Central Government is of opinion
that it is necessary and expedient in the public interest to
publish the names and other particulars hereinafter specilied
relating to assessees :
(i) being Individuals, or Hindu Undivided Families, who
have been assessed on an income of more than one
lakh of rupees, and
(ii) being firms, companies, or other association of per-
sons, who have been assessed on an income of
more than ten lakhs of rupees,
during the financial year 1974-75;
And whereas in exercise of the powers conferred by section
287 of the Income-tax Act (43 of 1961) and all other powers
enabling them in this behalf, the Central Government has by
its order dated 5th July, 1974, authorised all Commissioners
of Income-tax to publish the names, addresscs ; status and
assessment year, relating to assessees within their jurisdiction
and the income returned by, the income assessed on, the tax
ayablc by, and the tax paid by, such assessees during the
nancial year 1974-75;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred on
mo by the Central Government by its aforesaid order dated
5th July, 1974, I hereby publish in the schedule, hereto
annexed, the names and other particulars of the assessees
aforesaid^
INCOME-TAX DEPARTMENT PATIALA
Names of nil Individuals and Hindu Undivided Families
assessed on an income of more than Rs. one lakh during
financial year 1974-75 : (i) is for status — T for Individual,
H’ for H.U.F, (ii) for Assessment year, (iii) for Income
returned, (iv) for Income assessed, (v) for Tax payable and
(vi) for Tax paid.
1 . Modi D. D. & Sons, Sunam (i) ‘H’ (ii) 1974-75 (iii)
Rs. 1,67621, (iv) Rs, 1,68,060, (v) Rs. 1,32,197,
(vi) Rs. 1 *32, i 97.
2. Shri Deepak Raj Nath C/o M/s, Decpak Woollen
Industries, Panipat (i) T, (ii) 1973-74, (iii)
Rs, 1,01,010, (iv) Rs. 1,02,870, (v) Rs. 62,440 and
(vi) Rs. 62,440.
3. Shri D. D. Puri C/o M/s. Saraswati Industrial Syn-
dicate, Yamunanager (i) I (ii) 1974-75 (iii)
Rs. 1,81,906 (iv) Rs. 1,91,040 fv) 1,00,544 and (vi)
Rs. 1,00,544.
4. Shri K. R. Malhotra C/o M /s Punjab Business and
Supplv Co. Yamunanagar (i) T (ii) 1974-75 (iii)
Re. 1,27,230 (iv) Rs. 1,27,280 (v) Rs. 83,153 and
(vi) Rs. 83,153.
5. Smt. Bhagwati Devi, Ganeriwala, Sirsa (i) T (ii)
1974-75 (iii) Rs. 1,94.660 (iv) Rs. 1,95,880 (v)
Rs. 1,32,118 and (vi) 1,32,118.
[F. No. HQ n/Pub/I. Tax/75-76 /2]
M. S. UNNINAVAR, Commissioner.
'TfetriHT, 27 *T*q*T, 1975
UToWTo 494 9. — SlttPFT 1901 tTRT 7
rOTTimf ft $ft, foR (Vrffe W 1974*75 % fttR
(tm km* vimr so 00 *0 (ft* ^tr w$) It
ipfaT jhirtt wr *t : (i) jjftm ^ fftr — 'vrf
4068
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975 /AGR AHA YANA 1, 1S97 [Part II —
'nr? £ fan, (ii) rr
O roi^r * far | (iii) tftt 3 %' fare £ 1
1. aft ^ TR * WffRT RTR TRl, ^RTtC, flfff-
RTRT (j) VT t ? (ii) 19 68-69 (Hi) 8000
(ii) 1969-70 (iii) 8000,
2. fro fate wh rrr sintr;, tjtenTT i
(i) W (ii) 1970 71 (iii) 85,580.
3. Awb *FRT TpiTTR TOT 0^T Ti-bJfWM tetet fafao,
te OTtf, BtT^TT ^faETTRT (i) ^ 'Rt Tt' (ii) 1970*7 1
(iii) 3 1,477-
[td *ro te /wm II]
«fro Rto ^JRfT,
Patiala, the 27th October. 1975
S.O. 4949.— List of assesses on whom a penalty of not
less than Rs. 5000 (Five thousand) was imposed for conceal-
ment of income during the financial year 1974-75, under sec-
tion 287 of tfie I.T. Act, 1 96 1 . (i) stand for statu — l F* for
firm, ‘AOP’ for Association of persons and T for Individual,
(ii) stands for assessment year (iii) for amount of penalty.
1. Sh, Dev Raj C/o Shanti Surup Dev Raj Chaura Bazar,
Ludhiana (i) T (ii) 1968-69 (iii) 8000 (ii) 1969-70
(iii) 8000.
2. M/Girson Knitting Works, Saban Bazar, Ludhiana
(i) ‘F T 1970-71 (iii) B5,580.
3. M/s. Bassi Gujjran Labour & Construction Society
Ltd., village Dugri, Distt, Ludhana (i) 4 AOP’ (ii)
1970-71 (iii) 31,477.
[F. No. Rec/Publication/Il]
V. P. GUPTA, Commissioner
sttwt: smptf *ft *te
qWFT 1WPT
26 19 75
fTTo *TT° 4950. — TOtTcfW *f R ^ft telfafte $ : —
(nr) tern 3-Tfer m fijfj srftew Jr, ipr wiw
WT Jr TT fagrfte te?T IPTT I (R-PT JFJ^'qt
(i) A | I
(*rr) fa*m: te nr 'ft tm in ifter
w trny te Jr srfep *rnr qr tefte ten w $ (nnr teR
(2) R |)
(i) fate ^rr; "rT— wrte % ter tfR —
“teft $ faq (ii) faster *nt (Hi) tetter wr (iv) fate
te (v) qrnqrr (vj) <trrmFT smyr i
7 4-7 5 4 tfi Tpf fatfte % spjnR \ \
(*0 (l) tfr te u^to tete Tnrteu tefa
?ftft?TT RrrPTTj tec, i (i) tj (ii) 73*74 (iii) 88G00
(iv) 10 1700 (v) 18753 (vi) 18753 ( 2) RTo^o
fco (i) ^ (ii) ’ 72-73 (iii) 82410
(iv) 144330 (v) 100584 (Vi) 44629 ( 3 ) *ffo ^
5T^^R 7 ^pm-y, (i) ^ (ii) 72-73 (iii) 221004 (iv)
225480 (v) 1 76707 (Vi) 1 72922 ( 4 ) «ft tete
RUTFIT (L)rf (ii) 73*74 (iii) 190 50 5 (iv) 193430
(V) 143798 (vi) 101808 ( 5 )^^ q^^TRTT,
(1) 3 (ii) 73-74 (iii) 1 15270 (iv) 1 17530 (v) 73956
(vi) 10488 ( 6) sft €\o
^TTfTj tefateT^r, ’FT^rffa (i) ^ (ii) 74-75
(iii) 143857 (iv) 163890 (v) 115711 (vi) 115711
( 7 ) *fr ^0 jrrfafFT: vr
(i) R (ii) 74-75 (iii) 73930 (iv) 133780 (v)
97444 (Vi) 97444 (s) 5to ’R^Tr *fN%[^TT flOT,
(i) ^ (ii) 74-75 (iii) 1 44820 (iv)
165750 (V) 1 1870 1 (vi) 1 18701 ( 9 )
sfrrftRTJ (i) ^ (ii) 74-75 (iii) 127900 (iv) 120940
(v) 84585 (Vi) 30000 (l0) ^ tTRo tfUp.^d_
(i) ^ (ii) 72-73 (iii) (— ) 1 1970 (iv) 115110 (v)
73701 (vi) 3154 (ll) W>, RPT sntf
, f ? rte6'-3 (i) 3 (ii) 72-73 (iii) 110620 (iv)
119970 (V) 78172 (vi) 14000 (l2) ^
^Tter?: (i) ^ (ii) 74-75 (iii) 119900 (iv) liesoo
(v) 79625 (vi) 79625 (l3) ^ flW,
^Tter?: (i) ^ (it) 74-75 (iii) 109750 (iv) 101690
(v) 63835 (vi) 68835 (l4) «fTo mio
tiRo TRf?rn^R, tRyn^nr (i) tj (ii) 74-75 (iii)
98300 (iv) 102050 (v) 6108(3 (vi) 58334 (l 5 ) Rf
rr D #o Rhrte (i) ^ (ii) 74-75 (iii) 166300
(iv) 100300 (v) 120796 (vi) 120790 (l0) sft
tRRTLFT, eft o ^fo ^[teTT (i) ^
(ii) 73-74 (iii) 90650 (iv) 126990 (v) 39723 (vi)
39723 ( 17) (i) ^ (ii) 70-71
(iii) 222555 (iv) 226400 (v) 1 49672 (vi) 149672
(ii) 71-72 (iii) 179359 (iv) 183200 (v) 130 716
(vi) 130716 (ii) 69-70 (Hi) 257300 (iv) 261140
(v) 176677 (Vi) 1 76677 (lB) tfY to Jo qfiw,
(i) ^ (ii) 74-75 (iii) 160720 (iv) I60720 (v) 1 1 5662
(vi) 1 15662 ( 19 ) tfteoSTTTo ftrteT., (i) ^ (ij) 74-75
(iii) 170500 (iv) 170500 (v) 124706 (vi) 124706 ( 20 )
Mt ^frfte^r , (i) ^ (ii) 73-74 (iii) 124353
(iv) 131360 (v) 88651 (vi) 8865 1 ( 2l) qtft-
tftt qrre whesnr (j) ^ (ij) 73.74 ( iii)
107070 (iv) 107380 (v) 67761 (vl) 6776 1 ( 22)
ur'o ifffr r rrte drrf, vtteTT turt, (j) u
(ii) 74-75 (iii) 176670 (iv) 181210 (v) 109060 (vi)
9663 8- ( 23 ) r^ro <uto fitri ^fit Trf, qroRt,
(i) ^ (ii) 74-75 (iii) 197077 (iv) 199200
(v) 134651 (vi) 1349 51 ( 24) ? -4t fto ^ffo WtR?T, *FTfT-
^ (i) ^ (ii) 74-75 (iii) 109222 (iv) 111105 (v)
75516 (vi) 49350 ( 25) TlfH^(i)
(ii) 72-73 (iii) 208 (iv) 136730 (v) 65992
(26) *Tr qfte te, ter^r^-f «te7frter , (i) ^
(ii) 73-74 (iii) 78613 (iv) 116120 (v) 74035
Sec. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA ; NOVEMBER 22, 1975 / AGRAHAY AN A 1, 1897 4069
(27)^ tf© (i) t? (ii) 74-75 (iii)
80 540 (lv) 111310 (v) 7020 5 (vi) 51592 ( 28)
sfr (i) it (ii) 72-73 (iii) (-)i047
(iv) 1030-10 (v) 62597 ( 29) sft ffWt '3?jffeOT\
Tt^TFT (i) ^ (ii) 74-75 (iii) 115420 (iv) 115420 (v)
73 6 5 6 (vi) 73056 ( 30) *ft© qR q^IR, ifRMTq
3j*t, (i) 3 (ii) 72-73 (iii) 102190 (iv) 119350 (v)
77602 (vi) 61816 ( 3l) qiW, t^fe,
4to m (i) & (ii) 73-74 (iii) 135295 (iv)
1 46650 (v) 1 0 1 346 (vi) 101346 ( 32) ftft t TfcT qpft,
f^^R Tfe, (i) $ (ii) 72-73 (iii) 92330 (iv)
1 1 088 0 (v) 69810 (vi) 1470 5 ( 3 3) *ft *ft© %© qfwm - ,
tt£r, ?mr u<uu^n (H q (ii) 72-73 (iii) 142550
(iv) 141810 (v) 98265 (vi) 98265 (34) «ft tft© rfto
wttc far©, «
gTtfrfto *fr© q>© (i) q (ii) 72-73 (iii) K92oo(iv) 109200
(v) 63206 (vi) 6 8206 ( 35) *ft tft© ifVo qRo ^Yfw,
WTHTH feo, (i) ^ (ii) 73-74 (iii) 102160 (iv)
105040 (v) 64390 (vi) 64390 ( 36) «ft fo tf©
*mrfe (i) ft (li) 74-75 (iii) 132660 (iv) 132660
(V) 89846 (Vi) 89846 ( 37) sflq^t 2t° tfaft,
qfWfejq ^T3RT, foftPFt^T, I (i) ^ (ii) 74-75
(iii) 1 366 1 8 (lV) 141210 (v) 99987 ( vi ) 9 99 8 7 ( 3 8 )
sfftrcft ffo +HS.+JH jfWt,
vt^nr (i) ^ (ii) 74-75 (iii) 1 36573 (iv; 1 40840
(V) 9941 5 (vi) 994 1 5 ( 39) «ft %©
RpFT (i) ft (ii) 7 4-75
(iii) 92120 (iv) 110450 (v) 71 829 (vi) 71829 ( 40)
V^o r(q© 1 ftpq, ^fVqR Tf^q, faWFqfRT (i) <t
(ii) 74-75 (iii) 250530 (iv) 256530 (v) 220858 (vi)
220858 ( 4l) *ft RfRFT, tTF&£,
(i) ct(ii) 72-73 (iii) 140055 (iv) 141 850 (v) 9706 G
(vi) 97066 (ii) 73-74 (iii) 132885 (iv) 134460 (v)
97155 (vi) 97 1 55 (U; 74-75 (iii) 132325 (iv) 134220
(V) 00263 (vi) 90263 ( 42) *ft «fto q'mqq q*t, if© qfa
quit ^rrf^TT-3 (i) tt (ii) 72-73 (iii) 1 16620
(iv) 1 53360 (V) 108891 (vi) 7339 (43)^© tjq© ^
qrtfqt srrf, qrqq, (i) ft (ii) 74-75
(iii) 246480 (lV) 246490 (v) 211035 (vi) 211035
( 44 ) €t© qfaqr afaft, qtfktftfeOT
(i) ^ (ii) 74-75 (iii) 1 39470 (iv) 143730 (v) 102740
(vi) 102740 ( 45 ) Fnffa *fttRq iW, "^WT’ 1
font, (i) <£ (ii) 69-70 (iii) 127127 (iv)
186020 (v) 46247 ( 46) *ft t* q^f$qM fafe
qnfaro (i) ft (ii) 72-73 (iii) 20040 (iv) 152000 (v)
108376 ( 47 ) . «ft <FTfcPF£ (i) $ (ii) 72-73
(iii) 18110 (iv) 100040 (v) 59807 (48) «ft fa qqq
ftrfa, (i) ^ (ii) 72-73 (iii) 47430 (iv) 151950
(v) 107552 ( 49 ) *ft ft* qquft W, (i) (ii)
72-73 (iii) 92400 (iv) 130440 (v) 86586 (vi)
19261 ( 5o) «ft qf© ffPPT, ql)W
X*]i not PuPth fir©, tffcMH (i) $ (ii) 73-74 (iii)
1 08550 (iv) 1 1 4290 (v) 72947 (vi) 66798 ( 5 l)
4 Y 4 V, <£t, foRiVW^, qfttFqq (i) tt
(ii) 74-75 (iii) 144180 (iv) 150430 (v) 106196
(vi) 106196 (52) «ft tTo O^To ^Ti-
(i) $ (ii) 72-73 (iii) 100984 (iv)
102000 (v) 61 G 21 (vi) 6162 1 ( 53 ) * 4 t THTo %o fenr-
TTWT, (i) ^ (ii) 63-64 (iii) 1 84538 (iv)
190330 (v) 129804 (vi) 129804 ( 54 ) eftfRft ^TRTl,
eft^nr, ^TPOTfqq, (i) ft (ii) 74-75 (iii) 10G440
(iv) 114200 (v) 85543 (vi) 85543 ( 55 ) eftqcft %°
WtOTT, (i) ^ (ii) 74*75 (Jii; 104540 (iv) 106480
(V) 68852 (vi) 66233 I
(qr) ( 1 ) ft© qT*Ftqw ftrfrqT w ^tf^r fror fq©, wmmtft
(i) qr^Rro ^T^ft (ii) 74-75 (iii) 1 1 6 1 3 0 ( i v ) 1 388940
(v) 9062 3 2 (vi) 5 809 83 (2) ^ ^ prfwfiTo,
(i) Rfo (ii) 73-74 (iii) 1 1 1 6700
(iv) 1 140040 (v) 759609 (vi) 759609 (
MifTWJ, r^f^/ (i) t^osefto qto (ii) 71-7 2 (iii) — (iv) 37 5 0000
(v) 1884066 (4) ftro, qrfqiwift
(i) (ii) 74-75 (iii) 1057200 (iv) 1579210 (v)
933033 (Vi) 655826 1
XX XXX
(v) rniRR qf^iqq 1961 % 271 (i)(€r) %
qn: qrq *f»t ferret % ftfnrT ^ qT
^ ^ "R fir? ft 1974-75 ^
ftqr xr | 1
(*r) mq ftTTqV ^ ^7 qr % q*M
if fwr w | 1
(t) (1) ir© qtVfVFff; qr^ r (i)
(ii) 1964-05 (iii) 9854 (2) ’ft© rRT© inr
wr qqy (i) ^ (ii) 1971-72 (iii)
12360 1
(^r) (1) fr© tto q«j 5 T ^ tot, -^f«R-l (i)
(ii) 1970-71 (iii) 14472 (2) Too tfr©
qruK, qtf^rrvt, (i) ^ (ii) 70-71
(iii) 180 50 (3) ft© aft© '^TTq, 19F, 3 TOtr, qVrrq
fffejipr, qftqflr fn, wsrt -5 (i) ^ (il) 1970-71 (iii)
16340 I
[*ft© #© lO/aft/i^/q/ 75-76 (l)]
'ft© wfTqq, qr^qq 1
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,
KERALA
(Income-Tax Department)
Cochin, the 28th October, 1975
S.O,4950.^Follovving is the list of assesseos (a) being tho
individuals or Hindu Undivided Families, who have been as-
sessed on an income of more than one lakh of rupees, in Sche*
dulo I appended hereto; (b) being Firms, Association of Per-
sons or Companies who have been assessed on an income of
4 0 70 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA .!, 1897 [Part II-
more than 10 lakhs of rupees, in Schedule II appended hcro-
to: (i) indicates status — ‘I' for ‘Individual’ and ‘Co.’ for com-
pany. (ti) Assessment Year (i;i) Income returned (iv) Inco-
me assessed (v) Income-tax payable (vi) Income-tax paid.
The Information is with reference to assessments made during
1974-75.
(A) (1) Shri. C.L. Anand, Mg. Director, M/s. Toshiba
Anand Lamps l.td, Ernakulam (i) 1 (ii) 73-74 (iii) 88600 (iv)
101700 (v) 18753 (vi) 18753 (2) Shri K.J. Augustine, K.J. Joseph
& Co., Cochin-2, (i) I (ii) 72-73 (Hi) 82410 (iv) 144330 (v)
100584 (vi) 44629 (3) Shri A. Abdul Rahlman, Choughat
(i) I (ii) 72-73 (iii) 221004 (iv) 225480 (v) 176707 (vi) 172922
(4) Shri A. Abdul Rahiman, Choughat (i) I (ii) 73-74 (iii)
190505 (iv) 193430 (v) 143798 (vi) 101S0S (J) Haji A. Abduf-
khador, Choughat (i) I iii) 73-74 (iii) 115270 (iv) 117530 (v)
73956 (vi) 10488 (6) Shri T. Abdulkarim Musaliar, Kampi-
kettil House, Kilikollur, Quilon (i) 1 (ii) 74-75 (iii) 143857
(iv) 163890 (v) 115711 (vi) 115711 (7) Shri S. Aniyan, Re.
bv P. Satruglman Pillai, Srecvarahan Thevally, QuHon (i) I
(ii) 74-75 (iii) 73930 (iv) 133780 (v) 97444 (vi) 97444 (8) Shri
T. Assume Becvee, Kampikettil House, Kflikolloor, Quilon
(i) I (ii) 74-75 (iii) 144820 (iv) 165750 (v) 118701 (vi) 118701
(9) Shri U.K. Appu, Calicut (i) I (ii) 74-75 (iii) 127960 (iv)
126940 (v) 84585 (vi) 30000 (10) Shri M. Appukutty,
Calicut (i) 1 (ii) 72-73 (iii) (— ) 11970 (iv) 115110 (v) 73701 (vi)
3154 (11) P. Bernad Abro, M/s. Paul Abrao & Sous, Cochin-3
(i) I (ii) 72-73 (iii) 116620 (iv) 119970 (v) 78172 (vi) 14000 (12)
Shri C.K. Babu Naidu, Calfcut (i) I (ii) 74-75 (iii) 119900 (iv)
119900 (v) 79625 (vi) 79625 (13) Shri A.P. Balakrishna Pillai,
Calicut (i) I (ii) 74-75 (iii) 109750 (iv) 101690 (v) 68835 (vi)
68835 (14) Shri R. Chandrasekharan, Partner M/s R. Rama-
iinga Iyer, Ernakulam (i) I (ii) 74-75 (iii) 98300 (iv) 102050
(v) 61686 (vi) 58334 (15) Shri A.W.J. Caper, Koratty, (i) I
(ii) 74-75 (iii) 166300 (iv) 166300 (v) 120796 (vi) 120796 (16)
Shiri G. Dharmajan, PWD Contractor, Kalluvila Vecdu, Kanchi,
(i) I (li) 73-74 (iii) 90650 (iv) 126960 (v) 39723 (vi) 39723 (17)
K.J, Francis, Trichur (i) I (ii) 70-71 (iii) 222555 (iv) 226400
v) 149672 (vi) 149672 (ii) 71-72 (iii) 179359 (iv) 183200 (v)
30716 (vi) 130716 (ii)' 69-70 (iii) 257300 (iv) 261140 (v)
176677 (vi) 176677 (18) Shri. J.E. Forbes, Koratty (i) 1 (ii)
74-75 (iii) 160720 (iv) 160720 (v) 115662 (vi) 115662 (19) J-E,
R. Griffith, Koratty, (i) I (ii) 74-75 (iii) 170500 (iv) 170500 (v)
124706 (vi) 124706 (20) Shri T.V. Govindan, Trichur (i) I
(ii) 73-74 (iii) 124853 (iv) 131360 (v) 88651 (vi) 88651 (21)
Shri P. Gopinathan Nair, Jupitor Cashew Co. Qivlon 0) I (ii)
73- 74 (iii) 107070 (iv) 107380 (v) 67761 (vi) 67761 (22) H.H.
Gouri Parvathi Bavl, Kaudiar Palace, Trivandrum (0 1 (ii)
74- 75 (Hi) 176670 (iv) 184210 (v) 109060 (vi) 96638. (23) H.H.
Gouri Lakshmi Bayi, Princess, Kaudiar Palace, Trivandrum
(i) T 00 74-75 (Hi) 197677 (iv) 199200 (v) 134651 (vi) 134651
(24) Shri P.V, Gangadharnn, Calicut (i) 1 (ii) 74-75 (iii) 109222
(iv) 111165 (v) 75516 (vi) 49356 (25) Shri. M. Har/do's, Cali-
cut (i) T (ii) 72-73 (iii) 208 (iv) 136730 (v) 65992 (26)
Shri. Joseph John, Kunnath Financial Corporation, Thura-
veor (i) I (li) 73-74 (iii) 78613 (iv) 116120 (v) 74635 (27) Shri
P.T, Joseph, J owe Her Kottayam (i) I (ii) 74-75 (iii) 80540 (iv)
1111310 (v) 70205 (vi) 51592 (28) Shri M. Jayarrjan, Calicut
(i) I (li) 72-73 (Hi) (—) 1047 (iv) 103040 (v) 62597 (29) Shri
Kurian Abraham ‘Ooppoottii’ Kottayam (i) 1 (ii) 74-75 (iii)
115420 (iv) 115420 (v) 73636 (vi) 73656 (30) Shri C.R. Kesa-
van Vaidyar, Jrinjalakuda (i) I (ii) 72-73 (iii) 102190 (iv) 119350
(v) 77602 (vi) 61816 (31) Shri C.M.M. I awrcnce, Wentworth
Estate, Cherambadi (P. O) (i) 1 (ii) 73-74 (Hi) 135295 (iv) 146650
(v) 101346 (vi) 101346 (32) Mary Paul Abro, Chittoor Rond,
Ernakulam (i) I (ii) 72-73 (iii) 92330 (iv) 110880 (v) 69810
(vi) 14705 (33) Shri C.K, Manila), Partner, Lai products, Er-
nakulam (i) I (ii) 72-73 (iii) 142550 (iv) 141810 (v) 98265 (vi)
98265 (34) Shri C.O.R, Me. Neilly, Malayalam Plantations
Ltd., Upper Swindle Estate. Surenelli P.O. (i) I (ii) 7.2-73
(iii) 109200 (iv) 109200 (v) 68206 (vi) 68206 (35) Shri C.G.
R. Me. "Neilly, Malayalam Plantations Ltd. (i) 1 (ii) 73-74
(iii) 102160 (iv) 105040 (v) 64390 (vi) 64390 (36) Shri. .E.J.
Me. Intosh, Koratty (i) I (ii) 74-75 (Hi) 132660 (iv) 132660 (v)
89846 (vi) 89846 (37) Suit. T. Mariam Beevi, Kampikettil
House, Kilikollur, Quilon (i) I (ii) 74-75 (iii) 136618 (iv) 141210
(v) 999 87 (vi) 99987 (38) Suit. T. Maimoom Bcovi, Kampi-
kettil House, Kilikollur, Quilon, (i) I (ii) 74-75 (iii) 136574
(iv) 140840 (v) 99415 (vi) 99415 (39) Shri K. Rajendra Prasad,
Quilon Marine Produce Co., Quilon (i) I (ii) 74-75 (iii) 92120’
(iv) 110450 (v) 71829 (vi) 71829. (40) II, H, Ramavarma,
1st Prince, Kaudiar Palace Trivandrum (i) I (ii) 74-75 (iii)
250530 (iv) 256530 (v), 220858 (vi) 220858 (41) Shri N. Slor-
ence, Isfidd Estate, Kalttmnithy (i) I (ii) 72-73 (iii) 140055
(iv) 141850 fv) 97066 (vi) 97066 (ii) 73-74 (iii) 332885 (iv) 134460
(v) 97155 (vi) 97155 (ii) 74-75 (iii) 132325 (iv) 134220 (v) 90263
(vi) 90263 (42) Shri P. Solomon Abrac, M/s. Paul Abro &
Sons, Cochin-3 (i) 1 (ii) 72-73 (iii) 116620 (iv) 153360 (v) 108891
(vi) 7339 (43) H.H. Sothu Parvathi Bayi, Kaudiar Palace,
rrivandrum (i) I (ii) 74-75 (iii) 246480 (iv) 246490 (v) 211035
(vi) 211035 (44) T. Safia Beevi, Kampikettil House, Kilikollur,
Quilon (j) I (ii) 74-75 (iii) 139470 (iv) 143730 (v) 102740 (vi)
102740 (45) Late B.N. Sreodharan Unni, “Dwaraka'h Thy-
caud, Trivandrum (i) 1 (ii) 69-70 (iii) 127127 (iv) 186020 (v)
46247 (46) Shri Sycd Abdurahiman Jifri, Calicut (i) 1 (ii)
72-73 (iii) 20640 (iv) 152860 (v) 108376 (47) Shri Shorifa Ha-
moed, Calicut (i) I (ii) 72-73 (iii) 18110 (iv) 100040 (v) 59807
(43) Shri. Syed Fazal Jifri, Calicut (i) T (ii) 72-73 (iii) 47430
(iv) 151950 (v) 107552 (49) Shri Syod Alavi Jifri, Calicut (i)
T (ii) 72-73 (iii) 92400 (iv) 130440 (v) 86586 (vi) 19261 (50)
Shri* O. Thomas, Mg. director, Forbes Eward Sc Figgis Ltd.
Cochin (i) I (ii) 73-74 (iii) 108550 (iv) 114290 (v) 72947 (vi)
66798 (51) Umaiban Beevi- T. Kampikettil House, Kili-
kollur, Quilon (i) I (ii) 74-75 (iii) 144180 (iv) 150430 (v) 106196
(vi) 1061 96 (52) Shri A.N. Viswanalhakamath, Hindustan
Hardwares, Cochin-2 ( i ) l (ii) 72*73 (Hi) 100984 (iv) 102000
(v) 61621 (vi) 61621 (53) Shri M,K, Vijayaraghavan, Trichur
(i) I (ii) 63-64 (iii) 184538 (iv) 190330 (v) 129804 (vi) 129804
(54) Suit. K, Vasantha, Sreevilas, Thamarakulam, Quilon
(i) I (ii) 74-75 (iii) 106440 (iv) 114200 (v) 85543 (vi) 85543
(55) Sint. K.K. Yeshodhara, Trichur (i) I (ii) 74-75
(iii) 104540 (iv) 106480 (v) 68852 (vi) 66233.
X X X X X
(B) (1) M/s. Chackolas Spinning Sc Weaving Mills Ltd.,
Kalamassory (i) Pvt. Ltd. Company (ii) 74-75 (iii) 116130
(iv) 1388940 (v) 906232 (vi) 580983 (2) M/s. Forbes Eward
Si Figgis Ltd., Cochin-3, (i) Pvt, Ltd. Company (ii) 73-74
(iii) 1116700 (iv) 1140040 (v) 759609 (vi) 759609 (3) Nilambur
Kovilakam Forests, Nilambur, (i) A.O.P, (ii) 71-72 (iii)— (iv)
3750000 (v) 1884066 (4) Western India Cottons Ltd., Pappi-
nisseri (i) Coy. (li) 74-75 (iii) 1057200 (iv) 1579210 (v) 983033
(vi) 655826.
X x X X X
Persons who have been (a) penalised for concealment of
income u/s, 27 1 (I)(c) of the i.T. Act 1961 or where appeals
against penalties levied in earlier years have been decided du-
ring the financial year 1974-75 ; (b) Penalised for failure to
file returns of income or to produce boo\s of account, (i)
indicates status (ii) Asst, year (iii) Amount of penalty*
a, 1. M/s. Exccll Productions, Alloppey, (i) Registered
firm (ii) 1964-65 (iii) 9854 (2) P.L. Ousoph. Champion Fire
Works & Industries, Irinjalakuda (i) I (ii) 1971-72 (iii) 12360.
b. (1) P,A, Abdul Rahimankutly & Sons, Cochin-1 (i)
Firm (Rog.) (ii) 1970-71 (iii) 14472 (2) M.P. Azad, Azad Hotel,
Pazhavangadl, Trivandrum (i) I (ii) 70-71 (iii) 18050, (3) P.V.
Ragunath, 19A, 3rd Floor, Pipewall Buildings, Colaba Road,
Bombay-5 (i) I (ii) 1970-71 (iii) .16340.
[C.No. 10/B/Tcch/A/75-76(l)]
P. SADAGOPAN, Commissioner
9 yjWi, 19 7 5
495 1, — Wr* faiT*T, 1944 % ftPFT
143 tfk 2 33 % SFXbT urf*flT*TT |TT *j-
^rr £ ftr TPTT^rfvPT fcm s i 968 w\
2/^Pt n wrtpr fwr
STF? I
sfr srtf i
"(i) ifx* 4-11 (5) % SpjpT Wr ^TvT
PrRprfrr % srzfrn $$ feftrsr mwjri *rr wrr
^ V j# % *7 % srcteyTT snfoTToifF^ \
(w *r^r) 1
SEC. 3(ii) J
4071
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897
"WWT WR OT PTK IT 2 (t 7 HT^Tf
vx *1 arr=r i
[TTftr^-SRT l.f 2/WpT gWHTSrFp/197 5 'WiiTt'.’ 5(-l) 30-j3/£t»
¥N/75]
#oq;iT<. TTtrf, Tprriprt
CENTRAL EXCISE COLLECTORATE
Poona, the 9th July, 1975
S.O. 4951, — In exercise of the powers vesic in me under
Rules 143 and 233 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, 1 order
that the following amendments shall be made in this Collce-
lorate Notification No. 2 /Central Exeisc/1968 dated the 9 th
May, 1968.
Following additional item as Serial No. (1) may be insert-
ed.
“( 1 ) Crushing; of I AC Tobacco cured in whole leaf form
for obtaining different sizes of flake Tobacco intend-
ed to be used for manufacture of ‘Chewing
Tobacco 1 falling under T.I. 4 11(5).”
The existing serial numbers may be renumbered as 2
to 7.
[Notification No. 2 /Central Excise/ 197 5. F. No. V(4) 30-38/
TD/751
J. M. VERMA, Collector
fefr, 3 1975
VT° 9TTo 4952 — V SFTrtTCpV fffmTTTft I 9 4 4 % Pm5^
Tf wfdiqt q-ffET foN 3FTTU
mtorc ^ j ^ trfbvn: $vx 3r, ^rn^rr
ffffftTEEff 19-14 % fTTT 173 sfto ( 4 ) %
qfr nrfarff qrrsrflftr 1
r *pj*f f^ft ^ dUfar 4-11-68 •prf^^TT
*T° 9/68 w Ew 2 ^ f*T tfErr TF tfWtfSRT TTTTT !
1 / 75 / 4(8 /ltfto^o/73]
rrrr o mu 0 h^TT, ?fPTT?Sflf
CENTRAL EXCISE COLLECTORATE
(Central Excise)
Delhi, (he 3rd October, 1975
S.O. 4952.— In exercise of the powers confererd upon me
under Rule 5 of Central Excise Rules, 1944, I hereby autho-
rise the Deputy Collector of Central Excise of the Delhi
Central Excise Collectorate, to exercise within Jus jurisdiction,
the powers of the ‘Collector tinder Rule 173G(4) of the
Central Excise Rules, 1944,
2. The SI. No. 2 of the Notification No. 9/68 dated
4-11-1968 of the erstwhile Delhi Collectorate should be treat-
ed as modified to this extent.
[C. No. 1/75/TVC8) 1C E/73]
M. S. MEHTA, Collector,
anfrin, 2 7 WJIR 197 5
VT° J3t° 4 95 3 — Utm xrftjfffffff, 19 0 2 ffTtT 9
srnr xm srfvFff tt jr #, rm, fw:
fasrr vt (*tt arafinr ^vft) Or
qW <rorr f i
[ffo 2/75/8/48. 31 /^ 0 ^ 0 / 75 ]
T^q^TTo ferff, UUlUflt
central excise
(Customs)
Baroda, the 27th October, 1975
S.O. 4953. — In exercise of the powers conferred on me
by Section 9 of the Customs Act, 1962, I declare “NAV-
SARI\ District Bulsar, in the State of Gujarat, to be a
warehousing station.
[No. 2/75/VW/48.3 1 /Cus. /75]
H. R. SYIEM, Collector.
TTSft, 28 1975
VTo^t^ 4 9 5 4 — Ud 1^19 (TpSfR rT^fT IVhPi )
«rf sr^m ffwr 79 /flfaTflW/vTo 473 / 2/75 tfFrrVII form 1
18-7-75 % HFT Tfed ffEinjJFV wfapOT, 62 UTTT 9
trrfcr $RrT gtb t, wrfhff
^ ffbtn % Wffrff ffRjvr jwff ffffPrtA tnr vt ^tfnrr<
«frfT5 TRtT j i
(TTo lO/3/7 4 5TrJo5fk fo ?T ^jft)
^ntrfwr
T4T , 37tw?v ^rrpt i
COLLECTORATE OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL
EXCISE-GOA
Panaji, the 28th October, 1975
S.O. 4954. — In exercise of the powers conferred on me
under Seclkm 9 of the Customs Act, 62, read with Ministry
of Finance (Department of Revenue and Insurance) Notifica-
tion No. 79 /Customs /F. No. 473/2/75-Cus. VII, dated
18-7-1975 I hereby declare village Sirigae, Bichclim Taluka,
in the Union Territory of Goa, to be a Warehousing Station.
[Issues from F, No. 10/3/74-I& E]
J. DATTA, Collector of Customs &
Central Excise
2 2 197 5
VT° U7o 495 5““fWfcT (TOf^V rpTT )
^rtrfTTR'. 1963 ( 1963 VT 22) vV UTTT 4 3TTT ^
^FT T7FT ^TT FTTTR ^ Pf^TE (^ 4 T-
?rrT7T^ 7 -qr^oiroiT^Q^ 5fff 22 197 5
?r pRt^ET TTT fRrUlTt ft#T % T W
mqain viTfy ^ 1
[WnfMT 3( S8)/75-'fnTirfotPTyofo^o]
eth ^pr5m T 7 T| ^Tpr^pp ,
4072
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1S9 7 [Fart II
MINISTRY OF COMMERCE -
New Delhi, the 22nd November, 1975
5.0, 4955.- — In exercise of the powers conferred by Section
4 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963
(22 of 1963), the Central Government hereby appoints Shri
V. Krishnan, LA,S, f Director (Quality Control) in the Minis-
try of Commerce, as the Director of Inspection and Quality
Control, with eirect from the forenoon of the 22nd October,
1975.
[F. No. 3(88) /75-E.I&E.P,]
K. V. BALASUBRAMANIAM, Dy. Director
fana*!*, JTPTTCr Ri’hTu TT [ Tfai h
WrYTT 1 6 *TTOT, 19 75
vr* 495 — vir rttit Per qm fao,
3 G, 3RTR ttJ, fat fa fa mTR fa faq
21970 7FTO 'tJR TT ^ mm tTlWl /l7740fi/4to/
TTTTo ^ 0 / 50 / 7 ^^/ 37 - 38 , rRfa 28-2 74 TIRfar ^T^fl^TT
qfa Tfasft stprUY fafeTW, 23tTo, twr
fa Tfnr 4 Trftrrn: qnr % *rr«r srr tar nrr n i 4
fat sprfafa % farfa w stittr <rc fan ft fa
tTT^TT (tfkrnjvT faTEft *fk rjTT Mm RflPT TtRSTfafi)
fat 7R RT7nr PER, faptft, JKf RlfTT *TTRPiT RlflRT
far wr nrr nr ^nikr 4 pfr sfk fWf faY
tfl'Hrqw nfrorfr 4 fafafar ttt 4 fan ftV 4 ?gt wr
| irr wtrr ftt mt ft i
ufaf ?fa % unfa 4 srnfar 4 qfafr^ ien4i
Rum fa qm4 wtt tttp wr w fafa 4 *r fm fan
| fa trnpfa tt 4 r ^rfafir nr fw nr ft 4 k t
fatft tft n^/srrffafa fafa skt r ^ntl tfk 4 nr
fa4f <RT i3T?T fan R T , ApT 73JTT RT n TT
^TRfcr fan rt «rr fan Rr ft 1
nfa^r 4 n^far fat tffanjrr tfk *pT fafam fanm
Tfafaf 94 9R4 fa fat? TTRT fat ft *fk Rfa <R4 4 9R
4 3R *m[R 94 ?r^f4ff ^rftnff % f44 ftr^rr ft 4k
wr ferr ft f4; 94 4tRnnw qk ^ kkr^f44OT
srfTrt 4 f4?r ^ 4t irTftmforr Tt anfkr 4Y
^r44t i tt^t 4 4Y ^ttt ft far Rft farq-
4 q4f ^rrfar ^ ft i 4 4^r f fa ^ ^rr^far 4^ 4to^r 0 /
1 7749 6 l/7fto/irWoE977o/50 4fo/37-38 fefar 28-2-74 ^4
4turvi'^+- sfk 5jrr W4^r fam^r trfRrt m ft tt
ftf nT ft 4k ffakT 4 ttt far ^lmfaRtr d q 4i ttt 94
tr Tr^farfa ^Fr^fcr ?44f (4Rn?pfr ’tuTr »rk ^tf fatwr
fh^vr 54^4) Rkr fen ^rr4 i ^4 ^ dkmpr
rfk W4 rt far^^r Jifarr rrrRji7i ^ 94 str 4 ft i
[4 0 rroi^o 79537 / 51 /^ 0 ^ 0 - 74 / 3 / 132 ]
ftrofto TTKIW, TT
OFFICE OF THE JT. CHIEF CONTROLLER OF
IMPORTS AND EXPORTS
ORDER
Calcutta, the 16th August, 1975
S.O. 4956. — The State Trading Corporation of India Lid,,
Chandralok, 36, Jaupath, New Delhi were granted Import
licence G/T/1774961/C/XX/50/C/37-38 dated 28-2-19/4
with L/A to the Acual User firm M/s. Dhanwantari Chikit-
salaya, 23 A, Kalakar St. Calcutta for import of Gum Arabic
for Rs. 21970. The firm have applied lor duplicate copy of
licence on the ground that the original licence (both Customs
purpose Si Exchange Control copy) has been lost or misplac-
ed before utilisation and without having been registered with
any Customs Authorities by the above Actual User firm to
whom the original licence was sent by the S.T.C. New Delhi.
In support of their contention the applicant have filed an
affidavit sworn in before the Metropolitan Magistrate, Six-
teenth Court, Calcutta to the effect that the licence has not
been utilised at all and that the same has not been cancelled,
pledged, transferred or handed over by them or on their be-
half to any other party for any purpose /consideration
whatsoever.
The applicant have made a request to cancel the original
Customs purpose and Exchange Coutrol copies of the licence
in lieu of which duplicate copies have been applied for by
them and undertake to return the original Customs and Ex-
change Control copies of the licence to issuing authority, if
traced out later on S.T.C. New Delhi has also intimated their
‘No objection* in this regard. I am satisfied that the Origi-
nal Customs purpose and Exchange Control copies of the
licence No. G/T/1774061 /C/XX/50 /C/37-38 dated 28-2-74
have been lost or misplaced and direct that a duplicate licence
(both Customs Purpose & Exchange Control copies) be issued
to the Applicant Actual User firm.
The original Customs and Exchange Control copies of the
licence are hereby cancelled.
[No. AU/79537/51/AM 74AH/132]
K. N. KAPOOR, Dy. Chief Controller
3TTOT fapfanh TTRTT fWPT »TT ^TTfaftT,
ftraTlT, 11 XPFNT, 1975
?rfo mo 4957 . — 34)+r- 1 - 4 - 445 , TjtrfkRPr,
^RTfaprr fpf, *4 1,45, 658 wf rntf STFTTT
4o 4tp/TRo/i744347/4Yo/Two tm/so/ ^a°/ 37 -38
faTto 30-3-74 Pr IlfTT % <fk 50% TT % fatf
vfr $$ ft, Riflci farqr w qj i ^44 ^ qft
Tprr farfaRT farter Tfa % far? vi mTrr Tm t ft
fat 1,94,529 7:0 fa far if OTqfa fa trt
qf/TOTR^r Tf ft
2. ?n 4 Tfa fa wIt 4 4 wrm rttr fanfar
fa/R rrfa ffaqlfafa ft^^T 1975-76 fat fafwr 320( 2) fafa
Tfrfw s fa tr ^n 3 ? fa thrt tpr 9T
to 5m qi* TTf 'm fan ft i 4 f fa Jjyr ^tt faifam
STTRR Tfa WT^ Tf /^TTWf ?4 ft I
3- mr Tfitftfar ttrn (fatfi3R) 1055 , faRfa
7-12-1955 <ifr nrr 0(^0 fa 0 ) fa jrrh smn wfarkf
TT TtfpT Tt 4 rfrrfar4o 7443 4 7/(fao/l^RolTTn/5o/
Sec. 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 4073
37*38 fCTT 30-3-74 faftm
q-tfbJiT Jrfir Tt ^ *pt ^ *qr j i
4. trriw Tt ot sftfrfr iprr f#m
wtt% fqq^r q-fa ^nfr tttt % *rm^r qr *rnmr ^qn:
PnTSPT PTTq foqrfafa 1975-76 ^ TfSTT 320
% JPHTT7 fr^TT ferr i
[^o ^r-99/l^o^o?TTfo/^o/32/ l^oifR-/ 74/t^o]
%o JRTT 0 ^PT'Tj- ft-MflT
OFFICE OF THE DY. CONTROLLER OF IMPORT AND
CANCELLATION ORDER
Hyderabad, the 1st October, 1975
S.O. 4957* — M/s. Basichem Industries. 1-4-445,
Mushcerabad, Kavadiguda Road, Secunderabad-3 were grant-
ed licence No. P /S/1744347 /C/XX/50/W/37-38 dated 30-3-74
for Rs. 1,45,658 which is also valid for further 50 per cent
of the face value. They have now supplied for issue of
'duplicate copy of the Exchange Control purposes copy’ I he
above licence on the ground that the original copy has been
lost /misplaced having been utilised to the extent of
Rs, 1,94,529.
(2) The applicant has filed an affidavit on stamped paper
in support of their contention as required under 320(2) read
with Appendix 8 of Import Trade Control Hand Book of
Rules & Procedure, 1975-76. I am satisfied that the original
Exchange Control purposes copy has been lost /misplaced.
(3) In exercise of the powers conferred on me under Clause
9(cc) of Import (Control) Order 1955, dated 7-12-1955 as
amended upto date, I order the cancellation of the Exchange
Control Purposes copy of Licence No P/S/ 1744347 /C/XX/
50/W/37-38 dated 30-3-1974.
(4) The applicant’s case will now be considered for the
issue of duplicate Excange Control purposes copy of the
above licence in accordance with para 320 of Import Trade
Control Hand Book of Rules and Procedure, 1975-76,
[File No, B-98/SSI /D-32 /AM-74 /Hyd]
K.M.R. MENON, Dy. Chief Controller
tftra Ptwf, srRrm tt TTTfrrr, (tofto tfer)
*f£ llirmf, 1975
WJo 3TTo 4 95 8.— <fYo TOTT
172 , jtet pm ii, tntt tt 3 i3 8^m
WW BfTT TT#7 *TWT <ffo/fo/l8l 191 6, pFTtT 27-11-74
frqr wt tt twrr tfrfsrfaT i 49/
74 4 10-74 31-12-74 m qft*fYi w
#J if 17^ 7FT*T qr TTp57T pRT § fa STl^TT Spff
tjtt srfiprr fatft '4) tfPmnFT srifantf % qm -
pRT TTTT ftpTT tjt qf/
WFTHFt t ’if t >
WTq zpTT XTTqTT (faq^T) 1955 farfa
7-12-1955 3TCT 9(*frotf[o) 3T7T qw trfttTT 0’ TT
jTqVr T7 fl nmarTT TOH <fYofo/i 8 l/l9 1 6, fVTTT
27-11-74, 3438 (rfPT ^7 *TT tfY afydttf ^Pf)
102 GI/75 — 8
ito) Trar lpr fqfamr srtftoR’ qfam tfr
^ tt4 tt *rr%*r ^rr g i
[wr 2l(^Yo)4/33 /$nr/ 74 - 75 /'ftol£To 1 49 / / 4 /^n\f O
tfCTo 5Tf£^o iTo/^f|ot^ToqoJ
%o iTff o ft q^rr,
OFFICE OF THE JT, CHIEF CONTROLLER OT IMPORTS
AND EXPORTS
CANCELLATION ORDER
New Delhi, the 11th July, 1975
5.0, 4958 — M/s. Mohamed Mohidin P. Box No. 172
Shop No, 11, New Market, Margao Goa were granted an
import licence N. P/E/1811916 dated 27-11-1974 for Rs. 3438
with a validity period upto 31-12-1974 under Punblic Notice
No, 149/74 dated 4-10-74, They have given an affidavit 10
the effect that the both copies of the above said licence
has been lost/misplaced without having been registered with
any custom authorities and without having been utilised at
all.
In exercise of the powers conferred on me under clii use
9(cc) of Imoprt (Control) Order, 1955 dated 7-12-1955 as
amended upto-dale, I do hereby order the cancellation of the
Customs & Exchange Control Purposes copies of licence No.
P/E/1811916 dated 27-IM974 value of Rs. 3438 (Rs. There
Thousand four hundred and thirty eight only).
[File No. 21 (b) IV/333/Iraq/74-75/P. N. 149/74 /1.SWA /
CLA]
K. N. KAPOOR, Dy. Chief Controller,
for Jt. Chief Controller
^rt*T arft; HTTfTr <rfcr
(^TFifor 5fh* ir^rfctrr fr^TT )
17^^,1975
TT° 5TT° 4959. — TKTT7, 3TJ
jqfitlWT, 1942 (I942TT6) Wt UTTT 5*V q^T W fif .T qf
tt mm T7?r gir /qn^^ranr % (^T^TPc^rr
fir?TPT) ^ Tfw tUFTo-1 101 1 / 2/ 7 0-^oi^r bYo mTftf
8 19 7 3 ^ Ttvft'bFT TTTf wfa : —
iqrr Ttr 9 % tY
( 2 ) if, Tpf (ii) % PlMp^ftpr T 7 ? ^.FTrfTT
tY TrW, OTftl : —
"(iii) ^tTTT^ft, ft’jf tV ti 1 ift* s’qtidr^T firwf
TT ?fR Ttq TTqTTCT TT ^TT TfiT^Tt
Tjm, TKjq: l”
[tfw i5rfo-noi 1 / 2 / 7 o-f^rftr ctut
MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY & CVIL SUPPLIES
(Department of Civil Supplies and Cooperation)
New Delhi, the 17th October, 1975
5.0. 4959. — In exercise of the powers confered by Sec-
tion 5-B of the Multi-Unit Cooperative Societies Act, 1942 (6
of 1942) the Central Government hereby makes the following
amendment in the notification of the Government of India in
the late Ministry of Agriculture (Development of Cooperation)
4074
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGR AHA YANA 1, 1897
No. L. 1101 1/2 /70-P&C dated the 8th November, 1973,
namely
In the table to the said notification, in the entries against
$. No. 9, in column (2), after item (ii), Ihe following item
shall be inserted, namely : —
“(iii) Director of Handlooms, Powcrlooms and Coopera-
tive Textiles and ex-officio Additional Registrar of
Cooperative Societies Maharashtra State, Nagpur.”
[No. E. 1 101 1/2/70-L&M]
N. KRTSHNAMURTH1, Dy. Secy.
(mfr otPt fWr)
1 0 TTRT, 19 7 5
Wl* 4 96 0. — WR (iRTfETfT TffiiRtfipff
TrUlURR 1 971 ( 197 1 *FT 40) ^ tTRT 3 9TTT
uiUt-R *ft srR \ fj, tor mmfV %
wr ( i ) TtfanfV tT R trwn: % TtlwfY
<ffiR * ttUtrU ^ spffjpff %
fat IRR1 TlUPFRt ^ HmfT ^ W<R
(2) $ ITRdfl *TRf ^ Wff ^ tfM TR ttUiUer
am iiT srefPr rrtt TffarifRf srw ^fatf *ft trR
t\r ^UTtUR Tlfad TT TT^pT *F^7TT I
RTnt
TTfiFFift tt rtUrr *K+rfl firt ^ wf wh^rfy+rr^i
tff- pirR tfart
^5fTT ’irftmft , W^R Wiptt faRT ^tV FRRE ci^ufa ®F
tfftRT tESRE l Iwfk TORT t RqT TfU nrft
tTRt if WHR tfw faft£s %,
tt am r Tfn; t
^ m if fat *rt 'Tfarc 1
['FTo^fo 16( 4ii)/7 5-TTo^o5rrf 0 U]
unotrq'o *fR, trfaT,
(Department of Heavy Industry)
New Dolhi,tho 10th November, 1975
S* O. 4960. — In exorcise of tho powers conferred by Section
3 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants)
Act, 1971 (40 of 1971), the Central Government hereby appoints
the officer mentioned in column (1) of the Table below, being
an officer equivalent to the rank of a Gazottod Officer of Govern-
ment, to be an Estate Officer, for tho purposes of the said Act
who shall exercise the powers conferred and perform the duties
impoiod on Estate Officers by or under tho said Act in respect
of the categories of public promisos specified in column (2) of
the said Table.
TABLE
Designation of the Officer Categories of public premises
and local limits of jurisdic-
tion
; ( 1 ) ( 2 )
Chief Security Offlcor, Scoo- Promises belonging to, or taken
tors India Ltd., Lucknow. as lease by or on behalf of
tho Scooters India Ltd., Luck-
now in Cahroo and Gaud
Villages in Bijnore par-
gana of Lucknow Tehsil of
Lucknow District.
[F. No. I6(42)/75-AEI(I)]
S,M. GHOSH Jt. Secy.
[PART II—
5?<TTcT afk ^rm
(mi* Pret)
^ fcRt, 1 7 197 5
tffo ano 4 9 61. — "flfaR fafa TlfyftqR, 1925 ( 1925 *FT
19) Tt trm s # srom ( 3) $ 7m wfam *r srtPr
*F*t gu Tpr^FTT URS^m TR ’gfuTuTR' SRTJRf t ^
*RFF *ti *FT ffiR RRT ^ ^ ^ RRdt % I
[Ro 1 7 ( 8 )/ 73 -tntoifftomT 0]
MINISTRY OF STEEL & MINES
(Department of Steel)
New Delhi, the 17 th October, 1975
S.O. 4961 — -In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
section (3) of section 8 of the Provident Funds Act, 1925
(19 of 1925), the Central Government hereby adds the name
of the Iron Ore Board, as public institution, to the Schedule
to the said Act.
[No, 1 7 ( 8) /73 IOM]
27 W^TT, 1975
VTo *TT° 4962 — rPpr frfa 1935 ( 1925 VT
19) tim 8 Rwm (2) arm jitr yrffwt *ft urEt
TT^T Jtr ^ 1^11 mr^TTf pdtVT ^ Pf ’TfbfdU 1 !
TRW MTR R TTT fdlf %
r m % ?\i Tmpft Prfij ^ tfr ret vi*t i
[ro 1 7 ( 8) / 7 3-TP^ otftoiriTo]
rrtfo Ttro TRT RM
New Delhi, the 27 th October, 1975
S.O. 4962 * — In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
section ( 2 ) of section 8 of the Provident Funds Act, 1925
(19 of 1925 ). the Central Government hereby directs that the
provisions of the snid Act shall apply to the Contributory
Provident Fund established for the benefit of non-pcnsionablc
employees of the Iron Ctre Board.
[No. 17(8)/73-IOM]
M. M. HUSSAIN, Under Secy.
yfa 31k imji *vxjm
($fT PhTFT)
Hi feffi 4^RWT, 1975
w\o m* 4963. — quj wr fdrnvr TTfuf^rn, i960
urn 5 *f( R^nrm ( 1 ) % Trrot % trrr ; ht*fh:
3 ’m udiu Per % fRfiFRT TrftRnff ^rr
btfr fr RRt^r ^ 3 TRfu - ^F Ur m?j
trr ^rr mfpfk Vwr | 1
tper ffiTha -
1. TTo ^ddKRW 24-9-75 RTT 5(I)(^) TOR f^R
% irfgrUrUT 1
[if 0 14-27/7 3-lTRo rft 0 -I]
trt ITUw
Sec. 3 ( i i ) ]
4075
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRA HAY ANA 1, 1897
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE & IRRIGATION
(Department of Agriculture)
New Delhi, the 4th November, 1975
S.O. 4963. — Under provisions of Sub-section (1) of Section
5 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, I960, the
Central Govt, hereby nominates Dr. V, Venkatanarayana,
Veterinary Officer, Corporation of Madras, to be members of
the Animal Welfare Hoard for a period of three years from
the date mentioned against him
Member Date Category
1. Dr. V. Verkatanaryann 24-9-75 Section 5(l)(c)—
Re present at ivo of the
Corporation of Madras.
[No. 14-27 /73-LDI]
G UR DIAL MOHAN, Under Secy.
ff'T injTOH tffr fire tt
Tf fa^lT, 6 TTRT, 19 7 5
VTo ^TTo 496 4. — fa -4 h 19 40
tfTTl 7 3 WHT ( 2 ) % TFJTTT
irrcsffer tUt *pj 5 >jh qfRT grer farTTfaffl'
Tt if faRfarfarr ^rttfttnr trm^r qr Ufa wifarr
f^rr tttt $ 1
ttt fafaTm'T'ft t faffm 2 (iii) T ttft tt fa^T%frr
fa Pn t ur :
2. (iii) TRffr^r fpr ^rjTftgr^r % Rut fffYR r
favT ttr 1"
[^fo 24 (2)/75-*PRR I (&TT)]
(Department of AgricLiltural Research and Education)
New Delhi, the 6th November, 1975
S.O. 4964, — -The following amendment to the Standing
Finance Committee Regulations, 1940, made by the Indian
Council of Agricultural Research, with the previous approval
of the Central Government, in pursuance of sub-section (2)
of Section 7 of the Agricultural Produce Cess Act, 1940 are
published for general information namely ; —
In the said Regulations, for Regulation 2(iii), the following
regulation shall be substituted, namely
°2. (iii) Member-Finance of the Indian Council of Agri-
cultural Research Governing Body.”
[No. 24(2)/75-Cdn-KDARE)j
TT o WTo 4965 -—^ 3 FTR WT ’ffftrfjpFT apt UtTT 7(2)
R fafUT % *PJTTT 'SlTVFW TFRTOFT qfpPT THT
TRR mt wrf fw tffafr % fafamr 2 (IV)
% TXfrrw if qlw t mRt ettt Pttr It fanfaP iR
Tt pRhP 18 TRTTj 1975 & 'ft T faff
TP TT% Tr ffaFR sttt fafarr; fafffaT
■ ^ eft 7R TT ffr faff ST Sfaf if ff fff 3JTT if qfrqS
Tt RTTT farT tWt T1 TTOT farffaT fart TTT | 1
1. >4t ¥to HtT TRT TtfrT, 2 4 SflJRTr t*ft TPf,
<£[£, ***$-( 400001)
2. -«ft TFJ TTFT Tfar^T, TTTJTT *PTT*T Tt| TTUfW^R,
tfT=mr, fcm fT^mrr, fafjrc 1
3 , tfpfrrc R^To RTo SBT RftTvTT, fatfR
ffa fhwf&nvpi, qfjRffr ^ rr tt 1
4^ yto fffa vnRTfft, ^i-fTrfr, tTffrr tis fwfaRFR,
5. ¥To gffo rr^-o fiT^QTT r RTTf=T ^RRV
TT^R, 2 5 5, TTR ^TR^Tj TTTfa- ( 5 6 0 006)
6. *ft URTT tTRtT fit?, TT TTR, Tfr^R Tfa-t+Vl-T
STRt TTyIT TR, Mi'll - 1
7- ’Sff ^fo iTHo tRirDT ^ftnTTTj 17/4 TTRTTR 3 Tt?,
TT37TT- (60003l) mpR
[Tfo 3 5 ( l)/7 5-TTRR-I (t^R.)]
TlTTo ?fto ^tTT,
S.O. 4965. — In pursuance of regulation 2(iv) of the Stand-
ing Finance Committee Regulations framed by the Indian
Council of Agricultural Research in pursuance of provision
contained in Section 7(2) of the A. P. Cess Act, 1940, the
following members of the Governing Body of the Council
have been elected by that Body to be members of the Stand-
ing Finance Committee of the Council for a period of one
year with effect from he 18th August, 1975 or till such time
as their successors are duly elected by that Body, whichever
is later ; —
1. Shri D. D. Desai, Member, Lok Sabha 24, Syed
Abdullah Brelvi Road, Fort, Bombay-400001,
2. Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, Secretary, Sardar Vnllabh-
bhai College, Bhabua, Distt. Rohtas, Bihar.
3. Prof. L. N. Man dal. Dean, Faculty of Agriculture,
Bidhan Chandra Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Kalyani,
West Bengal.
4. Dr. G, Rangaswami, Vice-Chancellor, Tamil Nadu
Agricultural University, Coimbatore-3.
5. Dr. G. S. Randhawa, Director, Indian Institute of
Horticultural Research, 255, Upper Palace Orchards,
Bangalore-560006.
6. Shri Shankar Dayal Singh, Member, Lok Sabha,
Parijnt Publications, Dak Banglow Road, Patna-1.
7. Shri V. S. Tyagaraja Mudajiar, 17/4 Nungambakkam
High Road, Madras,-6(K)034.
[No. 35(l)/75-Cdn(I)(DARE)I
S. C, DU’ITA, Dy. Secy.
MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY PLANNING
(Department of Health)
New Delhi, the 30th September, 1975
CORRIGENDUM
S.O. 4966. — In partial modification of this Ministry's Order
No. V, 1 1016/13 /75-MPT dated the 4th July, 1975 the date
7th January, 1976 occuring against sub-para (1) of para 3
may be read as 1st July, 1976. Thus para 3(i) of the said
order will hereinafter be read as — -
“(i) a further period ending on (he 1st July, 1976”.
[No, V. 11016/13 /75-MPT J
V. K. AGNIHOTRL Under Secy.
4076
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA l, 1897 [Part II—
(q^rftm frvrm)
f£ 31 197 5
3Tfo 4 46 7 — 4^t1WT flfa TFRR TOFTF Ft feTT 3 1 TO^qT, 197 5 h^tfcRRT TOWTVT (Ffa it FTFtF % qfOTTT
*m TOt) tffafFFF 1962
fwr : Fwift
TRF f^FTT VdIHI FtFTFF sfrsftqFSTFdY^qqjfr^Sr FRIT IRTft hWRT FT wmRR f4w4 % fatr TT^RT
nftJTK % % faq 4^tf^PRT rnwreF jtfijfhro (*jf*r £r ^iqra'Pr $ nftnur tt tot) -irfafipTF 1962 % ws 3 ( 1 ) % arret
q\T TFTTO TOTTT ^T^RTF fTTRTj Ft *fh Ffa^FFI flo 1 20 1 6/ 1 3/74-RF 0*1 G.F fFFTFT 7- 1 1- 7 4 F*T7 OT 6(i) 4r
ftrtf srfyqqHr f<> i2oi6/i3/74-^i^^faFRfr 28 - 4-1975 ^ff*f if: —
q| % OTF FT
FWFT h tTtttt ifr qF
Fir
eptpf h o
"fRT ft
Um
^ FlFT
FFpF
hWPTT
rmfV
fTl^i F 0
sfr ifr qF ftftff & ;u ftft sift!
fa'HT
fwift
frj*r
ir^FTFT
m
f?tftft
TTTo
q *nr i
St IT
«rrc $
qqo qoFTT^^o
tft q mx i
295
0
08
5 5
295
0 Q5
25
296
0
04
20
296
0 0 9
45
302
0
09
00
302
0 03
15
301
0
1 1
25
301
0 1 2
45
303
0
03
75
303
0 19
35
303/qt
0
15
60
[To 12016/13/74 — pyj c^fo]
MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM & CHEMICALS
(Dept. of Petroleum)
ERRATUM
New Delhi, the 31st October, 1975 ^
S,0. 4967 . try of Petroleum & Chemicals, New Delhi, Dated 1975, Petroleum Pipeline (Acquisition of Right
Users in laud) Act, 1962,
D' dri c t - Mshsana . ^
Tu. ' * h '• i'lltr appended <0 the Govt. Notification, Ministry of Petroleum & Chemicals Department of Petroleum, New Delhi, number
1 016 13/74-L&L dared 7H1-74, issued U S 3(1) and notification number 1201 6/1 3/74- L&L dated 28th April, 1975, issued under sec-
tion 6(i) ofP^U’oFum PipNino Act, (Acquisition of Rifht of Users in land) Act, 1962, for the Acquiiilion of User for laying gas pipeline
from Sobhasan G.G.S.-Cuni-C.T,F. To Dudh sagar Dairy, at Mehsana in Gujarat State, Distiict Mdisena.
READ FOR
Sobhasan G.G. S.-Cum C.T.F. To Dudhsagar Dairy G.G.S. Sobhasan to Dudhsagar Dairy,
at Mchsana.
Village
KUKAS
Block No.
District
MEHSANA
Area
Taluka
MEHSANA
Village
KUKAS
Block No.
District
MEHSANA
Area
Taluks
MEHSANA
H,
Are,
. C. Arc.
H.
Are, C.
Are.
295
0
08
55
295
0
05
25
296
0
04
20
296
0
09
45
302
0
09
00
302
0
03
155
301,
0
11
25
301
0
12
45
303
0
03
75
303
0
19
35
303/P
0
15
60
[No. 1201 6/1 3/74- L & X)
Sec. 3(H)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 4077
TTo JUo 4968. — TTcT: 'TTTT^fiVT (ljF*f % 3WPT
% xrftrrn: m ■crfa) tfftrPm, 1962 (1902 *ft so) ^ ^rm
3 ( i ) % mcf ft^r; ^ tspft
fT*rr^r) ^ stFpju^t tto qr<> *fo 1754
cTirr^r 20-5-1975 jrrtf ^ mj^r *r
it Wafej tfSpflf %“ % «tFjw: *r c rt5 , T ^rnpft
3Ft % Uat3R * f?T4 *rfapT ^r ^T‘T^TT trPfTT
fwr *TT I
tfk 3Ter: qftrRm *£t nro 6 .
■zwrm ( 1 ) % *rif t fR/ttr; *Ft Tvtrt % fi % 1
xftT iffrft, ^TtT: *TrjF[T % fttf* TT l R^r %
qr^i *rfag;^qT ft *nr*fT trag;*!’ ^ RrRrF^ gf*rtt %
^r jrfu^rr *$<% vr faRrwr firm - £ i
*nr, ^pt: trfaPm *fft um 6 *FV ^thttt ( 1 ) sm st?tT
^far ^t sr^ftT ^rfhr w^yx t^arcr ^ftPrcT snsfr &
f«r w *tFsj^rt & if Wrfirc gftnfr ^r
^Tifrrr ^r *tFwr ir^i ^tst ftfsrft * sr^rsr-r ^ fir? t^jm
srfaff %qT ^r $ 1
tfk, *rnt tf*r urrr *rf ttstht (4) am srm wF^-PTf
spffir *m*nr facin’ %Sr £ fa wr r *Tfam A ^nffr
?rr fcata TT^fTpe if faf^r ^ % *r*pr ^<r tffa ^fRr*r
if ft 5 trpmr if, fiqfrf ft jjft *t ft, t*t fttT*rr smiff tfr
W ffrffa ^ Rrf^r ^'tnr 1
^0 ^ffo f 0 & ^ffo jffo t^ftq a rpp qn^mr^r
7TW: ^^TTH fror: %PT^T TT^t?T
Trfif TT^filTif ?fo t^o *t4 r <0 ^0 Tfo
^TKo i<>
2
3
4
5
SQ9/ f
0
01
05
669/2
0
06
45
674
0
10
50
675/5
0
04
50
675/2
0
16
6 5
726
0
2-1
00
755
0
04
55
721
’ 0
16
50
75 6
0
01
00
760
0
10
20
761
0
06
00
763
0
05
10
762
0
06
00
7 64/ 3
0
07
50
925
0
12
50
921
0
17
65
922/l
0
01
. 80
919/3
0
09
60
2
3
4
5
919/2
0
07
80
919/1
0
01
05
1043
0
04
80
1 044/1
0
10
50
1049/2
0
07
50
1049/1
0
04
05
1 048/2
0
01
00
1048/1
0
1 4
85
1 056
0
24
15
1055
0
1 2
1 5
1055
0
14
70
1065/2
0
0 7
80
1 0 6 5/ 1
0
07
50
1066/2
0
00
5 0
1072
0
13
50
1071/3
0
01
65
1071/4
0
05
55
1071/2
0
07
so
107l/l
0
09
00
1070/3
0
01
00
1117
0
03
60
1118
0
08
.40
[?T 0
12016/2/75-^0
U^o]
S.O. 4966. — Whereas by a notification of the Govt, of India
in the Ministry of Petroleum and Chemicals (Department of
Petroleum) S.O, No. 1754 Dated 20-5-75 under sub-section
(I) of section 3 of the Petroleum Pipelines (Acquisition of
Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central
Government declared its intention to acquire the Right of
User in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that-
notification for the purpose of laying pipelines.
And whereas the Competent Authority has under sub section
(1) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the
Government ;
And further whereas the Central Government has alter
considering the said report, decided to acquire the right of
user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to this
notification ;
Now therefore in exercise of the Power conferred by sub-
section (1) of the section 6 of the said Act, the Central Gov-
ernment hereby declares that the right of user in the said
lands specified in the schedule appended to this notification
hereby acquired for laying the pipelines ;
And further in exercise of the power conferred by sub-
section (4) of that Section, the Central Government directs
that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vest-
ing in the Central Government vest on this date of the publi-
cation of this declaration in the Oil & Natural Gas Commis-
sion free from all encumbrances.
4078
the gazette Of india ; November 22 , 1975/agrahayana 1, 1807 [part n-
SCHEDULE
Pipeline from KCE to G.GS. 8
State : Gujarat District : Mchsana
Taluka
: Kalol
Village Survey No.
Hectare
Arc Contiarc
Kalol 669/1
0
01
05
669/2
0
06
45
674
0
10
50
675/5
0
04
50
675/2
0
16
65
726
0
24
00
755
0
04
55
7?.t
0
16
50
756
0
01
00
760
0
10
20
761
0
06
00
763
0
05
10
762
0
06
00
764/3
0
07
50
925
0
.12
30
921
0
17
85
922/1
0
01
80
919/3
0
09
60
919/2
0
07
80
919/1
0
01
05
1043
0
04
80
1044/1
0
10
50
1049/2
0
07
50
1049/1
0
04
05
1048/7
0
01
00
1048/1
0
14
85
1056
0
74
15
1055
0
12
15
1055
0
14
70
1065/2
. 0
07
80
1065/1
0
07
50
1066/2
0
00
50
1072
0
13
50
1071/3
0
01
65
1071/4
0
05
55
1071/2
0
07
80
1071/1
0
09
00
1070/3
0
01
00
1117
0
03
60
1118
0
08
40
[No,
12016/2/75-L&L]
mo 8 U 0 4909 . — TRf: 9TSWVT (?jf*T % ^PTPT
% 1962 ( 1962 50) ^TRT
3 qft ( 1 ) ^ wtrEr r ^m ^
f^nm) ^rftr^TT tt© spo *i ; o 1227
flTffar 31-3-197 5 BTCT 4 StfOTTfiT *T *fe!T
uFjg/sft *f fedW *jfuqf '% % ^Tfvr-TTT t?i ttst »nvn
Tt fror% % w?m % fet m m srm 'itfe:
*r fen «n 1
m OT tJKT ^ ^PJTTCT ( 4 ) 5RT ^rT infepft VT 5pft*T
^ gfr fe?t Wt ft fir *jferf if *q*ftir
^t nftitiR nr^TT if fi%f % ^jtrt for suffer
m srRfe ^ sfe tftfei if ^?r ^q- if ^ Efmr % aft
W nrd^ ®frt ffifer ?^nr 1
3R*psft
^ cv
^to TT^o % rnf;o % iffo Tiffo tr*f 0 rTfT qT^TfTr^T fe3T4
% fm
tt^t: jprrnr fern Wrr nm^rr *fa&FT
4R
frrern:
q STTT
i
wf
fefcr
65
0
02
8 5
64
0
03
1 5
69
0
0 1
• 40
61
0
06
30
62
0
0 5
60
56
0
14
00
57
0
00
35
4 5
0
12
95
0
00
70
2 57
0
06
00
0
01
80
258
0
09
60
268
0
1.8
00
269
0
18
00
270 .
0
03
60
272
0
1 5
60
2 71
0
00
00
274
0
12
00
275
0
13
20
279
0
0 0
60
^4 R- -
791
0
12
00
(ifepr)
594
0
06
60
593
0
07
80
592
0
4)3
60
59 6
0
0 0
00
wpT—
595
0
00
60
[4- tr
1 2016/5/75-U^To ITS
tT$To]
iftr *rcr: bwt mferrfi % trfyfen *£f «mr 6 <rf
^tktto ( 1 ) % mftn ?mnr ^ fafli ^ it ft 1
*frr wt jrt: m * oth" fefi£ qrfepx 4fe ^
wm w n *fer *f ferfe^ ^fef 3r ^pyPt
«rr wftrTR sife ^fer *tt faffed fen | 1
nv, *pt; ott nfafenr qft erm 6 *) stoht ( 1 ) &m
51 TO infer m fen* =rr.^ 5 $ r^mr. tr^TO q)fe "fet
I fa ^ ’pftpg^m n ^pjr^r if ^ wfipff S
^nfirr ?rfwn: wr fe?in ^ nn^-
grrr ’RiferT fen ^ttt 1 1
S,0. 4969, — Whereas by u notification of the Govt, of India
in the Ministry of Petroleum and Chemicals (Department of
Petroleum) S.O, No. 1237 Dated 3N3-75 under sub-section (I)
of section 3 of (he Petroleum Pipelines (Acquisition of Ritfht
of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the Central Gov-
ernment declared its intention to acquire the Right of User
in the lands specified in the schedule appended to that noti-
fication for the purpose of laying pipelines.
And whereas the Competent Authority has under sub-
section (1) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to
the Government;
And further whereas the Central Government has after
considering the said report, decided to acquire the right of
user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to this
notification ;
Sec. 3 ( ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 4079
Now therefore in exercise of the Power conferred by sub-
section (1) of the section 6 of the said Act, the Central Gov-
ernment hereby declares that the right of user in the said
lands specified in the schedule appended to this notification
hereby acquired for laying the pipelines ;
And further in exercise of the power conferred by sub-
section (4) of that Section, the Central Government directs
that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vesting
in the Central Government vest on this date of the publica-
tion of this declaration in the Oil & Natural Gas Commis-
sion free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
For Laying Pipeline From D.S. KTF to G.G.S.
State : Gujarat District
: Kaira
Taluka
: Borsad
Village Survey No.
Hectare
Aie
Cculiare
Divcl 65
0
02
80
64
0
03
15
69
0
01
40
61
0
06
30
62
0
05
60
56
0
14
00
57
0
00
35
45
0
12
95
Cart-Track
0
00
70
251
0
06
00
Cart-Track
0
01
80
258
0
09
60
268
0
18
00
269
0
18
00
270
0
03
60
212
0
15
60
271
0
00
60
274
0
12
00
275
0
13
20
279
0
00
60
Dchvan 791
0
12
00
594
0
06
60
593
0
07
80
592
0
03
60
596
0
15
00
Kankapura 595
0
00
60
[No. 1 20 1 6/5/75-T-&L]
wrtc wro 4970-- qik mvr (qftr % qqqkr %
srfuqrrr qq Wkr) wfafTk j 962 ( 1962 *FT 50 ) qff UTTT
3 qft ^kjkt ( i ) % far ftr?TT
ruyw fwRWT % ftr3 qrcr ^ trttw % wef II 3 ( ii)
% ^ 3071 A 3072 OT 1 6- 8-75 k 3Tqrrf?T?r «TTo
WTo uwr 2677 ^ VTTTrT TOOT, q^rfkqq *fk TTOT
kTO T 1 wftFpFTT tot 12017/1/75 ott iftr mr krk
28 “ 7-7 5 % to TOq wq'ftTt ^to qr w it *ot to
qh q% 1
diOTi: Ft FTWR ftpqr : TH tjtit
% FTFfOT q^'
’FTtr OT ^
tr^-o ttc. no
76 0- 42- 1 676 . 0- 42- 10
% FTO qr qf
12017/l/75-trcTo tty mT°]
ERRATUM
S.O. 4970. — In the schedule appended to the notification
of the Government of India Ministry of Petroleum & Chemi-
cals No. 12017/1 /75-L&L dt. 28-7-7J published vide S.O. No:
2677 dated 16-8-75 from page No. 3071 to 3072 of the
Gazette of India Part II Section 3(ii) for Taluka Viramgam,
Dist, Ahmedabad, Gujarat State, under sub-sec‘ion (1) of
Section 3 of the Petroleum Pipelines (Acquisition of right ot
user in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) read as per the sche-
dule annexed hereto.
SCHEDULE
Taluka : Viramgam Dist. : AhmcJabad Gujarat State
For Road
S.No. Extent S.No. Extent
H.A, Sq. M. H.A. Sq, M.
76 0-42-01 676 0-42-10
For Read
— Hansalpur
Sureshvcr
[No. 120 1 7/I/75-L&L]
trfe-qw
wto to 497 1 tot tot (^ftf % %
wftPFn: qq srt) wfafTk 19 G 2 (i 962 ot 50) ^ fxpt
3 k otwitt ( 1 ) % sRPTq ijotft w % far^T wthtm r*
dlH'M WTO ^ ft TOd % % TO-II 3T7 3 (ii)
efr To TOT 3064 & 307 1 OT fkiT 16 - 8-1975 *Pt OTlfcr
qrro to Wto 2676 ^ nrr wnw toot, wk toft
toto wftr^qqr ww 12017/2/75-^ tjt t^r fq-TO
25 “ 7-75 %to wto % rqrw q^: wt w to
qh q? i
fbprn ^otpt TRq
% tot qr
q$
mRFT
qftr : qpmix
di'^r ? q’T'T
ftr^rr : wkttKR
% ftr" qr qf
wqr
ot
uq 0 tr 0 ■ktifkr
170 Fo
74
0 - 14-45
74 0 - 14-56
71
0 - 00-62
71 0 - 10-62
qk :
ftprr ■ ^j^rnrr
1283/3
0 - 25 - 00
1283/1 0 - 25 - 00
1701
0
1
0
0
1
j/i
1701 0 - 00-45
208/2
0 - 10 - 05
2080/2 0 - 10 - 05
qk kkrnr
dfil+T
ftpri: wyqrRrq
593
0 - 32 - 00
593 0 - 32-00
^ 1201 7 / 2/7 S-OTTo k rr^o]
4080 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975 / AGR AH A Y ANA 1, 1897 [Part IT —
ERRATUM
S.O. 4971 . — In the schedule appended to the notification of
the Government of India, Ministry of Petroleum & Chemi-
cals No. 12017/2 /75-L&L dt, 25-7-75 published vide S.O. No.
2676 dated 16-8-75 from page No. 3064 to 3071 of the
Gazette of India Part II Section 3(ii) for Taluka Sanand Dist.
Ahmedabad, Gujarat State, under sub section (1) of Section
6 of the Petroleum Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of user
in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962) read as per the schedule an-
nexed hereto.
SCHEDULE
Taluka ; Sanand Dist ; Ahmedabad Gljarat State
For Read
Santhal Sanathal
Village ; Ta : Sanand Dist : Ahmedabad Gujarat
Navapura State
For Read
S.No.
Extent
S.No.
Extent
H.A. Sq. M.
H A. Sq. M.
74
0-14-45
74
0—1 4 — 56
71
0-00-62
71
0-10-62
Village ;
Ta : Sanand
Dist. :
Gujarat Slate
Sanand
Ahmedabad
1283/3
0-25-00
1283/1
0-25-00
1701
0-00-54
1701
0-00-45
208/2
0-10-05
2080/2
0-10-05
Village :
Ta ; Sanand
Dist. :
Guj.uflt State
Khoiaj
Ahmedabad
593
0-32-00
593
0-32-20
[Nm-12017/ 2/U5-L&L
Ttfb VS
4 T 0 TR 0 4972. — 73TPFT fWFl) dW ( 1 2 0 1 9/ 2/ 7 4-W W W/ 1 ) fcrPF 2 3- 1 2- 7 5
^ tRTifa vrrar ^ Tnrra H w* 3 3W7 ii fFTfir 4- 1 - 7 5 t dwr 5 2 d 6 i ^ i
HR
qS
UFJTiT
M 6*3 ^
fzm
T F4PT TT
fasram
rrfaur do
d.«rrc.£4t
TT.SFTi
nTw no
n.wc.t «ffo
28
0
2
81
24 V
0
2
81
63 qr
0
2
01
48 ^
0
2
01
64 w
0
15
52
48 ^
0
15
52
[do 12019/2/74 — ^rrrfo/i]
ERRATUM
S.O.4972.— In the Notification of Government of India in the Ministry of Petroleum. & Chemicals (Department of PetroIeumNo.
(12019/2/74-L &L/I) dated 23-12-74 under S.O. No. 29 in the Gazette of India, Part II, Section 3. Sub-Section (ii) dated 4-1-75 page No,
52 to 61.
VILLAGE : SATSAI GRANT, TALUKA : ATHKHEL, DISTRICT : SIBSAGAR
READ
Survey No.
Hectare
Are
P. Are.
Survey No.
Hectare
Are. P.
Are,
28
0
2
81
24 Kha
0
2
81
63 Kha
0
2
01
48 Kha
0
2
01
64 Kha
0
15
52
48 Unga
0
15
52
FOR
[No, 12019/2/74-L &LJA]
Sec. 3 ( i: ) | THE GAZETTE OF INDJA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/ AGR AHA Y ANA 1, 1897 4081
T$ fmff, 4 1^0 7 5
VTo Wo 4973 :--TT: TOTTOTT (for ^ TTT>T
ft ?FTTTT) irfaffoTT, 1062 ( 19 62 W 50) ^ TOT
:j ^ tttrt ( 1 ) fo tot ttto %
(^TfrrT ftm) srPufoTTT *rr° mo to 1 1 9 Trfosr
26-12-74 frnr ^Vq- ttfr t tot Tftr^TTT ?r ttot Tfojfot
T wfeff % totttt % tRtto tot tot 1 ! *U fror^
% toittot % fro* Tfror tto* witt mrT Ttffor tr fro w i
*fk tt: tstt mftmfWTOT *rfaffonr tnrr 6 tot-
hki ( i ) * irtfftr ttto «fT ftfot H |i
And further whereas the Central Government has after
considering the said report, decided to acquire the right of
user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to this
notification ;
Now. therefore in exercise of the power conferred by sub-
section (1) of the section 6 of the said Act, the Central Gov-
ernment hereby declares that the right of user in the said
lands specified in the schedule appended to (his notification
hereby acquired for laying the pipelines ;
And further in exercise of the power conferred by sub-
section (4) of that Section, the Central Government directs
that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vest-
ing in the Central Government vest in this date of the
publication of this declaration in the Oil & Natural Gas
Commission free from all encumbrances.
*frt <TFT, TT TOTT ?t TOT fvtt TT fV^TX ^
% *mT?[ ft TffojTTO % tto foro t
TTTpT FT irfwn: ai *A FT ffodYTT fifPTT ^ |
W, WT.' dlT q T UTTT G Ffr dHU ( <| ( 1 ) fiKI
Tm Tffot TT TOTVT TOT 5^ TT?ftT TO T rr^TTT TlffoT TOjfr
^ Pf ft t ttot ftfrlfokr tot if
totIt m stIwr tot tot fr^T % srrftrT $ frof p?tf-
*trt *rf%r fw tot $ I
tflT, irnt TOT tjf <r d h U i <i (4) firm ¥i ftd fo FT
ttTt totI twit ffoR % ffo tot forfor ft
wfhr ft it furor ifojffor tfftt ft faf^T Ttft % ttpt for <ftr
STTfrfrRT ffq- WTTT w4\ WlVt W ^ W TtTW % TsTWT
^ W Ulfoff vt ffo^T ^tTT I
?rmT ^TT 41 & rriw rsft- TfT TFo To 1 TTT qTTT-
M I Ed
Tm : ffoTT : fTTOTTT
Thr
T^FTT To
i^rforr
*7°
f<
WTO fo€l T
5 WTof
TOTT TTT TffoTT iftr
5*fr
8 2[m
0
0
13
83/iJT
0
5
22
83/<T
0
0
67
S 4/^3T
0
0
13
8 4/TT
0
0
27
8S/^T
0
2
27
1 0 i/w
0
1
20
[To 1201G/8/7 4-rpTo for rr^o/j]
Now Delhi, the 4th November, 1975
lS.O. 4973. — Whereas by a notification of the Government
of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Chemicals (Depart-
ment of Petroleum) S.O. No. 119 dated 26-12-75 under sub-
section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum Pipelines (Acquisi-
tion of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the
Central Government declared its intention to acquire . the
Right of User in the lands specified in the schedule append-
ed to that notification for the purpose of laying pipelines ;
. A fl <l whereas the competent Authority has under sub-section
(1) of section 6 of the said Act. submitted report to the
Government ;
102 Gl/75— ‘9.
SCHEDULE
Pipeline fiom Lakwa well N_>. 41 to Lakwa GGS No, 1
State ;Assam District : Sibsagar, Taluk : Sfiakuti
Village
Survey No.
Hectare
Are
Ccntlare
Lakwa Chah
82 Kha
0
0
13
Bagicha and
83 Kha
0
5
22
Veloguri
83 Unga
0
0
67
Dubi
84 Kha
0
0
13
84 Gha
0
0
72
85 Kha
0
2
27
10! Khi
0
1
20
INo. 12016/8/74-L&L/H
fTR WR 4 9 74 :--TfT: ^PTT*T ; TnmTOT (ijfq- % 3TTW
% *rfi rm: *pt st^T) 1902 (1962 tt 50 ) ^ urrr
3 Tq>jm ( 1 ) % tfix T?rrTT
ttttt (^fforq- Ftatt) Ffo ^ ^ 120
TTfor 26-12-74 sm TT^TlT ^ TT tffaffTdT ^
faffoW wjmi % tttTt % trffom fot tot wnpff
fot f^rit % ttUtt * ttFtt 'rfot tt tttt ?hwt wfofor
wrr fforr tt i
X?\T itt: TSTT TTfh'^rft’ % WT q'frfTTT TOT 0
7TUTTT ( 1 ) fo TT^HT ^ ^ flr I
^ wit, 7TT: ^afor TWIT ^ ffofoF qr fWPC ^rfi-
^ TFTfo w ■uffojTTT ?T TTR % ft Pd ft id ^rffoff %
TTTtT <FT XTlWR qffol 3 fR^ VT WfW ffow j; I
wr: tot ■rfirfforr tttt b ^ totttt ( 1 ) rm
Tm Tffor tt ttPt frt 5 ? ^rfhr ttott foffor fncfo*
^ ffo ft irfT^rrr % topt ^ ftrffoW tot *foTfo
TOTPr 'FT trffofTT tttt TOT ft^r4 ^ ttUpt % W 1 ^-
TRT irffof fV^i ^iinT ^1
ifrr, TOT TTTT ^ TOTTTTT ( 4) JTTT TTOT TOrfo *T TnfpT
ttotr frforr fort t ftr tot foron T tottPt vt
^ rfarrn: ttott ft%r ^ tttt for ifk to fro
% WTtr ^T, TOft TTO?f % foPT FT if TT tITTO ^ TTOPT
^ Ft mtfw for ftifor ^tt i
4082 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 [Part IT—
*TO?r
xto ( 10 ) Jr to
Too (
9 ) nr
wr-
TOTO
TTTO TOR
fisPTT: fJrtTTOTT
to
ijr
0 TOTo
$0
Jr^l
no
TO*
to
TOT
339 *ST
0
8
03
340 m
0
12
71
501
0
11
77
514 TO
0
1
74
513
0
17
13
1032 tfT
0
24
22
81 5 m
0
17
66
847 3 TT
0
1
07
[to 12016/8/7 4-^0 tig ^o/JI]
S.O, 4974. — -Whereas by notification of the Government
of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Chemicals (Depart-
ment of Petroleum) S.O. No. 120 dated 26-12-74 under sub-
section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum Pipelines (Acquisi-
tion of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962), the
Central Government declared its intention to acquire the
Right of User in (he lands specified in the schedule appended
to that notification for the purpose of laying pipelines ;
And whereas the competent Authority has under sub-aecion
(1) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the
Government ;
And further whereas the. Central Government has after
considering the said report, decided to acquire the right of
user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to this
notification ;
Now therefore in exercise of the power conferred by sub-
section (t) of the section 6 of the said Act, the Central Gov-
ernment hereby declares that the righ of user in the said lands
specified in the schedule appended to this notification hereby
acquired for laying the pipelines ;
And further in exercise of the power conferred by sub-
section (4) of that Section, the Central Government directs
that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vest-
ing in the Central Government vest in this date of the publi-
cation of this declaration in the Oil Sc Natural Gas Com-
mission free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
Pipe Line from Geleki Well No. GO(10) To Well No. GL(9)
State : Assam
District
: Sibsagar
Taluk
: Athkhel
Village
Survey No.
Hectare
Ares
Ccntiares
Chutia Gaon
339 Kha
0
8
03
340 Kha
0
12
71
501 Kha
0
11
77
514 Kha
0
1
74
513 Kha
0
17
13
1032 Kha
0
24
22
815 Kha
0
17
66
847 Kha
0
1
07
[No. 12016/8/74-L&LAI]
TOo Wto 4975 TO TTTTO7TO
% nrfaro to^t) srfaftro, 1962 (i 962 *u so) tot
3 tfr wmu ( i) % TOfm TOn toto: % tfr tcim
Mixrm (^tfronr from) ^Tfrofror ^to to° to 30 faTO
2 3-12-7 4 TITT MTffiK % xtfTOjTOV t tRRT
ir fafafrc ^frofr % Tt to ^ farmer
% ■sfa* TOtT To TOTOT TO 1
xflx tot; sTTfimft % it tot 6
3WT t ( 1 ) % TOffir tottr vt fcfti * $ 1
tfa TOT; TO % WT fcfti Tr fxTOT *
mpr to % tfro toj^At Jr Wrft'e Jr ttotot
to urfaror nrftm to fafinTOr frnr ft 1
lent, TO: 3TO trfhfhTOT qft UTTT 6 qft TTUTTT ( 1 ) TOT
tTOT *rflrcr to TOfPr 5^ differ *tttot rr^ror
TOttff t ftr TO ^TOJTOTT % Jr fafofe ijfotff
^iTOT TO wfETTO TTTO ^TTTO % TOTT^T $ fa?
ittt fTOr TOTT ^ I
*cftT ; TOT TOT TTTOT ( 4) TOT ^TTTT VrfTOTO TO
STXfpT TTTTOT fr TTO Ijfipff Jf
irr *rfhror ^ttot Jr firf^r ^ tor arfftnr
for toPt Jr, tfrotfr Jr ^ Jr to * smro vV
TO m#sr firr^r ^i
"TO
JfJr^r *ft ^0 3 fro Jr Thrift ^fo 1 ^ tototto
TO: tor fror: fcrTOm sr^pi^r
i rtr
*r°
no TOT
. Jr^r-
TO to ‘l
26 W
0
14
45
12019 / 2 / 74 -TO 0 ^ TO°)
S.O. 4975.— Whereas by a notification of the Government
of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Chemicals (Depart-
ment of Petroleum) S.O. No, 30 dated 23-12-74 under
sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum Pipelines
(Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962),
the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the
Right of User in the lands specified in the schedule appended
to that notification for the purpose of laying pipelines;
And whereas the competent Authority has under sub-section
(1) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the
Government ;
And further whereas the Central Government has after
considering the said report, decided to acquire the right of
user in the lands specified in the scheduled appended to this
notification ;
Now therefore in exercise of the power conferred by sub-
section (1) of the section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said
lands specified in the schedule appended to this notification
hereby acquired for laying the pipelines ;
And further In exercise of the power conferred by sub-
section (4) of that Section, the Central Government directs
that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vest-
ing in the Central Government vest in this date of the
publication of this declaration in the Oil Sc Natural Gas
Commission free from all encumbrances,
Sec. 3(ii)]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975 /AGRAHAY ANA 1, 1897
4083
SCHEDULE
Pipeline from Geloki GGS No. 3 to Geleki Well No. 1
State : Assam District : Sibsagat Taluk : Atkhkhc!
Village Smvey No. Hectaro Are Centiare
Athkhel Grant 26 Kha 0 14 45
No, 2
[No. 1 201 9/2/74-L&L/H]
WJO WT° 4976, --m- fcjtlWT, 'TTWTTTT (gfa %
wftRTR rr W+T) wfafTO, 1962 (l962 So) WPT
3 ^tstrt ( 1 ) % wtfta tor to>k ^ ^ftlWT tflr tw
totr ( fan hi ) xrftjgRRT *pt° wt o *f o 31 TOfhff
23 - 12-74 a nr fcsfa to*t r ^ rr wfagror j sito WRgwt
fafafei gffeff % wfMr ^ ttT tot smfef ttT faTO
% ^ Rffer ^rrT *fT WTTT TOFT *ftfer *R fen RT I
tfft: Jin: rstr STfamf ^ m wfafror ^ tot 6
75rTETRT(l) % WSffe TO' IT ^ fefrt 4 rff Jf I
sflT TO, RR: fcjffa TOTT if 7m feff£ <R feTR *R% %
ri in ft wfegRRT ?T rctr ^ErgRf fHfefeR g fn at it ^nfMT
*TiT xrfsrTR wftpr k> Ft *ft feferqR fen ^ 1
wv, wt: 7m wfufero *rf tot 6 tff twttt ( 1 )
3ttt mrr infer tt nfbr ^^<3 gpr *fRTfaT nr^nr ot^sri *ft feet
*R?fr % fe Ft nfegnm tr rrr smgfer if fefefer tot gffefr
it Tmt^T ■tt nfernr trt rtft ffesrd sfthft % feR urt-
TRT wferr fen TOT $ 1
tffe TO rr tot tft totrt (4) tot RRfr vrfenff tt
TOn TO 5 ^ TOr totr bfer 3<ft £ fe tot TOrF if
tottr tt wfiTOK nfr^TO tout if fafer 3 YR 47 rto fcr TO
m$ffe % otrtr it, TO TOff ft ft $ ft %
5TWH t^-t fefer $fer 1
S.O. 4976. — Whereas by a notification of the Government
of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Chemicals (Depart-
ment of Petroleum) S.O. No. 31 dated 23-12-74 Under
sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum Pipelines
(Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962),
the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the
Right of User in the lands specified in the schedule appended
to that notification for the purpose of laying pipelines;
And whereas the competent Authority has under sub-section
(1) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the
Government ;
And further whereas the Central Government has after
considering the said report, decided to acquire the right of
user in the lands specified in the scheduled appended to this
notification ;
Now therefore In exercise of the power conferred by sub-
section (1) of the section 6 of the _ said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said
lands specified in the schedule appended to this notification
hereby acquired for laying the pipelines ;
And further In exercise of the power conferred by sub-
section (4} of that Section, the Central Government directs
that the right of user in the said land.s shall instead of vest-
ing in the Central Government vest in this date of the
publication of this declaration in the Oil & Natural Gas
Commission free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
Pipe Line from Gelekl Well No. GL to Geleki Well No. 1
State : Assam District ; Sibsagar Taluk : Athkhel
Village Survey No.
Hectare
Area
Gentian?
Chutia Gaon 1041 Kha
0
o -
27
1033 Kha
0
11
37
938 Kha
0
12
58
937 Kha
0
13
38
935 Kha
0
19
40
914 Kha
0
26
49
913 Kha
0
7
54
881 Kha
0
0
54
949 Kha
0
10
70
851 Kha
0
10
57
1026 Kha
0
1
20
847 Kha
0
1
34
[No. 1201 9/2/74- L & L/III]
fto r^To ir if wt jo 1 ?R7 tfr
TRT : STfTCT : fWTTTT
TOm jo I^TT $0 fofr-
t° ITT
^fen TO 1 04 1 3T
1033 *r
938 ^
937 3T
935 ^
914 ^
913^
881 7*
849 sr
851
1026 iff
847
[jo
0
0
27
0
1 1
37
0
1 2
58
0
13
38
0
19
40
0
26
49
0
2
54
0
n
54
0
10
70
0
1 0
57
0
1
20
0
1
34
1 201 9/2/74-^ TO n^c :i ]
VTo Vl* 49 77 „ — (qfe %
% fTfe^rn: 5T fafjW, 1962 ( 1 9 62 50) UTTT
3 jj ( 1) %
ittot faTO) siro jo 32 tfitbar
23-12-74 5Rr TO7R j j UTO
j fefefer ftfjji % toEt % wfmrR *p> trt m^ji jj fei^r
^ ^ tot ?TfTr TrtfeT ferr
«TT I
^ irt: ttott ^TTfertrrft' % irfa'feTu wri g jj
urrr ( 1 ) ^ iqrftq 7 TOtr ^ fefti j ^ | 1
xfri writ, JT7T: UTTTR j TO feT>i TT feTfT TR?T %
t^i?T ITT ^ fefefej '*tFto if
«t?i nrftR7R tfffer ipr fefeTO feqr | l
war, WT: 7?dpT wFtrferiT ITRr 6 Tjq^RT ( 1 ) sRF--
itto wfeT srifrn ^ ju, ?r.*pit -un^TRT jtfa ^
t fe FT wRrgWTT TT TOT if fafiffee TO if
^rq'trr W wfetHT Tm TTTf 7 T ^ !TifbiTR 47 frirr P/TOfTT
trffer fetn tot ^ 1
4084
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA . NOVEMBER 22. 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 [Part II
t AA ffRl ^ ^URT (4 ) BRT
trY fcaV t ftr tot *jf*prt A
^m>r ^ftpfTR if firf^ tfr^r % far tfE
5TTfrft?r Aa wrt>t *r, *ptfY *Y *j^r A vi «ftrr^T
JfflllR w fllftV ¥Y faf?pt fjVtT I
iPion^ro^o 3^T^rn?r ^ 4o 1 t*f *tfY 'tt^wt^t
Tm
wot
Um r :
fw-
A\AX
ntr
A ifR
i
1 £
i
avua rr^dl
2135
0
7
09
2144^
0
18
06
2143V
0
2 2
34
2 L43 V
0
1
6 1
1 604 V
0
6
15
2142 V
0
10
57
2024 V
0
8
03
2147V
0
1
61
[tfo 12019 / 2 / 74 - 1 ^^^/ 4 ]
S.O. 4977. — Whereas by a notification of the Government
of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Chemicals (Depart-
ment of Petroleum) S.O. No. 32 dated 23-12-74 under
sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum Pipelines
(Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962),
the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the
Right of User in the lands specified in the schedule appended
to that notification for the purpose of laying pipelines ;
And whereas the competent Authority has under sub-section
(1) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the
Government ;
And further whereas the Central Government has after
considering the said report, decided to acquire the right of
user in the lands specified in the scheduled appended to this
notification ;
Now therefore in exercise of the power conferred by sub-
aection (1) of the section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said
lands specified in the schedule appended to this notification
hereby acquired for laying the pipelines ;
And further in exercise of the power conferred by sub-
section (4) of that Section, the Central Government directs
that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vest-
ing in the Central Government vest in this date of the
pu plication of this declaration in the Oil & Natural Gas
Commission free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
Pipeline from Gelcki GGS No. 3 to Gelcki Well No. 1.
State : Assam District : Sibsagar Taluk : Athkhcl
Village
Survey No.
Hectare
Area
Centlare
Napam
2135 Kha
0
7
09
Baruwati
2144 Kha
0
18
06
2143 Kha
0
22
34
2143 Kha
0
1
61
1604 Kha
0
6
,15
2142 Kha
0
W
57
2024 Kha
0
8
03
2147 Kha
0
1
61
[No. 12019/ 2/74-L&L/I V]
vto 4978. — w: q^Yfrm, mwr^r (*jfh * AAA\A
vfmrx *rr 1962 ( 1962TT 50) ^ tmr 3
^ 3WKT ( 1 ) % ^TT?T TOTfT * 5fr X TA EH
A%rm (<Y{tfVm faqnT) w* *tto q 0 33
' 23- 1 2’ 7 4 5KT AVAR A AA 'A AWA
A ^fhqir %■ , ttpt ^Y fawrfi
spinr 1 ^ far? nfijRf <t-i v.4 M'-f’TT *mrir TTfin firqr 4 T 1
qqr: mA mftpjrrCY * srfafwr trrrr e 4 A aa-
«rm ( 1 ) ^ ^n-^nr *k+k qh ftfli ^ ft t 1
m\ *-) 'to 1 , m: u ^n: % frft^ qr 1 < ^ ^ ^
axax[ A xaaxa
«fn *tIwk qrrfi qq fafuu^q foqr | 1
wt, vtt: tot trfafim *£Y um e aA ^rtmr ( 1 ) arcr —
5 Kcu vi Fret qq snfPT qrtd jjrr httr pTfflf etti qifqTT x
t ftltr ^rftr^qqr A
^PTtq- qq - qTVT *?inpT ^ItT % wf 4 t frTq - T^^TTT
aU d kqr Jiidi ^ \
sfE, a\A aa uttt swm (4) am ^
ipfl PT J?T %^Yq TOT ffi^T kft t fr Y A
W\ Vi Fm ^ K 4 f qfYq' HTTR fqfi 5 ^r % 5 nrPT fiH A\ X
Aa OTfET A, WA\ AA 1 ^ A ^PT A ^ % AAmA ^Y
Av^m ty fr%r 1
^fY ° 3fY 0 o A 0 3 ^ q% 1 i^-t
xm
Uimi : fiR- fiBJVT :
ATAX
aU
i
AAliAAtZAo 2
1 V
1 9 16
1 5 V
0 3 5 8 6
1 5*
0 5 3 5
[tfo
1 2019/2/7 4-t^ro TT¥° TTA 5]
S.O. 4978. — Whereas by a notification of the Government
of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Chemicals (Depart-
ment of Petroleum) S.O. No. 33 dated 23-12-74 under
sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum Pipelines
(Acquisition of Right of User in land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962),
the Central Government declared its intension to acquire the
Right of User in the* lands specified in the schedule appended
to that notification for the purpose of laying pipelines ;
And whereas the competent Authority has under sub-section
(1) of section 6 of the said Act, submitted" report to the
Government ;
And further whereas the Central Government has after
considering the said report, decided to acquire the right of
user in the lands specified in the schedule appended to this
notification ;
Now therefore in exercise of the power conferred by sub-
section (1) of the section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said
lands specified in the schedule appended to this notification
hereby acquired for laying the pipelines ;
And further in exercise of the power conferred by sub-
section (4) of that Section, the Central Government directs
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 4085
that the right of user in the said lands shall Instead of vest-
ing in the Central Government vest in this date of the
publication of this declaration in the Oil & Natural Gas
Commission free from all encumbrance*,
SCHEDULE
Pipeline from Gelcki GGS No, 3 to Geleki Well No, 1
State : Assam District : Sibsagar Taluk : Athkhel
Village Survey No, Hectare Are Centiare
Athkhel Grant I Kha 1 9 16
N). 2
15 fOa 0 35 86
15 Unga 0 5 35
“ [No. 12019/2/74-L&L/V]
TTc 4979.— TO ^fWT, (*rfF * TORY 7 !
^ stfrorror wto) srftjfwr, 1962 ( 1902 *>r 50) qF nro 3
5U TOFTTT ( 1 ) ^ 'FRF ^TWR % F^YfeTF m \ T TOTTO
(F^tfeTF f^’+TRT ) *TT° 0 34 TOtY**
23 - 12-74 mi rtor F to srf^ror F * ; j^Y
if *jfFFY $ toFYf % vT rttr rtto t fwBiTF
* FFfer % feY rYto ftF *u. toft <mnr to; fan
1
iq“R *RT: TWF FTfaFrCY F TOT ’TFgfFFF STRr 6 TO-
URT ( 1 ) TOfe flTOR fF F tfr | I
%f \ r ^rh, TO *T<4>T< % TOT Wtf Tt faTR TOF %
FFTtF TO F FTOT V'^ff F fatHts 6 * Ijfeft F FFFTF
vrfOTR *trtt tof fen | 1
HT«r, STT: TOT *lftffFFF TT ETRT 6 FFFRT ( 1 ) TRT
ftot ^ toft tot 5 F ftor rtcert Ftfe TO.ar
| f^r w % trff TOT^pft F faFfer TOT F
^Tfifpr FT (tfWR TRF *TRF ferF % TO4w ffe ^F^RT
srfaT fw ^mrr | 1
UpR, ’tTFt TO (TRT ^F TO«RT ( 4 ) ITT T FTFT VffeFt FT
toft toF TOfe ftotr fFfrr *rfY frfa tot r * jfwti F wm
ttFtotr: 3>?#Pt ftor F fsrffffr ^ ftpt F<r *fR Fferor fe
FPfRT F, F*F M F ^«FT Rif W FtWT % WTVFT ^Y T[F
rfrfr^ *f?r hr%T hPTT 1
rj%^h *FT -To ^fY 0 0 ^1 ^ 0 1 TRTFTTT IV^rrh
% ftrh I
rjRq- 1 FFF fe^T : fF^TTRR :
fTf
3 wrt
i
FTOfFtTF 1
4
0
5
02
3 ?T
0
0
94
2
0
1
61
77T
0
21
81
[?to 1201 9/2/7 4 -OTo rrrrfo irt/6 ]
S.O, 4979, — Whereas by a notification of the Government
Of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Chemicals (Depart-
ment of Petroleum) S.O. No. 34 dated 23-12-74 under
sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum Pipelines
(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962),
the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the
Right of User in the lands specified in the Schedule appended
to that notification for the purpose of laying pipelines :
And whereas the competent Authority has under sub-section
(1) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the
Government ;
And further, whereas the Central Government has after
considering the said report, decided to acquire the right of
user in the lands specified in the Schedule appended to this
notification ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act. the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said
lands specified in the Schedule appended to this notification
hereby acquired for laying the pipelines ;
And further in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
section (4) of that Section, the Central Government directs
that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vest-
ing in the Central Government vest in this date of the
publication of this declaration in the Oil & Natural Gas
Commission free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
Pipeline from Geleki Well No. GL to Gelcki Well No, l
State : Assam
District
: Sib agar
Taluka :
Athkhel
Village
Survey No.
Hectare
Are
Ce nti arc
Gelki
4 Kha
0
5
62
Grant No, 1
3 Kha
0
0
94
2 Kha
0
1
61
77 Kha
0
21
81
[No, 1 201 9/2/74-LA L/ VI]
WTTo WTo 49 80. — TO ’fefeRT, TRWRF (ijfiT % 3TOP7
% FfeFTR *4^),3TfafenT, 1 962 ( t 9(52 VI 50) tfr ETRT 3
TTORT ( l) % FeTtt FR* HWR % qV>fer*T tfk RTITR
(^fetF faFR) tfr ^ro ffo do 3 5^rft^
23-12-74 tTRT nTOR d FF ^FdPJTO r d *Y
fq'fdfe? r *jfedf % TTfeT TRF RRHt tY fTOtd
% FTHfF % fer FPfF FTRT STRPT dlfqF RTT f^rp-
«n 1
dh TO F4TF FftTFFFF ^ KTRT 6 W\ Rq-
«TRT ( 1 ) ^ FWR Tt % $ T | |
dY T FRY, to: %^SPT TO^R d FTO fferfe FT feFTT FR^ -
FTOK W d FRTF ^T^^fY F fFfFFTO: Ffeff F FTOPT
FT FrtTFTR FIVcT FRF FT f-rfFy^ T fTTqT ^ I
5TF, TO: TTO ^FyfFTO HTRT (5 ^FtTFR ( 1 ) jTTr
FTO TrfTO FT fFPT FrF gF F^fpr FT?T7R tr^pj7;7 Ffer FTOt
ijtfFr w F fFto ^ fFtTfez 1 r FferY F
FWmFTtffWR FRF RTRT ferF % FFYto % fer FTR^TTt
Ffer ferr 'STrtt 1
< , 5TR1 TO STRT TOSTRT ( 4 ) fflTT TOFT ^rfenff FT
TOtF frF ^ Fi^bYf ftftt fFFw tot 'FfefY F RFdm
qfTOR FTOR F ?YF % TOF fe TfR StfeTO
% totYf F, hFY FffF F to F to fTfrt % totto
FrfYR fF fFfer ^>tt i
4086
the gazette of india : November 21 1 975 /agrahayana 1, 1897 [part h—
^7T4 To ¥T 4° 1 44 TT64-4TV4
TfiRT : feT : taw, 4T4¥T : W
wr, *f4: 344 ¥t HTTT 6 Or WJRT ( l) JRT—
!P*m;STfcr ¥r ¥7?t f? %^¥pT *R¥R 0^3171 *ftfa?T
¥7eft t fa vt ft ft fftfarftre ^4 *j-
fftftfft ¥r srfa¥R qr^r $rroH firaift % irm^r ¥ fwft
tr^ffT <T fanjr 4itii ^ 1
TtcFbRT ft° ^4CTJ7 ft ¥R ft^fttR:
*
^T'-T^pf 4H 1 21 *T 0 5 08
[ft° 12010/2/74-^0 tR¥RtT<>/7]
S.O. 4980* — Where by a notification of the Government
of India In the Ministry of Petroleum and. Chemicals (Depart-
ment of Petroluem) S.O. No, 35 dated 23-12-74 under
nib-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum Pipelines
(Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962),
the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the
Right of User in the lands specified in the Schedule appended
to that notification for the purpose of laying pipelines;
And whereas the competent Authority has under sub-section
(1) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to the
Government ;
And further whereas the Central Government has after
considering the said report, decided to acquire the right of
user in the lands specified in the Schedule appended to this
notification ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, (he Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in The said
lands specified in the Schedule appended to this notification
hereby acquired for laying the pipelines ;
And further, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-
section (4) of that Section, the Central Government directs
that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vest-
ing in the Central Government vest in this date of the
publication of this declaration in the Oil & Natural Gas
Commission free from all encumbrances.
SCHEDULE
Pipeline from Geleki Group Gathering Station No, 3 to
State : Assam
Geleki Well No. 1
District : Sibsagar
Talukfl : Athkhel
Village
Survey No.
Hectare
Are Centiare
Athkhel
21 Kha
0
5 08
Grant No. 1
[PK 12019/2/74- L&L/VI1]
^Tfo WT° 4 98 1,-- rPT- TRhtiTiu ( »tfft % t 3 T pfbT
¥ iR «T*0, 1962 ( 1 962 ¥T 50) tflTT
3 ¥t WJRT ( 1 ) ¥ TFR7T ¥7¥T7 ¥ ^tf?m TmrpT
if d T OT ft’flPT) ¥T *FT° *JT«» ft° 36,
23-12-74 3TTT TT7¥R 4" RTT t ft Hvi-f-f M ft
% trfft¥R ¥t ¥t frorft
¥ ¥ fftft ¥74 ¥T ?TT4T UT9PT fttffttf ¥7 fwT
«TT I
sqW 44: FF4T 4ThT47Tfr 4 xrfWPPT ¥V ETT7F 6 *ft RTUTTf
(1) ¥ snfPr *R¥r7 ¥T fWti % | 1
ftfr ?tt4, m- TT7¥Rft 3¥rT ¥7 fWR ¥74 ¥
qftf¥R ¥7ft ¥T f¥4T $ I
7^7, Sflft 44 tJPir ¥t 4TORF ( 4 ) 3T7T 5TOT ¥ff44t ¥T
¥7^ ^^4 47447 $f¥ 4¥T ^f44t 4^r4nT
¥r q-ftrTTR ^sVq- 47¥R 4 *44 ^ inmr 44 sft 7 qTffd¥
% 4, 4*fr 4 1J¥T ?T T tfff ¥ WRT4 ¥t
w ^rrfter ¥f f4Rr4 ^rr i
¥51^7 ifto 17^0 ^‘0 I # ^fto siff o u^o ffo 1
cT¥ 9 fror4 ¥ f4¥ I
am : *T44
dTtJ¥T :
ftrwjsT
4?9T*T 4o
d s 4T7 §v£t*
i
47
4firr 4T4 artfur
2 *r
0
35
0 5
27T
0
19
53
2 %
0
12
71
2 4
0
35
99
3 ST
n
20
47
134
0
0
94
634
0
98
56
63H
0
14
32
[40 ) 2019/2/7 4 -TT^ro quT 4W/s]
0 rfF 0 4 ^ Tn m n , M^7 4f4¥
S.O. 4981.- — Whereas by a notification of the Government
of India in the Ministry of Petroleum and Chemicals (Depart-
ment of Petroleum) S.O. No, 36, daated 23-12-74 under
sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Petroleum Pipelines
(Acquisition or Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 (50 of 1962),
the Central Government declared its intention to acquire the
Right of User in the lands specified in the Schedule appended
to that notification for the purpose of laying pipelines ;
And whereas the competent Authority has under sub-section
(1) of Section 6 of the said Act, submitted report to tho
Government ;
And further, whereas the Central Government has after
considering the said report, decided to acquire the right of
user in the Jand,s specified in th£ Schedule appended to this
notification ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-
section (1) of Section 6 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby declares that the right of user in the said
lands specified in the Schedule appended to this notification
hereby acquired for laying the pipelines ;
And further, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
section (4) of that Section, the Central Government directs
that the right of user in the said lands shall instead of vest-
ing in the Central Government vest in this date of the
publication of this declaration in the Oil & Natural Gas
Commission free from all encumbrances.
Sec. 3 ( i j ) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AORAHAY ANA 1,1897
SCHEDULE
Pipeline from Ruirasagar GGS No. 1 To Lakwa GGS No . 1
Slate : Assam
District
: Si biagar
Taluk
: Silakati
Village
Survey No.
Hectare
Are
Ccntiarc
Sola Chah
2 Kha
0
35
05
Bagicha
2 Ga
0
19
53
2 Unga
0
12
71
2 Sa
0
35
99
3 Kha
0
20
47
13 Ga
0
0
94
63 Sa
0
88
56
63 Jha
0
14
32
[No. 1201 9/2/74-L&L/ VIII]
T. P. SUBRAHAMANYAN Under Secy,
(' sflT OTPTR fa-RPT)
VTo dTTo 4982, — WH (RRTfwR RftTRtfRRf
flwrfy) RftffRRR, 197 1 ( 1 971 RR 40 ) RTTT 3 ffTTT
iron vrfwft tr otTr ?TT^n: RRRf if
rNir RfRTRfT T?T, Rt HOTRT % RfiiqRff ^ ,
RR^FT f, MUfafW % RRtOTf % f^TT HTtKT Rfa-
trO- Prjtr 5ft RTTRt % ( 2 ) if frPrfe:
flrcvrO wmf qft rtrr ^rq^ft RfbtfrfW wftR tffRrqf
RTTR>
wftr^rrfV »pr <rerfWffrr *rm*
STfaVlf«.dr TR OTRfR
~ ( 0 _(_ 2 _)
^5 WRTfa rr RftniRff, rr*?- RRRtR fam firfatr
^ Jjfe, RRtftR Rtwjr
jj -r q r fhRR NtIr^ 1 *£, NlF^’
RfiRfOT % *k*h t fttr j_
[qrr 0 r o ipr-270 1 a( s)/75-^ 2 ]
TTo ro RRjfaR, ^ rPft
(Department of Fertilizers and Chemicals)
S.O. 4982. — In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3
of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act,
1971 (40 of the 1971), the Central Government hereby appoints
the officer mentioned in column (|) of the Table below, being an
officer equivalent to the rank of Gazetted Officer of Government,
to be Estate Officer for the purposes of the said Act, who shall
exercise the powers conferred, and perform the duties imposed,
on Estate Officers by or under the said Act within the local limits
of his jurisdiction In respect of the public premises specified in
column (2) of the said Table.
TABLE
Designation of the officer Categories of public premises and
local limits of jurisdiction
1 2
Senior Administrative Officer, Public premises of Gprakhpur
Gorakhpur Unit, Gorakh- Fertilizer Factory including
pur Fertilizer Corporation its township belonging to
of India Limited. Fertilizer Corporation of
India Limited.
r 4hiC, RTR *fbi POTR TRT 4T *PftR Tt ^p \i_270l3(5)/75-FertsJI]
SRfr rNot) RT OT>R sflr RfiRtfaR *fOTff R7 TO ! F^TT i a. A, VASUDEVAN Under Sccy.
gw tfk starag
*n*sr
Rf faesft, 2 4 19 7 5
ftTo 5Ho 4983. — E<R% RTR R4Y RRR if fRRfftR RfRftRR % RWR % RTRrfa Iflft ^ TOR WfR
*R*R, NOT UUIf*R Wti, fwfoff TT fRRR WVt RR 7 tJRTT'fRT, RTR R^fV fi^R % TROT 2 ? ^ Rf f^FOT
OT% Wtit OTTmf % ^T%t f^RRTT fiTROT OT% OTFt OTT feflnr % *7rOT 6 t fTRT | I
hot
( 1 ) TTTfc* ^rftrfROT, 19 5 2 ( 1 9 5 2 TR 3 7 RT StfafOTR) Trt ETRJ 1 2 RHTTf ( 4 ) OTT tJRT 1 6 I
(2) ftptRT (Wrot) RfufROT 1953 ( 19 5 3 TR 1 TRt Rfdwr) Tff ^TT 5 R-lUftT ( 3 ) OTT RTTT 9 I
flrwVtr
OT fifOT RPT ftFOT OTTrf RTRTRr RTR TH^fRl TR RTR *fRT %rfR^r fr^ % qr \ WT
TOR 3 5 ^ Rfo OTtft NOT. RT OTTRTT ^
RTRfiPfT ROTRf ^ Not §; RT TPT^r
Not I
1 2 3 4 5 6
1. R^RI^ OTmiT RRRT 285
2, RRTTF£ OTTRIT RWT 286
2 8 9. 00 ^[RRT RRT RRRtR^ fi^“
m, wftnRff,
RTTRT, afRrf I
2 9 3. 00 rfhrr g^MT RRT fh^-
w 7 irNmft, RFRT^
RTTHT, I
ott^tr: RnrfhRr rhrtr f ttV Not
Nnr) 1
OTTRTT Tfk RToNt. ROTTRt T?T
Not (%RTT R^RpS? Rf%T it
p^4r * Ntr) i
[9Ro?(o 6/l/75-qRio^o-T(7fiTO:-20l9]
4088
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22. I975/AGRAHAYANA 1, J 897 [Part II -
MINISTRY OF INFORMATION & BROAD CASTING
ORDER
New Delhi the 24th October, 1975
S.O, 4983. — In pursuance of the directions issued under the provisions of the enactments specified in the First Schedule annexed
hereto ihe Central Government after considering the recommendations of the Film Advisory Board, Bombay hereby approves the films
specified in column 2 ot the Second Schedule annexed hereto inall its/thclr language versions to be of the description specified against
It/each in columns 6 of the said Second Schedule,
THE FIRST SCHEDULE
(1) Sub-section (4) of tho Section 12 of section 16 of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 (Central Act XXXVII of 1952).
(2) Sub-section (3) of section 5 and section 9 of the Bombay Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1953 (Bombay Act XI of 1953).
THE SECOND SCHEDULE
S.No. Title of the film
Length
35 mm
Name of the appli-
cant
Name of the Pro-
ducer
Whether a scientific film 01 a
film intended for educational
purposes or a film dealing with
news & current events or a
documentary film
1 2
3
4
5
6
1. Maharashtra News No. 285
289.00
Metres
293.00
The Director of
Information & Public
Relations, Government
of Maharashtra, Bombay.
Film dealing with news and
current events (for release in
. Maharashtra Circuit).
2. Maharashtra News No. 286
Metefs
DO.
Do.
[F. No, 6/l/75-F(P) App. 20191
VToSTTo 49 84. — FFT wft WU ftftrtpET trfwfWT ^ SflTf fr? Tpr fifet %
wzm, fe>r rft fwfwf tt fen *r wvt, r^nn, 2 % it
Itf ferft Vt F'JrurfV WTT TFTFTtf ffe™T 5RW W?T fafe 6 % fall JAR
«rdY $ : —
wc r
( l) 1 952 ( 195 2 3 7 *t^^^fafeR) W?T tTTTT I 2 ^UTTT ( 4 ) ?RT UTTT 16
(2) (faffer) srfhffer 1953 (1953 1 7 ¥t urrr 5 (3) ^ urtr 9
fefPr
^ am feu ¥r Fm ferfur wtt mr ■ftt forrfw feu ^ m fe^rr rifet
^pjqT 35 f*To *fto fWu ^ HT m \-^\ < ^
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 . fe 207
2. Ffisfa fe WT 208
274. 32 Jffe
243 > 83 UTT7
^rrr few, T f*PT^ ht-
*nr, nhfr mr i
few, TfTTRT
*rmr, Titsft mr 1
q \ t : ^rrufe wrntrt h uarfe
fe) 1
dHl^U sfrt *Rfe umivT &
wife fetr (^?m uffe
^ fe) 1
tt 6/1/7 sm^o <fr 0 fefer 2020]
qfo %o mn;; wrr *rfer
ORDER
S.O. 4984. — In pursuance of the directions issued under the provisions of each of the enactments specified in the First Schedule
annexed hereto, tho Central Government after considering the recommendations of the Film Advisory Board, Bombay hereby approves
the fUm/filnis specified in column 2 of the Second Schedule annexed hereto in Gujarati to be of the description specified against it/each
in column 6 of the said Second Schedule. - ■
Sec. 3 (ii) ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1 975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897
4089
THE FIRST SCHEDULE
(1) Sub-section 4 of the Section 12 and Section 16 of the Cinematograph AC, 1952 (Central AC XXXVII. of 1952).
(2) Sub -section (3) of Section 5 and Section 9 of the Bombay Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1953 (Bombay Act XV FI of 1 953).
THE SECOND SCHEDULE
S.No. Title of the film Length Name of the Appli- Name of the Pro- Whether a Scientific film or a
35 mm cant ducer film intended for o d u ducat ional
propose] or a film dealing with
news & current events or a
documentary film
1 2
3
4 5
6
1. Mahitichitra No. 207
274.32
Metres
Director of
Information Govt,
or Gi^rat,
Gandhi Nagar.
Film dealing with news and
current events (For release
in Gujarat Ciicuit only).
2. Mahitichitra No. 208
243,83
Metres
Do.
Do.
^ ffwfr, 13 ^TPiR, 1975
*TT. 31T. 4985.— r»TI# 3TT^T WTT 627, 8 *TT^,
1960 fTirr itfj; frRTT, 1051 ^ ^rw
434 ^ 3 ^ TTT (T) 'R 3l'1,«l< CI ; -JKn7 sf
1-12-75 # Juntora*
^7 iron# 77# tVn if 1
Rre*tr 5-18/75#. trcr. #.]
MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION'S
(P & T BOARD)
New Delhi, the 13th November, 1975
S.O. 498$. — In pursuance of para (li) of Section III of
Rule 434 of Indian Telegraph Rules, 1951, as introduced
by S. O, No. 627 dated 8th March, I960, the Director
General, Posts and Telegraphs, hereby specifies the 1-12-75
as the date on which the Measured Rate System will be
introduced in S^nkaran Koil Telephone Exchange, Tamil
Nadu Circle.
[No. 5-18/75-PHB]
*TT. 3TT. 4986.— WT# SIT#?! 627, TVlM> 8 »f#,
1960 ^it 7 t ^T 7 f#T>T, 1951 ^ faw
434 4 WS 3 ^ 4Vt (35) ^ *Tflfcr^T«B 't
T7T7 ^ 1-1-7 G JUntoR
^7 Hujv# ^fTT^ JfT# ART f^TT I
[#5*TT 5-18/75#, #,]
ST), 4986. — In pursuance of para (a) of Section III of
Rule 434 of Indian Telegraph Rules, 1951, as introduced
by S. O. No. 627 dated 8th March, I960, the Director
General, Posts and Telegraphs, hereby specifies the 1-1-1976
as the date on which ihe Measured Rate System will be
introduced in Sankarnagar Telephone Exchange, Tamil Nadu
Circle,
[No, 5-18/75-PHB]
[F. No. 6/I/75-FP Ap p. 2020]
K.P.K. NAYAR, Under Secy.
WT. 3IT. 4987.— BIT# 3n#7T #5*IT 627, f##T! 8 I Tf^
1960 fwr 37^; *nr#T ?tr 1951 ^
434 # 3 # #TT (^7> # 5FIKTT7 4
tVm 3 1 #7rh‘ -n'«b 1-12-75 nn i fW
T7 W°n# *67# «RT f'RTTTT f t
[TTOTT 5-21/75#. t7*T. #.]
S.O. 4987.— In pursuance of para (a) of Section III of
Rule 434 of Indian 'Telegraph Rules, 1951, as introduced
by S. O- No, 627 dated 8th March, 1960, the Director
General, Posts and Telegraphs, hereby specifies the 1-12-75
as the date on which the Measured Rate System will be
introduced in Virar Telephone Exchange, Maharashtra Cir-
cle.
[No, 5-21/7YPHB]
f^vft 14 1975
VTo *17 o 4 9 8 8.“ - FTFfy Kh NW ^hszfT 62 7, faJTPr 8 UPf,
1980 yrcr wpj frtT ^tr mx Pm, 1957 $
434 %■ HI ^ Ta (*») % 7TT-TIT %
T-Ji if Rl N> 1-12-7 5 SHTliVT TT ST'JTPft
?rr Theft ferr £ 1
[w 5- 10/7 s-Tt o mr o tft o ]
New Delhi, the 1 4th November, 1975
S.O. 4988. — In pursuance of para (a) of Section 111 of
Rule 434 of Indian Telegraph Rules, 1951, as introduced
by S. O. No. 627 dated 8th March, 1960, the Director Gene-
ral, Posts and Telegraphs, hereby specifies the 1-12-75 as the
date on which the Measured Rate System will be intro-
duced in Gurdaspur Telephone Exchange N, W, Circle.
[No. 5-10/75-PHB]
*1° *1° 4989. — P TPff *TT^W #WT 627, 8
I 960 tflTT fer ipr VTR/ft^r #K 1951 % f^T
434 % ^ III % q^TT (*) % iq^rn: T^ nf^TO %
7PR4T cTTlu T fiprhp 1-12-75 & Wtfw ffumft
^TRT ^T?t fT fmT^PT 1%^! ?t I
s- 2 1 / 7 5 *ft otp«r oft]
102 GI/75 — 10
4090 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1 975 / AG R AH A YANA 1, 1897 [Part II—
8.0, 4989. — In pursuance of para (a) Section III of
Rule 434 of Indian Telegraph Rules, 1951, as introduced
by S. O. No. 627 dated 8ih March, 1960, the Director Gene-
ral, Posts and Telegraphs, hereby specifies the 1-1 2-7 5 as the
date on which the Measured Kate System wili be intro-
duced in Sangamner Telephone Exchange, Maharashtra Cir-
cle.
[No. 5-21/75-P1IB]
P, C. GUPTA, Asstt. Director General (PHB)
sriV* wr
(Tf^^r w)
4 < -i *H T, 197 5
VTo Mfo 499 0- — *ft 9% feif 'i'RfT HTOR
% «PRT, feFTTT Xtft ’fife (W sfa TtOTK
*fiT° ^To 1322, dlfe* 7 1967
grrr 7*rrfe wtttt «nr % w ir ffepr fw
^PTT 'TT, 'sEi 97TOT7 (fetTW fefeFFl) FrTU, 196 2 %
few 4 % STfePT (5) ^ TO (iv) % WTT TO tfR
fen | ;
toft w arts if to fffe gf Sf;
icr?T: ; TO ?R3TO ifa affelT (feltTO «FT Wm)
fepT, 1 962 % faW 4 % TO*FUf ^ TFpTOT if TOT ftfe
*fRdf ^ 1
[*T O pFf° ^ 0 / 2 / 33 / 75 ]
*%TOTTTfejr, TORtffe
MINISTRY OF SHIPPING & TRANSPORT
(Transport Wing)
New Delhi, the 4th November, 1975
S.O. 4990. — Whereas Shri K. P. Mukherjee, wMo was ap-
pointed as a member of the Calcutta Dock Laloiir Board
established by the notification of the Government of India
in the late Ministry of Labour, Employment and Rehabili-
tation (Department of Labour and Employment) No. S.O.
1322, dated the 7th April, 1967, is deemed to have vacated
his office under item (iv) of sub-rule (5) of rule 4 of the
Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Rules, 1962 ;
And whereas a vacancy has occurred in the said Dock
Labour Board ;
Now therefore, in pursuance of the provisions of ride 4
of the Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Rules,
1962, the Central Government hereby notifies the said
vacancy.
[No. LDC/2/33/75]
V. SANKARALINGAM, Under Secy.
TH *T5rpW
=T€ feTt 16 TOJTO 197 5
3TTo 4 9 91. — flWR, ^TCTFT ^fafepT,
1890 ( 1 890 9) ft STITT 53 TOTJRT ( l) tfe ^ntTTT
( 4 ) SRT TOFT 7T fen TOFT *fR^T TOTTO $ ^r
wm (ter ni) tfr tfo 75 /to° (to )/» 5 1 / 09 ,
flTffar 1 2 faror, 1975 ft fen fa fad wfe £,
TOT tffa^TOT if, ‘ 1 SPT5TP f TOFT ^ dfe ^ mfrT,
^ ( 2 ) ^ T^nr ferfafe TOTO isfefeTOT WT: TOfe
fw ^rr^r, TO’ft -
"( 3 ) iff 15 n u nwo, st* ^’To srr£o, cff° ^R 0 TO°>
affo *TRo utfo, iff 0 *ff° W°: n 0 *rt° srfo TO°>
^ 1*0 no tfto nwo, tnn n ^Tfrr mrir
fer^ir > — n t7tt if, feff r 4f tor nro
fen ^TTTRT l”
[50 7 5/TTrro ( tnT 0 ) / 9 5 1 / 69]
tto Tjc<r, nifer
fer # 5 ^ nfe
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS
(Railway Board)
New Delhi, the 16th October, 1975
S.O. 4991.— In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
section (t) and sub-section (4) of section 53 of the Indian
Railways Act, 1890 (9 of 1890), the Central Government
hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of
the Government of India in the Ministry of Railways (Rail-
way Board) No. 75/M(N)/951/69, dated the 12th September,
1975, namely : —
In the said notification, under item T. Extent of overload-
ing permitted’, after sub-item (2), the following sub-item and
note shall be inserted, namely : — -
“(3) BOX, BOT, BRS, BRIL BCX, BOBS, BOBX wagons
may be permitted the loading tolerance to (he extent
of 2 tonned over the carrying capacity.
Note: No overloading is permitted in the case of tank
wagons.”
[No. 75/M(N)/951/691
A. 1, GUPTA, Secy.,
ex-olficio Jt. Secy.
w Tnpnr
fetfr, 2 6 S7WT, 1 97 5
tffio 3TTo 49D2-- -^=A>r tTTOR ^f 7PI f fe
if ferfe: Ffet % JTrt if Am *ftt 7 farfe?
% if&F t wfepw «Pf ^ m^R
tgT^r, fferr few % & tro fefbrof %■
fenr ferwr §■ ;
*fl7 wpr ^Fcr fero ^ff ^TPiferw % far^ fefer
TTTT WWdt | ;
W:, W, wViPw feTT ^rufeFT, 1947 (l947 ?TT 14)
Vf tTRT 10 Tt WJPJ ( l) % ^ (T) SRT ^rfefef
wpr TRrT u fens «Ff srfufern, ^f
tnrr 7 ^ ^ ^ViTto (ttwt 2 ), ^f
^TRrfef^pr ^ fap, TRrff ^ 1
Sec. 3(ii)J
4091
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1 975/AGRAHAYANA 1 , 1897
« rv
wt gw %|tftf 37m fgfgzF % tfew
gftwrWt *fr fitft gtFfFftrt wf, f^r^T % ssrfff
^ t, FWf WTF % fo^R nFp- -%ft vrRSfft ^ w wr
25-12-1973 ft IjrMV TfWST & W 3TRFTt WFtfftF
*ft ? gfe F?ft, ft wtr fwr fwTf | ?
[fwt ^ 0 - 43012 / 1 / 75/^-4 (aflr) ]
MINISTRY OF LABOUR
ORDER
New Delhi, the 26th August, 1975
S.O, 4992. — Whereas the Central Government is of opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in
relation to the management of Mosaboni Mines of Indian
Copper Complex of Messrs Hindustan Copper Limited, Post
Office Mosaboni Mines, District Singhbhum and their work-
men in respect of the matters specified in the Schedule hereto
annexed ;
And whereas the Central Government considers it desir-
able to refer the said dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
clause(d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947). the Central Government
hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Indus-
trial Tribunal (No. 2), Dhanbad constituted under section 7A
of the said Act.
SCHEDULE
Whether the action of the management of Mosaboni
Mines of Indian Copper Complex of Messrs Hindus-
tan Copper Limited, Post Office Mosaboni Mines,
District Swhbhum, in striking off the rolls the name
of Shri Naiki Hoe, Timber Mazdoor of their Surda
Mine with effect from 25-12-1973 was justified ? If
not, to what relief is the said workman entitled ?
[No. L-43Q12/1 /75-D-IV (B)]
fff fosft, i fftwR, 1975
^To FT® 49 9 3. — FTTR 3ft TFT | fi» Wft
F f pft ftftrfftfe fiwfr ft ftw fftww Tt WV
ftrf fr mw, fw^Fift, twig % wwff % gwg fftsrRwft
tfk wfwf % tNrw srteftftny fwiF ftwTF| ;
*fR WJTR SW fF 4 R Tt nr 4 TFftW % fw[ ffttfftF
3RFT ^TTTSTcft I ;
ff\ ff, rfNrtPFP fwR srfsrfftw, 1947 (1947 14)
eft grRT 10 «ft gwmr ( 1 ) % ^ (f) sttt srftwt
spfpr wft §F, TFT fftFTF W TFT FfafftW FT
Hrm 7 ^ ^ ffR Ffor *WtPpp (go 2 ), wrf Ft
wgfww % fftF ftrtftrF ttfV t 1
FFgtY
*n ftw ntw tft tsr ftrf fr fiw % swiff
sft, fftTFfftfiiF 106 TFPft FFFRT Ff 15 FT,' l‘>7 5 ft 0Wt
^ ^ FRcTTf ^TPftfW tt ? Ffar g£r, Ft WFR fWT
FFF>T % ffFR | ?
% FTF :—
1- sft Ft° «fto FWFFR 1
2- «fr «fto ^0 FftfT |
3. $ft tr 0 W° 3nwftt I
4 . sft Wo efto WfaFR |
5. sft FRo |
6. sft efto ITo %rt |
^ *
7 . «ft Wo FRo I
8 . sft efto w° wrnftw:
9. W° W° I
10 . sft %0 W° I
1 L sft tt^o tt^o f^OTr^ft I
12. sft trrfo W° l^qRft 1
1 3. sft W° gt® |^ft I
14. sft tro fto ^ftf^ |
15. CTfro fto
16. sft TTrro tr 0 I
17. Sft %o TT^To f?RkR |
18 . sft ITo TT^-o fCTTPift I
19. sft <fto Fto 1
20. sft ^fto %© Tift i
21. sft fo W° 9>at?FtF i
22. sft #0 Fto ftTT^R 1
2 3. sft eto ofto I
24- Sft %o TT 0 ^TRWt
2 5. «fr tr^o ITFo I
26- sft ofto fto t^afR l
2 7. Sft W° FTW I
28. Sft TTo fto !
29. «ft %o W° FtTTFTT I
30. Sft W° gto I
31. Sft ftfo %o FT4FT |
32. sft W° W° |
33. Sft £fo £to i
34. sft Zto tr^o I
3 5. sft 5ft o <fto FT^tTTT
36. sfr W a T
37 . sft snfo to ^Yft 1
38. sft %o itfo OT t
39. Sft *fto fto I
40. *ft FRo <to ^FT i
41. sfr w° ^ fffifYtt I
4 2 sft W° ^ 1 ° FWT \
13 . sft Wo Ft o fTTr-WT i
44 . sft q o W° FFFfF t
4 5. sft £to snto FtfTT I
46. sft W° ^ft 0 FmtT I
47 . sfi W° F 1 F?F I
4 s sft ttf o w o ^ 4rf*o f r 1
4 9- Ft FRo W° 1
5 0. Ft FT® qto TfT I
51. sft W° ^tTo S
4092
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 [Part II -
5 2. I
53 . p Er ifto gar \
5 4. tfVo T^o I
5 5. *sft 1 TR o >5tY o I
5 6. sft W° I
57 - *41 u^i o s^o i
5 9. w° i
59. *sft 4to TT7TO ^VrV4+< 1
60. *4t #T° W° *[4^ |
6 1. p 4t 4V o W o I
62- *4t 3jo 4to wtw^: i
63. p -fr W° qfro finrtM I
64. «ft W° Z\o I
6 5. p 4t 5ft O Trrt I
66 - *fr STO TT6T o *TTO I
6 7. p 4t W° I
6 9. «fY tT 0 tto warr i
69. ’rfV w° *fr Q rhr^n: i
7 0. p -ft 4to 41 o S^pfTT I
7 1. «ft iTFWW Tfto TO I
7 2- «ft W° 3 Tq irufldlc-m I
7 3. *ft sV° W° TO l
7 4. p 4r ¥to W° qrp^pTft I
7 5. Jtfttfto I
76- *4t W° W° TTTT I
77 . p 4t 4u w° i
7 8. «ft ffo ^5f7T |
79 . «fr w° i
8 0. *ft W° I
si. p 4Y Wo 4fo Tft^y i
8 2. «ft 4E w° I
83. Mt 4to «fVo TTi^fr I
84. «ft w° tfto 1
8 5. p 4V «fto 4to aT4t?ptfT i
86 . ^ 4t o tr^r I
87- p 4t w° 4to I
8 8- ^fV W° ^Tt° I
89. sft W 0 ^tttp i
90- «ft W° fclW^T I
9i. p 4t W rt W 0 l
9 2- p 4t *mTo w° 2 s 1 ^ < i
9 3. sfr %o afro mW I
9 4. p 4t w° 1
9 5. *ft 4to tfVo Wl 1
9 6. «ft 4to afro stwt i
9 7. «fr %0 W° '?EtTT I
9 8- p 4t 4V O fo 7TR I
9 9- *4V W f° I
100 - sft w° Trrrfi^ r
10 1. *fr filW ^o TTPpft 1
102 TFTRTR w° ^loftH^r t
103. ^ WpTT 4to RTWT I
104. * 4 r w^o i
105. «?t I
106. p 4t 4to 4to I
[4wr w°-20oi.2/u/75-4t'4(4r)]
ORDER
New Delhi, the 1st September, 1975
S.O. 4993, — Wfcercas the Central Government is of opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in
relation to the management of Redi Iron Ore Mine of Messrs
Gogte Minerals, Tilakwadi* Bel gaum and their workmen in
respect of the matters specified in the Schedule hereto an-
nexed ;
And whereas the Central Government considers it desir-
able to refer the said dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Indus-
trial Tribunal (No. 2), Bombay constituted under section 7 A
of the said Act.
SCHEDULE
Whether the action of the management of Redi Iron Ore
Mine of Messrs Gogte Minerals In retrenching the*
following 106 permanent workmen with effect from
the 15th May, 1975 was instilled 7 If not, to what
relief ore the concerned workmen entitled 7
Names of the workmen : —
1.
Shri
V.
B. Kanyalkar.
2.
Shri
B.
I, Deeya.
3.
Shri
A.
N, Kambli.
4.
Shri
N.
V. Nagolkar.
5.
Shri
R.
T. Kambali.
6.
Shri
V.
A. Bhute.
7.
Shri
S.
R. Kambli.
8.
Shri
P.
L. Ajgaonkar.
9.
Shri
s.
N. Kambli.
10.
Shri
K.
S. Kambli,
11.
Shri
N.
S. Krishnaji.
12.
Shri
M.
S. Krishnaih
13.
Shri
H.
B. Hukkeri.
14.
Shri
A.
B. Lodric.
15.
Shri
M.
B. Kambli.
16.
Shri
M.
A. Palyekar,
17.
Shri
K.
S. Shirodkar.
18.
Shri
A,
N. Krishna]!.
19.
Shri
P,
D. Fernandet).
20.
Shri
G.
K, Rane.
21.
Shri
E.
M. Fernandes.
22.
Shri
T.
D, Kerkar.
23.
Shri
A,
G. Manjarckat
24.
Shri
K.
A. Kambli.
25.
Shri
N. M. Redkar.
26.
Shri
G.
V. Redkar.
27,
Shri
U.
S. Nair,
28.
Shri
A,
Y. Korgaonkai
Sec. 3 (ix) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRA HAVANA 1, 1897
4093
29,
Shri K. L. Morojkai.
30.
Shri
M. B. Awade.
31.
Shri V. K. Naik,
32.
Shri S. S. Vcngurlektu.
33.
Shri T. T. Coelho.
34.
Shri
D. S, Pilankar.
35,
Shri G. P. Sakholkar.
36.
Shri
M. A. Surya]i.
37.
Shri
1. J. Deeyu.
38.
Shri
K. S. Kamat.
39.
Shri
B. D. Mannekar.
40.
Shri
R. D. Sutar.
41.
Shri
M. A. Salgaonknr.
42.
Shri
S. N. Redkar.
43.
Shri
M, V, Pilankai.
44.
Shri
U. S. Padval
45.
Shri
T. R. Lobar.
46.
Shri
S. CL Gadckar,
47.
Shri
S. A, Samant.
48.
Shri
N. S, Ibrahimpurkar .
49.
Shri
R. L. Redkar.
50.
Shri
G. P. Reddy,
51.
Shri
S. R, Warkhandkar.
52.
Shri
P. N. Pereira.
53,
Shri
G. L. Sutar.
54.
Shri
D. A. Rodric.
55.
Shri
M. (L Warkhandkar.
56.
Shri
J. H. Kanynlkar.
57.
Shri
II. T. Kadam.
58.
Shri
S. D. Smyawam&hi.
59,
Shri
B, N. Arondekar.
60,
Shri
D. N. Mayekar.
61.
Shri
D. S. Kanynlkai,
62. Shi
i U. V. Satoskar.
63.
Shri
N. K. Trivarckai.
64,
Shri
M. T. Kambli.
65.
Shri
J. V, Gawade.
66. Shri
R. M. Parab.
67.
Shri
M, E. Arolkaf.
68.
Shri
A, A. Shatkar
69. Shri
S. B, Pednekar.
70. Shri P. B. Pednekar.
71. Shri Pandurang G. Parab.
72. Shri M. J. Gaotalkar.
73. Shri T. S. Parab.
74. Shri D. II. Kambli.
75. Shri B. T. Kcrkar.
76. Shri H. S. Vadar.
77. Shri B, II. Kambli.
78. Shri R. D. Redkar.
79. Shri M. D. Pednekar.
80. Shri N. G. Gosavi.
81. Shri M. B. Gavandi.
82. Shri T. M. Konadkar.
83. Shri C. V. Kambli.
84. Shri S. B. Redkar.
85. Shri V. G. Nagolkar,
86. Shri Ankush B. Redkai.
87. Shri S. V. Kerkar,
88. Shri L. R. Parulekar,
89. Shri S, R, Gawade.
90. Shri Kaitan M. Shivalkai.
91. Shri M. M. Redkar.
92. Shri R. S. Redkar,
93. Shri K, P, Suryajl.
94. Shri S .K. Upsliekar.
95. Shri P. D. Bhujang.
96. Shri V. V. Sawant.
97. Shri K. S. Pednekar.
98. Shri B. E. Khan.
99. Shri A. E. Khan.
100. Shri J. M, Palyekar.
101. Shri Vithal K. Gavandi.
102. Shri Rajaranf S. Satoskar.
103. Shri Madhukar V. Savant.
104. Shri R. M. Padval.
105. Shri Sadanand Shirodkar.
106. Shri G, V, Raut.
[No. L-26012/tl /75-D“lV(B>]
srr^r
ft, 3 fadHT, 1975
4 9 9 4* — | Wit
if fWrt % % r
thh ^t^tt rtto f^r^rr
fro* fwREf | ;
fw* ^ ^ fHfftrcr
•f^Trr qiW'ftq rrmrtfi Jr ;
TO:, TO, flWtPrrf fTOT* flfirpTTO, 1 947 ( 1947 TI 14)
ernr 10 qSt (i) 9r tra (*) mr 5rw wfanff
*FI TOR 5fT^rT £17 *TT1TR "7ET fTOR ^ffT *rfil1WT
to 7 * * srefor nfar tfteftfw (sto 2), error*
wt PT?ftlcf Tdf I 1
to ^ ^fror qrtfftro wro; faF??.*
jjtfror mwr , ^rr^fprr for-Tf % to-jto
<t ; # f*r^r smnr £ V-— tr
Tt 3 to^t, 1974 & TOwjer ffltferrS rrMto «ft ?
Jifa *r#r ( fit rod vfalT fi»(T TOdR 4n | ?
^ 0 - 29011 / 0 / 75 -^^ 0 / 3 (^ 70 )^ 0-4 (afr)]
ORDER
New Delhi, the 3rd September, 1975
8*0. 4994. — Whereas the Central Government is of opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in
relation to the management of Jaduguda Uranium Mines of
Messrs Uranium Corporation of India Limited, Jaduguda
Mines, District Singhbhum and their workman in respect of
the matters specified in the Schedule hereto annexed ;
And whereas the Central Government considers it desir-
able to refer the said dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
clause (d) of sub-scction (1) of section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Indus-
trial Tribunal (No. 2), Dhanbad constituted under section 7A
of the said Act.
4094
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA ; NOVEMBER 22, 1 975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 [Part 11^
SCHEDULE
Whether the action of the management of Jaduguda
Uranium Mines of Messrs Uranium Corporation of
India Limited, Jaduguda Mines, District Singhbhum,
in dismissing Shri Chandreswar Rai, Helper ‘C\
Mill Division. Jaduguda Mines with effect from the
3rd August, 1974 Was justified ? If not, to what
relief is the said workman entitled ?
[No. L-2901 1 /6/75-D. 0.3(B) /DTV(B>]
4 mrr, 1975
o 499 5 — 'FiftT ^4 TlVf ^ fa d m 1 ^ 41
4 faftfaR Fmi % 4 *
ftr^ri 4
TO frfffafaf sfa afpfapT % tfa Frh faiRR % ;
sffa fcsfPlffTinT fipHT Vt RPTffalTT % fttfaff
tott mrspft
tp-T;, sfWtPBF fiTOT iffVfrTO 1947 (l947 *FT 14)
^ mj 7 *e *fR art 10 ttuttt (j) % ^ (^) jnr
tufffrff tt Rfm *tr 4 $7, t^r srftr-
'Tor Tfeff $ faff* ufanft *fr i^To irrcp
fYr, Differ ^wr^TT ^ntj?: '4 ^rr 4fc Frr *ffi tot
q'FnFrT £rruTR i7 r % f44 Fftffw TOft * ?
TO TtTT fafafr * TpRTU , TTTOT
Tfp, fa?n wfr ^farfaR mx sth
4 FfCFr tttR ftr? 4m (t^Nr vtrtR),
tttrrt (4tott), TO* (tsrfff^r) *ftr 4 r wrvr )
4t 3 1-5' i97 5 4 q^r=53jeT t < 4 44 ^r[ t.4 ? m4tfaff ft?
ufa mff, 4l wr <f4tr faff sifft-rfa % $ ?
[wrr 7$f°“' 4 301 1/3/7 s/^t 0 4 / 4 t
vpCsr fpt, ?fj»tr ^ter! (fro?)
ORDER
New Delhi, the 4th October, 1975
S.O. 4:395. — Whereas the Central Government is of opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in
relation to the management of Khctri Copper Complex of
Hindustan Copper Complex, Post Office Khetrinagar, District
Jhiinihimu and their workmen in respect of the matter specie
fied in the Schedule hereto annexed ;
And whereas the Central Government considers it defib
rable to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sec-
tion 7 A, and clause Cd ) of sub-section (1) of section 10, of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby constitutes an Industrial Tribunal of
which Shri U. N. Mathur shall be the Presiding Officer, wifh
headquarters at Jaipur and refers the said dispute for adjudi-
cation to the said Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
Whether the action of ibe management of Khetri Copper
Complex of Hindustan Copper Limited, Post Office
Khetnnagar, District Jhunjhunu in dismissing Sarva-
shri Gajvir Singh Sodha (Compressor Operator), Ram
Chander (Sampler), Phoolchand (Miner) and Om
Prakash (Drillman) employed in their Kolihan Copper
Mine with effect from 3L5-1975, is. justified? If
not, to what relief are the said workmen entitled ?
[No. L-4301 1 /3 /75 /D.IV/B]
BHUPENDRA NATH, Section Officer (Spl.)
6 fadTST, J 9 7 5
^Ttoano 4 9 96. — T7*TiR ^4 Tiff ^ fa Tff4
ffs spj^fr 4 fafafro: 4 fa iff 4
ffffffarf Fttit
iwnTfi
qf^frq- TTOEft ;
flff:, tfta'TPffF fWT ^FrfffiTiT, 1947 (1947^ 14)
tJTTT 10 ^4 TTtJTTT (l) % ^ (q) ftRT IRtT aiPrhffi ffi
JPftT ^4 Ff'TT 7 ? ^fdfdTtT
tnrr 7T % spjH dfed tt r^rprfmdiFT
4^ Ft4 dRdt ^ I
TO afar ^TEfl iffTT * Tt fi'Trff % faPTT
«ft no *0 dft io 1975 4 4tr : mn c d
^r 4 r^nftfaff $ ? fffe d^r, 4r ^et fntfriT
for f cr ^ttt $ ?
[4o q^fo- 120 1 2/ 9 8/7
ORDER
New Delhi, the 6th September, 1975
S.O. 4996. — Whereas the Central Government is of opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in
relation to the Bank of India and their workmen in respect
of the matters specified in the Schedule hereto annexed;
And whereas the Central Government considers it desir-
able to refer the: said dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to the
Industrial Tribunal, Delhi, constituted under section 7A of
the said Act.
SCHEDULE
Whether the management of the Bank of India is justi-
fied in terminating the services of Shri A. K. Jain,
clerk-cum-Typist of the Meerut Branch of the said
Bank with effect from the 10th April, 1975 ? If
not, to what relief is the said workman entitled ?
[No. L- 120 12/9 8 /75/DII /AJ
8 fTTRR, 1975
^no3TT<? 4 9 97. — 4FjftiT T^TTR ®ft 71 T %_ fa CTff
4 Frfrfavf famn 4? if tott fa 4
qufarrf * fffa 7 ^ Ttott
&
4095
Sec. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897
tittt % I t? ^ i
«nr f w, riWtftnr fern srfaferr, 19-17 (1947 tt 14 )
trnr 7 T am iot tV Twrra ( 1 ) % tfs (t)
sin wr infefi tt ttFt tet utett ^tIto
irfsrsF^r tDt ter $, 'ftenfrr rfwtT «fl
^frtPr fffi faror tTOtt 4 ffe ttt fenr tT
tot ^«ftPr«F stItotw tT ^rcfefer % frr4 TTrfr 1 1
stt/j^PT
*RT q^TT TSpTE $■ TOT^FT T?t TT%
SfnWrft ^ Tt TOT % qft TTIOT^I ^IWT if
yrerft ^ FT ^ Tltf T77^ 5t rftT TT^T IT TT
Tto rtf^ wrorr $ ^ttt^t, 1975 ^r tott 7«tftff-
TU[ TTT^t ^r *inftfeT I ? Tfa F^f ^ft TOT
T^TTT faFT fl^FFT TT fTSTT § ?
[4-n U^ro-1 20 12/ 102 / 715 -^ 0 - 2 -^ 0 ]
ORDER
New Delhi, the 8(h September, 1975
S.O. 4997. — Whereas the Central Government is of opinion
that on industrial dispute exists between the employers in
relation to the Punjab National Bank and their workmen in
respect of the matter specified in the Schedule hereto anne-
xed ;
And, whereas the Central Government considers it
desirable to refer the said dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
section 7A and clause (d) of sub-scction (1) of section 10, of
the Industrial disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central
Government hereby constitutes an Industrial Tribunal of
which Shri H. R. Sodhi shall be the Presiding Officer, with
headquarters at Chandigarh and refers the said dispute for
adjudication to the said Tribunal.
SCHEDULE
Whether the action of the management of the Punjab
National Bank, Chandigarh Region, is justified in
denying Shri Subhas Cnand subordinate Staff, to
work as Daftri at the Kathmandi Branch of the
said Bank and in transferring him to Railway Road.
Rohtnk Branch of the said Bank in January 1975 ?
Tf not to what relief is the said workman entit-
led? —
[No. L. 12012/102/75 /D1T / A |
TTl^T
1 0 fepRT, 10 7 5
TO TO 4998.— fcftT HTTTT TUT £ Pf
tthts ^ fafrfe: ferff % Jr irmffar
ft tftt sfk safari rf %
tfcftfTO ET4T7 feTTH ft ;
■q \t friPnmnT tot fftfn nor fftotTF % fftq Wftrr
Tim F IviiU iT 'TFTJTfT ft J
to TO tfteflfw frm 'crfftforo 1947 (1947 »ft 14 )
UTTT 10 Tt T’TtTRT (l) * WS (t) ST7T TOT Utfefif
sftPt Tnft jtt, ttcto tot fror Tft tot srfftfwr
uttt 7 *f % ’rtfrr Tfer 'qWlfro ttottt ^ttf-
5TTfJ^
¥TT V t R F ffq tTTTRyT ^TTT TT UTO ^TOT UTRt^VT
tt «ft ^riF, fr&enr 22
pTTnrr, 1970 ^rr ttot ^ ttFtpS
| ? qf* T^T 4 t TO fTFT jST^TT | ?
[To t^o - 120 ll/l 3/7 l-*rto<n^-l]
ORDER
New Delhi, the 10th September, 1975
S.O. 4998, — Whereas the Central Government is of opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in
relation to the National Insurance Company Limited and their
workman in respect of ihe matters specified in the Schedule
hereto annexed ;
And whereas the Central Government considers it desirable
to refer the said dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
clause (d) of Sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Indua-
tnal Tribunal, Calcutta constituted under section 7 A of the
said Act.
SCHEDULE
Whether the action of the management of the National
Insurance Company Limited, a unit of the General
Insurance Corporation of India, is justified in ter-
minating the services of Shri B, S. Das, Inspector,
with effect from the 22nd September 1970 ? If noL
to what relief is the said workman entitled ?
[No. L. 170U/13/71/IR I]
1 1 twro 19 7 5
¥T°3TTo 499 9. — r *TPR % TTTOT, r flET-2, TTT 3 ( ii )
TlffaT 28 1 975 ^ 2231 TT TT<MtTTo 2027
% 'fftftT TOTfflET STTtTT ’Ffo iTTfo 12012/
126/74^0^170-111^1^ 20 qf, 1 975 ^4 ?t^fr *T
WTT" % ^TPT TT 7^1
[To tt^c-i 20 i2/l 26 / 74 -^ 0 ^ 7 ^ 3 ]
New Delhi, the 11th September, 1975
CORRIGENDUM
S.O. 4999. — In the Schedule to Ministry of Labour Order No.
L-12012/126/74-LR. Ill dated the 20th May, 1975, published
on page 2331, Part II, Section 3(ii) of the Gazette of India
dated the 28th June, 1975, under Number S.O. 2027, for
“Amrik Lai”, read “Amrit Lai".
[No. L. 12012/126/74-LR. II1J
16 fhrorr, 1975
TToarto 5 000. — T frfhfe: VhftfTT
^rftPFTq-, t;
?ff7 wit Tttto T
^nr ?r Tf f^FT ftRT I f% ^ TOT fTOT *Ft H7TO
Tfi ViP p r <rfrooJT, tFrm tf tttt ^Dtt t^ 7 ^ fr
4096 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1 975 /AGRA HA Y ANA 1, 1897 [Pari 11^
TTTO if, FRT if frjfrfarf FT, 5m: F*^ OTrr
ft frt toft | xrfa Ffr *rr^*r Ft festfr toft toft £ Ft vff
sflr to Ft fstft t|ft ;
5fU TOstor fttot fartro Ft mm ft | ;
5m: # w?, wfanfirv (tom 1947
( 1947 TO 14) 5f=V FR1 33 ^ FFFRT ( 1 ) SRT TOTTVfTOFf
TO FFtF *FFt JF, xfafrfFF FftpFFF, fc*fr % fto fFto
>ff farrow % totof Jr TOtvrf^ff TO frf ftrft $ fto
farm to fft nrftrfFFF Ft trm 7 F % TOPtf f^f sfaftfarF
FfuroFF (4^ 1 ) uftof Ft fff TOtnfarFf tr fFFnfa % fai*}
frItf FFft ^ w \ ^ ff fafaF t?Tr ^ far ^tft FftrFFF
^pfanf^fr tt ff sff 4 f^ft, ftrcr t
Ft tof, tfK ffto farfa ^ sfjfr; farrdui f^ti 1
tot 5rfa^FFTF° VkFRfaj q^mrTi % ftf
4o
1 - O/To - 1 2 0 1 2/ 1 0 6/ 7 4-TpTo 4 ^iH ifalFF $F 4**hC FF%
(TRo 3 , FTtfaST 1 5 TOfar, F4FR I
1975 !
[ffo FF o- 12012/1 0fi/74-FF°TOFo 3]
ORDER
New Delhi, the 16th September, 1975
S.Ch 5000. — Whereas the industrial dispute specified in the
Schedule hereto annexed is pending before the Industrial
Tribunal, Delhi ,
And, whereas ihe All India Punjab National Bank Emp-
loyees Association has requested the Central Government for
transferring the said dispute to the Central Government Indus-
trial Tribunal, Dhanbad for the reason that, since the workman
was employed at Arrah in Bihar State the entire evidence is
to be adduced from Arrah and it would cause him hardship
and expenditure, if the evidence is to be brought to Delhi ;
And, whereas the Central Government considers the re-
quest as reasonable ;
Now. therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
section (1) of section 33B of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government hereby withdraws
the proceedings in relation to the said dispute pending before
the Industrial Tribunal, Delhi, and transfers the same to
the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (No. 1), Dhanbad,
constituted under section 7A of the said Act, for the dis-
osal of the said proceedings and directs that the said Tri-
unal f shall proceed with the said proceedings from the stage
at which it is transferred lo it and dispose of the same accord-
ing to law.
SCHEDULE
SI. No. Notification No, and date Name of the parties
L. 120 12/106 /74-LR III, Punjab National
dated the 15th April, 1975. Bank and their
workmen.
[No, L- 12012/106 /74-LR-III]
STRUT
f? fircsfr, i7farroFT, 1975
fTToSTU 5 00 1, — ^jTUr FTTOF TUT | far ^TflTff
if fafarfoi farot % 4 t 7 if
Ppfrsptf FF% TOfa'Kt % ttv PF iffaftfafF fafFR faflHH
t;
tffa TOtflF TRTOT FFT fa*!F TO TOFfaFFF ^ fart farfftTF
FTFT TO^F TORPTt
*tf, to trWtpPF from srfafam, 1947 (1947 ^ft 14 )
^kt 1 0 ^ ^r«nrt ( 1 ) * ms (v) fttt stto ftt
ttwtt from ^ ^
7^fr ^ qtfFr Ffer sfartPPF WFmr wh ?ftt-
f^rro F W Frffro Wt | 1
fFr FR?fhr jft, Erftt FimfhftTm fttfpt
^ sr4^rT0 m TORT TTFT FTF f«F tt4Y
% T.4-ur^ aft RTTjfFr TTfhfrTFf SR 1 TOflt ^
iff xff^: ^Rntf ^4 % ft % 5im 4
^ t-F ft ffat tot,
TOFTfro $ ? Ffe ^t p 4f ^Ffcr * ^FTR | ?
[4a rpT-1201 l/lo/7 5-¥t-2/R]
ORDER
New Delhi, the 17th September, 1975
S.O. 5001* — Whereas the Central Government is of opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in
relation to the State Bank of India and their workmen in
respect of the matters specified in the Schedule hereto annexed;
And whereas the Central Government considers it desirable
to refer the said dispute for adjudication ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act. 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby refers the said dispute^ for adjudication to the Indus-
trial Tribunal, Calcutta, constituted under section 7 A of the
said Act.
SCHEDULE
Whether the demand of the workman of the Stale Bank
of India represented by the State Bank of India
Employees’ Association, Bengal Circle, for treating
the staff of such canteens which are run by the
Local Implementation Committees, as workmen of
State Bank of India for giving them the same status,
pay and facilities as are available to other class IV
employees of the Bank is justified ? If so, to what
relief the workmen concerned are entitled ?
[No. L. 12011/10/75 /DII/Al
VTo mo 5 002. — fofTF FTOTTR TTF | far F7TTOJ
v^ft 4 fiftfircr faroflr vi ^ 4 tortEt *3t tv 4
frofTTOFf tfR vtVTTf * 4^ ^rFF fvVIV fTOTFTF
t;
qYr ^fRjfnr totfr fam vT F fart farffarv
ifTTFT FfarffF P# | 1
TO:, TO, 5lWrfFV fa-FR HTfarfaFF, 19 47 ( 1947 TO 14)
*Ft FTCl 1 0 ^TOITTT ( 1 ) % <TR (f) BUT TOTO FfaFFf TO
TOtF 5^, F^TOT IFF fvanv Ft FTO FfalfFTOT Ttf
FRT 7T t TOftF Ffer xffafrfFF XTfFF^F Fa 1 fpTTOT Ft
rquiffr^FF F fart firiffarF FFrt f I
Sec. 3 ( ii ) 1
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897
4097
"TO*
wt qrafbr fa TTj tot fa tt farj
9TIWT ^ mflTT Jsfr WTTTTTOT fast ^ ^TTflT 16 q Rfat , 1974
*r ttot httt | ? Tfr nt tot
^fau fa* ^T^rfrqr tJ^tr t 7
[To tf5T- 12012/78/7 5-Tt o H/q]
trixo iqum, mr nfar
ORDER
S.O. 5002. — Whereas the Central Government is of opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in
relation to the State Bank, of India and their workmen in
respect of the matters specified in the Schedule hereto annexed;
And whereas the Central Government, considers it desi-
rable to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Indus-
trial Tribunal, No. (1) Dhnnbad, constituted under section
7 A of the said Act.
SCHEDULE
Whether the action of the management of the State Bank
of India in terminating the services of Shri Shyama
Charan Mishra, Cashier in Deoghar Branch of the
said Bank with effect from 16th February, 1974
Is justified ? If not, to what relief is the said work-
man entitled ?
[No. L. 12012/78/75 /D1I/AJ
R KUNJTTHAPADAM, Under Secy.
TO
qf ffaft, 10 ftrcror, 197 5
VL 1 Wo 300 3. — Wt u<i>k qft tut $ fV faf ^rmz
SFpHf # fwff % pra TrfH ^tPT, VTT TTT
h prsru PpfRtTf Tfa TWTTf % ifW t7Tfr ?fhcftfw D ptpt
faptrmr
q*tr A’Ti a n * t fqrnr tutTiuI tt t fa tj fa if fa t
■rm ft;
TO, q*, tffaftffa fa^TT qfufaiTT, 1947 ( 1 94 7 57 14)
*Ft UTTT 10 7PTUTTT ( l) ^ 3FT (q) TOT wffrh flf
'ttt wpt «rrr ju, utor tot fwR w qfa fa q q qft
fjttt 7T7 ^7 qtfEr qfor ttor q'hrtfw qfTO^r,
%t TOrfafar $ far^ farffar Jt 1
"TO*
i m ^qnr % TldAir q^vtir % '^farOi
5T, TOTTfeff % TOT T fW Ttr ^Tq jfafl | ? tTt ftt, Tt
fTO UPT IT jffa faTT HTfrar ?
faw T7W- 3201 1 / 21 / 7 5^rfY 0 4 (t)]
New Delhi, the 10th September, 1975
S.O. 5003. — Whereas the Central Government is of opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the employers In
relation to the Calcutta Port Trust, Calcutta and their workmen
in respect of the matters specified in the Schedule hereto
annexed ;
And whereas the Central Government considers it desirable
to refer the said dispute for adjudication ;
I02jGI/75— It
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Central
Government Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta constituted under
section 7A of the said Act.
SCHEDULE
Whether the demand of the workmen of Senior Shipwright
Section of Calcutta Port Trust for supply of rain
coats is justified ? If so, on what scale and from
wftat date 7
[No. L. 32011/21 /75-D IV(A)J
1 3 v I
fawA, 2 0 faflrq c 1975
5 0 0 4 h <5iir< 5>f ttt ^
tttt j 3 frfafV^ farm % Tit H fat
ftrfqq trny % TOtfdr
PiifiqCi ^4^)1 0 % qfq v**fi qWtfrr f®mr frirm
I;
ipTrfhr nT^rr toi fro wh fTrrMTT % fWftm
t;
qr:, xtr, xfartfr* fror ’trfhfhrq, 1947 (1947 ttt t4)
^1 qm 10 ^ TWRT (i) qfr (q) TTTTT TOT WI^TTl
tt Tot *777* gq, tot tot fqqrr Tt tot qfuftrrq
OOTT 7T7 ^7 q^tr Tfer ^r?f*q q7q7lT qftPfPRT
TWI 2, Vt RTTTWqT ^ fMfftrr fRjft 4 I
q^ft
w ^ ihfor fuif'Bi tfrr %
TOWfr fh 3TT^ TTTfTT qVo TTT 2 2 TT.
1 974 ^ Trpf qqiT* ^74 vff ? irf^
?ft tot for q^j? ftr *rr ttWR ^ ?
[#ITT CRT- 3X012/2/7 5-^ft o 4 (tt)]
tqnr, q^rnr qfqqrrft (fVfK)
ORDER
New Delhi, the 20th September, 1975
S.O. 5004.— Whereas the Central Government is of opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in
relation to the management of Messrs New Dholera Shipping
and Trading Company Limited, Bombay, and their workman
in respect of the matters specified in the Schedule hereto
annexed ;
And whereas the Central Government considers it desirable
to refer the said dispute for adjudication ;
Now f , therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
clause (d) of sub-section (I) of section H> of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Central
Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Bombay constituted
under section 7 A of the said Act.
SCHEDULE
Wheteher the action of the management of Messrs. New
Dholera Shipping and Trading Company Limited.
Bombay, in terminating the services of Shrl B. J.
Bhagat, their Office Assistant, with effect from the
22nd June, 1974, was justified ? If not, to what
relief is the said workman entitled ?
[No. L-310012/2/75-D. 1V(A)J
NAND LAL, Section Officer, (Spl.)
4098
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 [Part II- -
SCHEDULE
iff fteft, 17 tWfrC, 1975
®TT° 5 00 5.^ — {RquT THT ^ fir {ReI TTRT5
4f fafiifrc f^nff *ttot tfRr
fW42f 'jftqRm'H vtftnrft, wr giTr ^qniHr, ftn^T
HTO Mi^T ft fRT3 ^ubfTTvf ft ^
tiT *JWrfW fq\iH ft ;
*ftr ftTffcr hwit Rtk ftT ft fftft fftfffcm
T77TT 'JfisTiH ^TRIRfr §■)
*rr, ot, JfadPui firrrr ttfaftm, 1947 (1947 tt 14)
ftV shtt 10 ftV T 7 prm (1) ft **vr (w) wt tracer urtwfr
spfm fT^ ]jtt mm mt brnr ftr *rfftfft7nr
ftf skt 7 ^ ft *rfer ft^Rr atpr tffafrfW ^rfWw ftwr
2, 5TTTTT ft! -TPTlVfTT % fftft fftJfw ^rft $ l
«TJTT fttfft vnr?T fttfanr ftfrT fftffta*; ftY lftqW[7: fttfftqfT,
itt^t ^trt ^ft’Tr i ftrr, fftqr EPf^T*! ft m^rf^ fftrqfftf^pr
*rfftftf tfr ftrmt *tt fftirMtorq q ftt *fnt*nr£ ?r ft!
*T'Errft | ?
( 1 ) «ft «fm3Tt
(2) *ft <M 4 ffti
(j?) sfamt flRnftt fxRTt VTfft*T
(4) ftf r\m qm*i?r
( 5 ) Tl+fT f r -f r TRf q l*T
( 0 ) *ft frm qmrr
( 7 ) ^ fcfr^R (faftftrftq)
( s) *fr f^nrt
( 9 ) *ft fttoT fftrt qftr
( 10 ) «ft ^TlT
irfr ffift ftt 3W ffttr ft ^wtt ^ isft^ fftrr
nrfrr ft 1
[^0 ^-20012/95/75-tfo/m P]
ORDER
New Delhi, the 17th September, 1975
(3.0. 5005* — Whereas the Central Government Is of opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the employers In
relation to the management of Joyrampur Colliery of Messrs
Bharat Cokmg Coal Limited, Post Office Khas Jeenagora
District Dhanbad and their workmen in respect of the matters
specified in the Schedule hereto annexed ;
And wher^aes the Central Government considers it desirable
to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industria
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Govcrnmcm
hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Central
Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Dhanbad, constitute.:
under section 7A of the said Act,
Whethere the action of the management of Jayrampui
Colliery of Messrs Bharat Coking Coal Limited
Post Office Ehas Jeenagora, District Dhanbad, in noi
regularising the following workers, is justified ?
(1) Shri Kapura Bouri
(2) Sri Paudi Pandit
(3) Shrimflti Jilani Mian Kamin
(4) Sri Suga Paswan
(5) Sri Rambalak Paswan
(6) Sri Diga Paswan
(7) Sri Bilo Gope (Tilo Gope;
(8) Sri Hasmuddin Mia
(9) Sri Bhola M/an
(10) Sri Anik Bhuia.
If not, to what relief are the said workmen entiled and
from what dates ?
[No. L-200 12/95 /75/D. III. A]
*rr^7T
*rf ftmt, 19 Iw^rr, 1975
^IToSTTo 5 006.— TPT £ far
fi - fW*M fqqql % 'tTt tint ^ if d
^RurTFpf f^rftr2r tfV 4^4 ?nf^nrrm
47^1 tpjf ’Trppft, TPFTq-T fijfTT tERTH - % 4
^any qi-H ( /i % tpF ^A^ftflpF frTr?’
Uwm
tfV rn^n: f’TTTT TnrirLmipT ^7 fir^pipT
CfHT ^NRfRT FiTlpfr
SRT, «tfHftP?lT tTfirfiPTT, 1947 ( 19 47 TO 14 )
ETRT 10 ^ ^T9TO (l) % (^) JITT 5TT?T 9TpF50 : t
srqTr ^ grr, mm f^n^r *ft ^
tTm 7 ^ trtfPr ^wit qfaftfw Jrfb^rcrrf
2, Tt ^ fW WftPT fPRfV $ |
wi TtT *R^rtl:i?rT frrf42¥ ^ #rff^
vtftr q 0 WTf^pT^nr ^ft^r mnr irrctpff ipfrirT;
7pf7?r ^tTTT^ ^Tirftl^rf ^ ? qfiif ^fT fiFB
^ ^F'TTT f ?
^>Tr
qrrOfnmr
L
jsft nw
feaT rftr qtqr
ttA
2-
^fr?r rrrft
3.
%it
-’mnRf-
4.
mil
-WrtTT-
■ 5.
"TRpft ernft 4Wfr
-Utftw-
6-
ttdY rntr
-trcftww-
7-
>$tm\ tfKf 4trfV
-Wwr-
■e.
>4V f
4099
SEC. 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/ AGR AHAYANA 1,1897
«p4'fnrt *pt -tr
e
totBwh'
9.
tfk
io. ^tt wr^fr
1 1- sfoTftV WjV mx\
12 .
t^RT—
13- <T*JFTT *t?ft
14- 'fPttft ^TH TTCTT
1 5- t ^THT
io. *frwt wn
1 7- «ft *ft*j ^rm
-#P1-
1 8. «ft ^fpft
-wt*w~
19. *ft *TPTT
q’TOcf-
20.
2i. Tfam
22 .
-rnm-
23 . ^ft^ftrfOTT
24.
25, *fr ^rirff
26. ^Yrn-Pr
'Wtw-
2 7. p 4t VTTT^
-iFTtW-
28. 'fttTFTFT
-WtW-
29 . tftjj^afr^
-wtw-
30. 'ftntw
-anrtar-
3 1- sftrnrt *Kft
- ipfl w-
32 . mrtf\
-WfacT-
33 . 'ftrpftwfr
- *r*rtw-
3 4- *ft »fm ^3Xt
35. *ft *frt afraft
-wt^~
36.
-wte-
37. *TWT
- JT«ftW-
38. Mtwr
39- 'ft *ftft
4 o. $fr*r{ft ^
-wmr-
41. 'ft*T<Tt&ft
42. 'ft^TTWH
-wtw-
43 . «ftmg
-WlW-
44. *ft$T¥
45- 'ffrcft tf“NT
- W £TTO«
46. 'ffa'Cft flTCRft
- iWk-
4 7. 'ft TPFfll
— ^T«fpTcT—
48.
“ir«frw-
49. *fortft
-*-
5 o. sfwaY
-wtair-
51. 'ft TtTFft TF3J
“WttcT-
52. 'ft srrcnft tffarnr
5 3- 'ft^V^Kt
^WftcT-
54, 'ft flft^ft
— [ r +c1~*
55. «fTK^t
-
56. tfMt wrtft
-wm-
^ JffflVr^f 'FT m*T
*T°
wfTOPT
57- p ^ft
fj?^t ifK
58- p 4t3?PT
59. «ftf<SISI
^TH
60. ^ g^PFTT
6 l - ^ ) *-Rft <4! d v.1 1
62. 'fmrft ™rt
-wtw-
6 3- 'ftrpft 6 1 fd<4t
64-
65. «ft*rrar
6 6- ft jjPrarroT
-iralw-
6 7 ■ ?j f\ -H dt ^W^t
-wtw-
68. 'ftoTUTT
-wfw-
69. «ft?mfar
- Wt^T-
70. «ft^rftnp
-^PTt^TT'
71-
72 . «ftftra7*rr
-WTO-
73- 'fteftiat
-iPTtW-
7 4. «ft^ft^t^Rt
— trvfrt^r -
7 5- p 4t *?14M!
76- 'ft fa^T
-
77 .
- *r*frw-
7 8. p -4t ^nrftwr
- wtw-
79. 'ft ^prt
’d^Wa-
so. 'ft^rft PrsrmT
-^nftw-
si. 'ffatfr
-iPTtfTl-
82. ^fnrffr ^thf
- WtTcf-
8 3- p -ftR?ft
- Wtf^T-
84- 'ft
- WfrcT-
85- MWt TTTpft
8 6. 'ft tar
87. sfrfRft 9pWfaT
-wtw-
8 8. 'ft^ft^WTcft
^RtW-
89. xt^nft
-4T«ftW-
90- 'fr^ftf^TTr^
— ^r t fl*Ki"
91. «fhldV ^ft 5tf*M
92. 'ftWt^T^TT
93. «ft *mt
-mm-
94- sfanfttf rf^r
-inftw? r-
95- 'ft^^Tcft
^Wtf?T-
96- 'ft T^fT «Tld{l
9 7- 'f^Hdl favTftft
-JufpRT-
9 8- ^Tt d i?15T ^ \
99. 5ftqrnw
- iptfr'm-
10 0- p -ft TTJj^rr
- ^TEfWTT-
loi- 'ftotftWr
10-2. 'ftrmt^JcU
i o 3 . 'ffrrcft
loi- 'fpr^t^
-inftf?T-
4100
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 [Part II -
wr ^ nnr
qrOTOTR
10 5-
fa^y tfft
106 *
10 7- MY
<mr ttstjt
108. MYqnfiRr
-qMlW-
109- MY 1 ^
- IRftW-
no- My*rfar
HI- MYUP^
-tpftfer-
112- ^ ¥HJ
* mftwer-
113. MY wr*
- qMY'RT-
i i 4 . Mi
-
1 1 5 . Mt MYnw
-w?m-
n o. MY ?nfr tr ^rjfr
-TRtr^r-
ii7- MY ferrnrc tft
-WtW-
lie. Mr Mtefy
1 19, MY rroi
—
120 . My M*mR % MYsrfY
?nnr
i2i- *TTf^Tnr
farfY tfn
122- MY*nftft
wet
12 3. MY^TT
12 4. MYtPTT
12 5- MtaMt w*j*n
JiRTf’T-
1 2 6. MY H | 7n
-iRtW^T-
127. MY*rm
-WttRT-
128 . «frwj
- irVt-
129. p -fr*rrfV *TTTft
-» ififtw-
130. MfatfYsrftm
-ZRPPT-
131. MY TfiJ
-qiftW-
132 .
-zwm-
133. MYMMjifrsfy
-crq^T-
134- MYgM^nn
-mm-
13 5. MY^Mt fmm
- *pm wa-
13 6. MYntfl MnMY
-OTtfcT-
13 7. M I *tMi c f%
- WT^PT-
138. ) 5frR^fY «PT^TT
-CRtlR*-
139- MY*rMYf*rj
-TRT^T-
140- M^^lMy
141. MtatfY$*n*T
-TFfm-
142 . MMYMMYj
143- MY^Mt ^1 Ml
-iRifn-
144. rtfmr
145-
-JRrtRT-
146- MYt*[
-xptflw-
14 7 .
148. MY TTITTOT
149- MtarfY ‘^TRT
-TRl**-
150. MtaMY^iftm
-WtW-
151. 4tWt fYpRTT
-WftlT-
152. MY*&
TIT WT^fmet *PT ^w
wlrr^Fr
i53. my writ
fa^Y Mir.
15 4. MY WT^Sfl
q^n: *rrz3
15 5. MY
156. MY *nHl*6T
157 . MY*pnf
-qMm-
15 8- MYM<frr
15 9. MY*nfc
— rr«ftqm*-
iso. MrqTfy
, i6i* My^MY^m
162, MYflTW
-ZR>PT-
163. MY ny*TT
- tRtWFT-
16 4. MYTRfY*T$*RT
-uMY^tt-
165.
“WT^-
166. MY*TJT
167. my^^y
-WTWTT”
16 8. p 4TRTft WlOVlt
i6 9- my f^yft-
170 . MY*rMY wnfY
-WTW-
171 - MY^
- zpqY’FT-
1 7 2/ Mftnfy JTRTfy *yfTRT
-TpfPrT-
17 3* MY^Pj^rr
-mm-
17 4. MY*fy
i7 5. My *rfrm-
-nMY’W-
17 6. MmMYYfw
177 . MY^fY
‘-WtW-
17 8- MY^
179. Mt wfrw
-qMtw-
180- MfaMYforfa*TT
181- MYtoY JfTR
182. MY^nfy ^rvftfir
- IR^RT-
183. MY*TTW
- mm-
1 84. MY^T^T
1 8 5. MmMY vnYMm
-ztfm-
18 6. MY HTqMyw
-Wtwt-
18 7. MY tiqwi
-mqYrr-
1 88- MtTRTfy yrrfY
-
18 9- MY <tfWP7T
- itMI^T-
190 . My iftqm
■* Wtort-
191- MYirffr
-nMYw-
i 92 . MYrMY Tmrft
-qMtW-
193 . MYflf^r
- WTT7T-
19 4. MYrrtfy tNY ^rfr^
195. MY MtafY
OTT
[Mo i^T-2001 2/ 156/74-TOo
^rroUiYo XIIm o ]
Sbc. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1 975/AGRAHAYANA 1 , 1 897
4101
ORDER
New Delhi, the 19th Sept., 1975
SO. 5006. — Whereas the Central Government is 'of
opinion that an industrial dispute exists between the employers
in relation to the management of Messrs Saligram Modi and
Company, Contractor, Monidih Colliery of Messrs
National Coal Development Corporation Limited, Post Office
Monidih, District Dhanbad and their workmen in respect of
the matters specified in the Schedule hereto annexed ;
And Whereas the Central Government considers it
desirable to refer the said dispute for adjudication ;
Now, Therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Clause
(d) of sub- section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial Dispu-
tes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947) the Central Government hereby refers
the said dispute for adjudication to the Central Government
Industrial Tribunal No. 2 Dhanbad Constituted under Section
7 A of the said Act.
THE SCHEDULE
Whether the action of the management of Messrs Saligram
Modi and Company, Contractor, Monidih Colliery of Messrs
National Coul Development Corporation Limited, Post office
Monidih, District Dhanbad, in stopping from work with effect
from the 2nd June 1974 the undermentioned workmen, Is
justified 7 If not, to what relief are the said workmen entitled?
Serial
No.
Name of the workmon
Designation
35. Shri Bhagat Bourl
Serial Name of the
No. workmen
Designation
1. Shri Mathura Bouri
Earth & Stone cutting
Mazdoor
2. Shri Ajit Bouri
Do-
3. Shri Pahalu Bouri
Do.
4. Shri Ujala Bouri .
Do.
5. Smt. Badhi Bouri
Do.
6. Smt. Boti Bouri .
Do.
7. Smt. Sori Bouri
Do.
8. Shri Dubraj Bouri
Do-
9. Shri Rohan .
Do-
10, Smt F Jamuna Bouri
Do.
11. Smt. Manjura Bouri
Do.
12, Shri Bhoju Bouri ,
Do.
13. Shri Amulya Bouri
Do.
14. Smt. Chan Chala .
Do,
15. Smt. Latika Chala
Do-
16. Smt. Mahadeb Chala
Do.
17. Shri Anandu Chala
Do.
18, Shri Gopi Chala ,
Do.
19, Shri Sahadeo Chala
Do.
20, Shri Nantu Chala
Do.
21, Smt. Kabita.
Do-
22, Smt. Sushila
Do.
23. Smt. Mithfla
Do.
24. Smt. Dusi
Do.
25. Shri Sagar Manjhi
Do.
26. Smt. Mani
Do.
27. Shri Bharat .
Do,
28, Shri Abtag .
Do.
29. Shri Sufal Bouri .
Do,
30. Shri Gokhal
Do,
31. Smt. Shankari
Do-
32. Smt, Balika .
Do.
33, Smt. Chapala
Do.
34. Shri Gour Bouri ,
Do.
36. Shri
37. Shri
38. Shri
39. Shri
40. Smt
41. Smt
42. Shri
43. Shri
44. Shri
45. Smt.
46. Smt.
47. Shri
48. Shri
49. Smt.
50. Smt.
51. Shri
52. Shri
53. Shri
54. Shri
55. Smt.
56. Smt.
57. Shri
58. Shri
59. Shri
60. Shri
61. Smt.
62. Smt.
63. Smt.
64. Shri
65. Shri
66. Smt.
67. Smt.
68. Shri
69. Shri
70. Shri
7L Shri
72. Shri
73. Smt.
74. Smt.
75. Shri
76. Shri
77. Shri
78. Shri
79. Shri
80. Smt.
81. Smt.
82. Smt.
83. Shri
84. Shri
85. Smt.
86. Shri
87. Smt.
88. Shri
89. Smt.
90. Shri
91. Smt.
92. Smt.
Sudara
Alta .
Indra
Bodi
. Chulvi
. Chhepi
Mandas
Monu ,
Haru .
, Bibi .
Lakshmi
Rajendra Ganju
Khedu Gapju
Mustul
Sanichariya
Rosani Gapju
Basni Sitram
Handu Souri
Dasu Bouri
Santi .
Malati
Kamadu
Chitan .
Gurpada
Subhankar
Batlla .
Achala
Sabitri
Chattu
Bharat ,
Munlbala
Putki Bouri
horat
Nagendra
Kartik .
Visuc ,
Sitala .
Rati .
Robani
Chopala
Dhiren
Debu
Jagdish ,
Abala
Bljala
Beli
Maru
Mantu
Sahadev
Reshmi
Bijala
Fulmani
Khodu Mahati
Rosni .
Lobin Das
Chori Domin
Kamala
Earth <$c Stone cutting
Mazdoor.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do,
Do,
Do,
Do
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do,
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Po.
Do.
Do.
Do-
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do*
Do.
Do,
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do,
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do,
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
4102 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 11 , 1975/AGRAHAYANA T, 1897 [Part II_
S. bfo, Name of the workmen '
Designation
93. Shrl Kanailal Dhobi
Earth & Stone
94. Smt. Chhobi
Cutting Mazdoor
95. Shri Khetu Mahato
Do.
96, Shri Dukhan Bouri
Do,
97. Smt. Bilaai ....
Do.
98. Shri Badal Bouri .
Do.
99. Shri PagaJ ....
Do.
100, Shri Amulya
Do.
101. Smt. Meni ....
Do,
102. Smt. Meputa
Do.
103. Smt, Kamala
Do.
104. Smt. Nebu ....
Do.
105. Shri Donu ....
Do.
J06. Shri Kanai .
Do.
107. Shri Tarapadu
Do.
108. Shri Fatik ....
Do.
109. Shri Rasu
Do.
I I 0, Shri Sakti .
Do.
111. Shri Mantu ....
Do.
112. Shri Basu ....
Do.
113. Shri Kamal ....
Do.
114. Shri Aklu ....
Do.
115. Shri Sricharan
Do.
116. Shri Ghasi Ram Bouri .
Do.
117, Shri Digamber Roy
Do,
118. Shri Bojoy Bouri ,
Do.
119. Shri Babulal
Do,
120. Shri Gangdhar Singh Choudhary
Sardar
121. Smt. Paritosh
Earth & Stone
Cutting Mazdoor
122. ShriBhaderi
Do.
123. Shri Chaita ....
Do.
124. Shri Ganga ....
Do.
125. Smt. Manbhula ,
Do,
126. Shri Majari ....
Do.
127. Shri Satya ....
Do.
128. Shri Aklu ....
Do.
129. Smt. Adari ....
Do.
130. Smt. Latika
Do,
131. ShriPatu ....
Do.
132. Shri Khantu .
Do.
133. Shri Gonu Bouri .
Do.
134, Shri Sulochna
Do.
1 35. Smt. Bijala ....
Do.
136, Smt. Nepali
Do.
137. Smt. Pankhi
Do.
138, Smt. Kapura
DO,
139. Smt. Bidu ....
Do.
140. Smt. Gungni
Do.
141. Smt. Sukhada
Do.
142. Smt. Bhcli ....
Do.
143. Smt. Narada
Do.
144. Smt. Kausyla
Do.
145, Shri Bipuli ...
Do,
146. Shri Rathu ....
Do.
147. Shri Ratim .
Do.
148. Shri Kajala ....
Do.
149. Smt. Champa
Do.
150,' Smt. Chadila
Do,
151. Smt. Birbal . ...
Do.
S. No. Nilme of the workmen Designation
152. Shri Chhutu.
Earth & Stone
Cutting Mazdoor
153. Shri Badhari
DO,
1 54. Shri Basudeo
Do.
155. Shri Kalaipada
Do.
156, Shri Manoka
Do,
157. Shri Gugal . , , '
Do.
158. Shri Sankar
Do.
159, ShriBhadi :
Do.
160. Shri Pari ....
Do.
161, Smt. Lakhan
Do.
162. Shri Samal ....
Do.
J 63, Shri Amulya
Do.
164. Smt. Sakuntala
Do.
165. Smt. Lalu
Do.
166, Shri Bhadur
Do.
167. Shri Turi ....
Do.
168, Smt. BaToai
Do.
169. Shri Lilmoni
Do.
L70. Smt. Phalari
.
Do,
171. Shri Chutu ... .
Do,
172. Smt. Sunsari Domln
Do.
173, Shri Sarnia *
Do,
174. Shri Nebu ....
Do.
175, Shri Anil
Do.
176, Smit, Perttfla
Do,
177. Shri Nebi ....
Do.
178. Shri Chandu
Do.
179. Shri Jagdish
Do,
180. Smt. Mithila
Do.
181. Smt Dropan
Do.
182. Smt, Ashoni
Do.
183, Shri Calu ....
Do.
184, Smt. Dom .
Do,
185. Smt. Bhalia
Do.
186. Shri, Calmochan .
Do.
187. Shri Satrughan
Do.
188. Smt. Dulari . ...
Do.
189, Shri Abilash.
Do.
90. Shri Gopal ....
Do.
191. Shri Sashi ....
Do.
192. Smt. Kasanr
Do.
193. Shri Kishan
Do.
194. Smt. Chari Bourin
Do.
195, Shri Bhuneshwar Singh Choudhary
Sardar
(No, L-20012/156/7J/LR.II/D.III-A)
23 fRTFTt, 1975
tnoSTTo 5007.— MN RWTC # tW t WTO
if foPifc.* Bornt % 4 4fT4 bttji vtPpr
ffrftW ifr ^ grrfcrra Ttfirnff % wrc rfst w^ptt'v, titrt
troiff, awe % wwfcr 4 tw? rVt ^
qnfrnrf ^ 4w aWf^ faere few* |i
sftr w ’ tMiK fwe nrTnPrfa* ^ Wfftrcr
Sec* 3(ioi
1’HE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/ AG R AHA Y AN AT, 1 897 4103
mr:, ot, qftrfRTffi 1947 (1947 *ft 14 )
um io ^ TT-enrT (. i) ^ qpnr (*r) ttct to vfavn
m smBr ^ £3 ^fbr mcrn: iffi firrrc ^ m
^5V mrr 7 ^ tf rn:m TAwrfTr^ arf^rcjr mm
% fair firffimr $ 1 .
<R^rt
«rt 4^4 TlfanT ftr° %
xnr ttfet f^n utotc % *$t 7
*fr %?T ^trt ipft, srrj*vi *ft 10 ^tt^, 1074 ^ w u tt^t
^ ^ { lq 1 737 pft ftr m 1^ ? irfa ffijff, Rrt *fT?ffn
£WTT ^ ?
[4w q*r.- 2001 2 / 2 5 / 7 s/^fc 3tr]
ORDER
New Delhi, the 23rd September, 1975
S.O. 5007. — Whereas the Central Government is of opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in
relation to the management of Upper Mandra Section of
Phularitand Colliery or Messrs Bharat Coking Coal Limited,
Post Office Kharkhtirec, District Dhanbad and their work-
man in respect of the matters specified in Schedule hereto
annexed;
And. whereas the Central Government considers it desirable
to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers, conferred by
clause (d) of sub-seclion (1) of section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government here-
by refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Central
Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2 Dhanbad, constituted
under section 7A of the said Act,
SCHEDULE
Whether the action of (he management of Upper Mandra
Section of Phularitand Qolliery of Messrs Bharat
Coking Coal Limited, Post Office Kharkharee, Dis-
trict Dhanbad, in stopping Shri Chet Lai Hari,
Sweeper, from work with effect from the 10th July,
1974. is justified? If not, to what relief is the said
workman entitled ?
[No. L-20012/25/75/D. HI. A]
trnftr
vtq*tto . 5008 . — TTy+TT nft tpt | ft mA
4 faffilVd iwfi ^ 3 Am -tptt qffir
fer fi r Z * 17 ft sfhrrrtrjr ton< slfarnttr, bpn
uwrr % % mrs fmdwt tfk wnFuff % 4H
t^T iilfflPl't' id i
xfK mi fW? ^ % fbpr ffifftRI
l TT7TT ^ }
m, qWrfmr fro qffeffim, 1947 (i047 VT 14 )
ifr UTTT 10 77-OTTT ( \) % W* (q) 5TTT OTd
mfpr fj t> %Tjfbr m*\< m fro *rt m qfuf^r
mn 7 v ^ xrcfhr TfferT trfrx mmr_ qWtftnr xfiw^r
tfvn 2 , srro Tt % ftp* fhrftrr 5 1
...
imt wrt ^frrEfrrT , ' pm ^
T4?rrff fpr ^ ^ nrpftf^r fc?
1. ^ ?Trr JJTT
2 .
tJTTlJTr
3.
4 ,
5 .
fi. ’rfLnE
7 - xmtrfrsfTTfr
8
9- q^TFTT
10.
1 1
12- URjfiT fipTt
1 3 . firatar tpttt
14
1 5. TJTT
1 G. *nTT J ft
17
^ >1 K-fV
ib.
10 .
20
firPi wrfiT^
21 .
2 2.
23
24 .
25 . mbFrrrrr^r
26
^ ij'i ^ 3 fl .
2 7- 4k
28.
29
Tfft, ^T^FfiTT (VtT ^ qYr fvT
xrttvi A ? '
[4W tn?T -2001 2/94/75-ffo-3U]
t^o hki4'J| , 4 p qftrrrd (firiK)
ORDER
S.O. 5008.— Whereas the Central Government is of opinion
that an industrial dispute exists between the employers in rela-
tion to the management of Jayrampur Colliery, of Messrs
Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Post Office Khas Jeenagorfl, Dis-
trict Dhanbad and their workmen in respect of the matters spe-
cified in the Schedule hereto annexed ;
And whereas the Central Government considers it desirable
to refer the said dispute for adjudication;
Now, therefore, in exerrfse of the powers conferred by
clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 10 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby refers the said dispute for adjudication to the Central
Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Dhanbad, constituted
under section 7 A of the said Act.
SCHEDULE
Whether the action of the management of Joyratnpux
Colliery of Messrs Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Post
Office Khas Jeenagora, District Dhanbad, in not
regularising the undermentioned workers is justified ?
1. Sri Dona Munda.
2. Ranga Munda.
3. Sundri Munda.
4. Gangl Munda,
5. Gauri Munda.
6 . Srimati Munda.
1, Adarl Bouri.
8 . Bahadur Bouri.
9. Amela Bouri.
10. Bhimji Bouri,
11. Dani Bouri.
12. Sabufia Mian.
13. Bisaukha Rajwar.
14. Kapura Bouri.
15. Haradhan Munda.
16. Akka Bouri.
17. Kujali Deshwali,
18. Bijay Bouri.
19. Aneda Bouri,
20. Bini Kamin.
21. Ichha Kamin,
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1 975 /AGRAHA YANA 1, 1S97 |Pari II,-
4104
22. Beedni Bouri
23- Budhu Bouri.
24. Khandu Bouri.
25. Dhnkina Bouri.
26. Arjun Bouri.
27. Gaur Bouri.
28. Sati Bouri.
29. Sati Lilamuni Manjhin.
If not to what relief are the said workmen entitled and
from what dates ?
[No. L-20012/94/75/DI1IA]
L. K. NARAYANAN, Section Officer (Spl.)
1 5 1975
ttomto 5oo 9. — ft nfq*q Mj 4k km fftfa
irfafftqn, 1952 (1952 qq 19 ) qft ottt is qft ( 1 )
OTtt vrfwtff qq qtfftr qnft jtt 4k vnr^r ^
tiwiK 4k ftqmq (w 4k Tkmn: fim) qft
fto tJ-120l5(2)/72-4taCr*ffo I, ARte 10 WJ¥T
1972 qft nfErobT qjrft ^nftq 4V nrro 4kwr
qft ^ xrfafftqn, mftn 4k *t#t PuNi fftqft
km mftq % aftfanr fcm toftq tot % nr fn4ei«ii-
tfk faqfr wm 4*te ft qr pRft kr qftftt, Tr^mrr, ott
*rr fttr ftw qr fftftftid atfhr ft ftftfftq ftafr *qm % 44* ft
nr frftft 3 ft nqm ft titfir ft famft t^r ft xm ft fanm mr
mwrt ti' fteft xm 4* ft fftq; fWw fft*jqq qrdft $ i
[fto ^o-l20l6( 4)/74-4tot^oI]
New Delhi, the 15th October, 1975
S.O. 5009. — In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
section (1) of section 13 of the Employees* Provident Funds
and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), and in
supersession of the notification £f the Government of India
in the late Ministry of Labour, Employment and Rehabilita-
tion (Department of Labour and Employment) No. A-12015
(2)/72-PF. I, dated the 10th October, J972, the Central
Government hereby appoints Shri R. K. Chopra to be an
Inspector for the whole of the Union Territory of Delhi
for the purposes of the said Act, the Scheme and the Family
Pension Scheme framed thereunder in relation to any estab-
lishment belonging to, or under the control of the Central
Government or in relation to any establishment connected
with a railway company, a major port, a mine or an oilfield
or a controlled industry or in relation to an establishment
having departments or branches in more than one State.
[No. A- 1 20 1 6(4) /74-PF. T]
qrrowto solo.— nfftsq fftfa 4k km fftfft
UNMM , 1952 ( 1 9 5 2 19) qft tJTTJ 13 qft 3T9TTT (l)
fl[TTT qrfwff VT SPTpT qrtft ^ dT+i X 4kftV fto
< fynrf h r *rmT 4k 4Y ft° 4tftq? qft ntfi wfftfqqq, mftq
4k tntfr trftk fqrftm fftftt f^r km % n4kmr ft
ftrjfrr urqqq ft qr ffttfawifm fftftt n<rm ft 44*
4 qr fftftt ft* qWt, t, qT ^ qT fh4Rrn
^ifpr ir mfm fWt prm % 4 qr fq^ft W wm ^
To & TTW 4 fWFT qT *TTWt fi,
xm 4k qT^r^Nrct ^ w % faq
prfkw qrr?ft $j
[4o q-l2016( ll)/72-<ftoTT^oI]
S.O. 50X0. — ^In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
section (1) of section 13 of the Employees’ Provident Funds
and Family Pension Fund Act. 1952 (19 of 1952), the Cen-
tral Government hereby appoints Shrimati k. Thankamoney
Amina and Shri C. J, Joseph to be Inspectors for ihe whole
of the State of Kerala and Mahe area of the Union territory
of Pondicherry for the purposes of the said Act, the Scheme
and the Family Pension Scheme framed thereunder in rela-
tion to any establishment belonging to, or under the control
of the Central Government or in relation to any establishment
connected with a railway company, a major port, a mine
or an oil field or h controlled industry or in relation to an
establishment having departments or branches in more than
one Stale.
[No, A-12016/11/72-PF. T1
30 WJSTT, 197 5
qqoanc. 5011 — ,toftq qrqrn; qft m $rm t far
kwqq (#*qr) *IMRwq , FkFT TTT, qkm %
ift+T , qnFq ^7[T qrqqr T^rmr, w 4 n rnni'-
tit ftqq ^qqft xwx Tfqkrq 4r wjrf V
^ ^ q^ fftqftqqr 4k i«4^ikqf qft qjqyqr w «tpt qr
q? % % qrftqfft vrfq^q fftfij sfa qVR fftftr ^TfhlwT
1 952 ( 1 952 19) %T LTTT4 qTF ^ fftrrr ipft
‘qrRn |
w-, w, Tqq Trfqrqqq qft tmer i qft WTTrr ( 4 ) ifj
qq?r qfrrqr qq qqftq qrrft jtt qwrr wt erfirfim %
Tfq ^eqrqq qft ^rr<j *mr 1
q$ 1974 Tr qf % qqrrfkrtf fftq qft srfff g$
TPTlft ^FFft 1
[ftd ^o-350l9( 13)/75 J Ttorn ffo 2l (i)]
New Delhi, the 30th October, 1975
S.O. 5011. — Whereas it appears to the Central Government
that the employer and the majority of the employees in rela-
tion to the establishment known as Messrs Ringlaon (India)
Sales Corporation, Station Road, Near Gopal Talkies. Anand,
District Kajra, including its Head Office at Venus Apartment
Sea Face. Worli, Bombny-18, have agreed that the provisions
of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Family Pension Fund
Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the
said establishment;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-section (4) of section 1 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act
to the said establishment.
This notification shall be deemed to have come into force
on the Thirty first day of May, 1974.
[No. S. 35019(1 3J/75-PF. H(i)l
qqo 3TTo 5012 , — ^tftq vriVq fftfatfk ftvR
fftfa, qfirftm 1952 (1952 qq 19 ) qft am e % m
TOjqr trni qqrr tfrfarqf qrr qtfW qrrft ^tt, ftry fftqq ft
^rtq qrrft % tnRiq 31 qri, 1974 ft r<3i«i*H (qfkqi)
qqqfknr, tm, fttqpr % fftqnr, fw +rr
qrro ptpft qft 4krr t^mfft^, tft in, qrftft,
fftFT TTOT qtTH Tiqt^q ftf WfT t TFT
snfkmif % fftn ftdftfw «rrftv fti
[ftot^Te-3501 9( l3)/7 54ot^o 2 ( ii )]
Sec. 3(H)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA I, 1897
4105
New Delhi, the 17th October, 1975
S O, 5012. — In exercise of the powers conferred by the first
proviso to section 6 of the Employees’ Provident Funds and
Family Pension Fund Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), the Central
Government after making necessary enquiry into the matter,
hereby specifies with effect from the 31st day of May, 1974
the establishment known as Messrs Ringlson (India) Sales
Corporation, Station Road, Near Gopal Talkies, Anand Dis-
trict, Kaira including its Head Office at Venus Apartment
Sea Face, Bombay- 18 for the purposes of the said proviso.
[No. S. 35019(I3)/75-PF. II(ii>]
WToWTo 5013.— Wk WTO qj SpfVff HffrTT $ fa filTp
TOTOT TO 84 ^(TOR TORTOJT
wtfu-22 tott pirn ft mrs ^ finftw tftr
wjtfvn w tot to; Tnprcr nf $ fa vFm faftr,
frtr 5^ Pro firftr 1952 (1952 m 19) fir
RTFFT TOT fVp TOt
to, m ^ urn 1 ^ ^tmrr (4) tot
tott ^rfippft to spffir grr tovtc %
otu from toj TOfr $ 1
XTtU^dr 1 9 7 4 ^ TO^TT fir 5 TTOT fiFT WT TOlft
|
[tfo 35019 ( 2l)/7 5- t fiomffo 2]
flTOTO tun, to rrfro
S.O, 5013. — Whereas it appears to the Central Government
that the employer and the majority of the employees in rela-
tion to the establishment known as Messrs Shaw Wallace
and Company Limited, 84, Industrial Suburb, Yeshwantpur,
Bangalore-22, have agreed that the provisions of the Emp-
loyees’ Provident Funds and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952
(19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the said establish-
ment ;
Now, there Tore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-section (4) of section 1 of the said Act. the Central
Government hereby applies the provisions of the said act to
the said establishment.
This notification shall be deemed to have come into force
on the first day of October, 1974,
[No. S. 35019(21)/75-PF. II]
S. S. SAHASRANAMAN, Dy. Secy.
1 7 TOJTT, 19 7 5
¥T0 sno 5014. — fcfpT TORTO *4 TO 'rfPl TOT J fa? firrp
TORTT TTX, T hri, f^fiTOTTO?fr- 1 2, TOT
h fTOrr jfrr stjtttot w tot to
TOTO t\*if f fir qfW firth tfir tottt firfh
qfijfifTO, 19 52 ( 1952 TO 19) % TOTOtf TOtf ROTO TO fTO*
mrh Trf^tT 1
to:, to, tot ^rfijfiro TO tot 1 TO touttt ( 4) tot
TOTT mi fori qf TO TO Ft TTh JIT TOTOq TKTOi TOT ’ffftrfiTTO %
w tott pttto TO to totTO $.1
1975 TO ^TTOfiT, % TPTTf fipT TO SPFT tjf
TOiftTOnfi 1
S.O. 5014. — Whereas it appears to the Central Government
Thai the employer and the majority of the employees in rela-
tion to the establishment, known as Messrs Ajantha Industries
Madurai Road, Crawford, Tiruchirapalli-12, have agreed that
the provisions of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Family
Pension Fund Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made appli-
cable to the said establishment ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-section (4) of section 1 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to
the said establishment.
This notification shall be deemed to have conic into force
on the first day of January. 1975.
[No. S. 35019(78)/75-PF. II]
mo mo 5015. — TOTOq toto TO qTOff TO?tt ft forforh
TOT TOta (tTT>T 1 ) ’TFRW
Tt¥, TtfiTOT, TOTSTTO, TPTT F4TFT h TOW fTOtTO
’chr Thrrftht w to | fr Tfi^rfr
firfh ?fh: 9TO firftr qfafim 1952 (1952 tt 19) %
^w*r tot ^qTTO Tt to fTu ^rfir 'rrf^p ;
TO:, TO, TOT^fafiTTO ^ TOT 1 TffTOT ( 4 ) TOT
tot wrfrof tt to>t Txh fjtt to+k %
^TTO qh bTOTOT TFT TTTt | 1
^ qfrr^TOT 197 4 % fTOTO, ^ hlTO fi^T TOT
HHub TPirfi 1
{? To PT °'3 50 1 9 ( 1 06)/7 5 -htoP^o 2]
S.O. 5015.— Whereas it appears to the Central Government
that the employer and the majority of the employees in
relation to the establishment known as Messrs
Auto Industries A jit Industrial .States (Part-I) NagarveJ
Hanuman Road, Rakhia, Ahmedabad, have agreed that the
provisions of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Family
Pension Fund Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made ap-
plicable to the said establishment ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-scction (4) of section 1 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to
the said establishment,
This notification shall be deemed to have come into force
on the thirtieth day of September, 1974.
[No. S. 35019/106/75-PF.IL]
frTo mo 5oie.--%TO fmr | fa:
Wltft ihTTOTFFT bY- 36, TSfFT TOT, TOTRf fTO, TORT
FTOTT TOT£ fipfTO OTTrlTTff TOT TV
q^TrT | for ^nTTOt ^fTOT fiffy VU 9TO firftr
^rfirfiTTO 1952 ( 19 5 2 m 19 ) T ^TOT'tT -?^rf TOJ
fifTiJ Tip ^rf|t7;
to:, TO, ^ftrfircpT TOT 1 *fi' ^ITOT ( 4 ) TOT
tott vrfrofil m toft ^ ott ^fyPrTO
^ wr t«im tot TT^fr $ 1
7 . nyr rrfirgroTT 1975 qrofr % 'srjrnr^ fro q?r tt^t
TOifr TOFh 1
102 Gl/75-12
[jfo trq-o-350 l9(78)/7 5 J fi-ontE* 2]
[ST® .q^-350!9( l28)/75^otrrFo2]
4106
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1 975/AGRAHAYAN A 1, 1897 [Part II—
S.O. 5016.^-Whereas it appears to the Central Government
that the employer and the majority of the employees in
relation to the establishment known as Messrs
Bhagwati Textiles C-36, Udyognagar, Navsari District Bul-
snr have agreed that the provisions of the Employees' Provi-
dent Funds and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952 (19 of
1952), should be made applicable to the said establishment;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-section (4 ) of section 1 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to
the said establishment.
This notification shall be deemed to have come into force
on the twenty-eighth day of February 1975.
(No. S. 35019/128/75-PF. II]
FT° mo 50 17. — 47T: f Ft ^ ( ft fF
tfro-36, uui, Twrff Mu ywr
THTT W T'd 'l fTfPFF tflT FH^lfVq 1 Ft F^TO4T UT
wtu tt rpppt ft fF f+i t i rt *TfF&T firfa
Mu 1952 ( 1 9 5 2 FT 19) F ^FT WITT
*TPJ M Ms TlfftR,
to:, m> ^3W rrfsrfrTJT Ft urt i Ft sfstrt ( 4 ) srt
STTTTFfFTFf FT TO>T F"Rf JTJ T^jfFr tHFK trfalWT %
'd^td W (H 4 Ft t ^ FTfft ft I
4? ’nfTfTTT 1 975 Ft TTF^t F tlgRff? far Ft TJTT
thpiV 1
[tT° TTq- 35019( 13 8)/7 5-'fToqTo2j
S.O. 5017.- — Whereas it appears to the Central Government
that the employer and the majority of the employees in
relation to the establishment known as Messrs
Navin Textile C-36, Udyognagar, Navsari, District, Bulsar,
have agreed that the provisions of the Employees' Provident
Funds and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952 (19 of 1952),
should be made applicable to the said establishment ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-section (4) of section 1 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to
the said establishment.
This notification shall be deemed to have come into force
on the twenty-eighth day of February, 1975.
(No. S. 35019(1 38) /75-PF.II]
FTo 3TTo 501 8: — TO: Ft Strfrr ftftTT ft fF
Mu Frt 4t °- 3 6 MXu tot Twrft farr ym
FTTO WTTT U fTOfaTF Ftr Ft 4|TO4T
TOT FT ftt ui ft fF FHTl'O Mm ftfa *flr Mu
Mu tffafFTO 1952 ( 1 9 5 2 FT 19) % TTTOT ?t?T WTTO
Tt Tuj fVn; ■TOffttr;
TO:, TO, ^FT STfufFTO Ft ETRT 1 Ft TT^PT ( 4 ) JTTT
rrrn' vifrn^Tl ft toPt Fed 5 ^ nwt tto ^rftrfTOrr
F wtr 3TOT PTFFT Ft TPJ FTOt ft 1
TO irfa^roT 1975 Ft FRrft F xtjtittF far Ft sryr jf
1
[*To ^To-350l9(l 39)/75-<froHl5o2]
S.O, 5018, — Whereas it appears to the Central Government
that the employer and the majority of the employees in
relation to the establishment known as Messrs
Kepee Textiles C-36 Udyognagar, Navsari, District Bulsar,
have agreed that the provisions of the Employees’ Provident
Funds and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952 (19 of 1952),
should be made applicable to the said establishment ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-section (4) of section 1 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to
the said establishment.
This notification shall be deemed to>have come into force
on the twenty-eight day of February, 1975,
[No. S, 35019(139) /75-PF-m
FU 3TTO 5109 * — wM
MM TTFT MR RT3T WVFT, 6 8 2 0 1 6^ fwh
TOrtr J 1 4 t> tr r , T, TlfiH \M ft'TT TTFt WP3T frfwi^TT'
ft, trt wm ^ frfppr M tthw w
wm qrr ft ft? wnfr Mu M Mu
Mu MuMxu, 1952 ( 1 9 5 2 uu 19 ) ^ TT3R7 TFT WTTT
Ft fw 1 5fFt 1 ;
TO:* P, TFT urn 1 TTSHTT ( 4 ) IKT
5TW MMui FT WM gtr fctfpT fKFK 2W ^^144 %
TM TFT wm Ft FRTt ^ I
4 ^ 1974 ^ TF«n: t % sm frr Fh sryr
IFTlft smnft 1
[To tW°"350 1 9( 237)/74-TtorrFo2]
S.O. 5019.^ — Whereas it appears to the Central Government
that the employer and the majority of the employees in
relation to the establishment known as Messrs
Peettes Wine Stores, South Junction, Ernakulam, Cochin-
682016, including its branch at Aloppat Jewcllary, Central
Junction, Kotlayam, have agreed that the provisions of the
Employees* Provident Funds and Family Pension Fund Act,
1952, (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the said
establishment ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-section (4) of section 1 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to
the said establishment,
This notification shall be deemed to have come into force
on the first day of November, 1974.
(No. S. 35019(237) /74-PF. IT)
Tf 30 1975
FT e Fo 5020. — ^TjfTq- *f <FTC Ft 4^ spftTT ^TtTT ft fF 4 ft 4
<fbTF yrnpjN - - 2 -^ TfF, F<TFttl-23 TTFF WPTF
tfk FrtFTfTTff ftt fft m
it ft ftr f44 1 *\ vrf^r frrftT xfhr tvrr Mu srftffwT,
1 952 ( 1 9 5 2 FT 19) % OTW ^HFT HTPTT Ft ^TPJ
MS , FT%R;
TO., TO, ^F?T ETR.T ] ^qtTRT ( 4 ) ffRj
tott ft srVt F7.T jtt F^fnr tofr t tft rrfufmrtT %
'TFT WlTO Ft WPJ FRrft ft I
4^ (Tf^TOT 1 975 F vMMS fro _y\ JPJTT
wnft wnfr 1
[^0 tJH o -35017( 1 5)/ 7 5-^013^02]
Sfic. 3( ti)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1915/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 4l07
New Delhi, the 30th October, 1975
8*0. 5020* — Whereas it appears to the Central Government
that the employer and the majority of the employees in
relation to the establishment known as Messrs
Deepak Ehterprises. 2-Dcvi Chowdhury Road. Cacutta-700023,
have agreed that the provisions of the Emloyees' Provident
Funds and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952, (19 of 1952),
should be made applicable to the said establishment ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-section (4) of section 1 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to
the said establishment.
This notification shall be deemed to have come into force
on the thirty-first day of January, 1975,
[No. S-35017 (15) /75-PF.II]
JTTo stto 5 0 21 — TO urr.K ^7 Tfafa fffTT J fa
tofa siu fad fa 32
£tc qrfrwnt, w Ptm w ffroa fmfnro TO
wpim t w tott | far mbvPf qfro fkfa TO
faert TOrfaro 1952(1952 vr 19 )
Vt fa ;
to to tot TOfaffm qft otit 1 toshtt ( 4 ) im
TOfr VlfatmT *FT SR FT ^^.ri frrTffT \JTO xrfijffHTO ^
TOff Tff 3TPJ ft
^ 1974 * fiPT Tf TOTT
^TTffHT I
P^o-3 50 19( 9)/ 75^0^0 2(i)]
*T*»no ao23 . — ttwr q? toft
Awfr Hgfavjt TOT jh-pfti tfo 120/7-2 TOnt wri^fr-
^ tfnTO-2, HI TO FTHTH ff fffTOffTT TO
TfaqTfriH HjTtWT w I far TOTO
nfa^ farfh TO 5 ^- 7vth ftfa wftrfnro 1952 (1952 m
19 ) tohet vt 'A nr far ^rfaHTf^ff;
TO, TO TOT TOfatTR ^ tmr l ^ TOUITT ( 4 ) TTTT
tott vrfafaT wFt jq TOVff htok tot TOfTOr %
TOT | |
TO TOrgw 1975 ^ * tot fan jfjtt jf
HHtft ITT^ff I
q?To~35Ol0( 30)/75 J fto^o2(i)]
S.O. 5023. — Whereas it appears to the Central Government
that the employer and the majority of the employees in
relation to the establishment known as Messrs Mahadeshwarn
Lorry Transports, No. 126/7-2, 5th Cross Kalasipalyam New
Extension, Bangalore-2, have agreed that the provisions of
the Employees' Provident Funds and Family Pension Fund
Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made applicable to the
said establishment.
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
sub section (4) of section 1 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to
the said establishment.
This notification shall be deemed to have come into force
on the first day of January, 1975.
[No. S-35019C30) /75-PF.TI (i ) ]
S.O. 5021,-^Whereag it appears to the Central Government
that the employer and the majority of the employees in
relation to the establishment known as Messrs
Faridabad Productivity Council, 32-C, Nehru Ground, N.I.T*
Faridabad, have agreed that the provisions of the Employees’
Provident Funds and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952 (19
of 1952), should be made applicable to the said establish-
ment ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-section (4) of section 1 of the said Act. the Central
Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to
the said establishment.
This notification shall be deemed to have come into force
on the first day of October, 1974.
[No, S. 35019(9) /75-PF.IKO]
*TTo 3JTo 5 02 2. — HTOTT T^HTtT TOw faftf TO:
ffvrff faftf, TOffm, 1952 (l952 ^T 19) UKl 6 % TOT
wfanTr srTh 3^ fax fa^^r if srmro
SRH % 1 197 4 &
fa^r ffffro, 32 *fr, u;ho ^rifo ti o qrffamnt hito
rtpFR toh qropr ^ snfpspff ^ fam farfirfa^ ’fnrfr ^ i
[Tfo TTtTo.350l9(9)/75^otTT^o2(ii)]
S.O. 5022. — In exercise of the powers conferred by the
first proviso to section 6 of the Employees' Provident Funds
and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), the Cen-
tral Government, after making necessary enquiry into the
matter, hereby specifies with effect from the first day of
October, 1974, the establishment known as Messrs Faridabad
Productivity Council, 32-C z Nehru Ground, N.I.T., Faridabad,
for the purposes of the said proviso.
tNo. S-35019(9) /75-PF.II (ii)l
mo «rr° 5024. — Mrir utok Tfaffrri »rfw Wrr
^TH f^TUT, tffafHTO 1952 ( 1952 W 19) 5TTTT 6 % IT«PT
am TOrT vifafftft m wFr jq, famr H ’fTT^vw
TO ^ 1 ^TH^rff, 1975 § TOf
120/7-2 ntrot tet wkH w,
HTTO WTH TOT * TRffaPff % faq fafTO^: TOf
[Tfo tETo-35019( 30)175^0^0 2(ii)]
S.O. 5024*— In exercise of the powers conferred by first
proviso to section 6 of the Employees’ Provident Funds and
Family Pension Fund Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), the Central
Government after making necessary enquiry into the matter,
hereby specifies with effect from the first day of January,
1975, the establishment known as Messrs Mahadeshwara
Lorry Transports, 126/7-2 5th Cross, Kalasipalyam New Ex-
tension, Bangalore 22, for the purposes of the said proviso,
[No. S-35019(30)/75-PF.II(ii)]
mo flTTo 5025- — TO TOlq TTTfnT SRITH $ fa
5TH+1 <?T fa fa ^ ^THTH-
(T^mT) hi to ir qfa
HJTOtt TH TO TT t{T fff I fa fafr
TO 55^ haft fafar TOfaro 1952 ( 1953 19) $ toto
tot *T TTIH faff
to, to tot TOfror 4^ urn 1 Tt ^Ttrm (4) am
q^rvr vi farnf Tff qzfpT jff htoit toh yfyfaffTr %
iqro tot Vt mn TOT 1
THE GAZETTE* OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 1% 1975/ AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 [Part
4108
srftr^^n 1972 % rwh:, ' % mm
’ i
[*To ir?To-3 5019( 5l)/7 5-*fto^o 2(i)]
3.0, 5025. — Whereas it appears to t the Central Government
that the employer and the majority of the employees in
relation to the establishment known as Messrs
Sultanpur Primary Co-operative Land Mortgage Bank, Limit-
ed, Sultanpur (Kapurlhala ) have agreed that the provisions
of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Family Pension
Fund Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), should be made appicable to
the said establishment ;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-section (4) of section 1 of the said Act, the Central
Government hereby applies the provisions of the said Act to
the said establishment.
This notification shall be deemed to have come into torce
on the first day of November, 1972.
[No. S. 35019(51 ) /75-PF.II(f)]
*To BfT? 5 020.— fcsfa mTTTR wfalft flfaTO W«T
fam fafa srfafwr, 1952 (1952 19) trnr 6 ^
skt jtctt mfauft srafPT jit, fwr *r
ww ^rfr % qrrrq; 1 1972 ^ fatfgsrfTETy* sthh<V
P4lMr| Tt % hh mTT % fipT ^ I
[ffo tm°"350 1 9( 5l)/754tot^o2(ii)]
W \ <oqYo Tpimr, 5 R T 4T -hPm^
5.0. 5026,— In exercise of the powers conferred by the
first provise to section 6of the Employees Provident Funds
and Family Pension Fund Act, 1952 (19 of 1952), the Central
Government, after making neccj:;ary enquiry into the matter,
hereby specifies with efi'eet from the first day of November,
1972, the establishment known as Messrs Sultanpur Primary
Co-operative Land Mortgage Bank Limited, Sultanpur (Kapur-
thala) for the purpose of the said proviso,
[No. S-35019(51)/75-PF.II (ii)]
R. P. NARULA, Under Secy.
fesft, 21 1 9 7 S
WT» 5027. — Wrq mrir, qntmft w aftm nfafmnr,
1948 ( 1948 T1 34) tJTTT 87 STTO mT qifqqqt TT snttq
TCT JTj'tflT qRd mm % «T*T WH qft nftnjmTT tfSHT
T I o WT ^ 2254 d rfl * r A 17 1974 % ,, ( ,4)9
fmrq ferM? % ifi^ret mmq tfk mr mm qft m
[wftrPm % qq#q ¥r, 28 ^r, 1975 % 27 ajq, 1976 qqr,
font q^ faq «ft ^rfmfmr qqr qftr mf qft sreftr % farr
1 1
2. qmfqq tjs ural mt t,
( 1 ) m fTwr^r qn fqqrspr, mr toRt qft .arm Wrr%
qWr m, maim m qfafqqq % srqtfq % tnsfw
<TTi (Nqs'iii !'ii wii( ^qq qqfq qr^r w $),
srrmr if qfk it# fqfnfefr qfijq
4m sft qmnfr qraq aftm qfufqqq (wtetrit) f4fq-
w, 1950 % wfln qqqnqfq % #nr if 4 # #;
\
( 2 ) Pm irt, iw wfafqqq qft uri 45 qft mnn
( 1 ) ^ wfW Prt ipn qftf m ftm
qq qftf m qqtrrft sft w fqftqr snfariq fqnn qor
t—
(i) 8171 44 >A mro ( 1 ) fldtq w mfir
™ ft qf fq^fl fmoft it (ft ^ fqfiifisiff
Tt rnifRl qr^ i 3qt7(RTq; qT
(ii) qrfirfirfm qr^ % to15rt^ fr qin m
qrqftr qft to q.4vrJ> -m (atotw)
fqfm, 1950 jrt qin qrtftrcr tPhwt rflr
<f, in
(iii) «r^ wf^rnf^d qn^ % snfTJRTvf fq? qm qnt-
^rtt, Prq'ld'q ffTTT ilT^t *At qq^ % it
5n% qr% wfl qit qq ift gqt qr <
8 d 1 jw ^ ftrq% srftniqi'qqq’T m v fNfd"4 q ^ nuftn
* 5TT -0 q\
(iv) q^ qrf¥df?q^ qrr^ ^ 5 nftJrcr 4 fv qqT
nqfii ^ ^krq aw ^q?r qriT^nit ^ qWv ir
qrfaPirR ^ m^sr ir, itir TKntt qr, wij-
qwr (Tin wr ht,
* far* *ratw: —
(qr) sram qi fWwq; ?r Trqr fqr
t?qft ^q’qrci ^ qft Ti<lqq fqftwqr in qnq qqtnft
am nrqqqqr mft unt; qr
(*r) ^t qsnq qT iw8^8 fqqrqqr «fr qrfemt*TTsfnT fq^ft
qnrqn^ wm, qrrqfqnr qT qnq qftqrf it fq^fl ijfqrr-
^q?r nqq qr q$*r q>rqT ti’k ^t »qfqff tt qft rj^qn
qnrrntnr qrr Tfr ft, q? qrrqr fqr q^ Prtt-
wqr m mrft % thtw ^qft tarr ff^qt q/k w»q
TOTt^qt aft, »qfq?rqf % fqqYqq qflr qar^ft ^ nqiq
tr nwftnr ^r, qr> qfgq q^:, trtr ^ mft 'rttwr qrt»t
i qr 9 ^ #sft ^ wrqqqqr tht^' arrqqnff qr
(q) itm m v»qqr^ Ptqla t q i, qrfqqrat m itqqr,
qT fqrrft *qfar qft aft qrrtwT^, «rm, qrrqf-
qfq m qnq it TTqT aiTTjqT fam% qft it rjq^
frrftwqr qi n ; q qqsrrtt ^ qrq q? fqqqrq qr^q qn
^ftq^qq qm $ fqr qj >qfqq qnf=qrft t, <rtt«T qrrqT
qr
(n) $t qmrrit, qqm, qrrqfqq qr *nq qftTr7 *r T?i
q^ fqnfr Tfat ht, norrqifT qr w*q TTdiqq qit to
frnq qrtqT qi rjqJr qflf q^tmq ^mi 1
t q i qq lT TO TO
Tq qrqit it ^ qft 'jqftrfl qqrr 4m wm* ^t qm
qqtfqr q,i i<itq qrt ^41t>n qriTt 4r qqq it M^lfdiqiq' 1 , T.4qr<1
naq qtm fmrq qft ftrqqfoir 4r if qnq 5 ^ *ft 1 mnfq q^
qqTfqq fqrqr ariqr 4 fqr farc qfqftqfinff if qt,T«T4 qft qmq:
if ^ qflrrr qft qf <ft, t wuft w* fqqnnq t qfk qnTunff
Sec., 3 (ii)] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA ; NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 4109
^ yq «tt?t t ^ r 4V qqrfarq fan im % fa ffffTq
qiff qqqT 1
nqo 38017/ 1/73^» l]
New Dchli, the 21st October, 1975
S.O. 5027 . — In exercise of the powers conferred by section
87 of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948)
and in continuation of the notification of the Government of
India in the Ministry of Labour No. S.O, 2254 dated the
17th August, 1974, the Central Government hereby exempts
the Gauhati Installation and Patna Installation of the Indian
Oil Corporation Limited from the operation of the said
Act for a further period of one year with effect from the
28th June, 1975, upto and inclusive of the 27th June, 1976.
2. The above exemption is subject to the following con-
ditions, namely : — ■
(1) The employer of the said factory shall submit in
respect of the period during which that factory was
subject to the operation of the said Act (herein-
after referred to as the said period), such returns
in such form and containing such particulars as
were due from it in respect of the said period
under the Employees’ State Insurance (General) Re-
lations, 1950 ;
(2) Any inspector appointed by the Corporation undet
sub-section (1) of section 45 of the said Act, or
other Official of the Corporation authorised in this
behalf shall for the purposes of —
(i) verifying the particulars contained in any return
submitted under sub-section (1) of section 44 of
the said period ; or
(ii) ascertaining whether registers and records were
maintained as required by the Employees* State
Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950 for the
said period; or
(iif ) ascertaining whether the employees continue to
be entitled to benefits provided by the employer in
cash and kind being benefits in consideration of
which exemption is being granted under this noti-
fication ; or
(iv) ascertaining whether any of the provisions of the
Act had been complied with during the period
when such provisions were in force in relation to
the said factory.
be empowered to —
(a) require the principal or immediate employer to
furnish to him such information as he may consider
necessary ; or
(b) enter any factory, establishment, office or other
premises occupied by such principal or immediate
employer at any reasonable time and require any
person found incharge thereof to produce to such
Inspector or other official and allow him to examine
such accounts, books and other documents relating
to the employment of persons and payment of
wages or to furnish to him such information as he
may consider necessary ; or
(c) examine the principal or immediate employer, his
agent or servant, or any persons found in such fac-
tory, establishment, office or other premises, or any
person whom the said Inspector or other official has
reasonable cause to believe to have been an emp-
loyee ; or
(d) make copies of or take extracts from, .any register,
account book or other document maintained in such
factory, establishment, office or other premises.
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
It has become necessary to give retrospective effect to the
exemption in this case, as the recommendation of the Direc-
tor General, Employees State Insurance Corporation for the
grant of exemption to the factory was received late. How-
ever, it is certified that the eondiions under which the factory
was initially granted exemption still persist and the factory is
eligible for exemption. It is also certified that the grunt of
exemption with retrospective effect will not affect the inte-
rest of anybody adversely.
[No. S. 38017(1 )/73-HI]
fToWo 5 0 2S. — ^^jfW ti -or- 1 *1*4 ffTtt TT^r srfuffiqq,
1948 ( 1948 34 ) # mrr 87arcr srrrT qfaqtfr yrr qzftq
51 T tffa: qrrq % nr twi
Wffo 3TTo 225 3, <11 17 197 4 % tffjqtq S %fifVq
fafqJ*. wfafaqq % Tnfa
13 1974 % 12 1975 fwt iff? for
4V qfarfaq t, rpr qtf fwr to fh
2 . ’jqfar srat % sTSTHfa —
( i ) '3’Tri (Tflrftr qtqcr faftfa
qj? tt xrftrfqqq % ^ xnftq «rr, (fan?
qrfa trrfq w t), faqTfaqf %%
qqq % tfhc %tfV ftft i ff CTf *rf^r *qi qV *tfqrfV xm
(uwhjt) Wm, 1950 % vsfVff *rqfa * qqq % fcft
«ft i
( 2) Pm BTTT, fffqfaqq tfV ffTTT 45 tfV ^TtTTXT ( 1 )
fan w yfff MfaT, qr firm i rr wq
thvi(V qV qq fafw wify#q fan qqi ?V : —
(i) *V «mrrT UTTT 44 ^tUTTl (I) ft tttfVff
it MV faT^fr % fir fl i fetf i ' vV tMw
q *% % ; TT :
(ii) q$ frfarfafaqq q<fiui47 i fi r far qqr d^n irqfar
arraff, Tm (^n^rr^) Mm,
1950 trnr xfatfex 5r :
qr
(iii) ^ snffaRPi % qnfanft,
PrqfalT 5TTT qT^V ^t faq '317%
Tq qjiqrf qr% ^ qq % fan% qfq-
to *q ^ urdVq ^ ft ^rr r^V
qT
(iv) qj? qfqfWVqq % qqVqqrf far fqy Tff qqfq
% lAriq qq qrrwT% ^ % stfbfqqq %
q’Tq^tr %% ^rq^qV ^1 5ffjTT?fq fan qqt qT,
fan fq fan ^ ftp* qwr itnr fa ^ —
(*) qqrff qr 5T«qqf^T fqqW % qf vfiw fa
qq i sfr qqffar PrtVw
qr irq qq^rrV JRf <rrq?qqr qqffr qrr; W
(ty) qtsnff qr qsqqf^q faq^ffsTT % qfqqVqTtfrq
faffV ^Trqr% ; ^qrrq, Trqferq qr xpq qfaqTt
% MV ^farqyq qqq tt 5tw r^T %%
®rfaq % qV OTytr qrcqrqq yrr ^ qq
xrterr TRqr fa %% *rr *r ? q qqimV
. % qqff %f\K ifn ifV aqfarql
% faifrqq wVT qqjTV % ffTrq % tfafar iff,
4110
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22 x 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 [Part 11
srfgw wk TftWT rot * rt ^ Wt
$ BTRrJTf: <?mtf srmrtf ?'; Jtr
(>r) jtstr ut vmfpi faukrer m
^TT ,: M ( T • 1 ^ 'Jft *fii *.'9 1 H ,
w-m, •pr’Tfcpr in qfkrrT if tpit iit
frW* <k ir TOT >TT TOJlkt % TITf
W fai^m jrt:^ vt ^fw'rw oti J ft ^
sKR^rft t, klwr <pttt; rt
(r) ffff wftc, wirlw rt tPott *f
V* JTTT TfsrRT ITT
*!Y =m7*r frirn: Rr ^rtw ^rrr^r i
sznwiw^r ^ ihH
^nr^r if vz *m xrpnurcr mn ^
fifffwr *m^Er *ft srpt ^ qnfriTft Tn*r
jtm ^ wv* %$ *ft i twrfo, srnPnrr
fW nmr Pp $- qftfarfwt, fer $ *rc»srEf *?r *jjt wt St
^jjf 5TJR tff *T$ *ft, iR^ft <ft f *ftr vttwht gs %
fair qr* $ i m tft 5nTTf^ faun jittt $ Pff *r
^ Tprft fVtff % ffcf <TT ^ VT^nft I
[tfo 38017/61/74^0 i]
8,0. 5028.— In exercise of the powers conferred by sec-
tion 87 of the Employees’ State Issuance Act, 1948 f 34 of
1948) and in continuation of the notification of the Govern-
ment of India in the Ministry of Labour No. 5.0. 2253,
dated the 17th August, 1974, the Central Government hereby
exempts the National Instruments Limited, Calcutta, from the
operation of the said Act for a further period of one year
with effect from the 13th November, 1974 upto and inclu-
sive of the 12th November, 1975.
2. The above exemption is subject to the following
conditions, namely
(1) The employer of the said factory shall submit in
respect of the period during which that factory was
subject to the operation of the said Act (herein-
after referred to as the said period), such returns
in such form and containing such particulars as were
due from it in respect of the period under the
Employees’ State Insurance (General) Regulations,
1950 ;
(2) Any inspector appointed by the Corporation under
sub-section (1) of section 45 of the said Act, or
other Official of the Corporation authorised in this
behalf shall, for the purposes of —
(i) verifying the particulars contained in any return
submitted under sub-section (1) of section 44 for
the said period ; or
(ii) ascertaining whether registers and records were
maintained as required by the Employees' State
Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950 for the
said period ; or
(iii) ascertaining whether the employees continue to be
entitled to benefits provided by the employer in
cash and kind being benefits in consideration of
which exemption is being granted under this noti-
fication ; or
(iv) ascertaining whether any of the provisions of the
Act had been complied with during the period
when such provisions were in force in relation to
the said factory,
be empowered to —
(a) require the principal or immediate employer to fur-
nish to him such information as he may consider
necessary ; or
(b) enter any factory, establishment, office or other pre-
mises occupied by such principal or immediate em-
ployer at any reasonable lime and require any per-
son found incharge thereof to produce to such Ins-
pector or other official and allow him to examine
such accounts, books and otheT documents relating
to the employment of persons and payment of
wages or to furnish to him such information as he
may consider necessary ; or
(c) examine the principal or immediate employer, his
agent or servant, or any person found in such fac-
tory, establishment, office or other premises, or any
person whom the said Inspector or other official has
reasonable cause to believe to have been an emp-
loyee ; or
(d) make copies of or take extracts from, any regis-
ter, account book or other document maintained in
such factory, estabishment, office or other premises.
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
It has become necessary to give retrospective effect to
the exemption in this case, as the recommendation of the
Director General, Employees’ State Insurance Corporation
for the grant of exemption to the factory was received late.
However, it is certified that the conditions under which the
factory was initially granted exemption still persist and the
factory is eligible for exemption. It is also certified that the
grant of exemption with retrospective effect will not effect the
interest of anybody adversely.
[No. S-38017 / 6 /74-HI]
30 197 5
VToSTTo 5029.--iRTC 7 T TTHTO, WWl 2, STO 3, OTI
(ii) wrtm 1 0 qf , 19 7 5 1784 T* $T*fufi||Q
W3T W Wo *fTTo %(\o 1464
wrtm 26 wfcf, 1 975 if 4 %ftK 1 9 if *TlJ jjq
tffc to*” vm <tt” sffrfb srftm it g <rrfor' 7 qf i
[qq 0 *fo^o leo 12 / 1 5 / 7 4-t^ro^rrfo]
CORRIGENDUM
New Delhi, the 30th October, 1975
SjO. 5029.-.— In the notification of the Government of India
in the Ministry of Labour No. S.O. 1464 dated the 26th
April, 1975, published at pa$e 1734 of the Gazette of India,
Para II, section 3, sub-section (ii) dated the 10th May,
1975.
for “Shrimati Pratibha D. Patel” and “Smt. Pratibha
D. Patel”, “occuring in lines” and 19 respectively,
read “Shrimati Pratibha D. Paul” and “Sint. Pratibha
D. Patil” respectively.
[F. No. U. 160 12/1 5 /74-HI]
J. C. SAXENA, Under Secy.
(Department of Labour and Employment)
New belhi, the 1 0th November, 1975
S.O. 5030* — In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby publishes the following award of the Industrial Tri-
bunal, No. 2 Dhanbad in the industrial dispute between the
Sec. 3 ( ii j ]
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/ AGR AHA Y AN A 1, 1897 4U1
employers in relation to the management of Jamadoba 3 &
4 Pits Colliery of M/s. Tata Iron & Steel Co., Ltd,, P. O.
Jamadoba, Distt Dhanbad and their workmen, which was
received by the Central Government on the 30th October,
1975.
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL (NO. 2) AT DHANBAD.
PRESENT
Shri K, K. Sarkar, Judge,
Presiding Officer.
REFERENCE NO. 100 OF 1975
In the matter of an industrial dispute under Section 10(1) (d)
of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947,
(Ministry’s Order No. L-20012/125/75/D.IIIA dated
7th August, 1975).
PARTIES :
Employers in relation to the management of Jamadoba 3
& 4 Pits Colliery of M/s, Tata Iron and Steel Co.
Ltd., Jamadoba, P. O. Jamadoba, Dist. Dhanbad,
AND
Their workmen.
APPEARANCES :
On behalf of the employers : Shri S. S, Mukherjee,
Advocate.
On behalf of workmen : Shri C. P. Rai Sharma, Vice
President, R, C. M. S. Jamadoba Branch.
State : Bihar. Industry : Coal.
Dhanbad, the 25th October, 1975
AWARD
The Government of India, Ministry of Labour made a
reference to this Tribunal for adjudication of the industrial
dispute involved with the following issues framed
“L Whether the action of the management of Jamadoba
Colliery of M/s. Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., P, O,
Jamadoba, Dist. Dhanbad in superannuating Smt.
Saraswatia, Mason Kamin, Ticket No, 26440, from
service w.e.f, 15th March, 1975 is justified?
2. If not, to what relief is the worker entitled ?”.
Before this reference could proceed, a memorandum of
settlement was filed before me by the parties jointly. I heard
the parties on the memorandum of settlement and it is submit-
ted by both sides that they have amicably arrived at a settle-
ment and it is prayed that an award be passed in terms of
the settlement. It is further submitted that passing of an
early award will enable the parties to implement the terms
of the settlement immediately. On the side of the employers
M/s, Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd,, the settlement is signed
by their authorised advocate Shri S, S. Mukhenee and on the
side of the workmen it has been signed by Shri C. P. Rai
Sharma who is the Vice President of the Union on record,
C.M.S. Jamadoba Branch. The left thumb impression of the
concerned worker Smt. Saraswatia is also there in the memo-
randum of settlement. Terms of the settlement appear to be
fair and beneficial to both sides and therefore I accept the
same.
In the result, 1 pass an award In respect of the industrial
dispute involved as referred to me in terms of the memoran-
dum of settlement which do form part of my Award as An-
nexure-A.
K. K, SARKAR, Presiding Officer.
ANNEXURE— A
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL NO. II, DHANBAD.
Reference No. 100 of 1975
In the mutter of Notification No. L-200 12/1 25/75 /D. I1I-A.
Employers in relation to the Management of Jamadoba
3 & 4 pits colliery of M/s. Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. Jama-
doba, Post Jamadoba, District Dhanbad.
Their workmen
A dispute has been referred to the Hon’ble Tribunal for
adjudication vide the above notification. In this connection
both the parties abovenamed beg to submit as under : —
1. After discussion the above dispute referred for ad-
judication has been amicably settled between the
parties on the following terms and conditions :
(a) Smt. Saraswatia, Mason Kamin, Jamadoba col-
liery will be referred to the Company’s Medical
Board to ascertain her age and tne decision of
the said Board will be final and binding on both
the parties.
(b) In case the above Medical Board finds that Smt.
Saraswatia is less than 60 years of age, she would
be reinstated in her job with continuity of service.
(c) As regards the period of her idleness from the date
of her superannuation to the date of her re-instatc-
ment, she will be paid 50 per cent of the wages
payable to her in the said period.
(dj The above period of her idleness would be treat-
ed as if she was on leave without wages for the
purpose of her eligibility of leave and other
benefits, if any-
(e) That in case the Medical Board opines that the
age of Smt. Saraswatia is 60 years or above she
will have no claim for reinstatement or any
compensation.
(f) That the above terms of settlement finally resol-
ves the dispute between the parties and there
remains no dispute for adjudication by the Hon’ble
Tribunal.
It is, therefore, humbly prayed that the above terms of
settlement may kindly be accepted and an Award passed In
terms thereof.
For Employers,
M/s, Tata Iron & Steel Co, Ltd,,
At & P. O. — Jamadoba,
Dist. — Dhanbad,
For workman,
L Vice-President,
R.C.M.S., Jamadoba Branch.
2. L.T.I, of
Smt, Saraswatia,
IF. No. L-20012/125/75-DIII-A]
S.O. 5031.- — In pursuance of Section 17 of the Indus*
trial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Govern-
ment hereby publishes the following award of the Industrial
Tribunal, (No. 2) Dhanbad, in the industrial dispute bet-
ween the employers in relation to the management of Kedla
Colliery, P.O. Hazaribagh, Distt. Hazaribagh and their work-
men which was received by the Central Government on
the 30th October, 1975.
4112
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/ AGRA HAY AN A 1, 1897 [Part 11-
BEFORE THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL
TRIBUNAL (No. 2), DHANBAD “ ‘
PRESENT
Shri K. K,. Sarkav, Judge,
Presiding Officer.
REFERENCE NO. 13 of 1974
In the matter of an industrial dispute under Section
10(l)(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
(Ministry’s Order No. L-2012/135/73-LR, II dt. 13-2-74)
PARTIES :
Employers in relation to the management of Kedla Col-
liery, P.O. HazafibagJh, Dist, Hazaribagh,
AND
Their Workmen
APPEARANCES :
: On behalf of the employers : Shri B. Joshi, Advocate.
On behalf of the Workmen ; Shri P. K. Bose, Advocate.
State : Bihar Industry : Coal
Dhanbad, dated the 23rd October, 1975
AWARD
This is a reference which was sent by the Government
of India, Ministry of Labour to this Tribunal for adjudica-
tion of the industrial disputes involved, with the following
Issues framed :
(1) Whether the action of the management of Kedla
Colliery, Post Office Hazaribagh, District Hazari-
bagh m fixing the monthly basic pay of Shri
. S. G. Singh, Overman, employed in Block No, 41,
at Rs. 265/- in the scale of pay of Rs. 245- Id
305-15-440 from the 4th November, 1972 is
justified ?
(2) If not, to what relief is the workman entitled 7
2, The short case of the workmen is that Shri S. G. Singh
the concerned workmen should be paid @ Rs. 335/- per
month basic in the scale of Rs. 305-15-395-20-575
from 4-11-1972 and for payment of difference of pay as
between Us, 335/- and Rs, 2 65/- in which he was placed
by the management. The management who is the Receiver
In respect of the Colliery opposes the claim of the work-
man. They deny that the concerned workman was ever
placed @ Rs, 335/- basic in the scale alleged.
3. Admittedly Kedla Colliery with some other collieries
belonged to Bokaro and Ramgarh Ltd. On 10-10-1969 in
a civil suit the State of Bihar was appointed as Receiver
Ip respect of the above colliery and other collieries and the
services of the workmen hithertobefore working under
Bokaro and 'Ramgarh Ltd,, was transferred to the Receiver.
On 1-12-1970 the concerned workman was appointed as
Mining Sirdar under the Coal Wage Board Recommenda-
tions, The State of Bihar as Receiver appointed Managing
Contractors to carry on the mining operations and in the
month of March, 1972 the concerned workman was trans-
ferred to one Madan Sukla who was the Managing Cont-
ractor of Block No. 16 of Kedla Colliery. While working
under the Managing Contractor the concerned workman
passed Overmanship examination and the managing Contrac-
tor appointed him as an Overman. Subsequently the Mana-
ging Contract system was abolished and the concerned work-
man among others was brought within the fold of the
Receiver’s services. The Receiver fixed the concerned work-
man @ Rs. 265/- basic after giving two increments in the
scale of Rs, 245-10-305-15-440. The point of dispute
Is what basic pay the concerned workman was getting under
the Managing Contractor Madan Sukla as an Overman and
what was the scale there ? Workmen contend that under
thn? Managing Contractor, Madan Sukla the concerned work-
man was getting a basic pay of Rs. 335/-. This to disputed
by the management of the Receiver, It remains to be seen
what evidence has the workman adduced in support of his
claim. The concerned workman was examined as W.W. 1
and his evidence is that he was appointed as an Overman
on a basic salary of Rs. 335/- by the Managing Contractor.
It appears that the management has not specifically denied
the atx ve basic pay alleged by the workmen. Tneir case
is that if the concerned workman was appointed as an Over-
man on a basic salary of Rs. 335/- by the Managing Contrac-
tor it was, just a collusive affairs and the concerned workman
could not hnve been fixed in the grade of Senior Overman.
The evidence of the management’s witness viz. Shri N, N.
Jha who was ail Agent of the Receiver (M.W. 1) and
evidence of B. B. Lai who was also an Agent at the Receiver
(M.W. 2) is not helpful, in that they do not deny that
the basic pay of the concerned workman was Rs. 335/-, So
the evidence of the concerned workman W,W. 1 remains
that ho was getting basic salary of Rs. 335/- under the
Receiver. I am not of course wholly depending upon the
uncorroborated 1 evidence of the concerned workman alone but
looking to other facts and circumstances available on record.
The workmen have produced photostat copy of an applica-
tion made by the concerned workman to the Superintendent
Of the Kedla Colliery which bears some notes of some offi
cers of that colliery and the same is Ext. 2. According to
him endorsement with signature of the manager Shri M, P,
Singh and also the endorsement with signature of the Superin-
tendent Shri D. C, Sharnia appear in Ext. W. 2. He also
says in his evidence that there is also an endorsement with
signature of the Agent Shri K. N. Pandey and also endorse-
ment with signature of Shri P. P. Singh, Personnel Officer.
Tt is not satisfactorily challenged before me ' from the side
of the management that the endorsements in Ext. W. 2
do not belong to the persons as named by the concerned
workman. The first endorsement by the officers of the Com-
pany is like this : “From perusal of the records it can be
Seen that the applicant was working as Overman in BN 16
colliery at the basic of Rs. 335/- per month, As at the
time of transfer to departmental mine he was not told that
the basic will be reduced, I feel he should get Rs. 335/-
basic on which he is working for last one year in th« scale
of Rs. 245— 450". The other endorsement of .Shri D. C.
Sharma said to be the Superintendent ia as follows : “T; K.
To do the needful as per direction of Shri M. P. Singh with
approval of Agent under Mines Rules". The third endorse-
ment in Ext. W. 2 by Shri K. N. Pandey said to be Agent
Is as follows ; P.O. to please enquire as to what is the scale
of pay of 1, Shri K. P. Singh, Overman B16ck 3; 2. Shri
Nagina Sinch Block 9; 3. Shri Dwarka Prasad Sinph, Over-
man,,,". The last endorsement in Ext. W, 2 which is of
Shri P, P. Singh said to be Personnel Officer is as follows
E.O.C, Sir. I inquired pay sheet and found that the basic
scale of Shri K. P, Singh is Rs. 335/- only, the basic of
Shri Nagina Singh is Rs, 335/- and the basic scale of Dwarka
Singh, Overman is Rs. 340/- only. So it will appear from
the endorsements above the Company on perusal of records
that the applicant was working as an Overman In Block No.
16 colliery at basic pay of Rs. 335/- per monffi and it is
further stated therein that as at the time of transfer to
departmental management he Was not told that the basic will
be reduced, he concerned workman should get Rs, 335/-
basic in which he is working for the. last one y$nr in' the
scale of Rs. 245/- — 440/-. It further appears from the
endorsement that other perrons viz. Shri K. P. Singh, Shri
£>. P. Singh and another person were also working as Over-
man under the Managing Contractor and they were all get-
ting basic pay of Rs. 335/- each, It is, therefore, very much
patent from Ext. W, 2 and the endorsements thereon that,
the concerned workman was getting a basic nay of Rs. 335/-
as an Overman under the Managing Contractor The evidence
of the concerned workman together with the facts appearing
from Ext. W. 2 and the unsatisfactory nature of the evidence
of the management witness in this resnect can only lead me
to believe that the concerned workman was getting a basic
pay of Rs. 335/- under the Managing Contractor where he
was an Overman. The case of the manneement appears to
be that the concerned workman could not have been Given
the basic nay of Rs. 335/- by the Man a Gin g Contractor which
was a collusive affair. No such evidence about collusion
comes before the Court nor the' >s n fficient material for
me to hold that the Manuring Contractor could not hnve
fixed him on Rs, 335/- basic. When the Managing Cont-
ractor who was owner of the colliery for all practical pur-
poses at the relevant time gave the concerned workman □
b 01 sic r»av of Rs. 335/-. there might have been some reasons
behind and i* will be idle now to senculate on that, So this
part of the case of the workmen that the concerned workman
4113
Sec. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA ; NOVEMBER 22, 1975 / AGR AH A Y AN A 1, 1897
waa getting a basic pay of Rs. 335/- under the Managing
Contractor stands proved. The next question that comes up
is what was the scale of pay given to the concerned work-
man by the Managing Contractor, Was it Rs. 245-10-305*
15-440 or Rs. 305-15-395-20-575 ? It is also for the
workman to prove that he was enjoying the scale of Rs.
305-15-395-20-575 as alleged by him under the Mana-
ging Contractor, It appears that apart from the written
statement the workmen have not stated elsewhere that the
scale which the concerned workman was enjoying under the
Managing Contractor was Rs. 305-15-395-20-575. Aver-
ment of a party in the written statement is no proof unless
such averment is admitted by the other side in their plead-
ings,- As I have already stated, it is for the workmen to
prove what scale he was enjoying under the Managing Cont-
ractor. I search in vain the evidence of the concerned
workman to find that under the Managing Contractor he was
enjoying the scale of Rs. 305*15-395-20-575, The most
important document on which the workmen rely viz. Ext.
W. 2 docs not also disclose anywhere that the concerned
workman was enjoying the scale of Rs. 305-15-395-20*
575 under the Managing Contractor. Ext. M. 3 is the letter
from the concerned workman dated 23-11-1973 to the Superin-
tendent of Kedla Colliery demanding difference of wages and
in this letter also the concerned workman never alleges that,
he was enjoying the scale of Rs. 305-1 5-395-20-575
under the Managing Contractor. On the other hand if Ext.
W. 2 on which the workman relies most is any guide, it
shows that he was enjoying the scale of Rs. 245-10-305-
15-440 under the Managing Contractor, I may quote the
last sentence of the first endowment in Ext. W. 2 which is
“J feel that he should get Rs. 335/- basic which he was
getting for last one year in the scale of Rs. 245 — 440".
Another fact which may appear to be of some importance
is that the concerned workman was getting Rs. 335 /- basic
under the Managing Contractor and I have accepted it and,
there is nothing to disbelieve it. The question remains that
Rs. 335/- is a stage in the scale of Rs. 305-15-395-20-
575 and so the question remains whether it can be said on
the strength of this that the concerned workman was in the
scale of Rs, 305-1 5-395-20-575, I think it will be only
surmises and conjectures if we arc to accept that the con*
cerned workman was in the scale of Rs. 305 — 575 simply
because he was getting the basic pay of Rs, 335/-. May it
be noted here that Rs, 335/- is also a stage in the scale
of Rs. 245-10-305-1 5-440. What will be more reason-
able for me to hold which of the two scales he; was actually
enjoying under the Managing Contractor ? Ext. W. 2 conics
to our help in this respect and T may say again that the
workman places much reliance on Ext. W. 2. They rely on
the endorsements of the Officers on Ext. W. 2. If the en-
dorsements of the officers are to be accepted I think they
should be accepted as a hole and not in part. Even at
the cost of reiteration T may say that the last sentence of
the first endorsement in Ext, W. 2 shows that, the concerned
workman was in the scale of Rs. 245—440. So analysing
the evidence as a whole it would appear that the workmen
have not been successful in establishing their case that the
concerned workman was in the scale of Rs. 305-15-395-
20-575 under the Managing Contractor. They have how-
ever been successful to establish that under the Managing
Contractor the concerned workman was in receipt of basic
pay of Rs. 335/-. There is notin' ng more on record to be
taken into consideration for our purpose. The matter does
not end there. On the facts as accepted by! me, the question
remains if the management is obliged to give the concerned
workman a starting basic salary of Rs.. 335/- and if thve nre
obliged to give him the scale of Rs. 305-15-395*20-575,
Now, the matter revolves in the same orbit i.c. from tho
Receiver to his Managing Contractor and from the Managing
Contractor to , the Receiver. The Managing Contractor had
a legal entity and they paid him basic Rs. 335/-. So long
a man was getting certain pay in a particular job, his nay
cannot and should not be reduced if posted in the same iob.
So the Receiver was not justified to reduce his pay to Rs. 2 65/-
from Rs. 335/- which he was getting under the Managing
Contractor, Wilh regard to the alleged scale under the
Managing Contractor, it has not been proved. The scale
of Rs. 305-15-395-20-575 is a scale attached to Senior
Overman or Head Overman. It has not been proved that
the concerned workman was a Senior Overman or Head Over-
man under the Managing Contractor. So the workmen have
not been able to m-ove that he should be placed in 1 the senior
Overman scale viz.. 305-15-395-20-575, In view of nil
that has been said above, the management, was justified in
placing him in the scale of Rs. 245-10-305-15-440. The
102 GI/75 — 3 3
workman has filed a calculation about tho difference of wages
he, is entitled to and it does not appear that^ the management
has challenged the accuracy of the calculation. On compu-
tation by this Court the same result follows,
4. In the result, the action of the management of the Kedla
Colliery, P.O, Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh in fixing the
monthly basic pay of Shri S. G. Singh, Overman employed
in Block No. 41, at Rs. 265/- is not justified. The action
of the management in fixing the concerned workman In
the scale of pay of Rs. 245-10-305-15-440 from 4th
November, 1972 is found not unjustified. The concerned
workman is, therefore, entitled to receive from the opposite
party management a total sum of Rs. 5,387,91 as difference
of wages.
This is my award.
K. K. SARKAR, Presiding Officer.
[F. No. L-2012/135/73-LR. II]
G. C. SAXENA, Under Secy.
New Delhi, the 12th November, 1975
S.O. 5032* — In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby publishes the following award of the Central Govern-
ment Industrial Tribunal Jaipur, in the industrial dispute bet-
ween the employers in relation to the Central Bank of India
and their workman, which was received by the Central Govern-
ment on the 1st November, 1975.
CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
PRESENT
SHRI UPDESH NARAIN MATHUR
JUDGE
Case No. I.T. 2 of 1974.
Workmen, Central Bank of India, Ambala Cantt. ... Applicant
Vs*
The. Central Bank of India, Sansar Chandra Road,
Jaipur ... Opposite party,.
APPEARANCES
For the applicant — none,
For the Opposite Party — -Shri D. N. Sharma,
Date of Award — 25-9-1975.
AWARD
The Central Government had mada the following reference
vide No. L. 1201 1/23/73 /TR. Ill dated 25-5-1974 for
adjudication to this tribunal 1 —
“Whether the demand of category ‘C 1 Head Cashier in
the Central Bank of India to be classified as cate-
gory ‘E’ Head Cashiers with effect from the 1st
March, 1969 in offices of the Bank in Rajasthan is
justified on the basis of such change affected in other
divisions of the same Zonal office, If not to what
relief are they entitled ? M
The statement of claim was filed on behalf of All India
Central Bank Staff Federation on 9-10-1974. The reply to
the statement was filed on 26th April, 1975, The case was
then fixed up on 2-6-1975 for the filing of documents. But
on that date no body represented the federation. The case
was, therefore adjourned to 10-7*1975. On that date too no-
body appeared on behalf of the Federation. Again on
25-9-1975 the next date of hearing the Federation remained
un-rep resented,. It appears that the federation is not interested
in getting the reference decided. In view of this a no dispute
award is passed.
UPDESH NARAIN MATHUR, Judge
[No. L-1201 1/23/73 LR, III]
S.O. 5033. — In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby publishes tho following award of the Central Govern-
ment Industrial Tribunal Jaipur in the industrial dispute bet-
ween the employers in relation to the Punjab National Bank
4114
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAHAYANA U 1897 [Part 11 -
and their workmen, which was received by the Central Govern-
ment on the 1st November, 1975.
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL,
RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR
Case No. DlT-6 of 1974
Tn the Matter of an Industrial Dispute
BETWEEN
The All India Punjab National Bank Employees Associa-
tion, Delhi,
AND
THE PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK LIMITED* JAIPUR.
APPEARANCES :
For the Union — Shri B. L. Bhardwaj.
For the Management — Sbri Ramesb Lai.
Date of Award — 16-10-1975,
AWARD
The Central Government by its order No. L, 12012/6/
74/LR. Ill, dated 27th November, 1974 have made the fol-
lowing reference to this Tribunal for adjudication
APPEARANCES :
For the Applicant — Shri ChantanlaJ Bhardwaj.
For the Opposite Party— -Shri Ramcsh LaL
Date of Award — 4-9-1975*
AWARD
The Central Government have made the following refe-
rence to this Tribunal vide No. L. 1201 2/44/72/T.R1II dated
2nd Nov., 1972: —
u Whether the action of the management of Punjab Na-
tional Bank, Central Circle, Indore in denying offi-
ciating chances in the post of Cashier to Shri
Shyamlal, Hundi Presenter (now designated as Bill
ColIector-cum-Cash Peon), Branch Office, Jaipur is
justified? If not, to what relief is he entitled?”
The statement of claim has been filed on behalf of All
India Punjab National Bank Employees Association* It has
been alleged in the statement of claim that Shyamlal joined
as a Peon at Jaipur Branch with effect from 21-11-44. He
was promoted and posted as Hundi Presenter w.e.f. 8-8-61
and under the First Bipartite Settlement dated 19-10-66 his
designation was changed to that of Bill Collector-cum-Cash
Peon. It is admitted that Shyam J.al is Non-Matriculate and
in terms of D. M. Central Circle, Indore, Internal Circular
No. DMC/STP/21 dated 10-5-67, Shri Shyamlal was
allowed to officiate as Assistant Cashier in stop-gap arrange-
ment w.e.f. 20-8-69 onwards. The details are given in para
2(c). The above mentioned circular of 10-5-67 has been
quoted as under ;
1. Whether the action of the management of Punjab
National Bank in terminating the services of Shri
Ram Singh, son of Shri Shyam Singh, Part-time
Waterman, Branch Office, Jaipur with elfect from
the 24th October, 1972 is justified ? If not, to what
relief is he entitled ?
2. Whether Shri Ram Singh lias been paid for his services
rightly in terms of the Awards and Settlements ap-
plicable to Punjab National Bank during his service
trom April, 1968 to October, 1972 ? If not, to
what relief is he entitled ?”
The statement of claim was filed on behalf of All India
Punjab National Bank Employees Association and the Associa-
tion of the P.N.B.E. Rajasthan State. Before a reply on be-
half of the management of the bank could be pled, the
parties filed a settlement arrived at between them with the
request that a no dispute award be passed. Hence a no
dispute award is accordingly passed.
U. N, MATHUR, Presiding Officer,
[No. L-12012/6/74-LR. ITT]
S*0. 5034 * — In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby publishes the following award of the Central Gov-
ernment Industrial Tribunal, Jaipur in the industrial dispute
between the employers in relation to the Punjab National
Bank and their workmen, which was received by the Central
Government on the 5th November, 1975.
CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
Case No. C. T, T. 11 of 1972
IN THE MATTER OF AN INDUSTRIAL DISPUTE
All India Punjab National Bank. Employees Association,
Delhi. — Applicant.
Vs,
“According to our existing instructions, Hundi Presen-
ters are allowed officiating chances to work in place
of cashier staff only. It has, however, been decided
that Hundi Presenters who are Matriculate or In-
termediate may also be allowed chances to offi-
ciate in the clerical vacancies also”.
It is alleged that in utter violation of the decision the manage-
ment abruptly denied officiating chance to Shyamlal w.e.f,
October, I97L It is further stated that from February 70
Shyamlal was officiating as a Cashier against a permanent
sanctioned vacancy and was entitled to be promoted and
osted as such against that vacancy, it is now prayed on
ehalf of the Association that the management be advised
to allow officiating chance to Shri Shyamlal on the post of
cashier w.e.f, the date he was denied to do so.
In reply on behalf of (he management of (he Punjab Na-
tional Bank, Jaipur Region, it is admitted (hat Shyamlal was
promoted as Hundi Presenter w.e.f. 1-1-62, It is submitted
that as in other banks, members of subordinate staff were
not allowed to officiate on any clerical cadre. It was to-
wards the end of 1966 that the management decided to
consider the cases of Matriculate Peons only for giving them
Promotion to the post of clerks and also to allow them offi-
ciating chances to work in clerical cadre. Accordingly
instructions were issued on 3-1 L66 to all the Regional Heads
to consider the cases of only such peons who had at least
four years service in the bank after passing matriculation
examination. The position was clarified in the circular dated
10-5-57 by the management. It is stated that since Shyamlal
is Non-Matriculate he was not eligible either for promotion
or officiating chance as per Bank rules. It is admitted that
he was allowed officiating chance to work as cashier, but
this was done inadvertently and when this fact came to the
notice of the higher authorities it was discontinued.
It is denied on behalf of the management that Shyamlal
was officiating as a cashier from February 1970 against e
permanent sanctioned vacancy. It is submitted that he wa<
allowed officiating chance by the Branch Manager in Stop-
gap-arrangement only under mis-interpretation of the instruc-
tions on the subject. Tt is submitted that no relief may b<
granted to Shyamlal.
[n evidence the statement of the concerned workman Shyam
lal was recorded while in rebuttal the statement of Shr:
Rameshlal, Manager, Punjab National Bank, Jaipur was re
corded on behalf of the Management. Arguments wer<
heard.
Punjab National Bank, Central Circle, Indore, Jaipur
Region— Opposite Party.
The facts as narriited abo\c are admitted in so far a
Shyamlal was allowed officiating chance to work as Assistan
Cashier or Cashier whenever vacancy occurred.
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22 , 1975/AGRAHAyANA 1, 1897 4115
Sec. 3 C i i ) ]
The only point l!or consideration is whether the instruc-
tions issued by the management which are placed on record
by both the parlies may be so interpreted as to discontinue
allowing officiating chance to Non-Matriculate Hurnli Presen-
ters, The two circulars have been filed on behalf of the
management which are admitted by the workmen's associa-
tion also. The first is circular No. 111/66 dated 9-11-66,
Now according to the submission made on behalf of the
management only matriculate persons who have at least
4 years service in the hank at their credit after passing the
Matriculation Examination and are reported to have picked
up working knowledge of clerical work are to be considered
to the post of clerks. It is submitted that the position has
been further clarified in the Internal Circuit)’ which is
Annexurc ‘A’ filed with the statement of claim by the asso-
ciation. It is submitted that since Shri Shyamlal docs not
fulfil the qualifications laid down in the two circulars he
should not be allowed officiating chance further* On behalf
of the association it is argued that the earlier circular No.
111/66 of .9-11-66 does nol apply to Shyamlal, The said
circular is meant for matriculate peons only. It does
not refer to Hundi Presenters whether Matriculate or Non-
Matriculate. It is the other circular. Annexure which
gives instructions regarding Hundi Presenters. It is the
submission on behalf of the association that so far, Hundi
Presenters were allowed officiating chance to work in place
of cashier staff only. Later on according to this Circular
Hundi Presenters who were Matriculate or Intermediate were
allowed to officiate in the clerical vacancies also, It is argued
that according to this circular Shyamlal could not be al-
lowed to officiate on the clerical post because of his non-
matric qualification, but he could continue to officiate on
cashier staff even though he was non-matric.
1 have given my considerate thoughts over the arguments
put forward by the Representatives of the parties and agree
with the submission made by the Representatives of the
workers association. The circular No. 111/66 djjled 9-6-66
docs not say anything about the Hundi Presenters. It relates
to the Matriculate peons only who were to be given officiat-
ing chance on clerical posts. A perusal of the contents of
this circular would show that it deals with the peons only
and the branches of the bank are directed to consider the
cases of such peons who are eligible to officiate on clerical
posts. The other circular Annexure { A’ while refering to
the earlier circular No. 111/66 which, as stated above, re-
lates to matriculate peons only, has dealt with Hundi Pre-
senters also. In the second paragraph of this circular it has
been clearly stated that according to the then existing instruc-
tions Hundi Presenters are allowed officiating chance to work
in place of cashier staff only. It shows that the existing in-
structions referred to in this paragraph did not put any res-
trictions on Non-Matriculate Hundi Presenters to officiate on
cashier staff, and now this circular has made Hundi Presen-
ters who arc Matriculate or Intermediate, eligible to officiat-
ing in the clerical vacancies also. This clarifies that Non-
Matriculate Hundi Presenters could officiate on posts of
cashier staff but not on clerical posts. The circular no-
where says that Non- Matriculate Hundi Presenters could not
henceforth be allowed to officiate in place of cashier. No
other instructions or circular has been filed according to
which a Non-Matriculate Hundi Presenter was nol allowed to
officiate as Assistant Cashier or Cashier.
In my opipion therefore the contention of the Represen-
tative of the management that according to Annexurc ‘A*
Shyamlal was not eligible to officiate on the post of Assistant
Cashier or Cashier, is not correct, Shymlal is eligible ac-
cording to the instructions referred to in para 2 of An-
nexurc to officiate in place of Assistant Cashier or Cashier.
There was no justification in disallowing Shri Shyamlal to
officiate as Assistant Cashier Or Cashier with effect from
February, 1970. He is entitled to officiate on this post as
he did before February, 1970.
Reference is answered accordingly.
UPDF.SH NARATN MATHUR, .Tudge
[No. L, 12012/44 /72-LR1 1 ]
Central Industrial Tribunal, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
Dated New Delhi, the
SO. 5035. — in pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
icrcby publishes the following award of the Central Govern-
meat Industrial Tribunal, Jaipur in the industrial dispute bet-
ween the employers in relation to the State Bank of Bikaner
and Jaipur and their workman which received by the Cen-
tral Government on the 5th November, 1975.
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL,
RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR
Case No. CIT-4 of 1975
Ref.— Government of India, Ministry of Labour, New
Delhi Order No. L. 1201 2/54 /72-LRIII dated 28th
April, 1975.
In the Matter of an Industrial Dispute
BETWEEN
Shri S. K. Gautam, Workman
AND
Ihe State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur; S. M. S. Highway
Jaipur.
APPEARANCES :
For the workman — None.
For the management- — Shri Tandon.
Date of Award — 30-9-75.
AWARD
The Central Government have made the following refe-
rence to this Tribunal for adjudication : —
‘'Whether the action of the management of the State
Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, Jaipur in discharging
Shri S, K. Gautam, Clerk-cum-Cashier-cum-Godown-
Keeper from service is justified ? If not. to what
relief is the said workman entitled ?”
Notice to Shri S. K, Gautam was issued to file his state-
ment of claim, but in-spite of serving of notice on 22*8-75
he did not turn up to file his statement of claim. The case
was twice adjourned to enable the workman to appear and
file his statement of claim but he did not do so. It appears
that he does not want to pursue the reference. The refe-
rence is, therefore, rejected and a no dispute award passed.
U. N. MATHUR, Presiding Officer.
[No. L- 120 12/54 /72-LRIII]
S.O, 5036, — In pursuance of section 17 of the ndustrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Centra! Government
hereby publishes the following Award of the Central Govx
ernment Industrial Tribunal, Jaipur in respect of a complaint
under section 33 A of the said Act filed by the All India
Central Bank Staff Federation, Ambala Catitt, which was
received by Central Government on 1st November' 1975,
CENTRAL. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
Complaint No. I. T. 1 of 1974
In the matter of an Industrial Dispute
BETWEEN
All India Central Bank Staff Federation,, Ambala Gantt.--
Applicant.
Vs.
The Central Bank of India. — Opposite Party. Sansar
Chandra Rd., Jaipur,
APPEARANCES:
For the applicant — None.
For the Opposite Parly — None.
Date of Award — 25-9-75.
4116 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975 / AGRAH A Y AN A 1, 1897 [Part H-
AWARD
This is a complaint filed under sec. 33(A) of the Industrial
Disputes Act on behalf of the workman of the Central Bank
of India. It is alleged that relerrencc is pending before this
tribunal in the matter of determining the seniority of cate-
gory ‘C’ and \E’ of Head Cashier. Pending this reference
the management has held interviews of senior cashier and
as such has flouted the provision of law and contravened
section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act. It is therefore
prayed that the management be directed to maintain status
que till the refcrrcnce is decided. A reply on behalf of
the management was filed and a rejoinder to it was filed on
7.2-75 on behalf of the All India Central Bank Staff Fede-
ration. The case was then, fixed on 2-6-75 for the filing of
documents but on that date no body was present on behalf
of the staff federation. The case was therefore adjourned to
10-7-75, Then also no body appeared on behalf of the fede-
ration. Again on 25-9-75 the federation remained unrepresem
ted. This absence on continuous dates shows that the Staff-
Federation is not interested in pursuing the complaint. The
complaint is rejected and a no dispute award is passed.
[No, L, 12025/1 /75/II/A]
UPDESH NARAIN MATHUR, Judge.
$.0* 5037. — In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Govrnment
hereby publishes the following award of the Central Gov-
ernment Industrial Tribunal Chandigarh in the industrial
dispute between the employers in relation to the State Bank
of India and their workmen, which was received by the Cen-
tral Government on the 5lh November, 1975.
BEFORE JUSTICE H. R. SODHI, PRESIDING OFFICER,
INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL (CENTRAL),
CHANDIGARH
Reference No. 35 /C of 1975
BETWEEN
The workmen and the State Bank of India, Sundernagar,
APPEARANCES;
Shri Jai Gopal Verma for the workman.
Shri S, P. Sharma for the respondent Bank.
AWARD
The management of the Sato Bank of India, Sundernagar,
terminated the services of Shri Ravi Singh, a workman,
with effect from 1st July, 1974. The workman felt aggri-
eved and served a demand notice on the management,
challenging the legality of termination of his services, and
the Central Government then, being of an opinion that an
industrial dispute existed, acted in exercise of the powers
conferred by section 7 A and clause (d) of sub-scction (1) of
section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act., 1947, and refer-
red as per Notification No, 12012/143 /74/l.RIII, doted 21st
July, 1975, published in the Gazette of India, the followinc
matter to this Tribunal for adjudication r —
“Whether the action of the management of the State
Bank of India, Sundernagar, in terminating the
services of Shri Ravi Singh with effect from the
1st July, 1974 is legal and justified? If not, to
what relief is he entitled?”
2. Notices were issued to the parties and the workmen
through the Sate Bank Staff Association, which is registered
under the Indian Trade Unions Act, filed a claims state-
ment. No, written statement was filed, and Shri S. P.
Sharma, appearing for the management of the Bank, assured
the workman at one of the hearings that, the latter would
be re-employed. The workman wantd actual employment
instead of assurance, and Shri S. P. Sharma then made a
statment on 4th October, 1975, to the effect that the work-
man had been ordered to be appointed to the job with effect
from the date he joins. Shri Jai Gopal Verma, authorised re-
presentative of the workman, accepted the statement as made
on behalf of the management, and it was agreed between the
parties that the claim would not be pressed. The claim was
accordingly dismissed as not pressed, with no orders as to
costs.
Dated October 4, 1975.
H. R. SODHI, Presiding Officer.
[No. L. 12012/143 /74-LRIII]
R. IKUNJITHAPADAM, Under Secy.
S.O. 5038. — In pursuance of section 17 of the Industrial
Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the Central Government
hereby publishes the following award of the Central Gov-
ernment Industrial Tribunal, Calcutta in the industrial dis-
pute between the employers in relation to the management of
Calcutta Port Commissioners and their workmen, which was
received by the Central Government on the 6th November,
1975.
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL
AT CALCUTTA
PRESENT:
Justice E, K. Moidu, Presiding Officer
Reference No. 14 of 1975
PARTIES;
Employers in relation to the management of Calcutta
Port Commissioners.
AND
Their Workmen,
APPEARANCE ;
On behalf of Employers-^Shri S. M. Bancrjee, Labour
Adviser, with Shri S. P. Naha, Deputy
Labour Adviser and Industrial Relation Officer,
On behalf of Workmen— Shri S. Kar, Jt. General Secre^
tary, National Union of Waterfront Workers.
State : West Bengal Industry : Port & Dock
AWARD
The case arises out of a rfercnce dated 7th February,
1975 made to this Tribunal by the Government of India on
the basis of the Order No. L-32012/I 1 /74-P&D/CMT/
DIV(A) passed by the Ministry of Labour, by virtue of its
power under Clause (d) of Subjection (1) of Section 10 of
the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act 14 of 1947). The
question that, arises for decision as set out in the referrence
is read as follows:
“Where the action of the management of the Calcutta
Por Commissioners in confirming Shri S. K. Khala-
que as Lascar from 1st January, 1966 was instified.
If not, what should be his date of confirmation
and what benefits should he be entitle to ?"
2, The workman concerned in the case is one Khalaque
in whose behalf the National Union of Waterfront Workers
filed a written statement contending that Khalaque having
been appointed a s a Lascar on the Despatch Vessel, ‘‘Seva*
on the 7th February, 1964 should have been confirmed in
the service of Lascar with effect from 7-8-1964 on the basis
of a circular which was in force allowing confirmation of
all the employees of the Calcutta Port Trust within 6 months
of their employment if the appointment was in a permanent
vacancy. It is alleged that Khalaque was appointed on
7-2-1964 in a permanent vacancy caused by the resignation
of one Nadu Meah. So the Union claims that Khalaque
should have been confirmed in the service as Lascar wdth
effect from 7-8-1964. Contrary to the rule and procedure
it is alleged that the Calcutta Port Trust confirmed Khalaque
4117
Sec. 3 (ii) ] THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/AGRAH AYANA 1 , 1 897
oiily with effect from 1-1-1966 by an order of the Port
Trust dated 19-12-1969. The Union pointed out an instance,
where discremination was made in the confirmation of
Khalaque when he was confirmed on 1-1-1966, even though
he was permanently appointed on 7-2-1962 while another
lascar Santi Ranjan Mahattam who was appointed as lascar
on 10-5-1964 had been confirmed as lascar on 1-3-1965.
According to the Union the confirmation of Khalaque on
1-1-66 is irregular, unjust and discreminatory and therefore
Union require this Tribunal to pass an order fixing the date
of confirmation of Khalaque as a lascar as on 7-8-1964
with consequent relief.
3. The Port Trust, Calcutta in their written statement
contended, that Khalaque has no valid claim for confirma-
tion as lascar with effect from 6-8-1964 as his confirmation
depended upon the confirmation of the crews holding higher
posts in the vessel “Seva" to which he was attached. The
Port Trust further stated that there was large scale exodus
of Pakistan nationals working in various boats and vessels
within the Port during 1964 with the result vacancies of
lascars as well as that of higher grade posts in ‘‘Seva”
were created unexpectedly. So the Port Trust was obliged
to promote lascars to higher posts and to recruit others in
the vacancy of lascars. It was accordingly Khalaque was
appointed on 7-2-64 in a regular vacancy. He has no
right to get confirmation as alleged because lascars promo-
ted to higher posts could not be earlier confirmed- How-
ever, after the confirmation of the persons In the higher
postB, Khalaque and others were also confirmed in the
permanent vacancies. According to the Port Trust the
promotion was vessel-wise and us such Khalaque could
not dispute the confirmation of Shanti Rajan Mahattam who
was appointed in the vessel, “Nadia" as lascar on 10-5-1964
while he was confirmed on 1-3-1965 in his own vessel. The
Port Trust had also denied in their rejoinder all the alle-
gations which the Union made in the written statement
stating that Khalaque has no right whatsoever to claim
confirmation with effect from 7-8-1964.
4. The simple question that arises for decision in this
reference is whether the confirmation of Khalaque is a
lascar on 1-1-1966 is justified in the circumstances of the
case or to put it in other way, whether Khalaquc*s claim
that his confirmation shall take effect from 7-8-1964 is
sustainable on the facts and circumstances of the case.
5. It is admitted on either side that Khalaque entered
the service of the Port Trust as a lascar in a regular
vacancy only on 7-2-1964 in the vessel, “Seva". However
it is in dispute whether it was a permanent vacancy to
which he was appointed on 7-2-1964. If it was a perma-
nent vacancy to which he had been appointed certainly
he would take his confirmation from the date of his ap-
pointment. But the union did not contend that the date
of his cofirmation was to be on 7-2-1964, but on the
other hand, they raised the contention that he shall take
his confirmation with effect from 7-8-1964 on the basis of
a circular of the Port Trust, which is marked in this case
as Ext. M-ll dated 2-7-47. The relevant portion of Ext.
M-ll reads :
“Every employee appointed in a temporary capacity
against a substantive vacancy should ordinarily be
confirmed after six months’ service and in any case
after the lapse of one year. If for any reason it
is found that an employee cannot be confirmed
after one year he should be discharged from the
service.”
6. The above rule is applicable to Khalaque only if it
was found that he had been appointed in a substantive
vacancy. On this question, there is some evidence in the
case. Khalaque himself did not however say that the in-
cumbent of the post who was alleged to have resigned
prior to 7-2-1964 was a permanent employee. His word
of mouth however was not contravened by any counter
evidence on the opposite side to prove that he was not
appointed in a substantive vacancy.
7. It is admitted case that in February 1964 a large
number of Pakistan Nationals who w'ere employed in
various vessels and boats in the Calcutta Port had left
this country and as a result of the exodus many posts in
vessels, especially in “Seva” became vacant. The Port
authorities were therefore obliged to promote lascars to
higher posts like seranp, seceaunny, leadsman and cassops
and to make new recruitment of lascars in the vacant posts.
Many lascars had also fled from this country to other places
in February, 1964. The list of persons so promoted and
recruited will find a place in the Muster Roll register which
is produced in the case. The list maintained for February,
1964 shows that items nos. 7 A to 16A were the persons
promoted from the rank of lascars and items 17 A to 27 A
w'ere the persons appointed as lascars by direct recruitment
or otherwise. They were substituted in the places of items
respectively nos. 7 to 16 and nos. 17 to 27 who were
the persons alleged to have left the services either in exodus
or as persons whose whereabouts were not known. It was
found on scrutiny of the above register as well as Ext. M-10
and Ext. M-13 that item nos. 16, 17, 18, 20 and 23 were
either persons missing or alleged to have left the service
as Paskistan National Items 19A, 21 A, 22A, 24A, 25A and
26A were persons who were promoted to the posts higher
to that of a lascar. On account of the exodus and promo-
tion large number of vacancies occurred in the rank of
Jascars, with which we are concerned in the case. Khalaque
was appointed on 7-2-1964 as item 23 A in place of item
23 who must have left the service either as Pak National
or he could have resigned the post on some other ground.
Number 23 in the register was one Nadu Meah. It is rele-
vant in this connection to point out that one Nadu Meatl’s
name appears in a cofirmation list issued by the Depart-
ment of Port Trust. That confirmation list is marked as
Ext. M4. Item 23 in Ext. M4 relates to lascar Santi
Rajan Mahattam. The commander of Vessel “Nadia" in
which Santi Ranjan Mahattam worked as lascar reported to
the Port authority to confirm Santi Ranjan Mahattam in the
vacancy caused due to the resignation of Nadu Meah as
per Ext. M4. Port Trust has no case that Nadu Meah
mentioned in Ext, M 4 was persons different from Nadu Meah
mentioned as Nadu Meah in the Muster Roll as well as In
Ext. M 10 and Ext, M 13. The Muster roll which is pro-
vided in the case shows that item 23 in thut register was
Nadu Meah in whose place Khalaque was said to have
been appointed as lascar on 7-2-1964 as item 23 A. In
the later month item 23 was declared vacant hut Khalaque
acted in the vacancy continuously. This conflict has not
been explained by the Port authorities. The Muster roll
shows that the peisonnel described in it were in the vessel
“Seva”. So, if N»du Meah was in “Seva" as per the Mus-
ter roll he could not have been in “Nadia” to enable the
Port authority to confirm Santi Ranjan Mahattam in the
vacancy created by the alleged resignation of Nadu Meah.
It is not shown that Nadu Meah had been transferred to
“Nadia” giving up his lean in “Seva". Any way, the Port
authorities in the written rejoinder dated 26-6^75 stated that,
‘The two vessels viz., 4 Seva’ and ‘Nadia’ are two separate
units for the purpose of appointment, seniority and promo-
tion in terms of the award of the Das Gupta Tribunal in
Reference No. 1 of 1956. That appointment and confirma-
tion of Shri-' Shanti Ranjan Mahattam on ‘Nadia’ arc not
relevant to the issue under reference”. If the confirmation
of Santi Ranjan Mahattam was in “Nadia”, of course, it
will have no relevancy to the matter concerned in the Ref-
erence. But that the Port authority did not establish fully
whether Nadu Meah was attached to “Seva” or “Nadia ,
Any way that question will have some importance in favour
of Khalaque to establish his case that he was appointed in
a specific substantive vacancy.
8. The Port authority has relied upon the list of lascars
as in February 1964 when Khalaque was appointed on
7-2-1964 as lascar. They point out Ext. MIO and Ext.
M13 for the purpose of showing that Khalaque could not
have been confirmed earlier than 1-1-1966 because of the
persons holding permanent post of lascar still were await-
ing confirmation in the higher posts. As per Ext. M10 list
the four persons who acted as seacunny could not be con-
firmed due to some error on their part. They were (1)
Bhim Baboo, (2) Gopal Dey, (3) Maahusudhan Barua and
(4) Madhusudhan Raha. Ext. M'10 shows that they could
not be recommended for confirmation as they were not
keeping Anchor Watch either in mooring or whilist down
the river. On account of the delay caused in their con-
firmation it is alleged that the lascars mentioned in Ext.
MlO as (1) Khalaque, (2) Oshiar Rahman, (3) Abdul
Mazid and (4) Bare mini Nath Mondal could not also be
confirmed till the above four acting seacumfies were per-
manently adjusted, Ext. M.13 list shows that the four seu-
cunnys mentioned above were confirmed only with effect
from 1-8-197U If the contention of the Port Trust is
4118
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : NOVEMBER 22. 1975/AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897 [Part IT—
p— n— mwwfc hh hm>i i— >
accepted that the confirmation of tha four lascars including
Khalaque was held up because of the delay in the con-
firmation of the above 4 seacunnies there was no justifica-
tion of the confirmation of Khalaquc and the 3 other lascars
with effect from 1-1-1966 when the four seacunnies were
found to have been confirmed only on 1*8-1971. The Port
Trust did not explain as to the permanent vacancies which
were available on l-f-1966 for the confirmation of Khalaque
and other 3 lascars. The only ground alleged against the
confirmation of Khalaque with effect from 7-8-1964 was that
the four acting seacunnies blocked his way in as much as
they could not be confirmed. That argument hus no subs-
tance.
9. It is more or less admitted that there was no adverse
remark against Khalaque and none was brought to the notice
of the Tribunal during the trial qf the case, So, even on
20-4-1969 which is the date of Ext. M10 list, Khalaque was
liable to be confirmed in spite of the impediment caused
by the acting seacunnies. if the four seacunnies were
found to be unfit for confirmation the Port trust could
have acted upon Ext, Mil circular and discharged them
from service- In that case Khalaque could have been
confirmed in spite of the bar caused by the four acting
seacunnies at an earlier date. The Port authorities did not
place any material before me to ascertain as to the perma-
nent vacancy against which Khalaque was confirmed with
effect from 1-1-1966, ft is for the Port authorities to
prove conclusively that Khalaque had been confirmed as
against a particular permanent vacancy. They were not
able to do so. On the other band, the only circumstance on
which they relied upon was the report in Ext, Ml 0 list showing
that four acting seacunnies blocked the confirmation of
Khalaque and 3 other lascars. If that explanation was cor-
rect and valid the four seacunnies should have also been
continued with effect from El- 1966 and in these resultant
vacancies Khalaque and the 3 other lascars could have also
been confirmed with effect from 1-1-1966 That was not
the case of the Port Trust. They admit that the four
seacunnies in question were confirmed only with effect from
1-8-1971. In that case Khalaque and 3 other lascars could
not have been confirmed with effect from El- 1966. It ap-
pears to me that the Port Trust fixed 1-E1966 as a national
date for confirmation in view of the Jong and satisfactory
period of probation in which Khalaquc and the 3 other
lascars worked in Vessel “Seva”. In the absence of any
Specific case as to why El-1966 was fixed as the aate of
tpnfirmation it would be difficult to accept the date of
confirmation of Khalaquc as valid and legal,
10. Under Ext. Mil circular Khalaque was bound to be
confirmed within 6 months of his regular appointment in
a substantive vacancy. That a vacancy had arisen in
“Seva” on 7-2-1964 admits of no dispute. It Nadu Mcah
hau left India as Pakistan National on 6-4-64 there was
bound to be permanent vacancy. The Port Trust did not
lead any evidence to show that it was not a permanent vacancy
as against evidence of Khalaquc. The Muster roll men-
tioned Nadu Meah as a lascar attached to “Seva” in Feb-
ruary 1964. So in the month of February 1964 just at the
time of the appointment of Khalaque as lascar in the place
of Nadu Mean (see items 23 and 23 A in the acquittance
roll) they were both employees of “Seva”, though Nadu
Meah left the service on 6-2-64. The confirmation of
Khalaque with effect from 7-8-1964 will not in any mariner
effect the seniority inter se among the lascars of “Seva”.
The Pori Trust did not show that any other lascars senior
to Khalaque had been confirmed prior to El -1966 so that
there might be conflict of interest between Khalaque and
his senior lascars. The date of appointment in the fourth
column in Ext, M13 is the date of original appointment
in respect of items 1 to 15 in the list. So Khalaque being
appointed on 7-2-1964 he is liable to be confirmed with
effect from 7-8-1964, But the confirmation will not in
any manner change the inter se seniority among the lascars
who are mentioned in Ext Ml 3 list. He will held the pre-
sent rank among the lascars but the date of his confirma-
tion takes effect from 7-8-1964. However, he will be en-
titled to all the money benefits if any to be accrued in
his favour on account of the confirmation from 7-8-1964
as lascar.
H, When the rule of confirmation is based upon a valid
and binding circular which is in force the employees are
entitled to take advantage of its provisions. It is for the
Port Trust to prove why the provisions of the circular were
not applied to the case on hand. The postponement of
Khalaque’s confirmation on the ground of delay in the
confirmation of four seacunnies as per Ext M10 list is
proved to be ineffective and in consistent with the facts in
the case. The Port Trust cannot take advantage of thut
ground for refusing to confirm Khalaquc with effect from
7-8-1964 which is the period to be reckoned with under
the circular, Kxt. M II, 1 find accordingly that the action
of the Calcutta Port Trust in confirming Khalaque as las-
car with effect from EE 1966 is not justified.
12. In the result, the reference is answered in favour of
the workman, Khalaquc. He shall he deemed to have
been confirmed as Lascar with effect from 7-8-1964 without
any interference of the seniority inter se among the lascars
working in the vessel “Seva”, He shall be entitled to
get the money benefits if any accrued in his favour as a
result of the altered date of confirmation.
An award is made in these terms,
E. K. MOTDU, Presiding Officer.
[No. L 32012/1 1 /74-P&D/CMT | DI V A]
NAND LAE, Section Officer (Spl.)
(rrm arfr
10 71TJ5R, 1975
•finr
«?tt. arr. 5039 - — tttw, armor dif'em (httt)
atf tifyqq , i97i (1971 *fiT so) rft yirr 5 r/f 1 rmim
( 3 ) frm m^ti irtfsRmrf rrr n < w
4 frrr irmw (nw arfV ^Err frroFO ^ srhirr^i^T w.
wr. an. 5483 rn/fsr 10 1971 4 rrr*r umfym armor
rr ( T iid ) *hhi ^rfa r-NiHmr rrmt r? TVi*^ V*i
frrfTrr Trfar ’prrcft f, arvfa;
1 . spr ^tt -n h armor JiflVj h (*ttw) (q
rrsrhmr) Frftr, 1975 4 1 1
2 . anw orrm «ftar t*rfar <fVr 14 4^, <fVi ( 3 )
4 cmuni; THqfAfiarr <fVr anrr:F*rrtTT fmr*rr
amrfq;
“4 r /rr 4" amrfife w ^ srgi uttt
8 ^ twit ( 1 ) 4 ar#r =*rfw 4 farrft 4
^rrfT^r ; 5nrfi' t, *rff VdRirff 4 f^rWt
srrsnr *Fm7 srrrfrrr **4 ^ f, famft
fcmrrst *r5 rWri iftfxmpT ^ 1 . fafrlWr '8 t4 4 rmrhmn^
t/4 4 m 1 4 1 ^ TRTPT iinmn fa mfarft
4 amr if rrmrr I”
ur t. 4. 60 (i) 4far 3/2/75'l]
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue and Insurance)
New Delhi, the 10th November, 1 97 5
INSURANCE
S.O. 5039, — In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-
section (5) of section 5 of the Emergency Risks (Goods)
Insurance Act, 1971, (50 of 1971), the Central Govern-
ment herebv makes the following Scheme further to amend
the Emergency Risks (Goods) Insurance Scheme, published
with the notification of the Government of India in the
Ministry ol! Finance (Department of Revenue and Insurance),
No S.O. 5483 dated the 10th December, 1971, namely : —
Sec. 3(ii)] THE GAZETTE OF 1NDTA : NOVEMBER 22, 1975/ AGRAHAYANA 1, 1897
4119
1. This scheme may be called the Emergency Risks
1 Goods) Insurance (Fourth Amendment) Scheme 1975,
"2, Jn the Emergency Risks (Goods) Insurance Scheme in
paragraph 14, after sub-paragraph (3), the following sub-
paragraph shall be inserted* namely : — -
“4. Notwithstanding anything contained in this paragraph,
where any penalty is recorvered from any person under
sub-section (1) of section 8 for any quarter, such person
shall, for the purpose of determining the rate of premium
for any quarter subsequent to the quarter for which penalty
has been so recovered, be deemed to have a policy in force
at the end of the first mentioned quarter.”
“4 IV# ^ irW # 3 tit 'frr
11 ^ s-#Vt (1) ^ 3Ttffa far# sqfaw # fa# ftrartf ^
fa] wrfar # 3# t, # faft fa*# < fa#
TW5# fa#
fat# q? far] sftfarpr # t* fafafa^fr qr# ^ iwliRfa
# ^ J n fa <31# ufa#
iiqq i q# r fat# 3r?r # rr^r # 1”
[qrr. w. 66 (i) iffa 3 / 2 / 75 - 2 ]
3TH. 3PH #V»T
[F. No, 66 (i) Tns, 111/2/75-1]
WT. air. 5040.— V#fa armKT fafarR - (31^ W)
#TT affafaw, 1971 (1971 *FT 51) # WT7T 3 # 3“ t TOT7T
(6) ^ infar qr# kr mrrr
^ farr tfaT?nr (jrtt # Vrt Wr) # arfa^FTT *f.
^T. OTT. 5486 10 f#H(, 1971 ^ (TT*r 3TTW
fafatr Oww) 4fa fafa # 3rtV #far *r# q? fa]
fafafafRT fafa T# t, :—
1. fafa *ft *n*r sfiw Vfanr cjw*t) #tt or#
farfaf) fafa, 1975 f I
2. simrr ntfarR- (ttw) #rr #*r, # # 13 # sr-
# 3 ^ 'ET'fl^ faRfafara- ST # '3FR: wrifa faRT
^mpiT, ar»# : —
S.O. 5040. — Iii exercise of the powers conferred by
sub-section (6) of section 3 of the Emergency Risks (Under-
takings) Insurance Act, 1971, (51 of 1971), the Central
Government hereby makes tho following Scheme further to
amend the Emergency Risks (Undertakings) Insurance
Scheme, published with the notification of the Government
of India in the Ministry of Finance, (Department of Revenue
& insurance), No. S.O. 5486 dated the 10th December,
1971, namely : —
E This scheme may be called the Emergency Risks (Under-
takings) Insurance (Fourth Amendment) Scheme, 1975,
2. In the Emergency Risks /(Undertakings) Insurance
Scheme, in paragraph 13, after subparagraph (3) the follow-
ing sub-paragraph shall be inserted, namely : —
“4, Notwithstanding anything contained in this paragraph,
where any penalty is recovered from any person under
sub-section (1) of section 11 for any quarter, such person
shall, for the purpose of determining the rate of premium
for any quarter subsequent to the quarter for which penalty
has been so recovered, be deemed to have a policy in force
at the end of the first mentioned quarter.”
[F. No. 66(1) Ins, E1I/2/75-II]
R. D. KHANWAEKAR, Finder Secy.
PRINTED BY THE MANAGER, GOVT. OF INDIA PR&iSS, RING ROAD, NEW DELHI-110027
AND PUBLISHED BY THE CONTROLLER OF PUBLICATIONS, DELHI-6, 1975.
Live Music Archive
Librivox Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland Museum of Art
Internet Arcade
Console Living Room
Books to Borrow
Open Library
TV News
Understanding 9/11